It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Silicate and oxide glasses are often chemically doped with a variety of cations to tune for desirable properties in technological applications, but their performances are often limited by relatively lower mechanical and elastic properties. Finding a new route to synthesize silica-based glasses with high elastic and mechanical properties needs to be explored. Here, we report a dense SiO2-glass with ultra-high elastic moduli using sound velocity measurements by Brillouin scattering up to 72 GPa at 300 K. High-temperature measurements were performed up to 63 GPa at 750 K and 59 GPa at 1000 K. Compared to compression at 300 K, elevated temperature helps compressed SiO2-glass effectively overcome the kinetic barrier to undergo permanent densification with enhanced coordination number and connectivity. This hot compressed SiO2-glass exhibits a substantially high bulk modulus of 361–429 GPa which is at least 2–3 times greater than the metallic, oxide, and silicate glasses at ambient conditions. Its Poisson’s ratio, an indicator for the packing efficiency, is comparable to the metallic glasses. Even after temperature quench and decompression to ambient conditions, the SiO2-glass retains some of its unique properties at compression and possesses a Poisson’s ratio of 0.248(11). In addition to chemical alternatives in glass syntheses, coupled compression and heating treatments can be an effective means to enhance mechanical and elastic properties in high-performance glasses.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Science and Technology of China, Laboratory of Seismology and Physics of Earth’s Interior, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.59053.3a) (ISNI:0000000121679639); University of Science and Technology of China, CAS Center for Excellence in Comparative Planetology, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.59053.3a) (ISNI:0000000121679639); University of Science and Technology of China, Frontiers Science Center for Planetary Exploration and Emerging Technologies, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.59053.3a) (ISNI:0000000121679639)
2 University of Science and Technology of China, Laboratory of Seismology and Physics of Earth’s Interior, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Hefei, China (GRID:grid.59053.3a) (ISNI:0000000121679639)
3 University of Chicago, Center for Advanced Radiation Sources, Chicago, USA (GRID:grid.170205.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7822)
4 The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)