Abstract

Interventions to improve working memory, e.g. by combining task rehearsal and non-invasive brain stimulation, are gaining popularity. Many factors, however, affect the outcome of these interventions. We hypothesize that working memory capacity at baseline predicts how an individual performs on a working memory task, by setting limits on the benefit derived from tDCS when combined with strategy instructions; specifically, we hypothesize that individuals with low capacity will benefit the most. Eighty-four participants underwent two sessions of an adaptive working memory task (n-back) on two consecutive days. Participants were split into four independent groups (SHAM vs ACTIVE stimulation and STRATEGY vs no STRATEGY instructions). For the purpose of analysis, individuals were divided based on their baseline working memory capacity. Results support our prediction that the combination of tDCS and strategy instructions is particularly beneficial in low capacity individuals. Our findings contribute to a better understanding of factors affecting the outcome of tDCS when used in conjunction with cognitive training to improve working memory. Moreover, our results have implications for training regimens, e.g., by designing interventions predicated on baseline cognitive abilities, or focusing on strategy development for specific attentional skills.

Details

Title
Impact of tDCS on working memory training is enhanced by strategy instructions in individuals with low working memory capacity
Author
Assecondi, Sara 1 ; Hu, Rong 2 ; Eskes, Gail 3 ; Pan, Xiaoping 4 ; Zhou, Jin 4 ; Shapiro, Kim 1 

 University of Birmingham, Visual Experience Laboratory, School of Psychology, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486); University of Birmingham, Center for Human Brain Health (CHBH), Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486) 
 University of Birmingham, Visual Experience Laboratory, School of Psychology, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486); University of Birmingham, Center for Human Brain Health (CHBH), Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486); South China University of Technology, Department of Neurology, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Guangzhou, China (GRID:grid.79703.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 3838) 
 Dalhousie University, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology & Neuroscience, Halifax, Canada (GRID:grid.55602.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8200) 
 South China University of Technology, Department of Neurology, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Guangzhou, China (GRID:grid.79703.3a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 3838) 
Publication year
2021
Publication date
2021
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2705220569
Copyright
© Crown 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.