1. Introduction
Water used for drinking purposes normally contains radioactivity of natural origin, i.e., uranium (238U and 235U) and thorium (232Th) decay chain products and 40K, whose presence is mainly due to erosion phenomena of the rocks with which it comes into contact [1,2]. Water, especially when of underground origin, is, thus, enriched with the constituent elements of rocks, including radioactive ones [3,4,5]. Groundwater is normally not affected by natural and artificial radionuclides of anthropogenic origin, such as 137Cs [6]; however, these contributions can affect the superficial water that can often be used for drinking purposes [7]. Water controls are, therefore, aimed at looking for the presence of both artificial and natural radioactive substances [8,9].
The presence of natural radioisotopes in Italian drinking water as a hazard factor to the public is addressed today in detail by the national regulation currently in force, i.e., the Legislative Decree 28/2016, that implements the Directive 2013/51/Euratom. The Legislative Decree 28/2016 establishes the principles, criteria, and methods for radioactivity controls in water for human use [10]. In detail, it introduces indicator parameters and the related parameter values, i.e., Indicative Dose (Dind, 0.1 mSv y−1), 222Rn specific activity (100 Bq L−1), and 3H activity concentration (100 Bq L−1). It also establishes that the determination of the Dind must always be carried out after a preliminary screening consisting of a gross alpha and beta specific activity assessment. In particular, in the case of gross alpha and gross beta specific activities higher than 0.1 Bq L−1 and 0.5 Bq L−1, respectively, the Dind value could exceed the parameter value of 0.1 mSv y−1 set by the Italian legislation [10]. As a consequence, an analytical study must be carried out in order to calculate the Dind based on the evaluation of both the specific activity of the radionuclides in the investigated samples (including 226Ra) and the dose coefficients reported in [11].
In the present study, a campaign of measurements was conducted with the aim of monitoring the 226Ra activity concentration in drinking water coming from public supplies in the Calabria region, Southern Italy. In detail, six sampling sites in the Reggio Calabria district, where only the gross alpha activity concentration exceeded the parameter value [10], were selected. Such investigation was aimed, on one side, at the development of a database concerning the presence of 226Ra in drinking water in the Calabria region, and, on the other side, at the evaluation of the associated radiological health risks for the population [12]. This communication supplements previous works referring to the monitoring of only the gross alpha and beta specific activities of Calabrian waters [2], providing original data on 226Ra, which is the most radiotoxic nuclide that contributes to the gross alpha activity concentration. Moreover, it complements previous studies referring to the 222Rn content in Calabrian drinking water [6,13], putting in evidence that the detected 222Rn concentration was mainly due to the radon gas emanating from rocks forming the aquifer rather than to the 226Ra decay.
Worth of note, the aforementioned approach appears to be crucial since 226Ra exposure can cause, on one side, detrimental effects on the human health, such as broken teeth, anemia, and cataracts, for high levels of exposure. On the other side, somatic effects can also occur, i.e., bone, cranial, and nasal tumors, being 226Ra characterized by high radiotoxicity and a chemical affinity with calcium [14,15].
2. Materials and Methods
Six different municipalities (ID#, # = 1, …, 6; see Table 1), located in the Calabrian district of Reggio Calabria (Figure 1), with springs, wells, and related fountains and tanks, were identified and monitored four times during the year 2021, one for each different season, according to what was reported in [10].
The sample collection was conducted based on the local weather conditions, which in some periods put severe limitations on the access to the sampling stations. A total of 80 drinking water samples were collected into 1 L of acidified polyethylene holders.
A Perkin Elmer Tricarb 4910 TR Liquid Scintillation Counter (LSC), with a 0–2 MeV (β particles) and a 0–10 MeV (α particles) energy range, a minimum acceptable efficiency of 60% for 3H (0–18.6 keV) and 95% for 14C (0–156 keV), an average background of 17 CPM for 3H and 26 CPM for 14C, and an external standard 133Ba, was employed for the measurements [2].
An initial volume of 200 mL of sample, acidified with 20 µL of 14 M ultrapure HNO3, was preconcentrated at a final volume of 20 mL and a pH of ~1.85. Of this total volume, only 10 mL were taken and mixed with 10 mL of Perkin Elmer Opti-Fluor scintillation cocktail immiscible in water, stored in a 20 mL plastic vial in a dark place, and, after a rest time of at least 23 days, counted for 1000 min, together with a blank sample of distilled water, used as background, for the 226Ra detection [16].
The 226Ra activity concentration (Bq L−1) was calculated using the following formula:
(1)
where N indicates the net counts, ε the counting efficiency, V the sample volume (L), and t the live time (s).The quality of the experimental results was certified by the Italian Accreditation Body (ACCREDIA) [17].
In the selected sampling sites, where the gross alpha activity concentration was exceeded [18], the Indicative Dose was evaluated considering that when with Ci(mis.) and Ci(der.), accounting for the measured and derived specific activities of the i-th radionuclide that contributed to the Indicative Dose, respectively, the Dind value is lower than the parameter one [10]. For 226Ra, the derived specific activity is 0.5 Bq L−1, as reported in [10].
3. Results and Discussion
Table 2 reports the average 226Ra activity concentrations in the analyzed samples for each sampling site.
It can be noticed that all obtained average values are lower than the LSC minimum detectable activity (0.04 Bq L−1) [16] and are much lower than the 226Ra derived activity concentration (0.5 Bq L−1). It should be underlined that the analytical sensitivity of the measurements is completely adequate to the requirements of the Legislative Decree 28/2016.
Noteworthy, since up to now, there has not been enough information regarding the concentrations of 226Ra in drinking water, these results represent a main reference for the investigated area and can be used, in principle, as a baseline to extend this investigation to the whole region.
From a radiological point of view, the obtained results exclude a significant radioactive contamination of 226Ra for all the investigated samples and any possible radiological hazards for the population in terms of the 226Ra radioactive content [13].
It is important to put in evidence that a complete evaluation of the radiological health risks implies the calculation of the Indicative Dose after the specific activity quantification of all the relevant α-emitting radionuclides [10]. This would, therefore, involve a quantitative measurement of the activity concentration of the radioisotopes of Uranium, in particular 234U and 238U, and of Polonium, in particular 210Po, other than 226Ra, as widely reported in the literature [19,20,21].
Going on, the content of 226Ra in aquifers is not only related to the abundance of its parent radionuclides [22], but also it is controlled by sorption, desorption, and ion exchange processes [23]. In particular, factors related to geology and climate that affect the acidity, redox potential, degree of mineralization, and composition of groundwater, as well as their potential residence time, can also affect sorption and, thereby, the distribution pattern of Ra-isotopes [23]. Moreover, it is worth noting is that the investigated area falls within the Aspromonte Massifs, a geological segment of the Calabrian Arc, which consists of a series of Palaeozoic plutonic–metamorphic nappes, locally overlain by a Mesozoic–Cenozoic sedimentary cover. Accordingly, based on published cartography and several research studies [24,25], heterogeneous crystalline–metamorphic rocks, rich in U and Th, crop out in the area surrounding the sampling sites [26]. These rocks are affected by weathering processes, which are responsible for their chemical and mechanical transformation when interacting with the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, and the biosphere [27]. Furthermore, weathering plays a crucial role in controlling the chemical and mineralogical features of the final sedimentary products (clays, mineral oxides, oxyhydroxides, etc.), and, according to [28], the alteration products of the parent rocks located in the surrounding areas of the investigated sites are controlled by the general climate of the region (temperate and moderately humid). Finally, even if the obtained results were achieved following the official institutional indications [10], it has to be underlined that a periodical screening could be necessary in order to guarantee the safety of the drinking water for the sake of public health [29].
4. Conclusions
This article reports on the results of 226Ra specific activity measurements performed on drinking water samples coming from six different sampling sites in the Calabria region, Southern Italy, with the aim of evaluating the radiological health risk associated with 226Ra ingestion in terms of the 226Ra content. The investigation was conducted during the year 2021 by collecting 80 water samples from springs, wells, and related fountains and tanks.
The 226Ra activity concentration was measured by means of the Perkin Elmer Tricarb 4910 TR Liquid Scintillation Counter (LSC). The obtained results show that the 226Ra specific activities for all of the investigated drinking water are lower than the LSC minimum detectable activity. Therefore, it can be argued that the analyzed samples are safe for drinking and other domestic purposes in terms of 226Ra content, and, hence, no remedial actions are needed. The obtained results also represent a main reference for the investigated area and can be used as a baseline to extend this investigation to the whole region.
Conceptualization, F.C. and V.V.; methodology, F.C. and V.C.; validation, D.M.; formal analysis, A.B., S.M. and M.D.; investigation, F.C., S.E.S., G.P. and V.V.; resources, F.C., V.C. and D.M.; data curation, F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C.; supervision, D.M. and V.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure 1. A map of the Calabria region, with the sampling district and the site IDs indicated.
The investigated municipalities.
Site ID | Municipality |
---|---|
1 | Cittanova |
2 | Giffone |
3 | Gioiosa Jonica |
4 | Mammola |
5 | Martone |
6 | Reggio Calabria |
The average 226Ra activity concentrations in the analyzed samples for each sampling site.
Site ID | CRa-226 (Bq L−1) |
---|---|
1 | <0.04 |
2 | <0.04 |
3 | <0.04 |
4 | <0.04 |
5 | <0.04 |
6 | <0.04 |
References
1. Love, S.K. Natural Radioactivity of Water. Ind. Eng. Chem.; 1951; 43, pp. 1541-1544. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie50499a024]
2. Caridi, F.; Belmusto, G. Gross Alpha and Beta Radioactivity Evaluation in Drinking Water: Results from the Calabria Region, Southern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res.; 2021; 15, pp. 695-700. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41742-021-00341-1]
3. Rosell, J.R.; Ortega, X.; Dies, X. Natural and artificial radionuclides on the northeast coast of Spain. Health Phys.; 1991; 60, pp. 709-712. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004032-199105000-00010]
4. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: New York, NY, USA, 2000; Volume I, ISBN 92-1-142238-8
5. Cooper, E.L.; Zeiller, E.; Ghods-Esphahani, A.; Makarewicz, M.; Schelenz, R.; Frindik, O.; Heilgeist, M.; Kalus, W. Radioactivity in food and total diet samples collected in selected settlements in the USSR. J. Environ. Radioact.; 1992; 17, pp. 147-157. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0265-931X(92)90023-M]
6. Caridi, F.; D’Agostino, M.; Belvedere, A.; Marguccio, S.; Belmusto, G. Radon radioactivity in groundwater from the Calabria region, south of Italy. J. Instrum.; 2016; 11, P05012. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/11/05/P05012]
7. Kamiya, K.; Ozasa, K.; Akiba, S.; Niwa, O.; Kodama, K.; Takamura, N.; Zaharieva, E.K.; Kimura, Y.; Wakeford, R. Long-term effects of radiation exposure on health. Lancet; 2015; 386, pp. 469-478. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61167-9]
8. Caridi, F.; Messina, M.; D’Agostino, M. An investigation about natural radioactivity, hydrochemistry, and metal pollution in groundwater from Calabrian selected areas, southern Italy. Environ. Earth Sci.; 2017; 76, 668. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-7031-9]
9. Torrisi, L.; Caridi, F.; Giuffrida, L. Protons and ion acceleration from thick targets at 1010 W/cm2 laser pulse intensity. Laser Part. Beams; 2011; 29, pp. 29-37. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263034610000728]
10. Italian Legislative Decree No. 28/2016; Italian Government: Rome, Italy, 2016.
11. Italian Legislative Decree No. 101/2020; Italian Government: Rome, Italy, 2020.
12. Nishad, S.; Chauhan, P.K.; Sowdhamini, R.; Ghosh, A. Chronic exposure of humans to high level natural background radiation leads to robust expression of protective stress response proteins. Sci. Rep.; 2021; 11, 1777. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80405-y] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33469066]
13. Caridi, F.; Belmusto, G. Assessment of the public effective dose due to the 222Rn radioactivity in drinking water: Results from the Calabria region, southern Italy. J. Instrum.; 2021; 16, P02033. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/16/02/P02033]
14. Caridi, F.; Torrisi, L.; Margarone, D.; Borrielli, A. Investigations on low temperature laser-generated plasmas. Laser Part. Beams; 2008; 26, pp. 265-271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0263034608000311]
15. Hendry, J.H.; Simon, S.L.; Wojcik, A.; Sohrabi, M.; Burkart, W.; Cardis, E.; Laurier, D.; Tirmarche, M.; Hayata, I. Human exposure to high natural background radiation: What can it teach us about radiation risks?. J. Radiol. Prot.; 2009; 29, pp. A29-A42. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/29/2A/S03] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19454802]
16.
17. ACCREDIA. Available online: https://www.accredia.it/ (accessed on 24 July 2022).
18.
19. Borio, R.; Rongoni, A.; Saetta, D.; Desideri, D.; Meli, M.A.; Feduzi, L. Natural radionuclides measurements and total dose indicative evaluation in drinking waters of an Italian central region. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Toxic/Hazardous Subst. Environ. Eng.; 2007; 42, pp. 1631-1637. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10934520701517903] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17849305]
20. Flesch, K.; Schulz, H.; Knappik, R.; Koehler, M. Determination of the total indicative dose in drinking and mineral waters. StrahlenschutzPraxis; 2006; 12, pp. 34-40.
21. Currivan, L.; Kelleher, K.; Solodovnik, E.; McMahon, C. Radioactivity in Bottled Water Produced in Ireland; Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland: Dublin, Ireland, 2014.
22. Murphy, R.J.; Lenhart, J.J.; Honeyman, B.D. The sorption of thorium (IV) and uranium (VI) to hematite in the presence of natural organic matter. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.; 1999; 157, pp. 47-62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(99)00115-6]
23. Siegel, M.; Bryan, C. Radioactivity, Geochemistry, and Health. Environ. Geochem.; 2013; 11, pp. 191-256. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00906-2]
24. Calcaterra, D.; Parise, M. Weathering in the crystalline rocks of Calabria, Italy, and relationships to landslides. Weathering as a Predisposing Factor to Slope Movements; Geological Society, Engineering Geology Special Publications: London, UK, 2010; pp. 105-130.
25. Atzori, P.; Ferla, P.; Paglionico, A.; Piccarreta, G.; Rottura, A. Remnants of the Hercynian orogen along the “Calabrian-Peloritan arc”, southern Italy: A review. J. Geol. Soc. Lond.; 1984; 141, pp. 137-145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.141.1.0137]
26. Amodio-Morelli, L.; Bonardi, G.; Colonna, V.; Dietrich, D.; Giunta, G.; Ippolito, F. L’Arco Calabro-Peloritano nell’Orogene Appenninico-Maghrebide. Mem. Soc. Geol. It.; 1976; 17, pp. 1-60.
27. Moresi, M. L’alterazione dei graniti delle Serre Orientali (Calabria). Rend. Soc. Ital. Mineral. Petrol.; 1987; 42, pp. 237-248.
28. Ogniben, L. Schema geologico della Calabria in base ai dati odierni. Geol. Rom.; 1973; 12, pp. 243-585.
29. Lal, B.S. Water for Life: Issues and Challenges. Int. J. Sci. Res.; 2019; 8, pp. 1949-1957. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21275/ART20199011]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
In this article, the authors report experimental results obtained for the assessment of the 226Ra content in 80 drinking water samples from the Calabria region, Southern Italy. The activity concentration, measured with the Perkin Elmer Tricarb 4910 TR Liquid Scintillation Counter (LSC) setup, was compared with the reference values reported in the Italian Legislative Decree 28/2016 in order to evaluate any possible radiological health hazards for the population in terms of 226Ra content due to the ingestion of the investigated drinking water. The obtained results put in evidence that the average 226Ra specific activity is lower than the LSC minimum detectable activity (MDA) in all cases, thus, excluding any radiological risk. They also represent the main reference for the investigated area and can be used as a baseline to extend this investigation to the whole region.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche e Informatiche, Scienze Fisiche e Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno D’Alcontres, 31-98166 Messina, Italy
2 Dipartimento di Reggio Calabria, Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente della Calabria (ARPACal), Via Troncovito SNC, 89135 Reggio Calabria, Italy