1. Introduction
In addition to being attacked by various pathogens (e.g., bacteria, fungi, and viruses), plants are also prone to lots of environmental stresses (e.g., drought, high temperature, salt, and low temperature). Plants have evolved several molecular mechanisms that enable them to adapt to these stresses. In eukaryotes, more than 90% of RNA transcripts are termed ncRNAs [1,2] and do not encode proteins. lncRNAs are a key player in regulating various aspects of genomic activities [3]. So far, with the progress of sequencing technology, the Plant Long non-coding RNA Database version 2.0 (PLncDB V2.0) has been constructed with 1,246,372 lncRNAs from more than 80 plant species [4]. Another lncRNA database, NONCODEV6, contains 94,697 lncRNAs from 23 plant species [5]. At the same time, the database of experimentally confirmed functional lncRNAs (EVLncRNAs2.0) contains only 506 lncRNAs [6] (Table 1).
Plants have a variety of transcription machineries. Four DNA-dependent RNA polymerases are believed to be involved in the production of lncRNAs. Unlike mRNA, lncRNAs do not have the potential of protein coding. Regarding gene expression, lncRNAs often function as structural, catalytic, or regulatory molecules [7]. They can affect all elements of a gene, including the promoter, untranslated regions, exons, introns, and the termination region, and thus control the gene expression at different levels, including access, transcription, splicing, and translation [8,9,10,11,12]. Some lncRNAs are involved in protecting the integrity of the genome, while others are engaged in responses to adverse environmental conditions such as temperature fluctuations, drought, and pathogen attacks [13,14,15]. Plants respond to the surrounding environment (sunlight, temperature, water availability, carbon dioxide concentration, etc.) or pathogen attack (fungus, bacteria, virus, etc.) by multiple processes, in which lncRNAs may play key roles [16,17,18].
2. Production, Characteristics, Nomenclature, and Classification of lncRNAs
According to the protein coding ability, RNA can be divided into two types, protein-coding and non-protein-coding [7]. Generally, an RNA that encodes protein is called coding RNA (also mRNA), while an RNA that does not encode any protein is called ncRNA [14]. Other than rRNAs and tRNAs, ncRNA can be further divided into sncRNA (small non-coding RNA of ≤50 nt in length) and lncRNA of ≥200 nt in length. So far, there is no formal method for naming different lncRNAs. In general, lncRNAs can be classified into five categories based on the direction and starting site of transcription events: (1) long intergenic ncRNA (lincRNA); (2) intron ncRNA (IncRNA); (3) antisense RNA and natural antisense transcript (NAT); and (4) divergent lncRNA; (5) enhancer RNA (eRNA) [19,20,21] (Figure 1a).
Most non-coding RNAs often lack high sequence or secondary structure conservation, and their higher-order structures are unclear [22]. The biogenesis process of many lncRNAs has a similar pattern to mRNAs, and most lncRNAs are enriched in the nucleus. [23,24]. lncRNA is different from mRNA in many aspects [25]. lncRNAs vary widely in length and contain fewer exons. Similar to mRNAs, lncRNAs usually have an m7G cap at the 5′ end and a poly-A tail at the 3′ end. mRNAs are produced by RNA polymerase II (Pol II), while different lncRNAs are generated by different RNA polymerases: Pol II, Pol III, Pol IV, or Pol V. During plant growth and development, the expression and coding capacity of lncRNAs differ from those of mRNAs. lncRNAs are expressed at lower levels than mRNAs [26]. Interestingly, some lncRNAs may contain ORFs (open reading frames) that may have the potential to encode oligopeptides [27] (Figure 1b).
lncRNA, once known as “transcriptional noise”, has been found to play a vital role in various life processes [28,29]. The first study of lncRNA in animals was reported in 1991, in which Brown et al. [30] discovered that lncRNA XIST expression could silence the whole X chromosome during development. MALAT1 (metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1) was identified as a highly expressed ncRNA in lung cancer. The expression level of MALAT1 was associated with increased metastatic potential and poor prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer [31]. In the animal kingdom, the functional mechanisms of lncRNAs are intensively studied, especially in animal cells [32,33], neural differentiation [34,35], cancers [36], organ development [8], and other fields.
The study of plant lncRNAs is a new field. With the development of sequencing technology, tens of thousands of lncRNAs have been identified. These lncRNAs participate in the regulation of different growth and development processes of plants, such as responses to pests and diseases [37,38,39,40,41], growth [42,43,44], and abiotic stresses [45,46,47].
Figure 1The source and mechanism of lncRNA. (a) The lncRNAs are transcribed inside the nucleus from the genome by Pol II and the arrows represent different types of lncRNAs. (b) lncRNA can encode small peptides [27]. (c) lncRNA enod40 directly binds to MtRBP1 (Medicago truncatula RNA binding protein 1) in root nodules to relocate MtRBP1 from the nuclear speckle of plant cells to the cytoplasmic granules [48]. (d) miRNA is transcribed by RNA Pol II. First, the pre-miRNA (precursor miRNA) is processed into miRNA duplex by DCL1 (Dicer-like protein 1), and then the miRNA duplex is processed into single stranded miRNA by HEN1 (HUA ENHANCER 1). The mature miRNA strand is combined with AGO (Argonaute) to carry out post-transcriptional gene regulation through target cutting or inhibition [49]. (e) lncRNA IPS1 (INDUCED BY PHOSPHATE STARVATION1) can competitively bind to miRNA399 to upregulate the expression level of PHO2 and maintain phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis [50]. (f) Transcription of lncRNA APOLO (AUXIN-REGULATED PROMOTER LOOP) and PID is directly activated by ARF7, while APOLO binds to its adjacent site PID to form an R-loop and recruits LHP1 to change chromatin conformation. APOLO can regulate auxin-related response genes to coordinate auxin distribution and lateral root formation [51]. (g) LAIR (LRK Antisense Intergenic RNA) is an inverted NAT of LRK (leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase), which can directly interact with the LRK1 genomic region and act as a scaffold to recruit OsMOF or OsWDR5 to deposit H4K16ac or H3K4me3, respectively, resulting in up-regulation of LRK1 expression and increased grain yields [52]. (h) lncRNAs PMS1T (PHOTOPERIOD-SENSITIVE GENIC MALE STERILITY T) and miR2118 combine with Pms1 (photoperiod-sensitive genic male sterility 1) transcript PMS1T, which can be recognized by miR2118 and cut to form a string of 21-nt miRNAs. These plant-specific miRNAs are called phasiRNA (phased siRNA), which regulates the fertility of rice [53].
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
3. The Action Mode and Function Mechanism of lncRNAs
lncRNAs have been shown to perform many biological functions with complex and varied mechanisms in many eukaryotes [54]. Figure 2 depicts the action mode and function mechanism of lncRNA. They regulate gene expression at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels and are involved in epigenetic regulation [7,55,56]. At present, there is no unified statement on the action mechanism of lncRNA. In this review, we systematically summarized the regulatory mechanisms of lncRNAs at different molecular levels, and the regulatory role of lncRNAs in plant stress and growth and development.
3.1. Multilayered Regulation of Gene Expression
lncRNA can bind to transcription factors as signal molecules to participate in various regulatory reactions or take part in signaling pathways to further regulate the spatiotemporal expression of protein-coding genes [57]. For instance, the lncRNA as-DOG1 can inhibit the expression of DOG1 to break the dormancy of Arabidopsis seeds [58].
lncRNA can bind to protein [48]. Many lncRNAs are in chromatin and can interact with proteins to promote or inhibit their binding activity in the target DNA region [25]. lncRNA can guide RNA–protein complexes to bind to specific locations or recruit chromatin-modifying enzymes to target genes either in cis or trans (Figure 2a). For example, in M. truncatula, the lncRNA enod40 could bind to MtRBP1 protein directly in root nodules to relocate MtRBP1 from nuclear speckles to cytoplasmic granules in plant cells [48] (Figure 1c).
lncRNAs can perform molecular functions as scaffold molecules [57,59] (Figure 2b) They can combine with various proteins to form ribonucleoprotein complexes. The specific sites contained in lncRNAs can be combined with certain regulatory molecules, thereby affecting the life process of an organism [60] (Figure 2a). Some enhancer RNAs can even affect DNA topology [61] (Figure 2c). A lncRNA produced by RNA Pol IV in Arabidopsis is the binding scaffold for several RNA-binding proteins [62]. According to previous studies, Pol IV is believed to produce siRNA precursors [28]. Pol V can generate scaffold transcripts essential for the recognition of target genes and ultimately chromatin modification by the RdDM (RNA directed DNA methylation) pathway [28]. Unlike Pol IV, Pol V is mostly not required for siRNA biogenesis [28]. However, a subset of siRNAs has been shown to require Pol V, suggesting that it may have a limited or indirect involvement in siRNA biogenesis [28]. The RdDM pathway mainly depends on two core proteins, DCL3 (DICER-LIKE3) and AGO4 (ARGONAUTE4). DCL3 cleaves long double-stranded RNAs to generate siRNAs (small interfering RNAs), which bind to AGO proteins to form AGO–siRNAs complexes, and lncRNAs generated by RNA polymerase act as scaffolds to transport AGO–siRNAs complexes to target chromatin sites [63,64] (Figure 1d).
3.2. Interaction between ncRNA and miRNA
lncRNA can be used as a bait to combine with miRNA and then act as a molecular sponge by blocking the interaction between miRNA and its downstream target genes and indirectly regulating the target gene function of miRNA [65] (Figure 2d). Several lncRNAs have been found to be precursors of miRNAs and siRNAs [66,67] (Figure 2e). miRNA is ncRNA with a length of 20–24 nt. miRNAs are Dicer nuclease processed derivatives of immediate precursor pre-miRNAs, they contain a hairpin structure and have a 5′-phosphate and a 2-nucleotide 3′ overhang [68], and the further mature miRNA single-strands bind to AGO through targeting dot cleavage or repressing post-transcriptional gene regulation [49,68]. On one side, miRNA targets lncRNA to generate phasiRNA (phased small interfering RNA) [69]. On the other side, lncRNA acts as sources of miRNA or regulates miRNA accumulation or activity at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels [70]. The most important action mode of lncRNA and miRNA is to reduce the expression level of miRNA by adsorbing miRNA to reduce the inhibition of mRNA and dynamically regulating the translation speed and stability of downstream target genes [71]. For example, both IPS1 (Figure 1e) and At4 can competitively bind to miR399 to upregulate the expression level of PHO2. miR399 and PHO2 play an important role in maintaining phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis [50,72]. Such fine-tuning of miRNA activity by endogenous non-cleavable lncRNA targets is referred to as targeting [50].
Figure 2The action mode and function mechanism of lncRNA. (a) The expression of lncRNA may require special secondary structure or specific binding motifs. (b) lncRNA can act as a molecular scaffold to shorten the distance between different protein complexes and combine with specific sequences to play a special function. (c) The eRNAs expressed by enhancers are regulated by exosomes, which can combine with promoters and enhancers to affect the topology of DNA and finally change the expression of genes [61]. (d) lncRNA acts as a molecular sponge by adsorbing miRNA to regulate the expression of downstream genes. (e) Double stranded lncRNA can be used as a precursor of smRNA (small miRNA). (f) ASCO-lncRNA (AS competitor long noncoding RNA) in Arabidopsis can affect the expression of proteins regulating alternative splicing. ASCO acts as a bait to compete with mRNA to bind to NSR (nuclear speckle RNA) splicing regulators. ASCO-RNA and NSR-binding proteins compete for the binding of their targets, and hijacking NSR changes for the splicing pattern of mRNA targets regulated by NSR and produces alternative splicing isomers [73].
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
4. lncRNAs Are Involved in Regulating Plant Growth and Development
4.1. Plant Vernalization
lncRNA is involved in the vernalization of plants [59,74]. Figure 3 illustrates how COOLAIR, COLDWARP, and COLDAIR are involved in regulating vernalization response of FLC gene. In Arabidopsis, FLC (FLOWING LOCUS C) encodes a mad box transcription factor, a key gene regulating vernalization [75]. FLC transcription will be inhibited at a low temperature but gradually decreased with the extension of cold exposure [76]. lncRNA COOLAIR (COLD-INDUCED LONG ANTISENSE INTRAGENIC RNA) is the antisense transcript of FLC, which is involved in the methylation of H3K36 and the synchronous replacement of H3K27m3 in the early vernalization [77]. COLDAIR (COLD-ASSISTED INTRONIC NONCODING RNA) is transcribed from the first intron of FLC and directed to FLC by recruiting the polycomb complex PRC2–CLF to inhibit the establishment of H3K27me3, while H3K4me3 is induced at the FLC locus to promote the enhancement of FLC expression [78]. COLDWRAP (WINTER-INDUCED NONCODING RNA FROM THE PROMOTER) mainly controls the intragenic gene loop between the promoter and the first intron of the FLC gene [79]. When exposed to a cold stress, COLDWRAP and COLDAIR work together to establish a restrictive intracellular chromatin loop that inhibits FLC expression [79]. In addition, COLDWRAP combines to PRC2-CLF to help it locate in the FLC gene and promote H3K27me3 response vernalization of FLC chromatin [79]. When induced by cold treatment, COOLAIR can cover almost the whole FLC gene [80]. During cold exposure, the nucleation region composing of VIN3, VRN5, and PRC2 accumulates as part of the PHD–PRC2 complex downstream of the FLC transcription initiation site [81]. In this region, the aggregation of this complex will lead to the decrease in H3K4me3/H3K36me3 and the increase in H3K27me3 [82]. COOLAIR appears in the form of multiple alternative splicing isomers and indirectly inhibits FLC expression through transcriptional interference [80]. A recent report has found a homologous domain protein, AtNDX, which regulates the expression of COOLAIR [83]. AtNDX binds to single stranded DNA rather than double stranded DNA non-sequentially in vitro and is in the heterochromatin region of the COOLAIR promoter in vivo [83]. The R-loop mediated by AtNDX stably inhibits COOLAIR transcription, thereby changing FLC expression [83]. This region extends from 200 bp upstream of the COOLAIR promoter to the polyadenylation site near COOLAIR [83]. In conclusion, these lncRNAs jointly participate in and regulate the vernalization response of Arabidopsis.
VRN1 is a flowering activator and a central gene regulating the vernalization of cereal crops [84]. Winter wheat flowering requires long-term low-temperature induction, and VRN1 is a key regulator of low-temperature induction and can accelerate the flowering transition [74]. lncRNA VAS from the wheat VRN1 gene can recruit transcription complexes RF2b–RF2a to enable it to bind to the TaVRN1 promoter region to activate VRN1 transcription and promote flowering [74].
Figure 3COOLAIR, COLDWARP, and COLDAIR are involved in regulating vernalization response of FLC gene [19]. COLDAIR is transcribed from the first intron of FLC. It inhibits the establishment of H3K27me3 and induces H3K4me3 by recruiting and directing PRC2-CLF to FLC [78]. COLDWRAP is from the promoter of FLC induced by vernalization. COLDWRAP and COLDAIR collaborate to establish a restrictive intracellular chromatin loop [79]. COLDWRAP binds to PRC2-CLF, localizes to FLC gene, and promotes vernalization of FLC chromatin in response to H3K27me3 [79]. COOLAIR has two alternatively spliced isoforms (AS I and AS II). R-loop stabilization mediated by AtNDX inhibits COOLAIR transcription, thereby altering FLC expression [83]. The nucleation region consists of VIN3, VRN5, and PRC2, and accumulates as part of the PHD–PRC2 complex downstream of the FLC transcription start site [81]. The aggregation of the nucleation region leads to a decrease in H3K4me3/H3K36me3 and an increase in H3K27me3 [82]. AS: alternative splicing; PRC2: polycomb repressive complex 2; green boxes indicate exons of COOLAIR, AS I and II represent exons, dotted lines indicate splice sites; the red dotted line represents the R-loop; the yellow and purple dotted lines indicate the modification direction; numbers represent introns; H3K4me1, histone H3 lysine 4 monomethylation; H3K36me3, histone H3 lysine 36 trimethylation; H3K27me3, trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
4.2. Plant Growth
lncRNAs take part in plant growth and regulate plant life activities in seed development [84,85], fiber accumulation [13], lipid metabolism [86], and leaf development [87]. In rice, lncRNA TL (TWISTED LEAF) was reported to maintain leaf flatness by regulating the expression of the R2R3-MYB gene [88]. In alfalfa, the lncRNA enod40 binds to MtRBP1 in root nodules to relocate the protein from the nucleus to play a role in the cytoplasm [52]. Nitrate is a key signal molecule that regulates plant gene expression, metabolism, growth, and development [89,90,91,92]. The lncRNA T5120 was reported in Arabidopsis and can promote nitrate assimilation and plant growth, thereby improving nitrogen utilization efficiency [93]. The overexpression of T5120 in Arabidopsis promoted the plant response to nitrate with enhanced nitrate assimilation, improved biomass, and root development. It is noteworthy that T5120 is co-regulated by the nitrate transcription factor NLP7 and the nitrate sensor NRT1.1 to regulate nitrate signal transduction [93]. miR9678 targets the lncRNA WSGAR in wheat and produces phasiRNA by cutting, which delays seed germination [69]. ASCO-lncRNA in Arabidopsis plays a role as a bait and regulates root development [73]. In Arabidopsis, ASCO expression affects the splicing patterns of several mRNA targets and is regulated by NSRs binding proteins. Therefore, ASCO-lncRNA can hijack nuclei as regulators to produce alternative splicing isomers, causing changes in plant root development [73] (Figure 2f). lncRNA APOLO can coordinate auxin distribution and lateral root formation [51] (Figure 1f).
4.3. Light Response
Among the few lncRNAs with known biological functions, two are involved in the light regulation process. HID1 (HIDDEN TREASURE 1) is involved in photomorphogenesis and seedling greening [94]. FLORE (CDF5 LONG NON-CODING RNA) is a lncRNA that regulates circadian rhythm. The aggregation of FLORE can inhibit the expression of CDF5 (CYCLING DOF FACTOR), while CDF can directly bind and repress the CO (CONSTANS) and FT (FLOWERING LOCUS T) promoters to regulate photoperiod flowering [95]. It is interesting that both CDF5 and FLORE transcripts accumulate in vascular tissues to conversely regulate the CO-FT module, which in turn regulates the flowering time [95]. Strong light can enhance the synthesis and coloration of anthocyanins in apple fruits. Qiu et al. [96] verified that a lncRNA MdLNC610, which is located 81 kb downstream of the ethylene biosynthesis gene MdACO1, was involved in anthocyanin accumulation under strong light. MdLNC610 can promote ethylene release and anthocyanin accumulation in apples upstream of MdACO1 [96]. Both strong light and ethylene can significantly promote apple coloring and anthocyanin biosynthesis [96]. MdLNC610 can enhance the activity of the MdACO1 promoter and is in the same topological domain of MdACO1. MdLNC610 and MdACO1 can significantly improve ethylene release, anthocyanin accumulation, and the expression of related genes [96]. Figure 4 enumerates the roles of lncRNAs in plant growth and stress responses.
4.4. Yield and Seed Formation
lncRNAs affect seed formation and yield composition. lncRNA LAIR, a reverse antisense transcript of LRK1, was identified in rice [52]. It can directly interact with the LRK1 genomic region and act as a scaffold to recruit OsMOF and OsWDR5. H4k16ac and H3K4me3 were deposited, resulting in the up regulation of LRK1 expression and the increase in grain yield [52] (Figure 1g). Chen et al. [109] have found the lncRNA MISSEN that regulates the molecular functions of tubulins during endosperm nuclear division and endosperm cellularization. By competing with tubulin, MISSEN binds to HeFP and prevents HeFP (helicase family protein) from participating in endosperm development, which in turn interferes with the normal development of the endosperm, rendering the produced seeds defective.
4.5. Floral Organ Development
At present, many lncRNAs, including LDMAR (LONG-DAY SPECIFIC MALE-FERTILITY-ASSOCIATED RNA) [110] and PMS1T (Figure 1h) [53], are known to be involved in the regulation of flower growth and development. In Arabidopsis, the upregulation of LINC-AP2 and the downregulation of its neighboring gene AP2 (APETALA2), an intergenic lincRNA close to the transcription factor AP2, occur simultaneously after TCV (turnip crinkle virus) infection [9]. The strong upregulation of LINC-AP2 is correlated with structural abnormalities of flowers [9]. Another lncRNA, XLOC_057324, plays an essential role in controlling fertility and flowering [111]. The lncRNA SUF (SUPPRESSOR OF FEMINIZATION), an antisense lncRNA of MpFGMYB, is important for Goldilocks female sexual differentiation. SUF loss of function mutants generated by the deletion of Cas9 null mutants shows male to female sexual conversion [112]. The identification of ncRNAW6 in the HaWRKY6 promoter revealed another regulation layer of this gene by ncRNAs [113]. ncRNAw6 is derived from a transposon of the mite family that is capable of forming a hairpin structure. The hairpin is processed by DCL3 to produce 24-nt het siRNAs to trigger the DNA methylation of the HaWRKY6 region and enhance HaWRKY6 transcription [113]. The level of DNA methylation, loop formation, and the level of HaWRKY6 expression are regulated in a tissue-specific manner [113]. Ef-cd, an antisense RNA at the OsSOC1 locus, positively regulates ossoc1 activity through depositing H3K36me3 and reducing the time span required for plant maturation, but not reducing the yield [114]. An intronic lncRNA AG-incRNA4 in Arabidopsis is expressed in leaves and interacts with the PRC2 complex component CLF to deposit the H3K27me3 histone mark at the AG loci, thereby contributing to the repression of AG expression in leaves [115]. The knockdown of AGlincRNA4 leads to the activation of AG in leaves by reducing the H3K27me3 levels at AG sites. The corresponding mutants exhibit a phenotype such as ectopic AG expression [115]. During cabbage pollen development and pollination fertilization, 15 lncRNAs were predicted to potentially regulate the expression of 13 miRNAs in the form of ETMs (endogenous pseudo target mimics). Two of these lncRNAs, bra-eTM160-1 and bra-eTM160-2, were further identified to regulate the activity of cabbage miRNA160, which is involved in pollen development by affecting the expression of ARF family members of target genes [116]. These studies have demonstrated that lncRNAs regulate reproductive growth versus flower bud differentiation at different molecular levels, which is essential for normal plant reproduction.
5. LncRNAs Respond to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses
5.1. Biotic Stress Response
Plants are attacked by various pathogenic organisms, especially viruses, fungi, and bacteria. Pathogens interfere and destroy the physiological activities of plants in many ways, resulting in a great impact on growth and production. In Figure 5, we show the action mechanism of lncRNA in response to various stresses. To cope with this adverse effect, plants have evolved lncRNA survival strategies [38]. Some lncRNAs are related to the response to herbivorous insect feeding in plants [39]. Some lncRNAs are even associated with insect resistance mediated by the plant jasmonate hormone signal pathway [38]. Some early responding lincRNAs are co-expressed with many genes in the JA signaling pathway [38]. Furthermore, during infestation by phytophagous insects, silencing two lincRNAs (JAL1 and JAL3) reduces the JA content and the content of insect resistant substances regulated by JA, leading to the weakening of host resistance to phytophagous insects [38]. It is worth noting that the expression of some late responding lincRNAs can also be regulated by the JA signal pathway [38] (Figure 5a).
The lncRNA MSTRG.19915, a natural antisense transcript of the MAPK gene BrMAPK15, was found to be associated with susceptibility to downy mildew (Hyaloperonospora brassicae) in Chinese cabbage [119]. BrMAPK15 enhanced resistance against downy mildew [119]. When MSTRG.19915 was silenced, seedlings showed enhanced resistance to downy mildew, which may be related to the up-regulation of BrMAPK15 expression [119]. Li et al. [37] first reported 565 lncRNAs responsive to nematodes, which play a crucial role in host resistance or sensitivity to nematode infection. Zhang et al. [99] extracted the lncRNA L2 (GhlncNAT-ANX2) and lncRNA L3 (GhlncNAT-RLP7) from cotton that were responsive to two major species of Verticillium dahlia. Silencing L2 and L3 may up-regulate the expression of LOX1 and LOX2, thus enhancing the resistance of cotton to Verticillium dahlia [99]. Overexpression of the lncRNA ELENA1 (ELF18-INDUCED LONG NONCODING RNA 1) in Arabidopsis increased the expression of PR1 (pathogenesis-related gene 1) and enhanced the resistance to Pst DC3000 (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000) [117]. The lncRNA ELENA1 had increased the transcript level upon pathogen infection and combined with FIB2 and MED19a [117,118]. After dissociation of FIB2, MED19a could continue to bind to the promoter to activate PR1 expression to enhance disease resistance [117,118] (Figure 5b). TYLCV (tomato yellow leaf virus) has a great effect on tomato crop production. In TYLCV-susceptible strains, SILNR1 is a key lncRNA for virus resistance and normal leaf development. SILNR1 is complementary to siRNA produced by TYLCV, and SILNR1 is downregulated to increase host susceptibility [120]. Yu et al. [121] discovered 567 lncRNAs from Xanthomonas oryzae-infected rice leaves, the targets of which were significantly enriched with the JA pathway. To reveal the interaction between lncRNAs and JA-related genes, 39 JA-related protein coding genes were found to interact with 73 lncRNAs by co-expression analysis, indicating the potential regulatory role of these lncRNAs in the JA pathway [121]. The lncRNA ALEX1, whose expression was highly induced upon pathogen infection, was identified. The overexpression of ALEX1 in rice caused the activation of the JA pathway and thereby enhanced the host resistance to pathogenic bacteria [121]. As a positive regulator, lncRNA33732 in tomato was able to enhance tomato resistance against Phytophthora infestans by inducing the expression of respiratory burst oxidase and increasing H2O2 accumulation [97]. In rape, lncRNAs play a significant role in resisting infection of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum [122]. Li et al. [123] reported 5294 lncRNAs that were used to construct the expression profiles of lncRNAs responsive to Fusarium oxysporum infection in banana. Table 2 lists the lncRNAs research progress and corresponding functional identification in recent years.
5.2. Abiotic Stress Response
Many chemical products have entered crop production, which inevitably cause a lot of heavy metal poisoning (such as cadmium, manganese, and lead), and these heavy metals are becoming one of the important hazards in crop production [132]. Under Cd stress, 120 lncRNAs that may regulate genes of cis cysteine-rich peptide metabolism, as well as secondary metabolites of trans cysteine rich peptide metabolism and photosynthesis, were identified to activate various physiological and biochemical responses in response to excess Cd, presumably playing important roles in those gene and protein pathways in response to Cd stress [106].
Soil salinization remains a constraint to the increasing global food production. During growth and development, plants suffer from salt stress with reduced yield due to the absorption of too many toxic ions [133]. Wan et al. [134] reported 172 lncRNAs responsive to salt stress through cis or trans interactions with important coding genes. A total of 35 differentially expressed lncRNAs were predicted to interact with 42 differentially expressed coding genes [134]. These genes may participate in the auxin response and the ABA and Ca2+ signal transduction pathways under salt stress [134]. Twelve lncRNAs were predicted to be the target mimics of 17 known mature miRNAs in Camellia sinensis, thus affecting the expression of downstream functional genes [134]. A new intergenic lncRNA was identified in Populus tomentosa, which was mainly localized in the cytoplasm [60]. Ptlinc-NAC72 contained a stem ring with five tandem repeats of “CTTTTT” motif, which were complementary to the “GAAAA” repeats in the 5′ UTR of the two target genes [60]. Through recognition and interaction with the salt-responsive element “GAAAA”, Ptlinc-NAC72 regulated the expression of the two target genes PtNAC72.A and PtNAC72.B at the same time [60]. Co-transformation and GUS staining have verified that Ptlinc-NAC72 binds to the 5′ UTR region of two target genes at the post transcriptional level and plays a role in stabilizing gene expression [60]. In addition, stable overexpression of the Ptlinc-NAC72 gene in Arabidopsis can enhance the salt resistance of Arabidopsis seedlings [60] (Figure 5c). In cotton, lncRNA354 is a lncRNA from the intergenic region that acts as an miRNA sponge to participate in the regulation of biological processes [135]. lncRNA354 affects the response of upland cotton to salt stress by interacting with miR160b. The splicing of the GhARF17/18 gene maintains normal growth and development. However, under salt stress, lncRNA354 expression is weakened and the binding of miR160b to lncRNA354 is decreased, while the increase in miR160b will inhibit the expression of GhARF17/18, thereby enhancing the resistance to salt stress [135].
Extreme environments cause inevitable hazards to plants. Under these environments, plants generate molecular signals to cope with the stress. In Arabidopsis, MIR398b/c and its antisense NAT398b/c can interact to regulate plant heat tolerance [70] (Figure 5d). Qin et al. [103] reported a lncRNA DRIR (DROUGHT INDUCED lncRNA), from Arabidopsis that can be induced by ABA, drought, and salt stress. DRIR can positively regulate plant tolerance to drought and salt stress by regulating the expression of key genes for stress responses. Also in Arabidopsis, lncRNA SVALKA can regulate cold tolerance in Arabidopsis [101] (Figure 5e). In cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), CRIR1 (a cold-responsive intergenic lncRNA 1) is a positive regulator of the plant response to cold stress [136]. CRIR1 is significantly induced by cold treatment to interact with MeCSP5 (cassava cold shock protein 5) [136]. Further studies have found that CRIR1 may recruit MeCSP5 to improve the translation efficiency of mRNA. CRIR1 affects the mechanism of the cold stress response by regulating the expression of stress response genes and increasing their translation efficiency [136]. In apple, 13 variable spliceosomes for lncRNAs MSTRG.85814 were identified, of which five were involved in the iron deficiency response. It was further confirmed that the spliceosome MSTRG.85814.11 could positively regulate its target gene SAUR32 to promote the plant rhizosphere response to iron deficiency and stepwise regulation by MSTRG 85814.11-SAUR32-H+-ATPase (AHA10) in iron deficiency response in an apple graft complex [107] (Figure 5f). StCDF1 (CYCLING DOF FACTOR 1) is a transcription factor that regulates potato (Solanum tuberosum) tuberization [136]. StCDF1 and NAT StFLORE together regulate water loss by affecting stomatal growth and diurnal opening [137]. Moreover, both natural mutations of StFLORE transcripts and CRISPR-Cas9 mutations increase the sensitivity of plants to water restriction [136]. StCDF1 regulates the expression of StFLORE and a high level of StFLORE expression can reduce water loss and enhance drought tolerance [137].
6. Concluding Remarks
lncRNAs, play a role in the process of light morphogenesis, growth and development, stress adaptation, and so on. Although more and more data suggest that lncRNAs also play an important role in plant immunity, the research on its specific regulation mechanism is still limited. The conservation of lncRNAs is not high, and the mechanism revealed in model plants may not be directly applied to other plant species. Therefore, lncRNA research is still in the initial stage of exploration. In the present review, an indispensable role of lncRNAs in plant growth and development, as well as under biotic and abiotic stress, was summarized. A single gene may be regulated by multiple ncRNAs and lncRNAs may not function in a single way or alone. On the contrary, lncRNAs can interact with many genes and proteins and the mechanism is complex. It is worth noting that the structure, function, and origin of lncRNAs in animals and plants are highly similar and there are certain rules to follow [138]. The research of animal lncRNAs can be used as a reference for plant lncRNA. Once target lncRNAs are excavated at a large scale in a specific species, they can be annotated and predicted by using bioinformatic means. Further development of CRISPR/cas9, RNA pull-down, RIP, CHIP, and RNAi may facilitate the elaboration of function and mechanism of the lncRNAs.
Conceptualization, Z.Z. and Y.Q.; methodology, Z.Z. and Y.Q.; validation, Z.Z., W.Z., W.Y. and S.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Z.; writing—review and editing, Y.-B.P. and Y.Q.; supervision, C.Y. and Y.Q.; project administration, Y.Q.; funding acquisition, Y.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The authors are thankful to Yuling Jia, Zhongqi He, and James Todd for re-viewing the manuscript with excellent comments. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Thanks for material provided by Biorender (
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure 4. The role of lncRNA in plant growth and stress response. lncRNA33732 and lncRNA16397 respond to pathogen infection [97,98]. GhlncNAT-ANX2 and GhlncNAT-RLP7 are a pair of lncNRAs that regulate pathogenic infection and are involved in enhancing cotton disease resistance [99]. COOLAIR [77], COLDWRAP [79], COLDAIR [59], and MAS [100] respond to cold and regulate spring flowering time in Arabidopsis. SVALKA regulates cold signal transduction [101]. The binding of lincRNA159 to miR164 reduces the expression of three NAC genes targeting miR164 in cassava under cold stress [102]. HID1 plays an important role in seedling photomorphogenesis under red light [94]. FLORE regulates photoperiod flowering [95]. DRIR regulates plant tolerance to drought and salt stress [103]. CNT0018772 and CNT0031477 respond to salt stress [104]. TalnRNA5 and TahlnRNA27 respond to heat stress [105]. XLOC_086307, XLOC_086119, and XLOlC_066284 are involved in heavy metal cadmium response [106]. MSTRG.85814.11 regulates iron deficiency response [107]. lncRNA1459 is involved in fruit ripening [108]. ASCO alters root development [73]. APOLO coordinates auxin distribution and lateral root formation [51]. enod40 promotes root nodule formation [48].
Figure 5. Mechanisms of lncRNAs in response to external pressure. (a) JA signaling is regulated by lncRNAs (such as JAL1 and JAL3) in response to early plant attack by diamondback moth [38]. (b) The transcription level of lncRNA ELENA1 increases under pathogen attack. The transcripts then bind to FIB2 and MED19a (Mediator subunit 19a). When FIB2 dissociates, MED19a then binds to the promoter region to activate the expression of PR1 leading to enhanced disease resistance [117,118]. (c) The lncRNA Ptlinc-NAC72 is induced under long-term salt stress to regulate salt tolerance with the tandem in the PtNAC72.A/B 5′ UTR [60]. (d) MIR398b/c and its antisense NAT398b/c genes are co-expressed in vascular tissues. NAT398b/c inhibits pri-miRNA processing, while knocking out NAT398b/c promotes miR398 processing. By silencing miR398-targeted genes, heat tolerance is improved. On the contrary, overexpression of miR398 activates NAT398b/c and reduces heat tolerance. Moreover, NAT398b/c can also be activated by MIR398b/c overexpression [69]. (e) Prolonged cold exposure peaked in CBF1 expression along with increased expression of the lncRNA SVALKA in the antisense direction to CBF1. The transcripts of SVALKA would lead to decreased CBF1 transcription and increased RNA PII occupancy on both strands. CBF1 repression by RNA PII collisions originates from the SVALKA-asCBF1 lncRNA cascade, ultimately resulting in decreased CBF1 transcription on the sense strand and decreased full-length CBF1 mRNA, and thus reduces cold tolerance [101]. (f) The spliceosome MSTRG.85814.11 positively regulates its target gene SAUR32 to promote the response to iron deficiency in the rhizosphere of plants [107].
Validated long non-coding RNAs in 10 plant species [
Species | Number of Functional lncRNAs |
---|---|
Arabidopsis thaliana | 160 |
Oryza sativa | 43 |
Digitalis purpurea | 29 |
Zea mays | 26 |
Solanum lycoperscium | 24 |
Setaria italica | 19 |
Populus tomentosa | 18 |
Manihot esculenta | 17 |
Salvia miltiorrhiza | 17 |
Populus trichocarpa | 15 |
Discovery and function analysis of lncRNAs.
Time | Name | Species | Biological Functions | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
1997 | TPSI1 | Solanum lycopersicum | Phosphate homeostasis | [ |
2002 | GmENOD40 | Glycine max | Root nodules formation | [ |
2004 | At4 | Arabidopsis thaliana | Phosphate homeostasis | [ |
Enod40 | Medicago truncatula | Nuclear-cytoplasmic re-localization |
[ |
|
2007 | IPS1 | Arabidopsis thaliana | Phosphate homeostasis | [ |
2010 | MtNOD40 | Medicago truncatula | Root nodules formation | [ |
2011 | COLDAIR | Arabidopsis thaliana | Vernalization flowering | [ |
2013 | BcMF11 | Brassica campestris | Flowering regulation | [ |
2014 | HID1 | Arabidopsis thaliana | Seedling photomorphogenesis | [ |
APOLO | Auxin response; lateral root development | [ |
||
ASL | Flowering | [ |
||
2016 | TCONS_00061773 | Solanum lycopersicum | Nitrogen-deficient response | [ |
2017 | COLDWRAP | Arabidopsis thaliana | Vernalization flowering | [ |
lncRNA16397 | Solanum lycopersicum | Disease resistance response | [ |
|
LAIR | Oryza sativa | Rice grain yield | [ |
|
2018 | TL | Oryza sativa | Leaf shape remodeling | [ |
MAS | Arabidopsis thaliana | Vernalization flowering | [ |
|
COOLAIR | Arabidopsis thaliana | Vernalization flowering | [ |
|
2019 | lncRNA39026 | Lycopersicon esculentum | Disease resistance response | [ |
2020 | lncRNA MISSEN | Oryza sativa | Seed development | [ |
2021 | Ptlinc-NAC72 | Populus trichocarpa | Salt stress regulation | [ |
2022 | MdLNC610 | Malus pumila | Fruit coloring | [ |
References
1. Chekanova, J.A.; Gregory, B.D.; Reverdatto, S.V.; Chen, H.; Kumar, R.; Hooker, T.; Yazaki, J.; Li, P.; Skiba, N.; Peng, Q. et al. Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of exosome substrates reveals hidden features in the Arabidopsis transcriptome. Cell; 2007; 131, pp. 1340-1353. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.056] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18160042]
2. Xue, Y.; Chen, R.; Qu, L.; Cao, X. Noncoding RNA: From dark matter to bright star. Sci. China Life Sci.; 2020; 63, pp. 463-468. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11427-020-1676-5]
3. Böhmdorfer, G.; Wierzbicki, A.T. Control of chromatin structure by long noncoding RNA. Trends Cell Biol.; 2015; 25, pp. 623-632. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2015.07.002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26410408]
4. Jin, J.; Lu, P.; Xu, Y.; Li, Z.; Yu, S.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Chua, N.H.; Cao, P. PLncDB V2.0: A comprehensive encyclopedia of plant long noncoding RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2020; 49, pp. 1489-1495. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa910] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33079992]
5. Zhao, L.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Song, T.; Wu, Y.; Fang, S.; Bu, D.; Li, H.; Sun, L.; Pei, D. et al. NONCODEV6: An updated database dedicated to long non-coding RNA annotation in both animals and plants. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2020; 49, pp. 165-171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1046] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33196801]
6. Zhou, B.; Ji, B.; Liu, K.; Hu, G.; Wang, F.; Chen, Q.; Yu, R.; Huang, P.; Ren, J.; Guo, C. et al. EVLncRNAs 2.0: An updated database of manually curated functional long non-coding RNAs validated by low-throughput experiments. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2020; 49, pp. 86-91. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1076]
7. Wierzbicki, A.T.; Blevins, T.; Swiezewski, S. Long noncoding RNAs in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.; 2021; 72, pp. 245-271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-093020-035446]
8. Fatica, A.; Bozzoni, I. Long non-coding RNAs: New players in cell differentiation and development. Nat. Rev. Genet.; 2014; 15, pp. 7-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg3606]
9. Gao, R.; Liu, P.; Irwanto, N.; Loh, D.R.; Wong, S.-M. Upregulation of LINC-AP2 is negatively correlated with AP2 gene expression with Turnip Crinkle Virus infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Rep.; 2016; 35, pp. 2257-2267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-016-2032-9]
10. Ben Amor, B.; Wirth, S.; Merchan, F.; Laporte, P.; d’Aubenton-Carafa, Y.; Hirsch, J.; Maizel, A.; Mallory, A.; Lucas, A.; Deragon, J.M. et al. Novel long non-protein coding RNAs involved in Arabidopsis differentiation and stress responses. Genome Res.; 2009; 19, pp. 57-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.080275.108]
11. Wang, D.; Qu, Z.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Z.-H.; Do, T.; Adelson, D.L.; Wang, Z.-Y.; Searle, I.; Zhu, J.-K. Transposable elements (TEs) contribute to stress-related long intergenic noncoding RNAs in plants. Plant J.; 2017; 90, pp. 133-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13481] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28106309]
12. Caley, D.P.; Pink, R.C.; Trujillano, D.; Carter, D.R.F. Long noncoding RNAs, chromatin, and development. Sci. World J.; 2010; 10, pp. 90-102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2010.7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20062956]
13. Zou, C.; Wang, Q.; Lu, C.; Yang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, H.; Feng, X.; Prosper, M.A.; Song, G. Transcriptome analysis reveals long noncoding RNAs involved in fiber development in cotton (Gossypium arboreum). Sci. China Life Sci.; 2016; 59, pp. 164-171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11427-016-5000-2]
14. Quinn, J.J.; Chang, H.Y. Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Genet.; 2016; 17, pp. 47-62. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2015.10]
15. Hong, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, J.; Meng, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, C.; Yang, J.; Luan, Y. The lncRNA39896-miR166b-HDZs module affects tomato resistance to Phytophthora infestans. J. Integr. Plant Biol.; 2022; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13339]
16. De Wit, M.; Galvão, V.C.; Fankhauser, C. Light-mediated hormonal regulation of plant growth and development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.; 2016; 67, pp. 513-537. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112252]
17. Noctor, G.; Mhamdi, A. Climate change, CO2, and defense: The metabolic, redox, and signaling perspectives. Trends Plant Sci.; 2017; 22, pp. 857-870. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.07.007] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811163]
18. Zhang, H.; Zhu, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhu, J.-K. Abiotic stress responses in plants. Nat. Rev. Genet.; 2022; 23, pp. 104-119. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41576-021-00413-0]
19. Wang, H.-L.V.; Chekanova, J.A. Long noncoding RNAs in plants. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.; 2017; 1008, pp. 133-154.
20. Zhao, X.-Y.; Lin, J.D. Long noncoding RNAs: A new regulatory code in metabolic control. Trends Biochem. Sci.; 2015; 40, pp. 586-596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.002]
21. Wu, H.; Yang, L.; Chen, L.L. The diversity of long noncoding RNAs and their generation. Trends Genet.; 2017; 33, pp. 540-552. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2017.05.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28629949]
22. Guo, C.J.; Ma, X.K.; Xing, Y.H.; Zheng, C.C.; Xu, Y.F.; Shan, L.; Zhang, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, Y.; Carmichael, G.G. et al. Distinct processing of lncRNAs contributes to non-conserved functions in stem cells. Cell; 2020; 181, pp. 621-636.e22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.006] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32259487]
23. Guh, C.-Y.; Hsieh, Y.-H.; Chu, H.-P. Functions and properties of nuclear lncRNAs—From systematically mapping the interactomes of lncRNAs. J. Biomed. Sci.; 2020; 27, 44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12929-020-00640-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183863]
24. Brosnan, C.A.; Voinnet, O. The long and the short of noncoding RNAs. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.; 2009; 21, pp. 416-425. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2009.04.001]
25. Statello, L.; Guo, C.-J.; Chen, L.-L.; Huarte, M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.; 2021; 22, pp. 96-118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9]
26. Chen, L.; Zhu, Q.-H.; Kaufmann, K. Long non-coding RNAs in plants: Emerging modulators of gene activity in development and stress responses. Planta; 2020; 252, 92. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00425-020-03480-5]
27. Matsumoto, A.; Pasut, A.; Matsumoto, M.; Yamashita, R.; Fung, J.; Monteleone, E.; Saghatelian, A.; Nakayama, K.I.; Clohessy, J.G.; Pandolfi, P.P. mTORC1 and muscle regeneration are regulated by the LINC00961-encoded SPAR polypeptide. Nature; 2017; 541, pp. 228-232. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature21034]
28. Wierzbicki, A.T. The role of long non-coding RNA in transcriptional gene silencing. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.; 2012; 15, pp. 517-522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2012.08.008]
29. Ariel, F.; Romero-Barrios, N.; Jégu, T.; Benhamed, M.; Crespi, M. Battles and hijacks: Noncoding transcription in plants. Trends Plant Sci.; 2015; 20, pp. 362-371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.003]
30. Brown, C.J.; Hendrich, B.D.; Rupert, J.L.; Lafrenière, R.G.; Xing, Y.; Lawrence, J.; Willard, H.F. The human XIST gene: Analysis of a 17 kb inactive x-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus. Cell; 1992; 71, pp. 527-542. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90520-M]
31. Ji, P.; Diederichs, S.; Wang, W.; Böing, S.; Metzger, R.; Schneider, P.M.; Tidow, N.; Brandt, B.; Buerger, H.; Bulk, E. et al. MALAT-1, a novel noncoding RNA, and thymosin beta4 predict metastasis and survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene; 2003; 22, pp. 8031-8041. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206928] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12970751]
32. Rinn, J.L.; Chang, H.Y. Genome regulation by long noncoding RNAs. Annu. Rev. Biochem.; 2012; 81, pp. 145-166. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-051410-092902] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22663078]
33. Batista, P.J.; Chang, H.Y. Long noncoding RNAs: Cellular address codes in development and disease. Cell; 2013; 152, pp. 1298-1307. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.012]
34. Feng, J.; Bi, C.; Clark, B.S.; Mady, R.; Shah, P.; Kohtz, J.D. The Evf-2 noncoding RNA is transcribed from the DLX-5/6 ultraconserved region and functions as a DLX-2 transcriptional coactivator. Genes Dev.; 2006; 20, pp. 1470-1484. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1416106] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16705037]
35. Bond, A.M.; Vangompel, M.J.W.; Sametsky, E.A.; Clark, M.F.; Savage, J.C.; Disterhoft, J.F.; Kohtz, J.D. Balanced gene regulation by an embryonic brain ncRNA is critical for adult hippocampal GABA circuitry. Nat. Neurosci.; 2009; 12, pp. 1020-1027. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2371] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19620975]
36. Anastasiadou, E.; Jacob, L.S.; Slack, F.J. Non-coding RNA networks in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer; 2018; 18, pp. 5-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc.2017.99]
37. Li, X.; Xing, X.; Xu, S.; Zhang, M.; Wang, Y.; Wu, H.; Sun, Z.; Huo, Z.; Chen, F.; Yang, T. Genome-wide identification and functional prediction of tobacco lncRNAs responsive to root-knot nematode stress. PLoS ONE; 2018; 13, e0204506. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204506]
38. Li, R.; Jin, J.; Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Lou, Y.; Baldwin, I.T. Long non-coding RNAs associate with jasmonate-mediated plant defense against herbivores. Plant Cell Environ.; 2021; 44, pp. 982-994. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.13952]
39. Li, W.Q.; Jia, Y.L.; Liu, F.Q.; Wang, F.Q.; Fan, F.J.; Wang, J.; Zhu, J.Y.; Xu, Y.; Zhong, W.G.; Yang, J. Genome-wide identification and characterization of long non-coding RNAs responsive to Dickeya zeae in rice. RSC Adv.; 2018; 8, pp. 34408-34417. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8RA04993A]
40. Gao, C.; Sun, J.; Dong, Y.; Wang, C.; Xiao, S.; Mo, L.; Jiao, Z. Comparative transcriptome analysis uncovers regulatory roles of long non-coding RNAs involved in resistance to Powdery mildew in melon. BMC Genom.; 2020; 21, 125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-020-6546-8]
41. Zuo, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, B.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q.; Gao, L. Network analysis of noncoding RNAs in pepper provides insights into fruit ripening control. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 8734. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45427-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31217463]
42. Zhou, R.; Sanz-Jimenez, P.; Zhu, X.-T.; Feng, J.-W.; Shao, L.; Song, J.-M.; Chen, L.-L. Analysis of rice transcriptome reveals the lncRNA/circRNA regulation in tissue development. Rice; 2021; 14, 14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12284-021-00455-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33507446]
43. Das, A.; Nigam, D.; Junaid, A.; Tribhuvan, K.U.; Kumar, K.; Durgesh, K.; Singh, N.K.; Gaikwad, K. Expressivity of the key genes associated with seed and pod development is highly regulated via lncRNAs and miRNAs in pigeonpea. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 18191. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54340-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31796783]
44. Yan, X.; Ma, L.; Yang, M. Identification and characterization of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) in the developing seeds of Jatropha curcas. Sci. Rep.; 2020; 10, 10395. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67410-x]
45. Sun, X.; Zheng, H.; Li, J.; Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Sui, N. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals new lncRNAs responding to salt stress in sweet sorghum. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.; 2020; 8, 331. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00331]
46. Hao, Q.; Yang, L.; Fan, D.; Zeng, B.; Jin, J. The transcriptomic response to heat stress of a jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) cultivar is featured with changed expression of long noncoding RNAs. PLoS ONE; 2021; 16, e0249663. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249663]
47. Song, X.; Hu, J.; Wu, T.; Yang, Q.; Feng, X.; Lin, H.; Feng, S.; Cui, C.; Yu, Y.; Zhou, R. et al. Comparative analysis of long noncoding RNAs in angiosperms and characterization of long noncoding RNAs in response to heat stress in Chinese cabbage. Hortic. Res.; 2021; 8, 48. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00484-4]
48. Campalans, A.; Kondorosi, A.; Crespi, M. Enod40, a short open reading frame-containing mRNA, induces cytoplasmic localization of a nuclear RNA binding protein in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell; 2004; 16, pp. 1047-1059. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.019406]
49. Meng, X.; Li, A.; Yu, B.; Li, S. Interplay between miRNAs and lncRNAs: Mode of action and biological roles in plant development and stress adaptation. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J.; 2021; 19, pp. 2567-2574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2021.04.062]
50. Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; Valli, A.; Todesco, M.; Mateos, I.; Puga, M.I.; Rubio-Somoza, I.; Leyva, A.; Weigel, D.; García, J.A.; Paz-Ares, J. Target mimicry provides a new mechanism for regulation of microRNA activity. Nat. Genet.; 2007; 39, pp. 1033-1037. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng2079]
51. Ariel, F.; Lucero, L.; Christ, A.; Mammarella, M.F.; Jegu, T.; Veluchamy, A.; Mariappan, K.; Latrasse, D.; Blein, T.; Liu, C. et al. R-loop mediated trans action of the APOLO long noncoding RNA. Mol. Cell; 2020; 77, pp. 1055-1065.e4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2019.12.015] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31952990]
52. Wang, Y.; Luo, X.; Sun, F.; Hu, J.; Zha, X.; Su, W.; Yang, J. Overexpressing lncRNA LAIR increases grain yield and regulates neighbouring gene cluster expression in rice. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 3516. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05829-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30158538]
53. Fan, Y.; Yang, J.; Mathioni, S.M.; Yu, J.; Shen, J.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Cai, Z.; Xu, C. et al. PMS1T, producing phased small-interfering RNAs, regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2016; 113, pp. 15144-15149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619159114] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965387]
54. Kopp, F.; Mendell, J.T. Functional classification and experimental dissection of long noncoding RNAs. Cell; 2018; 172, pp. 393-407. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29373828]
55. Ramirez-Prado, J.S.; Abulfaraj, A.A.; Rayapuram, N.; Benhamed, M.; Hirt, H. Plant immunity: From signaling to epigenetic control of defense. Trends Plant Sci.; 2018; 23, pp. 833-844. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2018.06.004]
56. Kim, E.-D.; Sung, S. Long noncoding RNA: Unveiling hidden layer of gene regulatory networks. Trends Plant Sci.; 2012; 17, pp. 16-21. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2011.10.008]
57. Wang, K.C.; Chang, H.Y. Molecular mechanisms of long noncoding RNAs. Mol. Cell.; 2011; 43, pp. 904-914. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.018]
58. Fedak, H.; Palusinska, M.; Krzyczmonik, K.; Brzezniak, L.; Yatusevich, R.; Pietras, Z.; Kaczanowski, S.; Swiezewski, S. Control of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis by a cis-acting noncoding antisense transcript. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2016; 113, pp. E7846-E7855. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608827113]
59. Heo, J.B.; Sung, S. Vernalization-mediated epigenetic silencing by a long intronic noncoding RNA. Science; 2011; 331, pp. 76-79. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1197349]
60. Ye, X.; Wang, S.; Zhao, X.; Gao, N.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wu, E.; Jiang, C.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, W. et al. Role of lncRNAs in cis- and trans-regulatory responses to salt in Populus Trichocarpa. Plant J.; 2022; 110, pp. 978-993. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15714]
61. Pefanis, E.; Wang, J.; Rothschild, G.; Lim, J.; Kazadi, D.; Sun, J.; Federation, A.; Chao, J.; Elliott, O.; Liu, Z.-P. et al. RNA exosome-regulated long non-coding RNA transcription controls super-enhancer activity. Cell; 2015; 161, pp. 774-789. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.034] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25957685]
62. Zheng, Z.; Xing, Y.; He, X.-J.; Li, W.; Hu, Y.; Yadav, S.K.; Oh, J.; Zhu, J.-K. An SGS3-like protein functions in RNA-directed DNA methylation and transcriptional gene silencing in Arabidopsis. Plant J.; 2010; 62, pp. 92-99. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04130.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20059743]
63. Daxinger, L.; Kanno, T.; Bucher, E.; van der Winden, J.; Naumann, U.; Matzke, A.J.M.; Matzke, M. A Stepwise pathway for biogenesis of 24-nt secondary siRNAs and spreading of DNA methylation. EMBO J.; 2009; 28, pp. 48-57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.260] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19078964]
64. Zheng, Q.; Rowley, M.J.; Böhmdorfer, G.; Sandhu, D.; Gregory, B.D.; Wierzbicki, A.T. RNA polymerase V targets transcriptional silencing components to promoters of protein-coding genes. Plant J.; 2013; 73, pp. 179-189. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12034] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23013441]
65. Thomson, D.W.; Dinger, M.E. Endogenous microRNA sponges: Evidence and controversy. Nat. Rev. Genet.; 2016; 17, pp. 272-283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.20]
66. Reinhart, B.J.; Weinstein, E.G.; Rhoades, M.W.; Bartel, B.; Bartel, D.P. MicroRNAs in plants. Genes Dev.; 2002; 16, pp. 1616-1626. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1004402]
67. Hirsch, J.; Lefort, V.; Vankersschaver, M.; Boualem, A.; Lucas, A.; Thermes, C.; d’Aubenton-Carafa, Y.; Crespi, M. Characterization of 43 non-protein-coding mRNA genes in Arabidopsis, including the miR162a-derived transcripts. Plant Physiol.; 2006; 140, pp. 1192-1204. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.073817]
68. Liu, X.; Fortin, K.; Mourelatos, Z. microRNAs: Biogenesis and molecular functions. Brain Pathol.; 2008; 18, pp. 113-121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2007.00121.x]
69. Guo, G.; Liu, X.; Sun, F.; Cao, J.; Huo, N.; Wuda, B.; Xin, M.; Hu, Z.; Du, J.; Xia, R. et al. Wheat miR9678 affects seed germination by generating phased siRNAs and modulating abscisic acid/gibberellin signaling. Plant Cell; 2018; 30, pp. 796-814. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.17.00842]
70. Li, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; He, Y. Natural antisense transcripts of miR398 genes suppress microR398 processing and attenuate plant thermotolerance. Nat. Commun.; 2020; 11, 5351. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19186-x]
71. Salmena, L.; Poliseno, L.; Tay, Y.; Kats, L.; Pandolfi, P.P. A ceRNA hypothesis: The rosetta stone of a hidden RNA language?. Cell; 2011; 146, pp. 353-358. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21802130]
72. Shin, H.; Shin, H.-S.; Chen, R.; Harrison, M.J. Loss of At4 function impacts phosphate distribution between the roots and the shoots during phosphate starvation. Plant J.; 2006; 45, pp. 712-726. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02629.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16460506]
73. Bardou, F.; Ariel, F.; Simpson, C.G.; Romero-Barrios, N.; Laporte, P.; Balzergue, S.; Brown, J.W.S.; Crespi, M. Long noncoding RNA modulates alternative splicing regulators in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell; 2014; 30, pp. 166-176. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2014.06.017] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25073154]
74. Xu, S.; Dong, Q.; Deng, M.; Lin, D.; Xiao, J.; Cheng, P.; Xing, L.; Niu, Y.; Gao, C.; Zhang, W. et al. The vernalization-induced long non-coding RNA VAS functions with the transcription factor TaRF2b to Promote TaVRN1 expression for flowering in hexaploid wheat. Mol. Plant; 2021; 14, pp. 1525-1538. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2021.05.026]
75. Liu, F.; Quesada, V.; Crevillén, P.; Bäurle, I.; Swiezewski, S.; Dean, C. The Arabidopsis RNA-binding protein FCA requires a lysine-specific demethylase 1 homolog to downregulate FLC. Mol. Cell; 2007; 28, pp. 398-407. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.018]
76. Michaels, S.D.; Amasino, R.M. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domain protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell; 1999; 11, pp. 949-956. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.11.5.949]
77. Tian, Y.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, F.; Wang, S.; Ji, X.; Xu, C.; He, Y.; Ding, Y. PRC2 recruitment and H3K27me3 deposition at FLC require FCA Binding of COOLAIR. Sci. Adv.; 2019; 5, eaau7246. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau7246]
78. Liu, Z.-W.; Zhao, N.; Su, Y.-N.; Chen, S.-S.; He, X.-J. Exogenously overexpressed intronic long noncoding RNAs activate host gene expression by affecting histone modification in Arabidopsis. Sci. Rep.; 2020; 10, 3094. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59697-7]
79. Kim, D.-H.; Sung, S. Vernalization-triggered intragenic chromatin loop formation by long noncoding RNAs. Dev. Cell; 2017; 40, pp. 302-312.e4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2016.12.021]
80. Swiezewski, S.; Liu, F.; Magusin, A.; Dean, C. Cold-induced silencing by long antisense transcripts of an Arabidopsis polycomb target. Nature; 2009; 462, pp. 799-802. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08618]
81. De Lucia, F.; Crevillen, P.; Jones, A.M.E.; Greb, T.; Dean, C. A PHD-polycomb repressive complex 2 triggers the epigenetic silencing of FLC during vernalization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2008; 105, pp. 16831-16836. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0808687105] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18854416]
82. Yang, H.; Howard, M.; Dean, C. Antagonistic roles for H3K36me3 and H3K27me3 in the cold-induced epigenetic switch at Arabidopsis FLC. Curr. Biol.; 2014; 24, pp. 1793-1797. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.06.047] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25065750]
83. Sun, Q.; Csorba, T.; Skourti-Stathaki, K.; Proudfoot, N.J.; Dean, C. R-loop stabilization represses antisense transcription at the Arabidopsis FLC locus. Science; 2013; 340, pp. 619-621. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1234848] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23641115]
84. Trevaskis, B.; Hemming, M.N.; Dennis, E.S.; Peacock, W.J. The molecular basis of vernalization-induced flowering in cereals. Trends Plant Sci.; 2007; 12, pp. 352-357. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.06.010] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17629542]
85. Gasparis, S.; Przyborowski, M.; Nadolska-Orczyk, A. Genome-wide identification of barley long noncoding RNAs and analysis of their regulatory interactions during shoot and grain development. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 5087. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105087]
86. Xia, W.; Dou, Y.; Liu, R.; Gong, S.; Huang, D.; Fan, H.; Xiao, Y. Genome-wide discovery and characterization of long noncoding RNAs in African Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Peer J.; 2020; 8, e9585. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9585]
87. Qin, S.-W.; Jiang, R.-J.; Zhang, N.; Liu, Z.-W.; Li, C.-L.; Guo, Z.-Z.; Bao, L.-H.; Zhao, L.-F. Genome-wide analysis of RNAs associated with Populus euphratica Oliv. heterophyll morphogenesis. Sci. Rep.; 2018; 8, 17248. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35371-x]
88. Liu, X.; Li, D.; Zhang, D.; Yin, D.; Zhao, Y.; Ji, C.; Zhao, X.; Li, X.; He, Q.; Chen, R. et al. A novel antisense long noncoding RNA, TWISTED LEAF, maintains leaf blade flattening by regulating its associated sense R2R3-MYB gene in rice. New Phytol.; 2018; 218, pp. 774-788. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15023]
89. Krouk, G.; Crawford, N.M.; Coruzzi, G.M.; Tsay, Y.-F. Nitrate signaling: Adaptation to fluctuating environments. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.; 2010; 13, pp. 266-273. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2009.12.003]
90. Bisseling, T.; Scheres, B. Plant science. Nutrient computation for root architecture. Science; 2014; 346, pp. 300-301. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1260942]
91. Forde, B.G. Nitrogen signaling pathways shaping root system architecture: An update. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.; 2014; 21, pp. 30-36. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.06.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24997289]
92. Noguero, M.; Lacombe, B. Transporters involved in root nitrate uptake and sensing by Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci.; 2016; 7, 1391. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01391] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27708653]
93. Liu, F.; Xu, Y.; Chang, K.; Li, S.; Liu, Z.; Qi, S.; Jia, J.; Zhang, M.; Crawford, N.M.; Wang, Y. The long noncoding RNA T5120 regulates nitrate response and assimilation in Arabidopsis. New Phytol.; 2019; 224, pp. 117-131. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16038] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31264223]
94. Wang, Y.; Fan, X.; Lin, F.; He, G.; Terzaghi, W.; Zhu, D.; Deng, X.W. Arabidopsis noncoding RNA mediates control of photomorphogenesis by red light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2014; 111, pp. 10359-10364. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409457111] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24982146]
95. Henriques, R.; Wang, H.; Liu, J.; Boix, M.; Huang, L.-F.; Chua, N.-H. The antiphasic regulatory module comprising CDF5 and its antisense RNA FLORE links the circadian clock to photoperiodic flowering. New Phytol.; 2017; 216, pp. 854-867. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.14703] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28758689]
96. Yu, J.; Qiu, K.; Sun, W.; Yang, T.; Wu, T.; Song, T.; Zhang, J.; Yao, Y.; Tian, J. A long noncoding RNA functions in high-light-induced anthocyanin accumulation in apple by activating ethylene synthesis. Plant Physiol.; 2022; 189, pp. 66-83. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plphys/kiac049]
97. Cui, J.; Jiang, N.; Meng, J.; Yang, G.; Liu, W.; Zhou, X.; Ma, N.; Hou, X.; Luan, Y. LncRNA33732-respiratory burst oxidase module associated with WRKY1 in tomato-Phytophthora infestans interactions. Plant J.; 2019; 97, pp. 933-946. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14173]
98. Cui, J.; Luan, Y.; Jiang, N.; Bao, H.; Meng, J. Comparative transcriptome analysis between resistant and susceptible tomato allows the identification of lncRNA16397 conferring resistance to Phytophthora infestans by co-expressing glutaredoxin. Plant J.; 2017; 89, pp. 577-589. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13408]
99. Zhang, L.; Wang, M.; Li, N.; Wang, H.; Qiu, P.; Pei, L.; Xu, Z.; Wang, T.; Gao, E.; Liu, J. et al. Long noncoding RNAs involve in resistance to Verticillium dahliae, a fungal disease in cotton. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2018; 16, pp. 1172-1185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.12861]
100. Zhang, C.; Tang, G.; Peng, X.; Sun, F.; Liu, S.; Xi, Y. Long non-coding RNAs of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in multiple dehydration stresses. BMC Plant Biol.; 2018; 18, 79. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1288-3]
101. Kindgren, P.; Ard, R.; Ivanov, M.; Marquardt, S. Transcriptional read-through of the long non-coding RNA SVALKA governs plant cold acclimation. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 4561. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07010-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385760]
102. Li, S.; Yu, X.; Lei, N.; Cheng, Z.; Zhao, P.; He, Y.; Wang, W.; Peng, M. Genome-wide identification and functional prediction of cold and/or drought-responsive lncRNAs in cassava. Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 45981. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep45981] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28387315]
103. Qin, T.; Zhao, H.; Cui, P.; Albesher, N.; Xiong, L. A nucleus-localized long non-coding RNA enhances drought and salt stress tolerance. Plant Physiol.; 2017; 175, pp. 1321-1336. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00574] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28887353]
104. Deng, F.; Zhang, X.; Wang, W.; Yuan, R.; Shen, F. Identification of Gossypium Hirsutum long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) under Salt Stress. BMC Plant Biol.; 2018; 18, 23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1238-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29370759]
105. Xin, M.; Wang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Song, N.; Hu, Z.; Qin, D.; Xie, C.; Peng, H.; Ni, Z.; Sun, Q. Identification and characterization of wheat long non-protein coding RNAs responsive to Powdery Mildew infection and heat stress by using microarray analysis and SBS sequencing. BMC Plant Biol.; 2011; 11, 61. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-11-61]
106. Chen, L.; Shi, S.; Jiang, N.; Khanzada, H.; Wassan, G.M.; Zhu, C.; Peng, X.; Xu, J.; Chen, Y.; Yu, Q. et al. Genome-wide analysis of long non-coding RNAs affecting roots development at an early stage in the rice response to cadmium stress. BMC Genom.; 2018; 19, 460. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4807-6]
107. Sun, Y.; Hao, P.; Lv, X.; Tian, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Han, Z.; Wu, T. A long non-coding apple RNA, MSTRG.85814.11, acts as a transcriptional enhancer of SAUR32 and contributes to the Fe-deficiency response. Plant J.; 2020; 103, pp. 53-67. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14706]
108. Li, R.; Fu, D.; Zhu, B.; Luo, Y.; Zhu, H. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of lncRNA1459 alters tomato fruit ripening. Plant J.; 2018; 94, pp. 513-524. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13872]
109. Zhou, Y.-F.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Sun, Y.-M.; Yu, Y.; Lei, M.-Q.; Yang, Y.-W.; Lian, J.-P.; Feng, Y.-Z.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, L. et al. The parent-of-origin lncRNA MISSEN regulates rice endosperm development. Nat. Commun.; 2021; 12, 6525. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26795-7]
110. Ding, J.; Lu, Q.; Ouyang, Y.; Mao, H.; Zhang, P.; Yao, J.; Xu, C.; Li, X.; Xiao, J.; Zhang, Q. A long noncoding RNA regulates photoperiod-sensitive male sterility, an essential component of hybrid rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2012; 109, pp. 2654-2659. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1121374109]
111. Zhang, Y.-C.; Liao, J.-Y.; Li, Z.-Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, J.-P.; Li, Q.-F.; Qu, L.-H.; Shu, W.-S.; Chen, Y.-Q. Genome-wide screening and functional analysis identify a large number of long noncoding RNAs involved in the sexual reproduction of rice. Genome Biol.; 2014; 15, 512. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-014-0512-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25517485]
112. Hisanaga, T.; Okahashi, K.; Yamaoka, S.; Kajiwara, T.; Nishihama, R.; Shimamura, M.; Yamato, K.T.; Bowman, J.L.; Kohchi, T.; Nakajima, K. A cis-acting bidirectional transcription switch controls sexual dimorphism in the liverwort. EMBO J.; 2019; 38, e100240. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2018100240] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30609993]
113. Gagliardi, D.; Cambiagno, D.A.; Arce, A.L.; Tomassi, A.H.; Giacomelli, J.I.; Ariel, F.D.; Manavella, P.A. Dynamic regulation of chromatin topology and transcription by inverted repeat-derived small RNAs in sunflower. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2019; 116, pp. 17578-17583. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1903131116] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31409706]
114. Fang, J.; Zhang, F.; Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Zhao, F.; Li, Z.; Sun, C.; Chen, F.; Xu, F.; Chang, S. et al. Ef-Cd locus shortens rice maturity duration without yield penalty. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2019; 116, pp. 18717-18722. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815030116]
115. Wu, H.-W.; Deng, S.; Xu, H.; Mao, H.-Z.; Liu, J.; Niu, Q.-W.; Wang, H.; Chua, N.-H. A noncoding RNA transcribed from the AGAMOUS (AG) second intron binds to CURLY LEAF and represses AG expression in leaves. New Phytol.; 2018; 219, pp. 1480-1491. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15231]
116. Huang, L.; Dong, H.; Zhou, D.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Feng, Y.; Yu, D.; Lin, S.; Cao, J. Systematic identification of long non-coding RNAs during pollen development and fertilization in Brassica rapa. Plant J.; 2018; 96, pp. 203-222. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.14016]
117. Seo, J.S.; Sun, H.-X.; Park, B.S.; Huang, C.-H.; Yeh, S.-D.; Jung, C.; Chua, N.-H. ELF18-INDUCED LONG-NONCODING RNA associates with mediator to enhance expression of innate immune response genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2017; 29, pp. 1024-1038. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.16.00886]
118. Seo, J.S.; Diloknawarit, P.; Park, B.S.; Chua, N.-H. ELF18-INDUCED LONG NONCODING RNA 1 evicts fibrillarin from mediator subunit to enhance PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENE 1 (PR1) expression. New Phytol.; 2019; 221, pp. 2067-2079. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.15530]
119. Zhang, B.; Su, T.; Li, P.; Xin, X.; Cao, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, D.; Yu, Y.; Li, D. et al. Identification of long noncoding RNAs involved in resistance to downy mildew in Chinese cabbage. Hortic. Res.; 2021; 8, 44. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00479-1]
120. Yang, Y.; Liu, T.; Shen, D.; Wang, J.; Ling, X.; Hu, Z.; Chen, T.; Hu, J.; Huang, J.; Yu, W. et al. Tomato yellow leaf curl virus intergenic siRNAs target a host long noncoding RNA to modulate disease symptoms. PLoS Pathog.; 2019; 15, e1007534. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007534]
121. Yu, Y.; Zhou, Y.-F.; Feng, Y.-Z.; He, H.; Lian, J.-P.; Yang, Y.-W.; Lei, M.-Q.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-Q. Transcriptional landscape of pathogen-responsive lncRNAs in rice unveils the role of ALEX1 in jasmonate pathway and disease resistance. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2020; 18, pp. 679-690. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13234] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31419052]
122. Joshi, R.K.; Megha, S.; Basu, U.; Rahman, M.H.; Kav, N.N.V. Genome wide identification and functional prediction of long non-coding RNAs responsive to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum infection in Brassica napus. PLoS ONE; 2016; 11, e0158784. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158784] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27388760]
123. Li, W.; Li, C.; Li, S.; Peng, M. Long noncoding RNAs that respond to Fusarium oxysporum infection in “Cavendish” banana (Musa acuminata). Sci. Rep.; 2017; 7, 16939. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17179-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29209086]
124. Liu, C.; Muchhal, U.S.; Raghothama, K.G. Differential expression of TPS11, a phosphate starvation-induced gene in tomato. Plant Mol. Biol.; 1997; 33, pp. 867-874. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005729309569] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9106510]
125. Rohrig, H.; Schmidt, J.; Miklashevichs, E.; Schell, J.; John, M. Soybean ENOD40 encodes two peptides that bind to sucrose synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2002; 99, pp. 1915-1920. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.022664799]
126. Laporte, P.; Satiat-Jeunemaître, B.; Velasco, I.; Csorba, T.; Van de Velde, W.; Campalans, A.; Burgyan, J.; Arevalo-Rodriguez, M.; Crespi, M. A novel RNA-binding peptide regulates the establishment of the Medicago truncatula-Sinorhizobium meliloti nitrogen-fixing symbiosis. Plant J.; 2010; 62, pp. 24-38. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04121.x]
127. Song, J.-H.; Cao, J.-S.; Wang, C.-G. BcMF11, a novel non-coding RNA Gene from Brassica campestris, is required for pollen development and male fertility. Plant Cell Rep.; 2013; 32, pp. 21-30. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00299-012-1337-6]
128. Ariel, F.; Jegu, T.; Latrasse, D.; Romero-Barrios, N.; Christ, A.; Benhamed, M.; Crespi, M. Noncoding transcription by alternative RNA polymerases dynamically regulates an auxin-driven chromatin loop. Mol. Cell; 2014; 55, pp. 383-396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2014.06.011]
129. Shin, J.-H.; Chekanova, J.A. Arabidopsis RRP6L1 and RRP6L2 function in FLOWERING LOCUS C silencing via regulation of antisense RNA synthesis. PLoS Genet.; 2014; 10, e1004612. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004612]
130. Chen, M.; Wang, C.; Bao, H.; Chen, H.; Wang, Y. Genome-wide identification and characterization of novel lncRNAs in Populus under nitrogen deficiency. Mol. Genet. Genom.; 2016; 291, pp. 1663-1680. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-016-1210-3]
131. Hou, X.; Cui, J.; Liu, W.; Jiang, N.; Zhou, X.; Qi, H.; Meng, J.; Luan, Y. LncRNA39026 enhances tomato resistance to Phytophthora infestans by decoying miR168a and inducing PR gene expression. Phytopathology; 2020; 110, pp. 873-880. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-12-19-0445-R] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31876247]
132. Shahid, M.; Natasha,; Dumat, C.; Niazi, N.K.; Xiong, T.T.; Farooq, A.B.U.; Khalid, S. Ecotoxicology of heavy metal(loid)-enriched particulate matter: Foliar accumulation by plants and health impacts. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.; 2021; 253, pp. 65-113. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897760]
133. Ismail, A.M.; Horie, T. Genomics, physiology, and molecular breeding approaches for improving salt tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.; 2017; 68, pp. 405-434. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-042916-040936] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28226230]
134. Wan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Duan, M.; Huang, L.; Wang, W.; Xu, Q.; Yang, Y.; Yu, Y. Integrated analysis of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and mRNAs reveals the regulatory role of lncRNAs associated with salt resistance in Camellia sinensis. Front. Plant Sci.; 2020; 11, 218. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00218]
135. Zhang, X.; Shen, J.; Xu, Q.; Dong, J.; Song, L.; Wang, W.; Shen, F. Long noncoding RNA lncRNA354 functions as a competing endogenous RNA of miR160b to regulate ARF genes in response to salt stress in upland cotton. Plant Cell Environ.; 2021; 44, pp. 3302-3321. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.14133]
136. Li, S.; Cheng, Z.; Dong, S.; Li, Z.; Zou, L.; Zhao, P.; Guo, X.; Bao, Y.; Wang, W.; Peng, M. Global identification of full-length cassava lncRNAs unveils the role of cold-responsive intergenic lncRNA 1 in cold stress response. Plant Cell Environ.; 2022; 45, pp. 412-426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pce.14236]
137. Ramírez Gonzales, L.; Shi, L.; Bergonzi, S.B.; Oortwijn, M.; Franco-Zorrilla, J.M.; Solano-Tavira, R.; Visser, R.G.F.; Abelenda, J.A.; Bachem, C.W.B. Potato CYCLING DOF FACTOR1 and its lncRNA counterpart StFLORE link tuber development and drought response. Plant J.; 2021; 105, pp. 855-869. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15093]
138. Au, P.C.K.; Zhu, Q.-H.; Dennis, E.S.; Wang, M.-B. Long non-coding RNA-mediated mechanisms independent of the RNAi pathway in animals and plants. RNA Biol.; 2011; 8, pp. 404-414. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4161/rna.8.3.14382]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
During the process of growth and development, plants are prone to various biotic and abiotic stresses. They have evolved a variety of strategies to resist the adverse effects of these stresses. lncRNAs (long non-coding RNAs) are a type of less conserved RNA molecules of more than 200 nt (nucleotides) in length. lncRNAs do not code for any protein, but interact with DNA, RNA, and protein to affect transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and epigenetic modulation events. As a new regulatory element, lncRNAs play a critical role in coping with environmental pressure during plant growth and development. This article presents a comprehensive review on the types of plant lncRNAs, the role and mechanism of lncRNAs at different molecular levels, the coordination between lncRNA and miRNA (microRNA) in plant immune responses, the latest research progress of lncRNAs in plant growth and development, and their response to biotic and abiotic stresses. We conclude with a discussion on future direction for the elaboration of the function and mechanism of lncRNAs.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2 Sugarcane Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Houma, LA 70360, USA
3 Guangxi Key Laboratory for Sugarcane Biology & State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Agro Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530005, China
4 College of Life Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
5 Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Biology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Genetics, Breeding and Multiple Utilization of Crops, College of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China