It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
To advance understanding of biodiversity and ecosystem function, ecologists seek widely applicable relationships among species diversity and other ecosystem characteristics such as species productivity, biomass, and abundance. These metrics vary widely across ecosystems and no relationship among any combination of them that is valid across habitats, taxa, and spatial scales, has heretofore been found. Here we derive such a relationship, an equation of state, among species richness, energy flow, biomass, and abundance by combining results from the Maximum Entropy Theory of Ecology and the Metabolic Theory of Ecology. It accurately captures the relationship among these state variables in 42 data sets, including vegetation and arthropod communities, that span a wide variety of spatial scales and habitats. The success of our ecological equation of state opens opportunities for estimating difficult-to-measure state variables from measurements of others, adds support for two current theories in ecology, and is a step toward unification in ecology.
Combining metabolic and maximum entropy theories of ecology, the authors derive an equation of state capable of capturing the relationships between multiple ecological variables across varied spatial scales and habitats.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 University of California, The Energy and Resources Group, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); The Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Gothic, USA (GRID:grid.294303.f); The Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, USA (GRID:grid.209665.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1941 1940)
2 University of California, The Energy and Resources Group, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of Alberta, The Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Edmonton, Canada (GRID:grid.17089.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 316X)
3 University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources & the Environment, Tucson, USA (GRID:grid.134563.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2168 186X)
4 University of California, The Energy and Resources Group, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); Kobe University, Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe, Japan (GRID:grid.31432.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 1092 3077)