It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Incomplete understanding of the sources of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) leads to large uncertainty in both air quality management and in climate change assessment. Chemical reactions occurring in the atmospheric aqueous phase represent an important source of SOA mass, yet, the effects of anthropogenic emissions on the aqueous SOA (aqSOA) are not well constrained. Here we use compound-specific dual-carbon isotopic fingerprints (δ13C and Δ14C) of dominant aqSOA molecules, such as oxalic acid, to track the precursor sources and formation mechanisms of aqSOA. Substantial stable carbon isotope fractionation of aqSOA molecules provides robust evidence for extensive aqueous-phase processing. Contrary to the paradigm that these aqSOA compounds are largely biogenic, radiocarbon-based source apportionments show that fossil precursors produced over one-half of the aqSOA molecules. Large fractions of fossil-derived aqSOA contribute substantially to the total water-soluble organic aerosol load and hence impact projections of both air quality and anthropogenic radiative forcing. Our findings reveal the importance of fossil emissions for aqSOA with effects on climate and air quality.
Isotope fingerprinting is used to track precursor sources and formation pathways of aqueous SOA, such as oxalic acid, finding that fossil fuel precursors contributions have largely been underestimated.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Guangzhou, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309); CAS Center for Excellence in Deep Earth Science, Guangzhou, China (GRID:grid.454798.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0644 5393)
2 Stockholm University, Department of Environment Science and the Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.10548.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9377)
3 Chubu University, Chubu Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasugai, Japan (GRID:grid.254217.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8868 2202)
4 Chubu University, Chubu Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasugai, Japan (GRID:grid.254217.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8868 2202); CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography, Dona Paula, India (GRID:grid.436330.1) (ISNI:0000 0000 9040 9555)
5 Chubu University, Chubu Institute for Advanced Studies, Kasugai, Japan (GRID:grid.254217.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8868 2202); Tribhuvan University, Institute of Science and Technology, Kathmandu, Nepal (GRID:grid.80817.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2114 6728)