It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Electrolyte engineering advances Li metal batteries (LMBs) with high Coulombic efficiency (CE) by constructing LiF-rich solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). However, the low conductivity of LiF disturbs Li+ diffusion across SEI, thus inducing Li+ transfer-driven dendritic deposition. In this work, we establish a mechanistic model to decipher how the SEI affects Li plating in high-fluorine electrolytes. The presented theory depicts a linear correlation between the capacity loss and current density to identify the slope k (determined by Li+ mobility of SEI components) as an indicator for describing the homogeneity of Li+ flux across SEI, while the intercept dictates the maximum CE that electrolytes can achieve. This model inspires the design of an efficient electrolyte that generates dual-halide SEI to homogenize Li+ distribution and Li deposition. The model-driven protocol offers a promising energetic analysis to evaluate the compatibility of electrolytes to Li anode, thus guiding the design of promising electrolytes for LMBs.
The low conductivity of LiF disturbs Li+ diffusion across solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and induces Li+ transfer-driven dendritic growth. Herein, the authors establish a mechanistic model to decipher how the SEI affects realistic Li plating in high-fluorine electrolytes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Zhejiang University, State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X)
2 Zhejiang University, State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, School of Energy Engineering, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X)
3 University of Maryland, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, College Park, USA (GRID:grid.164295.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 7177)
4 Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics, Institute of Physics, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.9227.e) (ISNI:0000000119573309)
5 Zhejiang University, State Key Laboratory of Silicon Materials, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X); Key Laboratory of Advanced Materials and Applications for Batteries of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X)
6 Zhejiang University, State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, School of Energy Engineering, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X); Key Laboratory of Clean Energy and Carbon Neutrality of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34)