Abstract

Purpose

Little is known about the direct influence of different technical options at the rotator cuff tendon-bone interface (TBI) and, more specifically, at the medial bearing row (MBR), regarding local contact force, area and pressure. We evaluated the mechanical repercussions of different medial row anchor configurations for that setting using different values of tension in the lateral row anchors.

Methods

Knotless transosseous equivalent (TOE) rotator cuff repairs with locked versus nonlocked medial anchors and single versus double-hole suture passage were tested in a synthetic rotator cuff mechanical model, using 2 different values of lateral row tension. Contact force, area, pressure, peak force and MBR force were compared at the simulated TBI using a pressure mapping sensor.

Results

When compared to locked anchors, medial row sliding configurations generate lower values for all the above-mentioned parameters.

The use of double-hole suture passage in the medial cuff generated slightly higher values contact area regardless of lateral row tension. At higher lateral row tension values, lower values of the remaining parameters, including MBR force, were found when compared to single-hole suture passage.

Lateral row anchor tension increase induced an increase of all parameters regardless of the medial row configuration and TBI contact force and MBR force were the most susceptible parameters, regardless of the medial row pattern.

Conclusion

Medial row mechanism, suture configuration and lateral row tension interfere with the mechanical force, area and pressure at by TBI. Lateral row tension increase is a major influencer in those parameters.

These results can help surgeons choose the right technique considering its mechanical effect at the TBI.

Details

Title
Mechanical consequences at the tendon-bone interface of different medial row knotless configurations and lateral row tension in a simulated rotator cuff repair
Author
Maia Dias, Carlos 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Gonçalves, Sérgio B. 2 ; Completo, António 3 ; da Silva, Manuel Ribeiro 4 ; de Campos Azevedo, Clara 5 ; Mineiro, Jorge 6 ; Ferreira, Frederico 7 ; Folgado, João 2 

 Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Department of Bioengineering, and iBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.9983.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4263); Hospital CUF Tejo, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.421304.0) 
 IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.9983.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4263) 
 University of Aveiro (UA), TEMA, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aveiro, Portugal (GRID:grid.7311.4) (ISNI:0000000123236065) 
 Hospital CUF Porto, Porto, Portugal (GRID:grid.490116.b) 
 University of Minho, Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, Braga, Portugal (GRID:grid.10328.38) (ISNI:0000 0001 2159 175X); ICVS/3B’s - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal (GRID:grid.10328.38) (ISNI:0000 0001 2159 175X); Hospital CUF Tejo, Elbow and Shoulder Unit, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.421304.0); Hospital Dos SAMS de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.421304.0) 
 Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.421304.0) 
 Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Department of Bioengineering, and iBB - Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, Lisbon, Portugal (GRID:grid.9983.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4263) 
Publication year
2022
Publication date
Dec 2022
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
e-ISSN
21971153
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2715333384
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.