1. Introduction
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) belong to Glomeromycota [1,2,3] and form an obligatory symbiosis with approximately 80% of terrestrial plants [4] and aquatic plant communities [5,6]. This ecological relationship brings several benefits for the plant host, including greater mineral nutrition and increased resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses [4,7]. Said stresses (saline, hydrical, pathogens), as well as other general environmental factors such as temperature, precipitation and agricultural activities, affect soil conditions, influencing AMF sporulation and species establishment, shaping the geographic distribution of these fungal species [4,8,9,10,11,12,13].
The cosmopolitan distribution of Glomeromycota [2,14,15,16] demonstrates that the establishment of this symbiosis is both widespread [4] and ancient, and thus extremely important for the colonization of the terrestrial environment by plants [17].
Description of the Glomeromycota species is mostly based on morphological characterization, which is still the basis of the AMF classification [11,14,16]. However, in some cases, the same morphological characteristics can be shared by different species [16,18,19]. For example, the species Acaulospora colombiana and Acaulospora koskei both present spores with a smooth and hyaline outer wall. Additionally, the presence of non-viable or immature spores in soil samples makes the morphological identification tricky [16,20]. Therefore, the combination of molecular and morphological studies has been pointed out as the most appropriate methodology for classifying the AMF and describing their geographical distribution [15,16,20], as well as their phylogenetic relationships [19,21,22,23,24,25,26].
Among Glomeromycota genera, Acaulospora (class Glomeromycetes, order Diversisporales, family Acaulosporaceae), described by Gerdermann and Trappe [27], is one of the most widely distributed genera in the world, with several species having been described in recent years [13,28,29,30].
Many studies have highlighted the ability of Acaulospora to develop under extreme conditions, such as in highly saline soil [31,32], and also in soil contaminated with nickel [33] and arsenic [34]. This resistance to different abiotic stresses indicates the biotechnological potential of Acaulospora species for agricultural and bioremediation activities.
Furthermore, the genus Acaulospora has also been reported as the second most frequent genus in disturbed areas, with high diversity indices, mainly in South America [28,35]. Together with Glomus (Tul. & C. Tul.) [29,30], the genus Acaulospora has an essential role in the use and management of soil, especially in semiarid areas [13,28,30,36].
Taking into account the high diversity and wide distribution of the Acaulospora genus, as well as its relevance for biotechnological applications and area conservation, this review aims to revise the spore wall ornamentation patterns found in this genus, to update the global geographical distribution of Acaulospora species, and to provide a robust phylogenetic analysis based on ITS and SSU-ITS-LSU (nrDNA) sequences of the nuclear rDNA.
2. Acaulospora: A Review of Its Taxonomy, Morphology and Molecular Markers
The articles used in this review were searched using the keywords: “Acaulospora + biogeographical”, “Acaulospora + description” and “Acaulospora + revision”, covering articles from 1974 to 2021, in order to gather historic and the most updated information on Acaulospora biology. In addition to the literature review, some Acaulospora species were evaluated for assessment of morphological characteristics, such as ornamentation.
Eighteen voucher specimens (spores permanently mounted in PVLG and a mixture of PVLG and Melzer’s reagent (1:1, v/v) on slides) deposited at UFRN (Natal, Brazil) (Table 1) and at Oregon State University (OSC), Oregon, USA (isotypes, types and other materials) were morphologically analyzed and used as reference.
Morphological features of spores were categorized based on original species descriptions and other related references. The preparation of spores for study and photography was carried out as previously described [37]. The types of spore wall layers were defined by Błaszkowski [37] and Walker [38]. Fungi nomenclature and the authors of their descriptions were retrieved from the Index Fungorum website
The classification and description of Acaulospora species is mainly based on the morphology and ontogeny of their spores. The most important characteristic in distinguishing Acaulospora from other Glomeromycota genera is the type of spore development, called acaulosporoid, in which the glomerospores develop through the transfer of the content from the sporiferous saccule, which is connected to a hypha [21,37,40]. When this saccule is released from the spore, it leaves a single scar, which is used to differentiate species with acaulosporoid development from species with other types of spore formation. However, the acaulosporoid formation is also present in the genera Ambispora C. Walker, Vestberg & A. Schüßler, Archaeospora J.B. Morton & D. Redecker, Otospora Oehl, Palenzuela & N. Ferrol and Palaeospora Oehl, Palenz., Sánchez-Castro & G. A. Silva [21,37,41,42,43,44]. When two scars are produced, the spore formation is called entrophosporoid, which is present in the genera Entrophospora R.N. Ames & R.W. Schneid., Intraspora Oehl & Sieverd., Kuklospora Oehl & Sieverd., Sacculospora Oehl, Sieverd., G.A. Silva, B.T. Goto, I.C. Sánchez & Palenzuela and Tricispora Oehl, Sieverd., G.A. Silva & Palenz. [21,37,45,46,47], although Acaulospora colliculosa Kaonongbua, J.B. Morton & Bever has been described without the register of sporiferous saccule, but with two distinct scars, suggesting an entrophosporoid spore development [48].
Generally, spores produced by Acaulospora species are found as free spores, rarely in aggregates or sporocarps [27,37,40], and have three walls [21]. When some ornamentation is present, it is generally observed in the second layer of the outer wall and rarely in the inner layer [49]. A granular germ layer with a “beaded” surface, which reacts to Melzer’s reagent, is also observed in the spores [27,37,40].
There are many different types of spore wall ornamentations: projections (Acaulospora brasiliensis, A. colliculosa, A. denticulata, A. endographis, A. elegans, A. entreriana, A. flavopapillosa, A. ignota, A. pustulata, A. rehmii, A. soloidea, A. spinosa, A. spinossissima, A. spinulifera, A. tortuosa, A. tuberculata, A. walkeri and Kuklospora spinosa), depressions (Acaulospora alpina, A. aspera, A. baetica, A. cavernata, A. excavata, A. foveata, A. herrerae, A. kentinensis, A. lacunosa, A. minuta, A. nivalis, A. paulinae, A. punctata, A. scrobiculata, A. sieverdingii, A. taiwania, A. terricola and A. verna) and double ornamentation (A. bireticulata and A. reducta). These ornamentations can be uniform (ellipsoidal, circular, concave round), multiform (triangular, circular, ellipsoidal, y-shaped, tooth-shaped), or irregular in shape, and densely or sparsely distributed (Table 2, Figure 1).
At the time the order Glomerales was proposed, encompassing all AMF [40], Acaulospora covered only 25 species and, when the phylum Glomeromycota was proposed, this number changed little, with the addition of four species [1]. In the past 20 years, seven species have been relocated to other genera and three have been transferred from other genera to Acaulospora (Table 3). Additionally, a significant number of new AMF species have been described as belonging to the Acaulospora genus, which currently comprises 60 species.
In addition to these morphological characteristics for species differentiation, molecular data have been broadly used for species descriptions and phylogenetic analyses [50]. For instance, some species, such as A. scrobiculata and other species with similar ornamentations (pitted surface) are only distinguished by molecular analysis, along with morphological description [21].
Forty-five (75%) Acaulospora species have one or more sequenced regions available (Table 4) in NCBI, EMBL, GBIF, BLOYD SYSTEMS, MaarJAM and MYCOBANK databases, most from multicopy nuclear ribosomal RNA genes, which are organized as an operon containing the sequences for the Small Subunit 18S rRNA (SSU), 5.8S and Large Subunit 28S rRNA (LSU) nrDNAs, separated by two internal transcribed spacers, ITS1 and ITS2. The sequences corresponding to the rRNA genes are more conserved than the ITS regions and, for this reason, the SSU and LSU may be used in comparing distant taxa (genus, families), while ITS is more suitable for evolutionary analysis of very closely related species or individuals from the same species [2,26,50,51]. Only eleven species have an additional gene sequenced, which include Beta tubulin, Alpha tubulin, DNA-directed RNA polymerase II subunit (RPB1), Chitin Synthase (CHS), Transcription Factor (Ste12), Heat-Shock Protein 60 (HSP60) and a Group I Intron (IGI) from the Cytochrome Oxidase 1 (COX1) gene (Table 4), which is still insufficient for in-depth phylogenetic study. These other sequenced genes have been proposed as secondary barcode markers, in addition to the ribosomal markers, for multi-locus approaches [22,24,26].
SSU sequences have been widely used to infer the distribution of AMF species around the world [11,14,96]. In said works, only a few species stood out as having a global distribution, such as Acaulospora scrobiculata [15]. Considering that this might actually reflect the conservative nature of the SSU marker, in our review, we analyzed these sequences for Acaulospora species in order to address their potential for species resolution. The CD-HIT [97,98,99,100] online system was used for clustering and comparison of SSU sequences (53 sequences, belonging to 28 species), with different cut-offs of similarity. With a cut-off of 94% similarity among sequences, five clusters were defined. One of these clusters encompassed 20 different species, demonstrating that this threshold was not suitable for separating species. By using a cut-off of 100% similarity, 25 clusters were formed, yet three of them included more than one species; for example, the species A. ignota, A. baetica, A. nivalis, A. cavernata and A. punctata were grouped together in the same cluster, showing the conservative nature of this sequence and its inefficiency at distinguishing among species. Another example of such inadequacy is the 98% similarity of the SSU sequence of Acaulospora scrobiculata with other Acaulospora species (A. minuta and A. spinosa).
Likewise, an unconvincing pattern of clustering was observed when testing different cut-offs for LSU sequences, which, although presenting a better species resolution than SSU, is also a conservative marker when compared to ITS sequences. This low ability for species separation was also observed in preliminary phylogenies constructed only with SSU or LSU sequences, which presented many polytomic branches as well as para or polythyletic species (Supplementary Figures). On the other hand, when CD-HIT with cut-offs of 98 and 100% were performed for ITS sequences, a larger number of groups was formed, mostly containing sequences from the same species. However, some single species were distributed in more than one cluster. This was observed for A. scrobiculata, A. spinosa, A. laevis, A. minuta, A. mellea and A. delicata, indicating that, for these species, the intraspecific variability of ITS marker may be greater than interspecifically, or that some fungal isolates could have been erroneously identified. The best sequence clustering, for which each species formed a different single group, was achieved by using the combination of both regions (SSU/LSU plus ITS, here named nrDNA), indicating that this is the most suitable molecular marker available for understanding the evolution of Acaulospora.
3. Diversity and Distribution of Acaulospora Species on the Globe
All sequences, species descriptions, and geographical occurrences were obtained from the databases NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information [101]), EMBL (European Molecular Biology Laboratory–European Bioinformatics Institute [102]), GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility [103]), BLOYD SYSTEMS (Barcode of Life Data System [104]), MaarJAM [105], MYCOBANK Database [106], from November 2018 to December 2020.
The geographic distribution of the 60 Acaulospora species reported so far encompasses 61 countries. The records of Acaulospora species richness are observed in the tropical region. Brazil (43) presents the highest occurrence (Figure 2, Table 4), followed by: India (26), Switzerland (22), Poland (18), United States (16), Argentina (16), China (15), South Korea (12), England (11), and Benin (11). Brazil is considered one of the countries with the greatest biodiversity in the world [12,16], which can be explained by its high degree of endemism, vast territorial extension and diversification of ecosystems and biomes [16].
This difference in Acaulospora diversity among different localities may also be explained, in part, by the scientific efforts in taxonomic studies in said regions. There is a tendency for increased occurrences in countries where this type of research is emerging, such as in Latin America [16,107], Africa and Asia [108,109,110,111]. The distribution profile of Acaulospora species reviewed here seems to follow this trend. For instance, there were few Acaulospora reports in India until 2014, when Gupta et al. [110] reviewed the diversity of the genus, recording 45% of all known Acaulospora species in India. The same is valid for Brazil, the richest country in Acaulospora species, and other AMF.
The cosmopolitan distribution of Acaulospora genus was also pointed out by Öpik et al. [96], who collected sequences of virtual taxa of Glomeromycota worldwide and demonstrated that Acaulosporaceae was present on all continents, with a higher frequency in Europe and South America. In relation to the climate, no virtual taxa were detected in the Boreal zone, and the richness was higher in temperate and tropical zones. A tendency was detected for some species to have a wider geographic distribution and a greater number of hosts, although subsequent studies are needed to assess this condition [52].
Cofré et al. [16] defines the distribution of AMF species in the Atlantic Forest, Cerrado and Chaco (Argentina), as a diagonal biodiversity because richness of AMF species is in agreement with that observed for other fungi and plants in said biomes. The recent review by Maia et al. [12] indicated that about 60% (192 species) of all AMF species are present in Brazilian biomes, and this bias is also observed concerning the Acaulospora genus, as 71.6% (43 species) of its species are found in Brazil, where the Cerrado and Atlantic Forest are the richest biomes for this genus, with 33 and 31 species recorded, respectively. Stürmer and Kemmelmeier [35] documented that, in Neotropical areas, Acaulospora is the most frequent genus of AMF, followed by Glomus, Scutellospora C. Walker & F.E. Sanders, and Funneliformis C. Walker & A. Schüßler, with 47, 29, 15, and 13 species recorded, respectively.
However, we cannot rule out the influence of vegetation diversity, soil condition and environmental disturbance in shaping the AMF distribution [8,9,10,11,12,13,69]. For instance, Vieira et al. [13] showed that acidity, carbon, and clay content in soil proved to be detrimental in the composition of fungi in the Brazilian semiarid region. In said work, the authors observed that Glomus and Acaulospora were more frequent in clay rich soils than Gigaspora Gerd. & Trappe. Interestingly, Baar et al. [4] and Sudová et al. [112] indicated that, in lake areas, the AMF preference is over the plant symbiont, while the abiotic conditions of soil had no effect on the composition of the fungal community.
According to Davison et al. [14], 34% of AMF species are cosmopolitan. Acaulospora and Glomus are the most represented genera in several studies including different vegetation types [5,6,12,13,15,96,113,114,115]. For example, A. scrobiculata is found on six continents, while in Brazil, it is recorded in all biomes [12], evidencing the global distribution of AMF, when SSU is used as a molecular marker [15].
Nevertheless, the inference of a global distribution of a certain species should be reanalyzed carefully; after all, the majority of available sequences are from rRNA (sequences of SSU or LSU), which are considered conservative when compared with other genomic sequences. Furthermore, for a phylogenetic species recognition, a multi-locus approach presents a higher resolution power for species discrimination [116]. The use of few and relatively conservative markers may give the wrong impression that everything is everywhere, which is an outdated view in mycology. There are many examples of cryptic species distribution revealed by phylogeographic, mainly for pathogenic fungi, which, unlike the AMF, count on a large number of genes and genomes sequenced [26,117]. In reality, even using the SSU sequence as a marker, a certain level of endemism is observed among Glomeromycota species [96,113].
The SSU marker is still one of the most available for AMF species, mainly for virtual taxa, representing more than 77% of the sequences on the MaarjAM database [11,14,57]. Notwithstanding, we ought to rethink about what we are analyzing indeed: the distribution of species or the distribution of a sequence that, due to its conservative nature, may depreciate species diversity and, in turn, overestimate the geographic distribution of some species.
The scarcity of distinct molecular markers available for species identification and differentiation in AMF [19,21,24,57,118] may be explained due to the problematic DNA extraction from spores. The quality of the collected spores in field may limit the yield of DNA, demanding the development of trap cultures and/or pure cultures [16]. However, once these cultures are acquired, there are other challenges to face, such as the maintenance of a pure culture under controlled conditions, free of contaminant fungal species [16]. As a consequence of these difficulties, most of the amplified sequences used for phylogenetic analyses are from the nrDNA multicopy region [2,3,16,18]. Furthermore, the search for new markers is quite laborious and expensive, as it demands (i) genetic material from a wide number of species, (ii) design of primers for gene amplification in all species, and (iii) time-consuming steps of cloning and sequencing.
Poor estimations of species diversity caused by morphological species recognition [20,118,119] or conservative molecular markers will certainly be overcome when variable sequences become available. To date, few species of Glomeromycota have their genome (Acaulospora colombiana and A. morrowiae) [120] or transcriptome (A. morrowiae) sequenced [121].
4. Phylogenetic Relationship among Acaulospora Species: Is There a Consensual Tree?
For the Acaulospora phylogeny we used an updated nrDNA sequence dataset. The NCBI Nucleotide database was consulted to obtain all available ribosomal sequences for Acaulospora. Using the keyword ((Acaulospora [Title]) OR Acaulospora [Organism]) AND ribosomal [Title], 1836 sequences were found in the GenBank, of different lengths.
The downloaded sequences were classified and divided by region: partial sequence SSU, ITS (=ITS1-5.8S-ITS2), partial sequence LSU and SSU-ITS-LSU (here designated as nrDNA). The separation of these sequences was carried out with reference sequences from Krüger et al. [118]. Highly incomplete and falsely annotated sequences were excluded after CD-Hit analysis and those addressed as Acaulospora spp., in GenBank annotation, had their species identified by accessing the original article of their description. Sequences from uncultured or not morphologically described species were not included in our phylogenetic analysis, as our objective was to compare the phylogenetic relationships of the previously described species concerning the spore wall ornamentation distribution in Acaulospora genus.
As the CD-HIT analysis and preliminary phylogenies using only SSU or LSU had a low resolution when distinguishing some species in monophyletic clusters (Supplementary Figures), we carried out three additional phylogenetic analyses: one utilizing SSU-ITS-LSU (nrDNA), one simply with ITS region and another with all the available sequences of ribosomal genes, as a concatenated analysis. The access numbers of the sequences used in each phylogeny are listed on Table 5.
Alignments were carried out using Mafft online with the E-INS-I parameter. The alignment was viewed and manually edited (when required) using Mega 5.2. CD-HIT was used for all datasets (SSU, ITS, LSU and SSU-ITS-LSU fragment) to compare DNA sequences, with cut-off points of 94%, 98% and 100% similarity. These four datasets were grouped separately using CD-HIT to avoid repeating identical sequences and to exclude the incongruent sequences. The alignments used for all analyses are available in Supplementary Material.
Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic analyses were performed using CIPRES Science Gateway 3.3 [122]. GTR + G + I was used as a substitution model for both phylogenies, as well as both partitioned analyses: SSU/ITS1/5.8S/ITS2/LSU/indel and ITS1/5.8S/ITS2/indel. For ML, 1000 quick bootstrapping runs were determined using RAxML-NG 1.0.1 [123]; for the BI, a million generations were run in MrBayes 3.2 [124]. The topologies of the ML and BI trees were compared. A consensus tree was produced, showing the significant supporting values from both analysis (0.95 for BI, 70 for ML). After previewing in FigTree v. 1.4.4 [125], the phylogenetic tree was exported to Inkscape (v 0.91) for further editing, diligently honoring the scale.
The tree topology was essentially the same for our three phylogenies (nrDNA, ITS and concatenated), and for all analyses we observed that, in some cases, different sequences from the same species did not cluster together. In the nrDNA phylogeny (Figure 3), this was the case for only two species, A. scrobiculata (FR692352, FR692354, FR692350) and A. lacunosa (KP756427, KP756435, KP756584), while in the ITS phylogeny (Figure 4), this occurred for three species, A. delicata (JF439093, JF439203), A. lacunosa (KP756427, KP756435, KP756584), and A. scrobiculata (FR692352, FR692354, FR692350), and in the concatenated analysis, three species had their sequences clustered with others: A. lacunosa (KP756427, KP756435, KP756584), A. longula (AM040291, AM040292, AJ510228), A. scrobiculata (FR692352, FR692354, FR692350). Aside from this problem of “polyphyletic” species, the concatenated and ITS (Figure 4 and Figure 5) analysis also presented polytomic branches between some sister species.
Therefore, the nrDNA dataset (Figure 3) provided the best phylogeny as, in this tree, the clades presented the highest number of bootstrap supports and the lowest number of polytomic branches, as well as fewest polyphyletic species.
The polytomy observed for A. lacunosa and A. scrobiculata in all analyses (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5) suggests that these sequences are from different species with similar morphology, or perhaps, in these lineages, the nrDNA region has some convergent sites (homoplasy). A possible explanation for this is that A. lacunosa and A. scrobiculata form two complexes of crypt species, with very similar morphological characteristics.
Aside from A. lacunosa and A. scrobiculata, other polytomic incongruities were observed. For example, in the ITS tree, one of the sequences of A. delicata was grouped with A. rugosa, and in the concatenated tree, A. longula was shown to be paraphyletic.
The resulting data suggest that, for some groups, the phylogenetic signal of the ITS is insufficient for discriminating among different species. Taken together, said incongruities reinforce the urgency of more molecular markers and a multi-locus sequencing analysis, as, to date, most phylogenies in AMF reconstruct the evolutionary history of one single gene or sequence, and not species. As pointed out by Taylor et al. [126], real phylogenetic species recognition is carried out by the concordance of genealogies from different loci.
4.1. Is Kuklospora a Different Genus?
One of the objectives in reconstructing the Acaulospora phylogeny was to reconsider the relationship between Acaulospora and Kuklospora, a genus described by Sieverding and Oehl [46], based on morphology and spore ontogeny. The authors proposed two new genera, Kuklospora and Intraspora, and the transfer of Entrophospora colombiana and Entrophospora kentinensis to Kuklospora, which was placed as a sister genus of Acaulospora. Later, Kaonongbua et al. [48] proposed the transfer of these species to Acaulospora according to 28S analysis, suggesting that the spore development (acaulosporoid or entrophosporoid) is not of monophyletic character.
In all phylogenies (Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5), the monophyletic nature of Acaulospora genus was confirmed, including the species Kuklospora colombiana, as sister species of A. koskei (both are species without ornamentation) and Kuklospora kentinensis as sister species of A. aspera and A. spinosissima, corroborating the analysis of 28S by Kaonongbua et al. [48], Krüger et al. [127] and other authors, such as Corazon-Guivin et al. [67], Crossay et al. [70], Lin et al. [91], Lee et al. [74] and Corazon-Guivin et al. [53], when they described A. flava, A. saccata and A. fragilissima, A. tsugae, A. koreana, and A. aspera, respectively.
Additionally, in our alignment, the difference in identity percentage between Kuklospora and its closest Acaulospora species was very low (21%) compared to differences among other genera, which reinforces that Kuklospora does not stand as a different genus.
Once K. colombiana and K. kentinensis are transferred to Acaulospora and the genus Kuklospora becomes invalid, the third species, K. spinosa [95] should also be relocated to Acaulospora; however, this will create a problem of homonyms with the specific epithets between A. spinosa and K. spinosa. Because A. spinosa was the species described first, it has nominal priority. Moreover, the absence of sequences from any molecular marker for K. spinosa makes a robust phylogenetic analysis still pending for its accurate phylogenetic positioning.
4.2. The Homoplasic Nature of Acaulospora Ornamentations
The ornamentations of the spore wall, illustrated in the nrDNA phylogenetic tree (Figure 3), do not follow the evolutionary history established by the molecular markers here used. The homoplasic nature of this morphological characteristic is observed in many groups of species in our trees. For instance, A. kentinensis (regular depression), A. spinossissima (projection) and A. aspera (irregular depression) are sister species and do not share the ornamentation type, as well as A. foveata and A. lacunosa, which have the depression type of ornamentation (irregular and regular, respectively) and form a monophyletic group with A. koreana and A. mellea, which are species without ornamentation.
The noted observations make it clear that spore wall ornamentations, at least in the Acaulospora genus, ought not to be applied for phylogenetic inferences, as they are exclusively used for morphological description of species. Furthermore, these evolutionary convergences ought to have their meaning investigated to better address questions such as: (i) is it possible the same species express different phenotypes, concerning ornamentation, depending on environmental conditions? (ii) Different ornamentations evolve independently in response to the same environmental pressures (climate, soil, plant host, etc.)? Indeed, a great deal of research must be undertaken in terms of molecular and biochemical interaction of these AMF with their substrate, but the starting point for all these studies must be a robust, well-supported, and multi-locus evolutionary analysis.
5. Morphological Characteristics of Acaulospora Species Shared with Other Genera
Once K. colombiana and K. kentinensis (now A. colombiana and A. kentinensis) are included in the Acaulospora genus [37,48], two types of spore formation, acaulosporoid and entrophosporoid, with one or two scars, respectively, should be considered as diagnostic characteristics of the genus.
Concerning the spore walls, as mentioned above, most Acaulospora species present three walls, with a Melzer reaction and a “beaded” layer, with few exceptions, as is the case with A. colliculosa, for which the inner wall is smooth, not beaded, and shows an absence of Melzer’s reagent.
The analysis of type collection for A. sporocarpia demonstrates a very distinct spore wall structure, different from the spore wall organization detected in Acaulospora species. Spores of A. sporocarpia present only two walls (vs. three in Acaulospora) and the inner wall is hyaline to light yellow, with laminated layers. Therefore, our findings suggest that A. sporocarpia does not belong to the Acaulospora clade, as well as A. splendida, A. gedanensis and Polonospora polonica (Acaulospora polonica, recently transferred to Polonospora genus). In all species, the spores present only two walls [37,62,64,71]. Notably, in our phylogeny, the species A. entreriana, which also presents only two walls, was grouped as an Acaulospora species. Therefore, additional phylogenetic analysis of isolates from the type location species ought to be investigated to verify this hypothesis.
Species with two spore walls, such as Archaoespora trappei, represent a very good example of species complexes with several sequences representing distinct clades of species ranking in Archaeospora [128]. Said data suggest that several isolates with similar morphology to A. trappei may represent new species in Glomeromycota, but the absence of sequences from type location isolates prevents the description of new species and makes the phylogeny ambiguous.
Acaulospora brasiliensis was originally described as Ambispora brasiliensis in Brazil [95]; however, according to the analysis of a variant Scottish isolate with similar morphology, Kruger et al. [96] transferred A. brasiliensis to Acaulospora (Diversisporales). Phylogenetic analysis of the Brazilian fungus is not available; however, its morphology does indeed resemble Ambispora species, not Acaulospora. Additional analyses of the fungus isolated in Brazil are necessary to clarify this inconsistency between the morphologies of Brazilian and Scottish isolates.
Acaulospora terricola represents another problematic case that invites further scrutiny. The available morphological description in protologue does not allow conclusions regarding its membership to Acaulospora [92]. Unlike other Acaulospora species with molecular data available, A. terricola presents ornamentation in the inner layer of its spore wall. The closest morphological species is A. endographis, which, similar to other Acaulospora species, has three walls and beaded layers, and, as ornamentations, the inner layer of outer wall of spore wall presents dense spine projections. However, A. terricola presents a much more complex structure, with 10 layers in the spore wall, while A. endographis presents only four.
Acaulospora walkeri, in addition, requires elucidation regarding its spore wall structure. Originally, the fungus was described with only four layers distributed in two walls, but the pictures presented in protologue suggest three walls [94].
Taking all these exceptions into account, we can rule out any morphological characteristic, to date, as being a real apomorphy of the Acaulospora genus. The molecular markers appear to present a better resolution. Our analyses showed a robust resolution for the monophyly of this genus, because, as stated previously, a few sparse cases in our analyses remained polyphyletic.
Poor-quality or insufficiently annotated sequences in GenBank may present another problem that would corroborate the occurrence of polyphyletic species in phylogenies. By applying a similarity cut-off of 98% for all downloaded sequences, we concluded that some may present entirely different nucleotides for the SSU and LSU regions. Indeed, in our first phylogenies, these sequences did not group even within the Acaulospora genus (data not shown). We call them “contaminating sequences”, as they completely altered our alignment. The access number of these sequences in GenBank are as follows: Z14006.1, NG_062371.1, HE610427.1, Y17633.2, AJ306439.1, FJ009670.1, NG_062381.1, Z14005.1, corresponding to the species A. colombiana, A. cavernata, A. lacunosa, A. laevis, A. longula, A. mellea, A. spinosa and A. rugosa, respectively. It is possible that they are sequences from other genera of Glomeromycota that have mistakenly been identified as Acaulospora.
Therefore, the aforementioned discrepancies warrant further investigation when studying Acaulospora species. Despite the high phylogenetic support of the genus, the resolution of some species relationships is still a challenge, perhaps due to factors such as cryptic speciation, phenotypic plasticity and genetic homoplasic polymorphism. To solve this enigma, more genes, such as RPB1, Alfa tubulin and Beta tubulin, should be sequenced and used in a multi-locus approach.
6. Conclusions
Acaulospora species are found in 61 countries around the world, foremost in temperate and tropical zones with the greatest record of diversity of this genus. Brazil is the country with the highest recorded diversity (43/60), showcasing a great potential for describing new species of Acaulospora and other AMF.
For the Acaulospora genus, the nrDNA tree containing SSU, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 and LSU gene sequences proved to be superior as compared to the concatenated analysis and the ITS-only tree, due to the lowest number of polyphyletic species found in this phylogeny. This polyphylism may be due to the occurrence of morphospecies or the poorly annotated sequences in the databases.
The phylogenetic trees revealed the homoplasic nature of the spore wall ornamentation in Acaulospora genus, indicating that it ought not to be used as a phylogenetic marker. We supported the inclusion of Kuklospora species as belonging to Acaulospora, using a robust phylogenetic analysis of the nrDNA region. Further molecular analysis is required to clarify the position and phylogenetic relationship of K. spinosa.
Lastly, we emphasize the importance of genome sequencing of more AMF species, as well as the sequencing of other markers for robust multi-locus phylogenies and, therefore, a better understanding of the evolution of these fungi as a starting point for clarifying the possible ecological meanings of morphological convergences, such as the ornamentation found among the species from the Acaulospora genus studied here.
The first draft of the manuscript and conceptualization of the article: K.J.G.d.S. Resources and revision: K.J.G.d.S. and L.B.A.L. Phylogenetic analyses: K.J.G.d.S., J.A.L.F. and F.M. Morphological analyses: K.J.G.d.S. and B.T.G. Tables and figures: K.J.G.d.S., J.A.L.F. and L.B.A.L. Comments, revision and editing of previous versions of the manuscript: F.M., B.T.G. and R.C.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
The databases consulted were NCBI (
We acknowledge the contribution of D.C. Dore with respect to the English grammar of this manuscript and we also thank the Postgraduate Program in Systematics and Evolution.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Spore wall ornamentations in Acaulospora species. (A) Smooth outer layer in A. morrowiae. (B) Cerebriform ornamentation in A. rhemii. (C) Spinose ornamentation in A. tuberculata. (D) Double ornamentation in A. elegans. (E) Spinose projection of the inner layers in A. endographis. (F) Denticulate (teeth) ornamentation in A. denticulata. (G) Dense irregular pits in A. herrerae. (H) Pits in the A. foveata. (I) Double ornamentation in A. bireticulata. Scale bars in (A,C,D,G–I) represent 10 µm. Scale bars in (B,E,F) represent 5 µm.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Global distribution of Acaulospora species. The numbers indicate the total Acaulospora species in the ten countries with the highest occurrence rates.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree of Acaulospora species using nrDNA sequences (partial SSU, ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2 and partial LSU). The alignment was performed and contained twenty-nine Acaulospora species and two Sacculospora species as outgroups. The support values are Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML), respectively, with values equal to or higher than 0.95 for BI and 70 for ML considered significant. Sacculospora baltica and Sacculospora felinovii were included as outgroups. Blue—smooth spores; Green—projection-shaped ornamentation; Red—depression-shaped ornamentation; Grey—outgroup.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree using complete ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences from thirty-five Acaulospora species and two Sacculospora species as outgroups. The support values are Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML), respectively, with values ≥0.95 for BI and ≥70 for ML considered significant.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree using all available nrDNA sequences (partial SSU, ITS, partial LSU, SSU-ITS-LSU) in a concatenated analysis. Forty-three Acaulospora species were included, along with Sacculospora baltica and Sacculospora felinovii, as outgroups. The support values are Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML), respectively, with values ≥0.95 for BI and ≥70 for ML considered significant.
Morphologically analyzed species and their reference numbers.
| Species | Reference Number |
|---|---|
| Acaulospora alpina | UFRN-Fungos 3408 |
| Acaulospora ignota | UFRN-Fungos 3409 |
| Acaulospora denticulata | UFRN-Fungos 3410 |
| Acaulospora excavata | UFRN-Fungos 3411 |
| Acaulospora elegans | UFRN-Fungos 3412 |
| Acaulospora foveata | UFRN-Fungos 3413 |
| Acaulospora herrerae | UFRN-Fungos 3414 |
| Acaulospora laevis | UFRN-Fungos 3415 |
| Acaulospora lacunosa | UFRN-Fungos 3416 |
| Acaulospora mellea | UFRN-Fungos 3417 |
| Acaulospora morrowiae | UFRN-Fungos 3418 |
| Acaulospora reducta | UFRN-Fungos 3419 |
| Acaulospora rugosa | UFRN-Fungos 3420 |
| Acaulospora scrobiculata | UFRN-Fungos 3421 |
| Acaulospora spinosa | UFRN-Fungos 3422 |
| Acaulospora spinosissima | UFRN-Fungos 2965 |
| Acaulospora sporocarpia | OSC, Oregon, 47836 1 |
| Acaulospora tuberculata | UFRN-Fungos 3423 |
1 Isotype.
Description and classification of ornaments of the Acaulospora species.
| Species | Ornate | Type | Shape | Original Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acaulospora alpina | Yes | Depressions | Pits | regular conical pits |
| Acaulospora aspera | Yes | Depressions | Pits | irregular depressions |
| Acaulospora baetica | Yes | Depressions | Pits | pitted |
| Acaulospora bireticulata | Yes | Double depressions | Depressed with central stratum | polygonal reticulum depressed central stratum; ridges occasionally branched forming irregular isolated projections |
| Acaulospora brasiliensis | Yes | Projections | Pustules | convex pustules irregular shape and size |
| Acaulospora capsicula | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora cavernata | Yes | Depressions | Pits | evenly pitted deep depressions separated by ridges |
| Acaulospora colliculosa | Yes | Projections | Protuberances | protuberances |
| Acaulospora colombiana | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora colossica | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora delicata | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora denticulata | Yes | Projections | Teeth | tooth-shaped projections circular or oblong |
| Acaulospora dilatata | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora endographis | Yes | Projections | Spines | irregular spines |
| Acaulospora elegans | Yes | Projections | Spines | ornamented with crowded densely organized spines |
| Acaulospora entreriana | Yes | Projections | Teeth | ornamented with teeth |
| Acaulospora excavata | Yes | Depressions | Pits | concave round pits |
| Acaulospora fanjing | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora flava | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora flavopapillosa | Yes | Projections | Papillae | fine papillae |
| Acaulospora foveata | Yes | Depressions | Pits | round to oblong and concave depressions |
| Acaulospora fragilissima | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora gedanensis | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora herrerae | Yes | Depressions | Pits | rounded to elliptical pits some pits vermiform or regulate |
| Acaulospora ignota | Yes | Projections | Excrescences | granular excrescences |
| Acaulospora kentinensis | Yes | Depressions | Pits | pits circular to subcircular deep when observed in cross view |
| Acaulospora koreana | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora koskei | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora lacunosa | Yes | Depressions | Pits | irregularly distributed irregular saucer-shaped pits |
| Acaulospora laevis | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora longula | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora mellea | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora minuta | Yes | Depressions | Pits | minute pit-like depressions |
| Acaulospora morrowiae | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora nivalis | Yes | Depressions | Pits | irregular pits |
| Acaulospora papillosa | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora paulinae | Yes | Depressions | Pits | concave round pits of widest diameter |
| Acaulospora punctata | Yes | Depressions | Pits | regular round pits |
| Acaulospora pustulata | Yes | Projections | Blister | pustulate projections |
| Acaulospora reducta | Yes | Depressions | Pits | irregularly-shaped small pits sometimes dumbbell-shaped pits |
| Acaulospora rehmii | Yes | Projections | Cerebriform | cerebriform folds |
| Acaulospora rugosa | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora saccata | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora scrobiculata | Yes | Depressions | Pits | ornamented with evenly distributed pits, circular ellipsoidal oblong triangular Y-shaped to irregular |
| Acaulospora sieverdingii | Yes | Depressions | Pits | irregular pits |
| Acaulospora soloidea | Yes | Projections | Bristle | ornamented with numerous acellular fibrillose hairy outgrowths forming a pile or thick coat |
| Acaulospora spinosa | Yes | Projections | Spines | densely organized spines |
| Acaulospora spinosissima | Yes | Projections | Spines | short spiny projections |
| Acaulospora spinulifera | Yes | Projections | Spines | fine spines |
| Acaulospora splendida | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora sporocarpia | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora taiwania | Yes | Depressions | Pits | side pits ridges form mesh |
| Acaulospora tsugae | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora terricola | Yes | Depressions | Pits | minutely pitted |
| Acaulospora tortuosa | Yes | Projections | Excrescences | tortuous hyphae-like structures on the surface |
| Acaulospora thomii | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora tuberculata | Yes | Projections | Spines/Tubercles | ornamented with evenly spines or tubercles |
| Acaulospora viridis | No | --- | --- | --- |
| Acaulospora verna | Yes | Depressions | Pits | ornamented with evenly distributed pits, circular to subcircular frequently ellipsoidal to oblong sometimes irregular |
| Acaulospora walkeri | Yes | Projections | Excrescences | finely ornamented |
| Kuklospora spinosa | Yes | Projections | Spines | fine spines |
Overview of the species transferred from Acaulospora to other genera.
| Original Name | Description | Current Name | Description | Authors |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≡Acaulospora appendicula | 1984 | Ambispora appendicula | 2008 | (Spain, Sieverd. & N.C. Schenck) C. Walker |
| ≡Acaulospora gerdemannii | 1979 | Ambispora jimgerdemannii | 2008 | (Spain, Oehl & Sieverd.) C. Walker |
| ≡Acaulospora myriocarpa | 1986 | Archaeospora myriocarpa | 2011 | (Spain, Sieverd. & N.C. Schenck) Oehl, G.A. Silva, B.T. Goto & Sieverd. |
| ≡Acaulospora nicolsonii | 1984 | Ambispora nicolsonii | 2012 | (C. Walker, L.E. Reed & F.E. Sanders) Oehl, G.A. Silva, B.T. Goto & Sieverd. |
| ≡Acaulospora trappei | 1976 | Archaeospora trappei | 2001 | (R.N. Ames & Linderman) J.B. Morton & D. Redecker |
| ≡Acaulospora undulata | 1988 | Archaeospora undulata | 2011 | (Sieverd.) Sieverd., G.A. Silva, B.T. Goto & Oehl |
| ≡Ambispora brasiliensis | 2008 | Acaulospora brasiliensis | 2011 | (B.T. Goto, L.C. Maia & Oehl) C. Walker, Krüger & Schüßler |
| ≡Acaulospora polonica | 1988 | Polonospora polonica | 2021 | (Błaszk.) Błaszk., Niezgoda, |
Global distribution of Acaulospora species and sequences available in online databases. (Available in: NCBI, EMBL, GBIF, BLOYD SYSTEMS, MaarJAM, MYCOBANK).
| N° | AMF Species | Occurrence | Sequence | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Acaulospora alpina Oehl, Sýkorová & Sieverd. | England, Switzerland, India, Brazil | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 2 | Acaulospora aspera Corazon-Guivin, Oehl & G.A. Silva | Peru | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 3 | Acaulospora baetica Palenz., Oehl, Azcón-Aguilar & G.A. Silva. | Spain, Brazil | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 4 | Acaulospora bireticulata F.M. Rothwell & Trappe | Brazil, Argentina, England, South Korea, Poland, Egypt, India, United States, China, Italy | --- | [ |
| 5 | Acaulospora brasiliensis (B.T. Goto, L.C. Maia & Oehl) C. Walker, Krüger & Schüßler | Brazil, Scotland, Argentina, South Korea | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 6 | Acaulospora capsicula Błaszk. | Australia, England, Poland, China, Brazil, Egypt, India, United States, Switzerland | --- | [ |
| 7 | Acaulospora cavernata Błaszk. | Poland, Brazil, Benin, China, Switzerland | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 8 | Acaulospora colliculosa Kaonongbua, J.B. Morton & Bever | United States, England | LSU | [ |
| 9 | Acaulospora colombiana (Spain & N.C. Schenck) Kaonongbua, J.B. Morton & Bever | Colombia, Brazil, India, Philippines, Benin, Germany, Switzerland | SSU-ITS-LSU; ORF1 gene cox1; Beta Tubulin; gene CHS | [ |
| 10 | Acaulospora colossica P.A. Schultz, Bever & J.B. Morton | United States, Brazil | SSU 1-ITS | [ |
| 11 | Acaulospora delicata C. Walker, |
Australia, Argentina, Brazil, China, United States, Spain, Philippines, Indonesia, Mexico, England, Senegal, Venezuela, Poland, India, Iceland | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 12 | Acaulospora denticulata Sieverd. & S. Toro | Argentina, Colombia, Mexico, Brazil, South Korea, South Africa, China, India, Canada, Kenya | ITS | [ |
| 13 | Acaulospora dilatata J.B. Morton | Argentina, United States, New Zealand, South Atlantic, Venezuela, Brazil, India | SSU; LSU; Beta tubulin | [ |
| 14 | Acaulospora endographis B.T. Goto | Brazil | --- | [ |
| 15 | Acaulospora elegans Trappe & Gerd. | United States, Indonesia, Poland, Brazil, South Korea, Argentina, India, South Africa, Switzerland | LSU | [ |
| 16 | Acaulospora entreriana M.S. Velázquez & Cabello | Argentina, Brazil | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 17 | Acaulospora excavata Ingleby & C. Walker | Australia, Argentina, Ivory Coast, Spain, New Zealand, Trinidad and Tobago, Brazil | ITS | [ |
| 18 | Acaulospora fanjing R.J. He, L.M. Yao & L. Jiang | China | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 19 | Acaulospora flava Corazon-Guivin, G.A. Silva & Oehl | Peru | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 20 | Acaulospora flavopapillosa Corazon-Guivin, G.A. Silva & Oehl | Peru | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 21 | Acaulospora foveata Trappe & Janos | Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica, Mexico, England, Congo, Poland, Panama, Indonesia, South Korea, Argentina, India | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 22 | Acaulospora fragilissima D. Redecker, Crossay & Cilia | New Caledonia, Peru | SSU-ITS-LSU; Beta tubulin; ORF1 gene cox1 | [ |
| 23 | Acaulospora gedanensis Błaszk. | Poland, Brazil, Austria, Switzerland | --- | [ |
| 24 | Acaulospora herrerae Furrazola, B.T. Goto, G.A. Silva, Sieverd. & Oehl | Brazil, Cuba, Peru | LSU | [ |
| 25 | Acaulospora ignota Błaszk., Góralska, Chwat & B.T. Goto | Brazil | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 26 | Acaulospora kentinensis (Wu & Liu) Oehl & Sieverd. | Taiwan, Brazil, Benin | SSU-ITS-LSU; ORF1 gene cox1; Beta Tubulin | [ |
| 27 | Acaulospora koreana E. H. Lee, S. H. Park & A. H | North Korea | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 28 | Acaulospora koskei Błaszk. | Australia, Spain, Poland, Brazil, Estonia, Egypt, India, Cameroon, England | SSU-ITS-LSU; Beta tubulin | [ |
| 29 | Acaulospora lacunosa J.B. Morton | Argentina, United States, New Zealand, Venezuela, Brazil, Poland, Denmark, India, Kenya, China | SSU-ITS-LSU; Beta tubulin; HSP60 gene | [ |
| 30 | Acaulospora laevis Gerd. & Trappe | Australia, Argentina, China, Ecuador, United States, New Zealand, England, Brazil, South Korea, Egypt, India, Mexico, Iceland, France, Germany, Greece, Benin, Switzerland, Israel, South Africa | SSU-ITS-LSU; Beta tubulin; RPB1; mRNA gene Ste12; Alfa tubulin;ef1 Alpha | [ |
| 31 | Acaulospora longula Spain & N.C. Schenck | Australia, Germany, Brazil, Colombia, Spain, Philippines, Japan, Indonesia, England, Uganda, Venezuela, South Korea, India, Switzerland | SSU; LSU; RPB1 | [ |
| 32 | Acaulospora mellea Spain & N.C. Schenck | Germany, Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, China, United States, Mexico, Poland, India, Canada, Denmark, Benin, Cameroon, Switzerland | SSU-ITS-LSU; Beta tubulin; ORF1 gene cox1 | [ |
| 33 | Acaulospora minuta Oehl, Tchabi, Hount., Palenz., I.C. Sánchez & G.A. Silva | Benin, Brazil | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 34 | Acaulospora morrowiae Spain &N.C. Schenck | Colombia, United States, Mexico, Brazil, Poland, South Korea, Namibia, India, Niger, Mali, France, Germany, Switzerland, Benin, Cameroon, China | SSU; LSU; SSU-ITS; ITS-LSU 1; Beta tubulin; glomalin cDNA; HSP60 gene | [ |
| 35 | Acaulospora nivalis Oehl, Palenz., I.C. Sánchez, G.A. Silva & Sieverd. | Switzerland, Brazil | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 36 | Acaulospora papillosa C.M.R. Pereira & Oehl | Brazil, Norway | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 37 | Acaulospora paulinae Błaszk. | Brazil, Poland, United States, India, Germany, France, Switzerland, Israel | ITS2-LSU; SSU-ITS1; SSU-ITS | [ |
| 38 | Acaulospora punctata Oehl, Palenz., I.C. Sánchez, G.A. Silva, C. Castillo & Sieverd. | Brazil, Switzerland, Chile | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 39 | Acaulospora pustulata Palenz., Oehl, Azcon-Aguilar & G.A. Silva | Spain, Switzerland | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 40 | Acaulospora reducta Oehl, B.T. Goto & C.M.R. Pereira | Brazil | SSU 1-ITS-LSU 1 | [ |
| 41 | Acaulospora rehmii Sieverd. & S. Toro | Brazil, Mexico, South Korea, Argentina, Poland, Colombia, Taiwan, Egypt, India, China | --- | [ |
| 42 | Acaulospora rugosa J.B. Morton | Brazil, United States, South Korea, Poland, India, Iran | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 43 | Acaulospora saccata D. Redecker, Crossay & Cilia | New Caledonia | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 44 | Acaulospora scrobiculata Trappe | Brazil, England, Mexico, Australia, Indonesia, Trinidad and Tobago, Spain, Argentina, Venezuela, United States, Thailand, Japan, Philippines, Poland, Canada, Israel, Greece, Italy, Cameroon, China, Taiwan, South Korea, India, Benin, Finland, Kenya, Switzerland, Nepal | SSU-ITS-LSU; Beta tubulin; gene CHS | [ |
| 45 | Acaulospora sieverdingii Oehl, Sýkorová & Błaszk. | Brazil, Germany, Poland, Italy, Northern Guinea, Southern Guinea, Benin, France, Sudan, Switzerland | ITS | [ |
| 46 | Acaulosporasoloidea Vaingankar & B.F. Rodrigues | India, Egypt | --- | [ |
| 47 | Acaulospora spinosa C. Walker & Trappe | United States, Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, South Korea, Ecuador, China, India, Canada, Venezuela, Colombia, Benin, Cameroon, Kenya, South Africa, Switzerland, Nepal | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 48 | Acaulospora spinosissima Oehl, Palenz., Sánchez-Castro, Tchabi, Hount. & G. A. Silva | Sudan, South Africa, Northern Guinea, Southern Guinea, Switzerland, Benin, Brazil | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 49 | Acaulospora spinulifera Oehl, V.M. Santos, J.S. Pontes & G.A. Silva | Brazil | LSU | [ |
| 50 | Acaulospora splendida Sieverd., |
Costa Rica, India, Mexico, Egypt, Brazil | --- | [ |
| 51 | Acaulospora sporocarpia S.M. Berch | England, Switzerland, United States, Pakistan, Egypt, India, Brazil | --- | [ |
| 52 | Acaulospora taiwania H.T. Hu | Taiwan | --- | [ |
| 53 | Acaulospora tsugae T.C.Lin & Oehl | Taiwan, Switzerland | SSU 1-ITS-LSU 1 | [ |
| 54 | Acaulospora terricola Swarupa, Kunwar & Manohar | India | --- | [ |
| 55 | Acaulospora tortuosa Palenz., Oehl, Azcon-Aguilar & G.A.Silva | Spain, Switzerland | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 56 | Acaulospora thomii Błaszk. | Poland, Egypt, India, Switzerland | --- | [ |
| 57 | Acaulospora tuberculata Janos & Trappe | Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Costa Rica, Panama, China, Egypt, India | LSU | [ |
| 58 | Acaulospora viridis Palenz., Oehl, Azcón-Aguilar & G.A.Silva | Spain | SSU-ITS-LSU | [ |
| 59 | Acaulospora verna Błaszk. | Poland | --- | [ |
| 60 | Acaulospora walker Kramad. & Hedger | Australia, Indonesia, Brazil | --- | [ |
| Kuklospora spinosa B.P. Cai, Jun Y. Chen, Q.X. Zhang & L.D. Guo | China | --- | [ |
1 Short sequences with less than 50 bp.
Sequences used in phylogenetic analyses.
| Access Number Sequence | Concatenated Analysis | SSU-ITS-LSU | ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| KX355819_Sacculospora_baltica | x | x | x |
| KX355818_Sacculospora_baltica | x | x | x |
| KX355821_Sacculospora_baltica | x | x | x |
| KX345938_Sacculospora_felinovii | x | x | x |
| KX345939_Sacculospora_felinovii | x | x | x |
| KX345941_Sacculospora_felinovii | x | x | x |
| FR681927_Acaulospora_alpina | x | x | x |
| FR681928_Acaulospora_alpina | x | x | x |
| FR681930_Acaulospora_alpina | x | x | x |
| MN080998_Acaulospora_aspera | x | x | x |
| MN081001_Acaulospora_aspera | x | x | x |
| MN080999_Acaulospora_aspera | x | x | x |
| LN810999_Acaulospora_baetica | x | x | x |
| LN811001_Acaulospora_baetica | x | x | x |
| LN811002_Acaulospora_baetica | x | x | x |
| FN825910_Acaulospora_brasiliensis | x | x | x |
| FR681934_Acaulospora_brasiliensis | x | x | x |
| FR681933_Acaulospora_brasiliensis | x | x | x |
| FM876789_Acaulospora_cavernata | x | x | x |
| FM876790_Acaulospora_cavernata | x | x | x |
| FM876788_Acaulospora_cavernata | x | x | x |
| AF133764_Acaulospora_colossica | x | x | x |
| AF133768_Acaulospora_colossica | x | x | x |
| AF133776_Acaulospora_colossica | x | x | x |
| GU326339_Acaulospora_colliculosa | x | ||
| GU326346_Acaulospora_colliculosa | x | ||
| GU326352_Acaulospora_colliculosa | x | ||
| FR750063_Acaulospora_colombiana | x | x | x |
| FJ461804_Acaulospora_colombiana | x | ||
| KX168435_Acaulospora_colombiana | x | ||
| JF439093_Acaulospora_delicata | x | x | x |
| JF439203_Acaulospora_delicata | x | x | x |
| MT832212_Acaulospora_dilatata | x | ||
| FJ461792_Acaulospora_dilatata | x | ||
| AJ239115_Acaulospora_denticulata | x | x | |
| MT112118_Acaulospora_denticulata | x | x | |
| FR750173_Acaulospora_entreriana | x | x | x |
| FR750171_Acaulospora_entreriana | x | x | x |
| FR750169_Acaulospora_entreriana | x | x | x |
| KM057069_Acaulospora_excavata | x | x | |
| KM057074_Acaulospora_excavata | x | x | |
| KM057076_Acaulospora_excavata | x | x | |
| KY362433_Acaulospora_fragilissima | x | x | x |
| KY362432_Acaulospora_fragilissima | x | x | x |
| KY362431_Acaulospora_fragilissima | x | x | x |
| LN736022_Acaulospora_foveata | x | x | x |
| LN736026_Acaulospora_foveata | x | x | x |
| LN736025_Acaulospora_foveata | x | ||
| JX135571_Acaulospora_herrerae | x | ||
| JX135569_Acaulospora_herrerae | x | ||
| JX135573_Acaulospora_herrerae | x | ||
| KP191468_Acaulospora_ignota | x | x | x |
| KP191471_Acaulospora_ignota | x | x | x |
| KP191472_Acaulospora_ignota | x | x | x |
| FM876830_Acaulospora_kentinensis | x | x | x |
| FM876822_Acaulospora_kentinensis | x | x | x |
| FN547520_Acaulospora_kentinensis | x | x | x |
| KP191475_Acaulospora_koskei | x | x | x |
| KP191474_Acaulospora_koskei | x | x | x |
| KP191476_Acaulospora_koskei | x | x | x |
| KY565428_Acaulospora_koreana | x | x | x |
| KY565427_Acaulospora_koreana | x | x | x |
| KY565429_Acaulospora_koreana | x | x | x |
| KP756438_Acaulospora_laevis | x | x | x |
| KP756447_Acaulospora_laevis | x | x | x |
| FN547512_Acaulospora_laevis | x | x | x |
| KP756427_Acaulospora_lacunosa | x | x | x |
| KP756435_Acaulospora_lacunosa | x | x | x |
| KP756584_Acaulospora_lacunosa | x | x | x |
| AM040291_Acaulospora_longula | x | ||
| AM040292_Acaulospora_longula | x | ||
| AJ510228_Acaulospora_longula | x | ||
| AF389007_Acaulospora_longula | x | ||
| KP756453_Acaulospora_mellea | x | x | x |
| KP756456_Acaulospora_mellea | x | x | x |
| KP756471_Acaulospora_mellea | x | x | x |
| FR869691_Acaulospora_minuta | x | x | x |
| FR821675_Acaulospora_minuta | x | x | x |
| FR821674_Acaulospora_minuta | x | x | x |
| AJ242500_Acaulospora_morrowiae | x | x | |
| HE603641_Acaulospora_nivalis | x | x | x |
| HE603643_Acaulospora_nivalis | x | x | x |
| HE603644_Acaulospora_nivalis | x | x | x |
| AJ891120_Acaulospora_paulinae | x | x | |
| AJ891119_Acaulospora_paulinae | x | x | |
| AY639265_Acaulospora_paulinae | x | x | |
| LN884304_Acaulospora_papillosa | x | x | x |
| LN884303_Acaulospora_papillosa | x | x | x |
| LN884302_Acaulospora_papillosa | x | x | x |
| FR846382_Acaulospora_punctata | x | x | x |
| FR846384_Acaulospora_punctata | x | x | x |
| FR846385_Acaulospora_punctata | x | x | x |
| HF567941_Acaulospora_pustulata | x | x | x |
| HF567939_Acaulospora_pustulata | x | x | x |
| HF567938_Acaulospora_pustulata | x | x | x |
| KM057064_Acaulospora_reducta | x | x | |
| KM057066_Acaulospora_reducta | x | x | |
| KM057063_Acaulospora_reducta | x | x | |
| LN881566_Acaulospora_rugosa | x | x | x |
| LN881565_Acaulospora_rugosa | x | x | x |
| LN881564_Acaulospora_rugosa | x | x | x |
| KY362428_Acaulospora_saccata | x | x | x |
| KY362430_Acaulospora_saccata | x | x | x |
| KY362429_Acaulospora_saccata | x | x | x |
| FR692352_Acaulospora_scrobiculata | x | x | x |
| FR692354_Acaulospora_scrobiculata | x | x | x |
| FR692350_Acaulospora_scrobiculata | x | x | x |
| AM076384_Acaulospora_sieverdingii | x | x | |
| AM076382_Acaulospora_sieverdingii | x | x | |
| FR750153_Acaulospora_spinosa | x | x | x |
| FR750156_Acaulospora_spinosa | x | x | x |
| FR750152_Acaulospora_spinosa | x | x | x |
| HG422734_Acaulospora_spinosissima | x | x | x |
| HG422733_Acaulospora_spinosissima | x | x | x |
| HG422732_Acaulospora_spinosissima | x | x | x |
| KY413817_Acaulospora_spinulifera | x | ||
| KY413815_Acaulospora_spinulifera | x | ||
| KY413814_Acaulospora_spinulifera | x | ||
| HF567933_Acaulospora_tortuosa | x | x | x |
| HF567937_Acaulospora_tortuosa | x | x | x |
| HF567936_Acaulospora_tortuosa | x | x | x |
| MH045497_Acaulospora_tsugae | x | x | |
| MH045498_Acaulospora_tsugae | x | x | |
| MH333280_Acaulospora_tsugae | x | x | |
| AF378440_Acaulospora_tuberculata | x | ||
| FJ461799_Acaulospora_tuberculata | x | x | x |
| MT832207_Acaulospora_tuberculata | x | x | x |
| HG421736_Acaulospora_viridis | x | x | x |
| HG421738_Acaulospora_viridis | x | x | x |
| HG421737_Acaulospora_viridis | x | x | x |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Schüßler, A.; Schwarzott, D.; Walker, C. A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: Phylogeny and evolution. Mycol. Res.; 2001; 105, pp. 1413-1421. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953756201005196]
2. Tedersoo, L.; Sánchez-Ramírez, S.; Kõljalg, U.; Bahram, M.; Döring, M.; Schigel, D.; May, T.; Ryberg, M.; Abarenkov, K. High-level classification of the Fungi and a tool for evolutionary ecological analyses. Fungal Divers.; 2018; 90, pp. 135-159. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0401-0]
3. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Hyde, K.D.; Al-Ani, L.K.T.; Tedersoo, L.; Haelewaters, D.; Rajeshkumar, K.C.; Zhao, R.L.; Aptroot, A.; Leontyev, D.V.; Saxena, R.K. et al. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere; 2020; 11, pp. 1060-1456. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8]
4. Smith, S.E.; Read, D. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; 3rd ed. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008; 787.Available online: https://www.elsevier.com/books/mycorrhizal-symbiosis/smith/978-0-12-370526-6 (accessed on 10 January 2020).
5. Baar, J.; Paradi, I.; Lucassen, E.C.; Hudson-Edwards, K.A.; Redecker, D.; Roelofs, J.G.M.; Smolders, A.J.P. Molecular analysis of AMF diversity in aquatic macrophytes: A comparison of oligotrophic and utra-oligotrophic lakes. Aquat. Bot.; 2011; 94, pp. 53-61. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.09.006]
6. Queiroz, M.B.; Gomes, S.R.B.S.; Vista, X.M.; Leroy, J.A.S.; Goto, B.T. Conhecimento, Conservação e Uso de Fungos; Oliveira, L.A.; Jesus, M.A.; Matsuura, A.B.J.; Oliveira, J.G.S.; Gasparotto, L.; Lima-Neto, R.G.; Rocha, L.C. Editora INPA: Manaus, Brazilm, 2019; Available online: https://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/1118871 (accessed on 10 January 2020).
7. Tedersoo, L.; Bahram, M.; Zobel, M. How mycorrhizal associations drive plant population and community biology. Science; 2020; 367, 6480. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aba1223]
8. Kivlin, N.S.; Hawkes, C.V.; Treseder, K.K. Global diversity and distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Soil Biol. Biochem.; 2011; 43, pp. 2294-2303. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.07.012]
9. Trejo, D.; Barois, I.; Sangabriel-Conde, W. Disturbance and land use effect on functional diversity of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Agrofor. Syst.; 2016; 90, pp. 265-279. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9852-4]
10. Oehl, F.; Laczko, E.; Oberholzer, H.-R.; Jansa, J.; Egli, S. Diversity and biogeography of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agricultural soils. Biol. Fertil. Soils; 2017; 53, pp. 777-797. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00374-017-1217-x]
11. Davison, J.; Moora, M.; Jairus, T.; Vasar, M.; Öpik, M.; Zobel, M. Hierarchical assembly rules in arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal communities. Soil Biol. Biochem.; 2016; 97, pp. 63-70. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.03.003]
12. Maia, L.C.; Passos, J.H.; Silva, J.A.; Oehl, F.; Assis, D.M.A. Species diversity of Glomeromycota in Brazilian biomes. Sydowia; 2020; 72, pp. 181-205. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12905/0380.sydowia72-2020-0181]
13. Vieira, L.C.; Silva, D.K.A.; Escobar, I.E.C.; Silva, J.M.; Moura, I.A.; Oehl, F.; Silva, G.A. Changes in an Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Community Along an Environmental Gradient. Plants; 2020; 9, 52. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants9010052] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31906323]
14. Davison, J.; Moora, M.; Öpik, M.; Adholeya, A.; Ainsaar, L.; Bâ, A.; Burla, S.; Diedhiou, A.G.; Hiiesalu, I.; Jairus, T. et al. Global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism. Science; 2015; 349, pp. 970-973. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1161] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26315436]
15. Stürmer, S.L.; Bever, J.D.; Morton, J.B. Biogeography of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota): A phylogenetic perspective on species distribution patterns. Mycorrhiza; 2018; 28, pp. 587-603. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00572-018-0864-6]
16. Cofré, M.N.; Soteras, F.; Iglesias, M.R.; Velázquez, S.; Abarca, C.; Risio, L.; Ontivero, E.; Cabello, M.N.; Domínguez, L.S.; Lugo, M.A. Biodiversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in South America: A review. Mycorrhizal Fungi in South America; Pagano, M.C.; Lugo, M.A. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 49-72. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15228-4_3]
17. Dotzler, N.; Walker, C.; Krings, M.; Hass, H.; Kerp, H.; Taylor, T.N.; Agerer, R. Acaulosporoid glomeromycotan spores with a germination shield from the 400-million-year-old Rhynie chert. Mycol. Prog.; 2009; 8, pp. 9-18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-008-0573-1]
18. Jobim, K.; Błaszkowski, J.; Niezgoda, P.; Kozłowska, A.; Zubek, S.; Mleczko, P.; Chachuła, P.; Ishikawa, N.K.; Goto, B.T. New sporocarpic taxa in the phylum Glomeromycota: Sclerocarpum amazonicum gen. et sp. nov. in the family Glomeraceae (Glomerales) and Diversispora sporocarpia sp. nov. in the Diversisporaceae (Diversisporales). Mycol. Prog.; 2019; 18, pp. 369-384. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-01462-2]
19. Błaszkowski, J.; Jobim, K.; Niezgoda, P.; Meller, E.; Malinowski, R.; Milczarski, P.; Zubek, S.; Magurno, F.; Casieri, L.; Bierza, W. et al. New Glomeromycotan Taxa, Dominikia glomerocarpica sp. nov. and Epigeocarpum crypticum gen. nov. et sp. nov. From Brazil, and Silvaspora gen. nov. From New Caledonia. Front. Microbiol.; 2021; 12, [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.655910] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33967994]
20. Lee, E.-H.; Eo, J.-K.; Ka, K.-H.; Eom, A.-H. Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Their Roles in Ecosystems. Mycobiology; 2013; 41, pp. 121-125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2013.41.3.121]
21. Oehl, F.; Sieverding, E.; Palenzuela, J.; Ineichen, K.; Silva, G.A. Advances in Glomeromycota taxonomy and classification. IMA Fungus; 2011; 2, pp. 191-199. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5598/imafungus.2011.02.02.10]
22. Choia, J.J.; Kim, S.-H. A genome Tree of Life for the Fungi kingdom. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2017; 114, pp. 9391-9396. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711939114]
23. De Souza, F.A.; da Silva, I.R.; Barreto, M.B.B.D.B.; Oehl, F.; Goto, B.T.; Maia, L.C. Racocetra crispa (Glomeromycotina) delimited by integrative evidence based on morphology, long continuous nuclear rDNA sequencing and phylogeny. Mycol. Prog.; 2018; 17, pp. 999-1011. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1410-9]
24. Błaszkowski, J.; Niezgoda, P.; de Paiva, J.N.; da Silva, K.J.G.; Theodoro, R.C.; Jobim, K.; Orfanoudakis, M.; Goto, B.T. Sieverdingia gen. nov., S. tortuosa comb. nov., and Diversispora peloponnesiaca sp. nov. in the Diversisporaceae (Glomeromycota). Mycol. Prog.; 2019; 18, pp. 1363-1382. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-019-01534-x]
25. Błaszkowski, J.; Niezgoda, P.; Zubek, S.; Meller, E.; Milczarski, P.; Malicka, M.; Goto, B.T.; Woźniak, G.; Moreira, H.; Magurno, F. Dominikia bonfanteae and Glomus atlanticum, two new species in the Glomeraceae (phylum Glomeromycota) with molecular phylogenies reconstructed from two unlinked loci. Mycol. Prog.; 2021; 20, pp. 131-148. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-020-01659-4]
26. Lücking, R.; Aime, M.C.; Robbertse, B.; Miller, A.N.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; Aoki, T.; Cardinali, G.; Crous, P.W.; Druzhinina, I.S.; Geiser, D.M. et al. Unambiguous identification of fungi: Where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding?. IMA Fungus; 2020; 11, 14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43008-020-00033-z]
27. Gerdemann, J.W.; Trappe, J.M. The Endogonaceae in the Pacific Northwest. Mycol. Mem.; 1974; 5, 76. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4102919]
28. Turrini, A.; Giovannetti, M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in national parks, nature reserves and protected areas worldwide: A strategic perspective for their in situ conservation. Mycorrhiza; 2011; 22, pp. 81-97. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00572-011-0419-6]
29. Pereira, C.M.R.; da Silva, D.K.A.; Ferreira, A.C.D.A.; Goto, B.T.; Maia, L.C. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Atlantic forest areas under different land uses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.; 2014; 185, pp. 245-252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.01.005]
30. Welemariam, M.; Kebede, F.; Bedadi, B.; Birhane, E. Effect of community-based soil and water conservation practices on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi types, spore densities, root colonization, and soil nutrients in the northern highlands of Ethiopia. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric.; 2018; 5, 9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40538-018-0121-4]
31. Yano-Melo, A.M.; Saggin, O.J.; Maia, L.C. Tolerance of mycorrhized banana (Musa sp. cv. Pacovan) plantlets to saline stress. . Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.; 2003; 95, pp. 343-348. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00044-0]
32. Tian, C.Y.; Feng, G.; Li, X.L.; Zhang, F.S. Different effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal isolates from saline or non-saline soil on salinity tolerance of plants. Appl. Soil Ecol.; 2004; 26, pp. 143-148. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2003.10.010]
33. Akib, M.A.; Mustari, K.; Kuswinanti, T.; Syaiful, S.A. The effect of application Acaulospora sp on the root growth of Canavaliaensiformis l at nickel post-mine land. Pak. J. Biotechnol.; 2018; 15, pp. 583-591. Available online: https://pjbt.org/index.php/pjbt/article/view/434 (accessed on 10 January 2020).
34. Schneider, J. Ocorrência e Ação Fitoprotetora de Fungos Micorrízicos Arbusculares em Solos Contaminados Com Arsênio; UFLA: Lavras, Brazil, 2011; 181p. Available online: http://repositorio.ufla.br/handle/1/3724 (accessed on 10 January 2020).
35. Stürmer, S.L.; Kemmelmeier, K. The Glomeromycota in the Neotropics. Front. Microbiol.; 2021; 11, 553679. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.553679] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33510711]
36. Medeiros, A.S.; Goto, B.T.; Ganade, G. Ecological restoration methods influence the structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in degraded drylands. J. Soil Ecol.; 2021; 84, 150690. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2020.150690]
37. Giovannetti, M. Janusz Błaszkowski (ed); Glomeromycota. Mycorrhiza; 2013; 23, pp. 251-252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00572-012-0470-y]
38. Walker, C. Taxonomic concepts in the Endogonaceae: Spore-wall characteristics in species descriptions. Mycotaxon; 1983; 18, pp. 443-455.
39. Goto, B.T.; Maia, L.C. Glomerospores: A new denomination for the spores of Glomeromycota, a group molecularly distinct from the Zygomycota. Mycotaxon; 2006; 96, pp. 129-132.
40. Morton, J.B.; Benny, G.L. Revised classification of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Zygomycetes): A new order Glomales and Gigasporineae and two new families Acaulosporaceae and Gigasporaceae with an emendation of Glomaceae. Mycotaxon; 1990; 37, pp. 471-491.
41. Morton, J.B.; Redecker, D. Two new families of Glomales, Archaeosporaceae and Paraglomaceae, with two new genera Archaeospora and Paraglomus, based on concordant molecular and morphological characters. Mycologia; 2001; 93, pp. 181-195. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.2001.12063147]
42. Walker, C.; Vestberg, M.; Demircik, F.; Stockinger, H.; Saito, M.; Sawaki, H.; Nishmura, I.; Schüßler, A. Molecular phylogeny and new taxa in the Archaeosporales (Glomeromycota): Ambispora fennica gen. sp. nov., Ambisporaceae fam. nov., and emendation of Archaeospora and Archaeosporaceae. Mycol. Res.; 2007; 111, pp. 137-153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mycres.2006.11.008]
43. Palenzuela, J.; Ferrol, N.; Boller, T.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Oehl, F. Otospora bareai, a new fungal species in the Glomeromycetes from a dolomitic shrub land in Sierra de Baza National Park (Granada, Spain). Mycologia; 2008; 100, pp. 296-305. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2008.11832484]
44. Oehl, F.; Sánchez-Castro, I.; Palenzuela, J.; Silva, G.A. Palaeospora spainii, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus from Swiss agricultural soils. Nova Hedwig.; 2015; 101, pp. 89-102. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2014/0229]
45. Ames, R.N.; Schneider, R.W. Entrophospora, a new genus in the Endogonaceae. Mycotaxon; 1979; 8, pp. 347-352.
46. Sieverding, E.; Oehl, F. Revision of Entrophospora and description of Kuklospora and Intraspora, two new genera in the arbuscular mycorrhizal Glomeromycetes. J. Appl. Bot.; 2006; 80, pp. 69-81.
47. Oehl, F.; Da Silva, G.A.; Sánchez-Castro, I.; Goto, B.T.; Maia, L.C.; Vieira, H.E.E.; Barea, J.M.; Sieverding, E.; Palenzuela, J. Revision of Glomeromycetes with entrophosporoid and glomoid spore formation with three new genera. Mycotaxon; 2011; 117, pp. 297-316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5248/117.297]
48. Kaonongbua, W.; Morton, J.B.; Bever, J.D. Taxonomic revision of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal genus Acaulospora Gerd. & Trappe to include Kuklospora and a description of Acaulospora colliculosa sp. nov. from field collected spores. Mycologia; 2010; 102, pp. 1497-1509. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3852/10-011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20943549]
49. Goto, B.T.; Pereira, C.M.; Nobre, C.P.; Zatorre, N.P.; Covacevich, F.; Berbara, R.L.L.; Maia, L.C. Acaulospora endographis (Glomeromycetes), a new fungus with a complex spore wall. Mycotaxon; 2013; 123, pp. 403-408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5248/123.403]
50. Wijayawardene, N.N.; Pawłowska, J.; Letcher, P.M.; Kirk, P.M.; Humber, R.A.; Schüßler, A.; Wrzosek, M.; Muszewska, A.; Okrasińska, A.; Istel, Ł. et al. Notes for genera: Basal clades of Fungi (including Aphelidiomycota, Basidiobolomycota, Blastocladiomycota, Calcarisporiellomycota, Caulochytriomycota, Chytridiomycota, Entomophthoromycota, Glomeromycota, Kickxellomycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mortierellomyc. Fungal Divers.; 2018; 92, pp. 43-129. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13225-018-0409-5]
51. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.D.; Lee, S.B.; Taylor, J.W. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA Genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols; Innis, M.A.; Gelfrand, D.H.; Sninsky, J.J.; White, T.J. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315-322. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1]
52. Oehl, F.; Sykorova, Z.; Redecker, D.; Wiemken, A. Acaulospora alpina, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species characteristic for high mountainous and alpine regions of the Swiss Alps. Mycologia; 2006; 98, pp. 286-294. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2006.11832701]
53. Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Cerna-Mendoza, A.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Silva, G.A.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora aspera, a new fungal species in the Glomeromycetes from rhizosphere soils of the inka nut (Plukenetiavolubilis L.) in Peru. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual.; 2019; 92, pp. 250-257. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2019.092.035]
54. Palenzuela, J.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Barea, J.M.; Silva, G.A.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora baetica, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species from two mountain ranges in Andalucía (Spain). Nova Hedwig.; 2015; 101, pp. 463-474. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2015/0285]
55. Rothwell, F.M.; Trappe, J.M. Acaulospora bireticulata sp.nov. Mycotaxon; 1979; 8, pp. 471-475.
56. Goto, B.T.; Maia, L.C.; Oehl, F. Ambispora brasiliensis, a new ornamented species in the arbuscular mycorrhiza forming Glomeromycetes. Mycotaxon; 2008; 105, pp. 11-18.
57. Krüger, M.; Walker, C.; Schüßler, A. Acaulospora brasiliensis comb. nov. and Acaulospora alpina (Glomeromycota) from upland Scotland: Morphology, molecular phylogeny and DNA-based detection in roots. Mycorrhiza; 2011; 21, pp. 577-587. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00572-011-0361-7] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21336507]
58. Błaszkowski, J. Polish Endogonaceae 7. Acaulospora capsicula, sp. nov. Mycologia; 1990; 82, pp. 794-798. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1990.12025965]
59. Błaszkowski, J. Acaulospora cavernata—A new species with pitted spores. Cryptogam. Bot.; 1989; 1, pp. 204-207.
60. Schultz, P.A.; Bever, J.D.; Morton, J.B. Acaulospora colossica sp. nov. from an old field in North Carolina and morphological comparisons with similar species, A. laevis and A. koskei. Mycologia; 1999; 91, pp. 676-683. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1999.12061068]
61. Walker, C.; Pfeiffer, C.M.; Bloss, H.E. Acaulospora delicata sp. nov.: An endomycorrhizal fungus from Arizona. Mycotaxon; 1986; 25, pp. 621-628.
62. Sieverding, E.; Toro, S. Acaulospora denticulata sp. nov. and Acaulospora rehmii sp. nov. (Endogonaceae) with ornamented spore walls. Angew. Bot.; 1987; 61, pp. 217-223.
63. Morton, J.B. Three new species of Acaulospora (Endogonaceae) from high aluminium, low pH soils in West Virginia. Mycologia; 1986; 78, pp. 641-648. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1986.12025300]
64. Velazquez, M.S.; Cabello, M.N.; Irrazabal, G.; Godeas, A. Acaulosparaceae from El Palmar National Park, Entre Ríos, Argentina. Mycotaxon; 2008; 103, pp. 171-187.
65. Ingleby, K.; Walker, C.; Mason, P.A. Acaulospora excavata sp. nov.—An endomycorrhizal fungus from Cote d’Ivoire. Mycotaxon; 1994; 50, pp. 99-105.
66. He, R.J.; Long, C.L.; Yao, L.M.; Jiang, L. Acaulospora fanjing (Glomeromycota), a new species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from Fanjingshan in China. Phytotaxa; 2021; 524, pp. 191-198. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.524.3.3]
67. Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Sota-Ricaldi, A.M.; Cerna-Mendoza, A.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Santos, V.M.; Silva, G.A.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora flava, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus from Coffea arabica and Plukenetia volubilis plantations at the sources of the Amazon river in Peru. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual.; 2021; 94, pp. 116-123. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2021.094.01]
68. Corazon-Guivin, M.A.; Vallejos-Tapullima, A.; Sota-Ricaldi, A.M.; Cerna-Mendoza, A.; Guerrero-Abad, J.C.; Santos, V.M.; da Silva, G.A.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora flavopapillosa, a new fungus in the Glomeromycetes from a coffee plantation in Peru, with an updated key for the identification of Acaulosporaceae species. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual.; 2022; 95, pp. 6-16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2022.095.002]
69. Janos, D.P.; Trappe, J.M. Two new Acaulospora species from tropical America. Mycotaxon; 1982; 15, pp. 515-522.
70. Crossay, T.; Cilia, A.; Cavaloc, Y.; Amir, H.; Redecker, D. Four new species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) associated with endemic plants from ultramafic soils of New Caledonia. Mycol. Prog.; 2018; 17, pp. 729-744. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-018-1386-5]
71. Błaszkowski, J. Four new species of the Endogonaceae (Zygomycotina) from Poland. Karstenia; 1988; 27, pp. 37-42. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.29203/ka.1987.252]
72. Furrazola, E.; Goto, B.T.; Silva, G.A.; Torres-Arias, Y.; Morais, T.; Lima, C.E.P.; Ferreira, A.C.A.; Maia, L.C.; Sieverding, E.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora herrerae, a new pitted species in the Glomeromycetes from Cuba and Brazil. Nova Hedwig.; 2013; 97, pp. 401-413. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2013/0128]
73. Błaszkowski, J.; Chwat, G.; Góralska, A. Acaulospora ignota and Claroideoglomus hanlinii, two new species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota) from Brazil and Cuba. Mycol. Prog.; 2015; 14, 18. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-015-1042-2]
74. Lee, E.-H.; Park, S.-E.; Eo, J.-K.; Ka, K.-H.; Eom, A.-H. Acaulospora koreana, a New Species of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (Glomeromycota) Associated with Roots of Woody Plants in Korea. Mycobiology; 2018; 46, pp. 341-348. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2018.1548805]
75. Błaszkowski, J. Acaulospora koskei, a new species in Glomales from Poland. Mycol. Res.; 1995; 99, pp. 237-240. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-7562(09)80892-7]
76. Schenck, N.C.; Spain, J.L.; Sieverding, E.; Howeler, R.H. Several new and unreported vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Endogonaceae) from Colombia. Mycologia; 1984; 76, pp. 685-699. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1984.12023899]
77. Oehl, F.; Palenzuela, J.; Sánchez-Castro, I.; Hountondji, F.; Tchabi, A.; Louis, L.; Barea, J.M.; Danny, C.; Silva, G.A. Acaulospora minuta, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species from sub-Saharan savannas of West Africa. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual.; 2011; 84, pp. 213-218.
78. Oehl, F.; Palenzuela, J.; Sánchez-Castro, I.; Kuss, P.; Sieverding, E.; Silva, G.A. Acaulospora nivalis, a new fungus in the Glomeromycetes, characteristic for high alpine and nival altitudes of the Swiss Alps. Nova Hedwig.; 2012; 95, 122. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2012/0038]
79. Pereira, C.M.; Maia, L.C.; Sánchez-Castro, I.; Palenzuela, J.; Silva, G.A.; Sudová, R.; Sýkorová, Z.; Rydlová, J.; Čtvrtlíková, M.; Goto, B.T. et al. Acaulospora papillosa, a new mycorrhizal fungus from NE Brazil, and Acaulospora rugosa from Norway. Phytotaxa; 2016; 260, pp. 14-24. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.260.1.2]
80. Błaszkowski, J. Three new vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Endogonaceae) from Poland. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Biol.; 1988; 36, pp. 271-275.
81. Oehl, F.; da Silva, G.A.; Palenzuela, J.; Sánchez-Castro, I.; Castillo, C.; Sieverding, E. Acaulospora punctata, a new fungal species in the Glomeromycetes from mountainous altitudes of the Swiss Alps and Chilean Andes. Nova Hedwig.; 2011; 93, pp. 353-362. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2011/0093-0353]
82. Palenzuela, J.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Barea, J.M.; Silva, G.A.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora pustulata and Acaulospora tortuosa, two new species in the Glomeromycota from Sierra Nevada (southern Spain). Nova Hedwig.; 2013; 97, pp. 305-319. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2013/0129]
83. Pereira, C.M.R.; Goto, B.T.; da Silva, D.K.A.; Ferreira, A.C.d.; de Souza, F.A.; da Silva, G.A.; Maia, L.C.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora reducta sp. nov. and A. excavata—Two glomeromycotan fungi with pitted spores from Brazil. Mycotaxon; 2015; 130, pp. 983-995. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5248/130.983]
84. Trappe, J.M. Three new Endogonaceae: Glomus constrictus, Sclerocystis clavispora and Acaulospora scrobiculata. Mycotaxon; 1977; 6, pp. 359-366.
85. Vaingankar, J.D.; Rodrigues, B.F. Acaulospora soloidea, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus from rhizosphere soils of Murraya paniculata. Mycotaxon; 2011; 115, pp. 323-326. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5248/115.323]
86. Walker, C.; Trappe, J.M. Acaulospora spinosa sp. nov. with a key to the species of Acaulospora. Mycotaxon; 1981; 12, pp. 515-521.
87. Pontes, J.S.; Santos, V.M.; Pereira, C.D.; Silva, G.A.; Maia, L.C.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora spinulifera, a new arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species from the Brazilian Cerrado and Atlantic Rain forest. Nova Hedwig.; 2017; 105, pp. 219-229. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2017/0407]
88. Sieverding, E.; Chaverri, A.; Rojas, I. Acaulospora splendida, a new species in the Endogonaceae from Costa Rica. Mycotaxon; 1988; 33, pp. 251-256.
89. Berch, S.M. Acaulospora sporocarpia, a new sporocarpic species and emendation of the genus Acaulospora (Endogonaceae, Zygomycotina). Mycotaxon; 1985; 23, pp. 409-418.
90. Hu, H.T. Study on the endomycorrhizae of China fir (Cunnighamia lanceolata Hooker) and taiwania (Taiwania cryptomerioides). Quart. J. Chin. Forest.; 1988; 21, pp. 45-72.
91. Lin, T.-C.; Silva, G.A.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora tsugae, a new species in the Glomeromycetes from Taiwan, and a key to species in Acaulosporaceae. Nova Hedwig.; 2019; 108, pp. 475-488. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2018/0513]
92. Swarupa, R.S.; Kunwar, I.K.; Manoharachary, C. Acaulospora terricola sp. nov. from India. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol.; 2003; 33, pp. 146-147.
93. Palenzuela, J.; Azcón-Aguilar, C.; Barea, J.M.; Silva, G.A.; Oehl, F. Acaulospora viridis, a new species in the Glomeromycetes from two moutain ranges in Andalucía (Spain). Nova Hedwig.; 2014; 99, pp. 71-82. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0029-5035/2014/0180]
94. Kramadibrata, K.; Hedger, J.N. A new species of Acaulospora associated with cocoa in Java and Bali (Indonesia). Mycotaxon; 1990; 37, pp. 73-77.
95. Cai, B.P.; Guo, L.D.; Chen, J.Y.; Zhang, Q.X. Glomus mume and Kuklospora spinosa: Two new species of Glomeromycota from China. Mycotaxon; 2013; 124, pp. 263-268. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5248/124.253]
96. Öpik, M.; Vanatoa, A.; Vanatoa, E.; Moora, M.; Davison, J.; Kalwij, J.M.; Reier, Ü.; Zobel, M. The online database MaarjAM reveals global and ecosystemic distribution patterns in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomeromycota). New Phytol.; 2010; 188, pp. 223-241. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03334.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20561207]
97. Li, W.; Jaroszewski, L.; Godzik, A. Clustering of highly homologous sequences to reduce the size of large protein databases. Bioinformatics; 2001; 17, pp. 282-283. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.3.282] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11294794]
98. Li, W.; Jaroszewski, L.; Godzik, A. Tolerating some redundancy significantly speeds up clustering of large protein databases. Bioinformatics; 2002; 18, pp. 77-82. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.77] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11836214]
99. Li, W.; Godzik, A. Cd-hit: A fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics; 2006; 22, pp. 1658-1659. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158]
100. Huang, Y.; Niu, B.; Gao, Y.; Fu, L.; Li, W. CD-HIT Suite: A web server for clustering and comparing biological sequences. Bioinformatics; 2010; 26, pp. 680-682. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq003]
101. National Center for Biotechnology Information. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 20 October 2020).
102. European Molecular Biology Laboratory—European Bioinformatics Institute. Available online: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ (accessed on 20 October 2020).
103. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/search?q=Acaulospora (accessed on 20 October 2020).
104. Barcode of Life Data System. Available online: http://boldsystems.org/index.php (accessed on 20 October 2020).
105. Maar, J.A.M. Available online: https://maarjam.botany.ut.ee (accessed on 20 October 2020).
106. MYCOBANK Database. Available online: https://www.mycobank.org/page/Basic%20names%20search (accessed on 20 October 2020).
107. Furrazola, E. Research on arbuscular mycorrhizae in Cuba: A historical review and future perspectives. Stud. Fungi; 2021; 6, pp. 240-262. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5943/sif/6/1/16]
108. Friberg, S. Distribution and diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in traditional agriculture on the Níger inland delta, Mali, west, Africa. CBMs Skr.; 2001; 3, pp. 53-80.
109. Kariman, K.H.; Goltapeh, E.M.; Minassian, V. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from Iran. J. Agric. Technol.; 2005; 1, pp. 301-313.
110. Gupta, M.M.; Naqvi, N.S.; Singh, V.K. The state of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity in India: An analysis. Sydowia; 2014; 66, pp. 265-288. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12905/0380.sydowia66(2)2014-0265]
111. Nafady, N.A.; Abdel-Azeem, A.M.; Salem, F.M. A checklist of Egyptian fungi: II. Glomeromycota. Microb. Biosyst.; 2016; 1, pp. 40-49. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/mb.2016.5256]
112. Sudová, R.; Kohout, P.; Rydlová, J.; Čtvrtlíková, M.; Suda, J.; Voriskova, J.; Kolaříková, Z. Diverse fungal communities associated with the roots of isoetid plants are structured by host plant identity. Fungal Ecol.; 2020; 45, 100914. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2020.100914]
113. Yang, H.; Dai, Y.; Xu, M.; Zhang, Q.; Bian, X.; Tang, J.; Chen, X. Metadata-mining of 18S rDNA sequences reveals that “everything is not everywhere” for glomeromycotan fungi. Ann. Microbiol.; 2015; 66, pp. 361-371. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13213-015-1116-z]
114. Marinho, F.; da Silva, I.R.; Oehl, F.; Maia, L.C. Checklist of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in tropical forests. Sydowia; 2018; 70, pp. 107-127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12905/0380.sydowia70-2018-0107]
115. Pereira, C.M.R.; García, A.L.; da Silva, D.K.A.; Maia, L.C.; Frøslev, T.G.; Kjøller, R.; Rosendahl, S. Tropical Forest type influences community assembly processes in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. J. Biogeogr.; 2019; 47, pp. 434-444. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbi.13739]
116. Bruns, T.D.; John, W.; Taylor, J.W. Comment on “Global assessment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus diversity reveals very low endemism”. Sci. Transl. Med.; 2016; 351, 826. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aad4228]
117. Gladieux, P.; Guérin, F.; Giraud, T.; Caffier, V.; Lemaire, C.; Parisi, L.; Didelot, F.; LE Cam, B. Emergence of novel fungal pathogens by ecological speciation: Importance of the reduced viability of immigrants. Mol. Ecol.; 2011; 20, pp. 4521-4532. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05288.x]
118. Krüger, M.; Stockinger, H.; Krüger, C.; Schüßler, A. DNA-based species level detection of Glomeromycota: One PCR primer set for all arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol.; 2009; 183, pp. 212-223. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02835.x]
119. Husband, R.; Herre, E.A.; Turner, S.L.; Gallery, R.; Young, J.P.W. Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and patterns of host association over time and space in a tropical forest. Mol. Ecol.; 2002; 11, pp. 2669-2678. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01647.x]
120. Montoliu-Nerin, M.; Sánchez-García, M.; Bergin, C.; Kutschera, V.E.; Johannesson, H.; Bever, J.D.; Rosling, A. In-depth Phylogenomic Analysis of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Based on a Comprehensive Set of de novo Genome Assemblies. Front. Fungal Biol.; 2021; 2, 716385. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ffunb.2021.716385]
121. Beaudet, D.; Chen, E.C.H.; Mathieu, S.; Yildirir, G.; Ndikumana, S.; Dalpé, Y.; Séguin, S.; Farinelli, L.; Stajich, J.E.; Corradi, N. Ultra-low input transcriptomics reveal the spore functional content and phylogenetic affiliations of poorly studied arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. DNA Res.; 2017; 25, pp. 217-227. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsx051]
122. Miller, M.A.; Pfeiffer, W.; Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE); New Orleans, LA, USA, 14 November 2010; pp. 1-8. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129]
123. Kozlov, A.M.; Darriba, D.; Flouri, T.; Morel, B.; Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics; 2019; 35, pp. 4453-4455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31070718]
124. Ronquist, F.; Teslenko, M.; van der Mark, P.; Ayres, D.L.; Darling, A.; Höhna, S.; Larget, B.; Liu, L.; Suchard, M.A.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference and Model Choice across a Large Model Space. Syst. Biol.; 2012; 61, pp. 539-542. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22357727]
125. Rambaut, A. FigTree, Version v.1.4.3; Computer Program Distributed by the Author. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh. 2018; Available online: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/.1.4.3 (accessed on 20 October 2020).
126. Taylor, J.W.; Jacobson, D.J.; Kroken, S.; Kasuga, T.; Geiser, D.M.; Hibbett, D.S.; Matthew, C.; Fisher, M. Phylogenetic Species Recognition and Species Concepts in Fungi. Fungal Genet. Biol.; 2000; 31, pp. 21-32. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/fgbi.2000.1228] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11118132]
127. Krüger, M.; Krüger, C.; Walker, C.; Stockinger, H.; Schüßler, A. Phylogenetic reference data for systematics and phylotaxonomy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi from phylum to species level. New Phytol.; 2012; 193, pp. 970-984. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03962.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22150759]
128. Schüßler, A.; Walker, C. Archaeospora ecuadoriana sp. nov. from a mountainous biodiversity hotspot area in Ecuador, and transfer of Palaeospora spainiae to Archaeospora, as A. spainiae comb. nov. Mycorrhiza; 2019; 29, pp. 435-443. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00572-019-00913-2]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Fernandes, José A L 2
; Magurno, Franco 3
; Leandro, Larissa B A 4 ; Goto, Bruno T 5
; Theodoro, Raquel C 6 1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Sistemática e Evolução, Centro de Biociências, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil; Centro de Biociências, Campus Central, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59064-741, RN, Brazil
2 Ottawa Health Research Institute (OHRI), Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
3 Institute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellońska 28, 40-032 Katowice, Poland
4 Centro de Biociências, Campus Central, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59064-741, RN, Brazil
5 Departamento de Botânica e Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59064-741, RN, Brazil
6 Departamento de Biologia Celular e Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59064-741, RN, Brazil