It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Invasive species have historically been a problem derived from global trade and transport. To aid in the control and management of these species, species distribution models (SDMs) have been used to help predict possible areas of expansion. Our focal organism, the African Armyworm (AAW), has historically been known as an important pest species in Africa, occurring at high larval densities and causing outbreaks that can cause enormous economic damage to staple crops. The goal of this study is to map the AAW’s present and potential distribution in three future scenarios for the region, and the potential global distribution if the species were to invade other territories, using 40 years of data on more than 700 larval outbreak reports from Kenya and Tanzania. The present distribution in East Africa coincides with its previously known distribution, as well as other areas of grassland and cropland, which are the host plants for this species. The different future climatic scenarios show broadly similar potential distributions in East Africa to the present day. The predicted global distribution shows areas where the AAW has already been reported, but also shows many potential areas in the Americas where, if transported, environmental conditions are suitable for AAW to thrive and where it could become an invasive species.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Lancaster University, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, UK (GRID:grid.9835.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8190 6402)
2 NARL Kabete, State Department for Crop Development & Agricultural Research, Nairobi, Kenya (GRID:grid.9835.7)
3 Crop Bioscience Solutions Ltd., Arusha, Tanzania (GRID:grid.9835.7); Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Pest Control Services, Arusha, Tanzania (GRID:grid.9835.7)
4 Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security, Pest Control Services, Arusha, Tanzania (GRID:grid.9835.7)
5 CABI, Nairobi, Kenya (GRID:grid.9835.7)
6 University of Exeter, Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Penryn, UK (GRID:grid.8391.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8024)