It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Characterization of material structure with X-ray or neutron scattering using e.g. Pair Distribution Function (PDF) analysis most often rely on refining a structure model against an experimental dataset. However, identifying a suitable model is often a bottleneck. Recently, automated approaches have made it possible to test thousands of models for each dataset, but these methods are computationally expensive and analysing the output, i.e. extracting structural information from the resulting fits in a meaningful way, is challenging. Our Machine Learning based Motif Extractor (ML-MotEx) trains an ML algorithm on thousands of fits, and uses SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanation) values to identify which model features are important for the fit quality. We use the method for 4 different chemical systems, including disordered nanomaterials and clusters. ML-MotEx opens for a type of modelling where each feature in a model is assigned an importance value for the fit quality based on explainable ML.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 University of Copenhagen, Department of Chemistry and Nano-Science Center, Copenhagen, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X)
2 University of Oxford, Department of Materials, Oxford, UK (GRID:grid.4991.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8948)
3 Aarhus University, Department of Chemistry & iNANO, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722); Lund University, MAX IV Laboratory, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361)
4 Lund University, MAX IV Laboratory, Lund, Sweden (GRID:grid.4514.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0930 2361); Technical University of Denmark, Department of Physics, Lyngby, Denmark (GRID:grid.5170.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 8870)
5 Columbia University, Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, New York, USA (GRID:grid.21729.3f) (ISNI:0000000419368729); Brookhaven National Laboratory, Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science Department, Upton, USA (GRID:grid.202665.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 4229)
6 University of Copenhagen, Department of Computer Science, Copenhagen, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X); University of Copenhagen, Department of Neuroscience, Copenhagen, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X)