It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Gene flow governs the contemporary spatial structure and dynamic of populations as well as their long-term evolution. For species that disperse using atmospheric or oceanic flows, biophysical models allow predicting the migratory component of gene flow, which facilitates the interpretation of broad-scale spatial structure inferred from observed allele frequencies among populations. However, frequent mismatches between dispersal estimates and observed genetic diversity prevent an operational synthesis for eco-evolutionary projections. Here we use an extensive compilation of 58 population genetic studies of 47 phylogenetically divergent marine sedentary species over the Mediterranean basin to assess how genetic differentiation is predicted by Isolation-By-Distance, single-generation dispersal and multi-generation dispersal models. Unlike previous approaches, the latter unveil explicit parents-to-offspring links (filial connectivity) and implicit links among siblings from a common ancestor (coalescent connectivity). We find that almost 70 % of observed variance in genetic differentiation is explained by coalescent connectivity over multiple generations, significantly outperforming other models. Our results offer great promises to untangle the eco-evolutionary forces that shape sedentary population structure and to anticipate climate-driven redistributions, altogether improving spatial conservation planning.
This study uses a compilation of 58 population genetic studies of 47 phylogenetically divergent marine sedentary species over the Mediterranean basin to assess how genetic differentiation is predicted by different dispersal models. Multi-generation dispersal models reveal implicit links among siblings from a common ancestor (coalescent connectivity) that could improve spatial conservation planning.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Chenuil, Anne 2
; Ser-Giacomi, Enrico 3
; Arnaud-Haond, Sophie 4 ; Bierne, Nicolas 5
; Rossi, Vincent 1
1 Aix Marseille University, Universite de Toulon, CNRS, IRD, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (UMR 7294), Marseille, France (GRID:grid.500499.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1758 6271)
2 Aix Marseille Université, Avignon Université, IRD 237, Station marine d’Endoume, Chemin de la Batterie des Lions, IMBE, CNRS UMR 7263, Marseille, France (GRID:grid.469997.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 1088 6739)
3 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 54-1514 MIT, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.116068.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2341 2786)
4 Exploitation and Conservation, UMR 9190) Univ. Montpellier, IFREMER, IRD, CNRS, MARBEC (Marine Biodiversity, Sète, France (GRID:grid.4825.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0641 9240)
5 ISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.462058.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 7059)




