It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Rising temperatures represent a significant threat to the survival of ectothermic animals. As such, upper thermal limits represent an important trait to assess the vulnerability of ectotherms to changing temperatures. For instance, one may use upper thermal limits to estimate current and future thermal safety margins (i.e., the proximity of upper thermal limits to experienced temperatures), use this trait together with other physiological traits in species distribution models, or investigate the plasticity and evolvability of these limits for buffering the impacts of changing temperatures. While datasets on thermal tolerance limits have been previously compiled, they sometimes report single estimates for a given species, do not present measures of data dispersion, and are biased towards certain parts of the globe. To overcome these limitations, we systematically searched the literature in seven languages to produce the most comprehensive dataset to date on amphibian upper thermal limits, spanning 3,095 estimates across 616 species. This resource will represent a useful tool to evaluate the vulnerability of amphibians, and ectotherms more generally, to changing temperatures.
Measurement(s) | CTmax • Critical thermal maximum • LT50 • Median lethal temperature • Thermal tolerance • Thermal limits |
Technology Type(s) | experimental |
Factor Type(s) | Location • Conservation status • Environmental temperature • Laboratory temperatures • Body size • Ontogeny • Methodological variation |
Sample Characteristic - Organism | Amphibians • Caudata • Amphibia • Frogs • Salamanders • Newts |
Sample Characteristic - Environment | natural environment • laboratory environment |
Sample Characteristic - Location | Global |
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details











1 The University of New South Wales, Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432)
2 Carleton University, Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Department of Biology, Ottawa, Canada (GRID:grid.34428.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 893X)
3 German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research, Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany (GRID:grid.9647.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 7669 9786); Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Leipzig, Germany (GRID:grid.7492.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0492 3830); The University of Queensland, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
4 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral Regional Unidad Durango (CIIDIR), Durango, México (GRID:grid.418275.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2165 8782); Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Laboratorio de Biología de la Conservación y Desarrollo Sustentable de la Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Monterrey, México (GRID:grid.411455.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2203 0321)
5 University of Debrecen, Department of Zoology and Human Biology, Debrecen, Hungary (GRID:grid.7122.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 1088 8582); Universidad Austral de Chile, Bird Ecology Lab, Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas, Valdivia, Chile (GRID:grid.7119.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 0487 459X)
6 The University of New South Wales, Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432); Zhejiang University, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Hangzhou, China (GRID:grid.13402.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 700X); City University of Hong Kong, Department of Infectious Diseases and Public Health, Jockey Club College of Veterinary Medicine and Life Sciences, Hong Kong, China (GRID:grid.35030.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1792 6846)
7 The University of Queensland, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
8 The University of New South Wales, Evolution & Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, Australia (GRID:grid.1005.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4902 0432); Jagiellonian University, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Kraków, Poland (GRID:grid.5522.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2162 9631)