It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Germanium-based oxides such as rutile GeO2 are garnering attention owing to their wide band gaps and the prospects of ambipolar doping for application in high-power devices. Here, we present the use of germanium tetraisopropoxide (GTIP), a metal-organic chemical precursor, as a source of germanium for the demonstration of hybrid molecular beam epitaxy for germanium-containing compounds. We use Sn1-xGexO2 and SrSn1-xGexO3 as model systems to demonstrate our synthesis method. A combination of high-resolution X-ray diffraction, scanning transmission electron microscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirms the successful growth of epitaxial rutile Sn1-xGexO2 on TiO2(001) substrates up to x = 0.54 and coherent perovskite SrSn1-xGexO3 on GdScO3(110) substrates up to x = 0.16. Characterization and first-principles calculations corroborate that germanium occupies the tin site, as opposed to the strontium site. These findings confirm the viability of the GTIP precursor for the growth of germanium-containing oxides by hybrid molecular beam epitaxy, thus providing a promising route to high-quality perovskite germanate films.
Germanium-based oxides are wide bandgap semiconductors with the prospects of ambipolar doping. Here, a hybrid molecular beam epitaxy is demonstrated for the growth of both rutile Sn1-xGexO2 and perovskite SrSn1-xGexO3 films.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 University of Minnesota, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Minneapolis, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000000419368657)
2 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Energy and Environment Directorate, Richland, USA (GRID:grid.451303.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2218 3491)
3 University of Delaware, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Newark, USA (GRID:grid.33489.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 0454 4791)
4 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Energy and Environment Directorate, Richland, USA (GRID:grid.451303.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2218 3491); University of Washington, Department of Physics, Seattle, USA (GRID:grid.34477.33) (ISNI:0000000122986657)
5 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Physical and Computational Sciences Directorate, Richland, USA (GRID:grid.451303.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2218 3491)