1. Introduction
Indoor exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and their potential impacts on human health have drawn public attention because people in developed countries spend more than 80% of their time in indoor environments [1], and indoor VOCs levels are several orders of magnitude higher than outdoor levels [2,3,4]. VOCs in indoor environments originate from various indoor or outdoor sources, including volatile chemical products, traffic, furniture, smoking, and fungi [5,6,7]. Human exposure to VOCs occurs mainly via inhalation, dermal uptake, and dust ingestion [8,9]. Among the three main exposure routes, inhalation is the dominant human route of exposure to VOCs [4,10]. Li et al. established a human exposure model and found that inhalation contributes to almost 100% of total human exposure to organic compounds with a logarithm of octanol–air partition coefficient less than 6.5 [10]. Furthermore, it was found that VOCs with higher indoor intake estimates also tended to have a larger proportion of intake from inhalation rather than ingestion and dermal uptake [11]. Their model results indicate that indoor air quality plays an important role in human exposure to VOCs.
Fungi, one of the indoor emission sources of VOCs, are known to deteriorate indoor air quality and negatively affect the quality of human life in multiple ways. For example, bioaerosol exposure to airborne fungi was associated with increased asthma development and allergic rhinitis in fungal-sensitive populations [12]. Fungi also produce microbial volatile organic compounds (mVOCs) in indoor environments as a result of metabolism [7], and mVOCs can enter the gas phase easily [13], resulting in human exposure via inhalation. Exposure to some mVOCs was related to several acute health effects, including headaches, eye and throat irritation, and bronchitis [14,15]. In addition, several mVOCs (e.g., 3-methyl-1-butanol, 3-octanone, 1-octen-3-ol, and formaldehyde) were also recognized as odor-causing compounds [16] and a risk factor for sick building syndrome [17].
Fungi can grow on various indoor materials, which act as fungal growth media, such as wallpaper, silicone rubber, air conditioner filters, ventilation ducts, carpets, furniture, and household dust [18,19,20,21,22], resulting in the ubiquity of fungi in indoor environments. In previous studies, profiles of mVOCs emitted from fungi are known to depend on the growth media of fungi [23,24], causing variations in the number and concentration of mVOCs with different growth media. It suggests that different mVOCs profiles can be observed depending on the types of indoor environments (e.g., library, residential environments, and hospital) as different indoor materials can be used according to the purposes of each type of indoor environment. Profiles of mVOCs can also be dependent on species of fungi. Therefore, for a thorough understanding of mVOCs indoor emissions, further studies are needed to investigate the occurrence of mVOCs emitted from species of fungi that are widely found indoors and which grow on various indoor materials.
For the determination of airborne mVOCs concentrations, different methods of sampling (i.e., active air sampling and passive air sampling) onto adsorption tubes with subsequent gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) have been widely used [25,26]. Active air sampling has been used for sampling mVOCs, as this method enables quick sampling. In contrast, passive air sampling has been used because of its ability to better obtain an overview regarding the airborne mVOCs concentrations, compared with active air sampling, via relatively long-term sampling over a few days or weeks [27]. Choosing an appropriate sampling method for the determination of mVOCs concentrations can help understand human fungal exposure because some mVOCs are known as indicators of fungi in indoor environments [7,28].
The objective of the current study was to investigate the various aspects of mVOCs in residential environments, including occurrences of various mVOCs emitted from fungi grown on different indoor materials, temporal emission patterns of mVOCs from fungi for a month, and the relationship between mVOCs air concentrations and airborne fungal concentrations. Specifically, we conducted chamber experiments to investigate emission characteristics of fungi-derived mVOCs from multiple fungi species (i.e., Aspergillus niger, Alternaria alternata, and Penicillium chrysogenum), which were detected frequently in residential environments and grown on different growth media (i.e., malt extract agar (MEA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) wallpapers, and silicone rubber). We also conducted field experiments to find the occurrences of fungi-derived mVOCs in residential environments. Lastly, we examined the potential use of fungi-derived mVOCs concentrations as a proxy for human fungal exposure indoors by estimating correlation coefficients (r) between fungi-derived mVOCs concentrations and fungal concentrations and compared the correlation coefficients between different sampling methods (i.e., active air sampling and passive air sampling).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chamber Experiments
Small-scale acrylic chambers were fabricated with a dimension of 0.3 m in length, 0.2 m in width, and 0.19 m in height (the chamber volume of 0.011 m3) for emission testing of mVOCs from three fungi species grown on three different growth media (Figure S1). The chambers were enclosed by polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) film to ensure a tight seal. The three fungi species included in this experiment were Aspergillus niger, Alternaria alternata, and Penicillium chrysogenum selected based on our previous work that detected the three species in most residential environments regardless of seasons [29]. The three selected fungi species were cultured in 10 mL of distilled water in the form of spores for more than 5 days, and then 0.5 mL of the culture solution was collected and further cultured on different fungal growth media. We used MEA (malt extract agar, Kisan Bio Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea), PVC wallpapers, and silicone rubber (Noroo Paint & Coatings Co., Ltd., Anyang, Korea) as the fungal growth media because PVC wallpapers and silicone rubber are building interior materials that are widely used, and MEA is a material used for collecting airborne fungi indoors. The fungal growth experiments using MEA lasted for 4 weeks, and those using PVC wallpapers and silicone rubber lasted for 6 weeks, considering the potential difference in both the growth rate of fungi and the timing of mVOCs generation from fungi depending on the different growth media.
The fungal growth experiments were conducted inside the small-scale chambers with an operating temperature of 28 ± 1 °C and relative humidity of 90% maintained with K2SO4 supersaturated solution. We sampled the headspace gas from the chambers once every 3 days during the entire fungal cultivation period. For each sample collection, 11 L of headspace gas inside the chambers was collected using 99.9999% pure air with a flow rate of 0.10 L/min and introduced into an adsorbent tube filled with Tenax-TA (20913-U, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA., USA) as a sorbing material.
2.2. Field Experiments
To check if mVOCs detected in our chamber experiments are also detected in real residential environments, we recruited 11 households in Seoul, Korea, to obtain air samples. Specifically, we collected air samples for measuring mVOCs concentrations using two different sampling methods: active air sampling and passive air sampling. The field experiments were conducted in summer (July–August) and winter (January–February) in the same households. The characteristics of the 11 households involved in this study are available in Supplementary Material (Table S1).
For the active air sampling, we used the Tenax-TA as a sorbent tube packed with 200 mg of 2,6-diphenylene oxide to collect the air samples. Before collecting the air samples, the tube was preconditioned using a tube conditioner (APK-1200, KNR Co., Ltd., Namyangju, Korea) for 180 min under a flow rate of 100 mL/min of pure nitrogen gas (99.9999%, Air Korea Gas Co., Ltd., Yeoju, Korea). We used an air pump (Libra Plus LP-1, A.P. Buck. Inc., Orlando, FL, USA), connected with the sorbent tube, to collect the air samples under a pump inlet flow rate of 100 mL/min for 120 min, leading to 12 L of sample volume. After collecting the air samples, we brought them to our laboratory and placed them in a 5 °C refrigerator until chemical analysis. To avoid the deterioration of the samples, we conducted the chemical analysis within 3 weeks.
For the passive air sampling, we used a passive sampler (OVM-3500, 3M Co., Ltd., Minneapolis, MN, USA) to collect the air samples. The passive samplers were placed in the households for 4 weeks and then brought to our laboratory for chemical analysis. To extract the sorbents, we injected 1 mL of CS2 (Kanto Chemical Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan) inside the samplers, stirred the samplers for 30 min under 30 °C, and placed them in a −5 °C freezer until chemical analysis. We conducted the chemical analysis 3 weeks after collecting the samples from the households. The room temperature and humidity were recorded during the same time of air sampling, which was presented in the preliminary study [29]. To check if mVOCs concentrations can be used as a surrogate for fungal exposure assessment, we collected air samples from the same 11 households to measure the airborne fungal concentrations. The method for estimating fungal concentrations is available in File S1 of Supplementary Material. For collecting bioaerosols in air samples, we used a sampling pump (Buck Bio-CultureTM, B30120, A.P. Buck Inc., Orlando, FL, USA) for 5 min per sampling cycle with a flow rate of 28.3 L/min at a sampling height of 1.2–1.5 m. We repeated this three times (three sampling cycles), and each sampling cycle was conducted after a 20 min interval. When collecting bioaerosols, we used MEA as a growth medium for fungi, which was prepared with the following composition: maltose 12.75 g/L, dextrin 2.75 g/L, peptone 0.78 g/L, and agar 15 g/L.
2.3. Chemical Analysis of mVOCs (Chamber Experiments)
After collecting samples from our chamber experiments, we conducted the chemical analysis of the collected samples using a thermal desorption unit (UNITY, Markes International, Bridgend, UK) coupled with gas chromatography (7820A, Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA)–mass spectrometry (5977E, Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) (TD–GC–MS). Analysis conditions of TD–GC–MS are described in Table S2. Using the Standard Reference Database (NT Search 2.0, National Institute of Standard and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), we confirmed compounds that were detected in either the headspace gas of the small-scale chambers or indoor air in residential environments (11 households).
Then, we also quantified the concentrations of the detected compounds using liquid standards (1000 μg/mL, 48 Component Indoor Air Standard, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Calibration curves were made with the liquid standard adsorbed on the Tenax-TA tube with four different concentrations (i.e., 5, 10, 50, and 500 ng/tube). Correlation coefficients in the calibration curves were higher than 0.999 with all four concentrations, and method detection limits ranged from 0.02 μg/m3 (Xylene) to 0.25 μg/m3 (Ethylbenzene).
For field experiments, the methods of chemical analysis are described in Files S2 and S3 of Supplementary Material.
2.4. Statistical Analyses
To characterize the emission pattern of fungi-derived mVOCs during the cultivation period (4–6 weeks), we conducted a clustering analysis for mVOCs concentrations with different fungi growth media. The clustering analysis is a method widely used for the classification of objects into groups (also known as clusters) with a similarity in a certain factor. Specifically, in this study, we used a hierarchical clustering analysis method using TIBCO Spotfire (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). We also categorized the detected compounds into eight groups according to their composition (i.e., aromatics, ethers, aliphatics, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, chlorides, and nitrides) and observed the emission patterns of each group.
We also examined the correlations between airborne fungal concentrations and mVOCs concentrations measured in 11 residential environments. To examine the appropriate sampling methods for indoor mVOCs, we examined the correlations using two different mVOCs concentrations obtained by either an active air sampler or a passive air sampler and then compared the correlations between the two sampling methods.
3. Results
3.1. Detection of mVOCs from Fungi in the Chamber Experiments
Figure 1 and Tables S3–S5 presented the number of mVOCs detected from the headspace gas of the chambers with each fungus grown on a different medium and their mass emitted during the culture period. Regardless of fungi species, silicone rubber produced the highest number of detected compounds among three growth media: 106 compounds (A. niger), 35 compounds (A. alternata), and 85 compounds (P. chrysogenum) (Figure 1). For all the three fungi species, the compound with the highest total emission during the whole culture period was also observed in silicone rubber; 2-ethyl-1-hexanol for A. niger (236 μg/c.p.), methyl methacrylate for A. alternata and P. chrysogenum (14 μg/c.p. and 220 μg/c.p., respectively).
From the viewpoint of fungal species, the highest number of detected compounds was observed in the headspace gas of the chambers cultivated with A. niger (108 compounds), followed by P. chrysogenum and A. alternata (88 and 43 compounds, respectively) (Tables S3–S5). Six compounds were detected from all three growth media for A. niger, two compounds for A. alternata, and nine compounds for P. chrysogenum (Table 1). Most of these compounds that were detected from all three growth media also had relatively high detection frequencies—more than 50%—on each growth medium. Ethylene dichloride and methyl methacrylate were compounds emitted from all three fungal species on all three growth media.
3.2. Emission Pattern of Individual Classes
When sorting the compounds having detection frequencies higher than 50% into each chemical class, we observed that the emission patterns of each chemical class were similar within the same growth media across three different fungi (Figure 2). For all three fungi, emission of chloride-containing compounds (chlorides) and aromatic compounds were prevalent with MEA as a growth medium. Meanwhile, aldehydes, ketones, and alcohols were not emitted with MEA. For A. niger and A. alternata, emission patterns were observed to be similar when using PVC wallpaper as a fungal growth medium; only chlorides and ethers were emitted. In contrast, for P. chrysogenum, more classes of compounds (i.e., aromatics, chlorides, nitrides, and alcohols) were emitted when using PVC wallpaper as a fungal growth medium. For A. niger and P. chrysogenum, silicone rubber was observed to be the growth media that caused the widest variety of chemical classes with the highest total emissions.
3.3. Temporal Patterns of mVOCs Emission
Figure 3 and Figure S2–S8 present the temporal emission patterns of some of the studied mVOCs during the culture period for three individual growth media. We assigned numbers to the clusters (e.g., Cluster 1 and Cluster 2) of mVOCs when there were specific emission patterns in common among or between compounds and presented those compounds in Figure 3 and Figure S2–S8. Depending on the combination of fungi and cultivation media, we observed 2–4 clusters having specific emission patterns.
For silicone rubber as a growth medium (Figure 3, Figures S7 and S8), we observed four clusters for A. niger and P. chrysogenum and three clusters for A. alternata. Compounds in Clusters 1 and 2 had relatively low concentrations throughout the cultivation period compared with Clusters 3 and 4. Compared with other growth media (i.e., MEA and wallpaper), various compounds of Clusters 3 and 4 (e.g., 2-ethyl-1-hexanol and methyl methacrylate) had consistently high natural logarithms of concentrations (>7), and their concentrations did not appear to decrease even at the end of the whole culture period. For MEA as a growth medium (Figures S2–S4), we observed three clusters for A. niger and P. chrysogenum and two clusters for A. alternata. Compounds in Cluster 1 had relatively low concentrations throughout the culture period, but their emissions seemed to be continued during the same period. Overall, compounds in Cluster 2 also had relatively low concentrations for the period, but their emissions appeared to increase in the second half of the culture period (from day 18 onward) to some extent. Compounds in Cluster 3 showed relatively high concentrations, and these concentrations were observed to be consistently high; 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane had the highest concentrations throughout most of the culture period with A. niger and A. alternata, while methyl methacrylate had the highest concentrations with P. chrysogenum.
For PVC wallpaper as a growth medium (Figures S5 and S6), we observed two clusters for A. niger and three clusters for P. chrysogenum. We did not include compounds emitted from A. alternata in this clustering analysis because there were only two compounds with detection frequencies higher than 50% (see Table S4). The emission of compounds in Cluster 1 was relatively low, but it increased from the middle of the culture period. The emission of compounds in Cluster 2 occurred mostly from the beginning of the culture period to the middle. Overall, compounds in Cluster 3 had consistently high concentrations compared with those in Cluster 1 and 2, and their emissions showed an increasing tendency from the beginning of the second half. Methyl methacrylate had the highest concentrations for the whole culture period among the studied compounds.
3.4. Occurences of mVOCs in Residential Environments
In our preliminary test [29], physical room conditions (i.e., temperature, humidity, water damage, and ventilation) affected the fungal growth in the residential environment. Particularly, VOCs (including mVOCs) levels correlated well with indoor environmental factors when using the passive sampling method rather than the active sampling method.
Among compounds detected in more than 50% of samples in our chamber studies, we detected 13 compounds in summer and 15 compounds in winter (a total of 17 compounds) with the active air sampler (Table 2). When we used the passive air sampler, we detected 7 compounds in summer and 13 compounds in winter (a total of 13 compounds). For the most detected compounds, detection frequency was higher in winter than in summer, irrespective of sampling methods. Among the 17 compounds detected using the active air samplers, 12 compounds had higher detection frequencies in winter than in summer. Among the 13 compounds detected using the passive air samplers, 10 compounds were detected more frequently in winter than in summer.
When examining correlations between mVOCs air concentrations and airborne fungal concentrations, we found higher correlation coefficients overall with the passive air samplers (Table 2). Positive correlation coefficients (r) were observed for most compounds with the passive air samplers, ranging from 0.08 to 0.86, except for two compounds (i.e., chloroform and n-decane). In contrast, negative correlation coefficients (r) were observed for most compounds with the active air samplers, ranging from −0.99 to −0.02, except for three compounds (i.e., dimethyl disulfide, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol).
4. Discussion
In this study, we conducted small-scale chamber experiments to investigate occurrences of mVOCs from multiple fungi species grown on different indoor materials and investigated temporal emission patterns of mVOCs for longer than a month of cultivation. We also performed field experiments in 11 households to find occurrences of mVOCs detected in our chamber experiments and assessed the potential utility of indoor mVOCs concentrations as a proxy for human fungal exposure in residential environments. Among the three fungal growth media included in this study, we observed that silicone rubber was the growth medium that produced the highest number of detected compounds. We also found that the emission patterns of each chemical class were similar within the same growth media across three different fungi. Additionally, we found that mVOCs were classified into 2–4 clusters depending on their temporal emission patterns during the cultivation periods, and some mVOCs (e.g., methyl methacrylate and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol) were emitted at consistently high concentrations throughout the entire cultivation period, regardless of the type of cultivation media. From the results of our field experiments, we found that using passive air samplers rather than active air samplers is desirable when intending to use mVOCs concentrations as a proxy for human exposure to fungi. Lastly, we found that detection frequencies of mVOCs in residential environments in winter were higher than in summer for most compounds.
We found that mVOCs profiles were different depending on different cultivation media of fungi (Figure 1 and Tables S3–S5), consistent with the results of previous studies [23,24]. The widest variety of mVOCs was observed when using silicone rubbers as a fungal growth medium. Silicone rubbers are one type of plastic material that can absorb some airborne organic matter and consequently facilitate the formation of biofilm (e.g., fungi and bacteria) on surfaces [30]. In addition, silicone rubbers are recognized as flexible polymeric materials that can emit a large number of organic carbon compounds over time [31,32]. The released organic carbon compounds from silicone rubbers can also enable the formation of biofilm. For these reasons, the promoted biofilm formation on silicon rubbers might contribute to the emission of various mVOCs with higher concentrations.
Our finding that fungi grown on silicone rubber produced the highest number of mVOCs may raise the issue of adverse health effects for people in residential environments. Since silicone rubber has been used in indoor residential settings in various domains such as household products, electronics, paints, and coatings [33,34], silicone rubber can act as a growth medium for fungi in various parts of indoor environments. Furthermore, from the results of our chamber experiments for temporal emission patterns of mVOCs (Figure 3, Figures S7 and S8), compared with other growth media (i.e., MEA and Wallpaper), we observed that various compounds were emitted from fungi grown on silicone rubber at consistently high concentrations. To be more specific, their emission was high (logarithm of concentration higher than 7) throughout the whole period of the cultivation experiments (~1 month) and did not tend to decrease until the end of our experiments. Considering that both fungi and fungi-derived mVOCs are known to contribute to adverse health effects [12,14,15], further studies are needed to investigate the contribution of silicone rubber to human exposure to fungi and mVOCs and develop methods to inhibit fungal growth on silicone rubber.
We examined the correlation between mVOCs concentrations and fungal concentrations and observed that correlation coefficients were higher with passive air samplers for most compounds compared with active air samplers (Table 2). Passive air samplers are known to afford long-term monitoring in field studies [27]. Considering the temporal variability of VOCs concentrations in indoor environments within a day [35], concentrations obtained from a few hours of sample collection with active air samplers are not likely to represent the long-term average concentrations. From our findings, it is recommended to use passive air samplers rather than active air samplers for collecting airborne mVOCs in future human-exposure studies. It is noted that physical room conditions, such as temperature, humidity, and ventilation, affect the sampling performance because the sampling rate in the passive air sampler is controlled by diffusion. Dodson et al. also suggested that passive air samplers are suitable for epidemiological studies involving VOCs in indoor environments [36], consistent with our suggestion. For compounds that did not have significant positive correlations between their air concentrations and fungal concentrations, they might have other primary emission sources in indoor environments besides fungi, including building materials, human activities, traffic, foodstuffs, smoking, and chemical reactions [7,37,38,39].
In this study, we also found higher detection frequencies of most mVOCs in winter than in summer (Table 2), indicating that there is a seasonal difference in the composition of mVOCs in indoor environments. Different usage patterns of consumer products that can emit VOCs indoors might contribute to the difference in the detection frequencies of mVOCs with seasons in this study [40]. Different ventilation frequencies depending on seasons might act as another factor affecting the difference in the detection frequencies with seasons [35,41]. Relatively frequent ventilation in summer might decrease the detection frequencies of mVOCs by removing mVOCs from indoor environments. In addition, the decrease in the detection frequencies of mVOCs that was due to the effect of increased ventilation is stronger for organic compounds with higher volatility [42].
We observed that mVOCs of specific chemical classes (e.g., chlorides, ethers, aliphatics, and alcohols) were prevalent in their emission from fungi compared with other chemical classes. The composition of fungal growth media might make a difference in the composition of mVOCs emitted. For example, the PVC wallpaper used in our experiment contains chloride, resulting in higher emission concentrations of chloride caused by fungal metabolism (Figure 2). In addition, silicone rubber includes oxygen in its backbone structure, which might lead to higher emission concentrations of ethers (O–R bond) or alcohols (O–H bond).
There are some limitations to this study. In addition to fungi, multiple indoor sources emit VOCs that were detected in our laboratory experiments, such as volatile chemical products, building materials, furnishings, pesticides, and combustion by-products [9,43]. Future studies are recommended to consider the multiple sources of indoor VOCs when investigating the relationship between mVOCs concentrations and airborne fungal concentrations. Moreover, recruiting more households may increase the statistical power of our correlation analysis between mVOCs concentrations and fungal concentrations. Lastly, although we have not included formaldehyde in this study, formaldehyde is one of the representative indoor environmental chemicals known to inhibit the growth of fungi. For this reason, further field studies should consider not only mVOCs levels indoors but also formaldehyde levels because formaldehyde levels can play an important role in mVOCs levels. Despite these limitations, we also noted three major strengths of this study. First, we suggest the use of passive air samplers for collecting airborne mVOCs in human fungal exposure studies rather than active air samplers. We believe that our findings can pave the way for establishing environmental policies related to sampling methods of mVOCs indoors. Second, we also found that airborne concentrations of some mVOCs can be used as a surrogate for airborne fungal concentrations in residential environments. Third, by conducting laboratory experiments and field experiments at the same time, we obtained information on various aspects of mVOCs in residential environments, including occurrences of various compounds from fungi, temporal emission patterns of mVOCs from fungi for a month, and the relationship with indoor airborne fungal concentrations.
5. Conclusions
The current study investigated (1) occurrences of fungi-derived mVOCs in residential environments, (2) temporal emission patterns of mVOCs from three selected fungi widely detected in residential environments, and (3) correlations between fungal concentrations and mVOCs concentrations using two different sampling methods (i.e., active air sampler and passive air sampler). We observed that a wide range of VOCs were generated from fungi in our laboratory experiment, and some compounds showed significant positive correlations between their airborne concentrations and fungal concentrations in our field experiment. Our findings may allow researchers to better understand several aspects of the indoor emission of VOCs from fungi, such as occurrences in residential environments and temporal emission patterns. Our study also suggested an appropriate sampling method (i.e., passive air sampler) to measure mVOCs concentrations in human fungal exposure studies, which will be helpful to environmental policy makers.
Conceptualization, K.K.; methodology, K.K., S.L. and D.K.; writing—original draft, K.K.; formal analysis, S.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.C. and D.K.; funding acquisition, D.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable
Not applicable
Not applicable.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. The number of compounds emitted from three fungi species cultivated on three different growth media.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Emission patterns for eight groups of compounds with different growth media and fungi (three growth media by three fungi). The radar charts were presented on a natural logarithmic scale.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. Temporal emission patterns of mVOCs originating from Aspergillus niger grown on silicone rubber during the cultivation period. Depending on the temporal emission patterns, compounds were classified into four clusters. Compounds were symbolized with numbers on the y-axis (see Table S6 for detailed information).
Compounds detected from all three growth media (i.e., MEA, PVC wallpaper, and silicon rubber) for each fungus.
| Compounds | Detection Frequency (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspergillus niger | Alternaria alternata | Penicillium chrysogenum | |
| MEA/Wallpaper/Silicone Rubber | MEA/Wallpaper/Silicone Rubber | MEA/Wallpaper/Silicone Rubber | |
| 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane | 100/70/100 | - * | 100/100/91 |
| Benzene | - * | - * | 90/41/91 |
| Ethyl methacrylate | 40/80/100 | - * | 30/100/91 |
| Ethylene dichloride | 100/80/91 | 90/70/91 | 100/100/91 |
| Isobutyronitrile | - * | - * | 90/50/91 |
| Methyl isobutyrate | 50/50/91 | - * | 100/100/91 |
| Methyl methacrylate | 100/90/73 | 70/100/91 | 100/100/91 |
| Methyl propionate | 30/10/82 | - * | - * |
| Methylacrylonitrile | - * | - * | 90/40/82 |
| Styrene | - * | - * | 100/70/91 |
* Compound was not detected from all three growth media
Detection of mVOCs in 11 residential environments and correlation analysis between mVOCs air concentrations and airborne fungal concentrations.
| Compounds | Active Sampling | Passive Sampling | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF a (Winter) | DF a (Summer) | r b | DF a (Winter) | DF a (Summer) | r b | |
| 2-Butanone | 27 | 9 | - | - c | - | - |
| 2-Butoxyethanol | - | 9 | - | - | - | - |
| 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol | 36 | 55 | −0.04 | 18 | 27 | 0.08 |
| Acetophenone | 45 | - | −0.81 | - | - | - |
| Benzene | 82 | 50 | −0.35 | 100 | 82 | 0.56 * |
| Chloroform | 45 | - | - | - | - | −0.04 |
| Dimethyl disulfide | 55 | - | 0.73 | 9 | - | - |
| Ethanol | - | 9 | - | 55 | 36 | 0.23 |
| Ethyl acetate | 73 | 45 | 0.37 | - | - | - |
| Ethylbenzene | 82 | 81 | −0.02 | 82 | 82 | 0.58 * |
| Isoprene | 73 | - | - | 45 | - | 0.73 |
| Isopropanol | - | - | - | 9 | - | - |
| n-Butanol | - | - | 0.90 * | - | - | - |
| n-Decane | 45 | 9 | −0.32 | 36 | - | −0.28 |
| Nitrophenyloxadiazolol | 9 | 18 | - | 54 | 36 | 0.86 * |
| n-Octane | 89 | 29 | - | 91 | - | - |
| o,m-Xylene | 100 | 81 | - | 82 | 91 | 0.46 * |
| Styrene | 82 | 44 | −0.26 | 62 | - | 0.41 |
| Toluene | 82 | 88 | −0.17 | 100 | 100 | 0.46 * |
| Trichloroethylene | - | - | −0.99 | - | - | - |
a Detection frequency (%). b Correlation coefficient between mVOCs air concentrations and airborne fungal concentrations. c Not detected or not calculated. * p < 0.05. Note: Compounds were presented in this table in alphabetical order.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Klepeis, N.E.; Nelson, W.C.; Ott, W.R.; Robinson, J.P.; Tsang, A.M.; Switzer, P.; Behar, J.V.; Hern, S.C.; Engelmann, W.H. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol.; 2001; 11, pp. 231-252. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11477521]
2. Bennett, D.H.; Margni, M.D.; McKone, T.E.; Jolliet, O. Intake fraction for multimedia pollutants: A tool for life cycle analysis and comparative risk assessment. Risk Anal.; 2002; 22, pp. 905-918. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00260] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12442988]
3. Nazaroff, W.W. Inhalation intake fraction of pollutants from episodic indoor emissions. Build. Environ.; 2008; 43, pp. 269-277. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.03.021]
4. Shin, H.M.; McKone, T.E.; Bennett, D.H. Intake Fraction for the Indoor Environment: A Tool for Prioritizing Indoor Chemical Sources. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2012; 46, pp. 10063-10072. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es3018286] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22920860]
5. Rosch, C.; Kohajda, T.; Roder, S.; von Bergen, M.; Schlink, U. Relationship between sources and patterns of VOCs in indoor air. Atmos. Pollut. Res.; 2014; 5, pp. 129-137. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5094/APR.2014.016]
6. Bari, M.A.; Kindzierski, W.B.; Wheeler, A.J.; Heroux, M.E.; Wallace, L.A. Source apportionment of indoor and outdoor volatile organic compounds at homes in Edmonton, Canada. Build. Environ.; 2015; 90, pp. 114-124. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.03.023]
7. Korpi, A.; Jarnberg, J.; Pasanen, A.L. Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol.; 2009; 39, pp. 139-193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10408440802291497]
8. Little, J.C.; Weschler, C.J.; Nazaroff, W.W.; Liu, Z.; Hubal, E.A.C. Rapid Methods to Estimate Potential Exposure to Semivolatile Organic Compounds in the Indoor Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2012; 46, pp. 11171-11178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es301088a]
9. Weschler, C.J.; Nazaroff, W.W. Semivolatile organic compounds in indoor environments. Atmos. Environ.; 2008; 42, pp. 9018-9040. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.052]
10. Li, L.; Arnot, J.A.; Wania, F. How are Humans Exposed to Organic Chemicals Released to Indoor Air?. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2019; 53, pp. 11276-11284. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b02036]
11. Mitro, S.D.; Dodson, R.E.; Singla, V.; Adamkiewicz, G.; Elmi, A.F.; Tilly, M.K.; Zota, A.R. Consumer Product Chemicals in Indoor Dust: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of U.S. Studies (vol 50, pg 10661, 2016). Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2016; 50, 13611. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05530] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27993061]
12. Mendell, M.J.; Mirer, A.G.; Cheung, K.; Tong, M.; Douwes, J. Respiratory and Allergic Health Effects of Dampness, Mold, and Dampness-Related Agents: A Review of the Epidemiologic Evidence. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2011; 119, pp. 748-756. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002410] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21269928]
13. Speckbacher, V.; Zeilinger, S.; Zimmermann, S.; Mayhew, C.A.; Wiesenhofer, H.; Ruzsanyi, V. Monitoring the volatile language of fungi using gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.; 2021; 413, pp. 3055-3067. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00216-021-03242-6]
14. Walinder, R.; Ernstgard, L.; Johanson, G.; Norback, D.; Venge, P.; Wieslander, G. Acute effects of a fungal volatile compound. Environ. Health Perspect.; 2005; 113, pp. 1775-1778. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.8193]
15. Meheust, D.; Le Cann, P.; Reboux, G.; Millon, L.; Gangneux, J.P. Indoor fungal contamination: Health risks and measurement methods in hospitals, homes and workplaces. Crit. Rev. Microbiol.; 2014; 40, pp. 248-260. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2013.777687]
16. Rose, L.J.; Simmons, R.B.; Crow, S.A.; Ahearn, D.G. Volatile organic compounds associated with microbial growth in automobile air conditioning systems. Curr. Microbiol.; 2000; 41, pp. 206-209. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002840010120] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10915209]
17. Sahlberg, B.; Gunnbjornsdottir, M.; Soon, A.; Jogi, R.; Gislason, T.; Wieslander, G.; Janson, C.; Norback, D. Airborne molds and bacteria, microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC), plasticizers and formaldehyde in dwellings in three North European cities in relation to sick building syndrome (SBS). Sci. Total Environ.; 2013; 444, pp. 433-440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.114]
18. Khan, A.A.H.; Karuppayil, S.M. Practices contributing to biotic pollution in Air-conditioned indoor environments. Aerobiologia; 2011; 27, pp. 85-89. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10453-010-9175-x]
19. Khan, A.A.H.; Karuppayil, S.M. Fungal pollution of indoor environments and its management. Saudi J. Biol. Sci.; 2012; 19, pp. 405-426. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2012.06.002]
20. Koch, A.; Heilemann, K.J.; Bischof, W.; Heinrich, J.; Wichmann, H.E. Indoor viable mold spores—A comparison between two cities, Erfurt (eastern Germany) and Hamburg (western Germany). Allergy; 2000; 55, pp. 176-180. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00233.x]
21. Noris, F.; Siegel, J.A.; Kinney, K.A. Evaluation of HVAC filters as a sampling mechanism for indoor microbial communities. Atmos. Environ.; 2011; 45, pp. 338-346. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.10.017]
22. Leow, M.E.L.; Kour, A.K.; Inglis, T.J.J.; Kumarasinghe, G.; Pho, R.W.H. Fungal colonisation in digital silicone rubber prostheses. Prosthet. Orthot. Int.; 1997; 21, pp. 195-198. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3109/03093649709164556] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9453093]
23. Fiedler, K.; Schutz, E.; Geh, S. Detection of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) produced by moulds on various materials. Int. J. Hyg. Environ.; 2001; 204, pp. 111-121. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1078/1438-4639-00094] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11759153]
24. Radványi, D. Detection and Identification of Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds of the Green Mold Disease: MVOC Profile on Different Media. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Inf. Syst.; 2020; 11, pp. 14-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4018/IJAEIS.2020040102]
25. Araki, A.; Eitaki, Y.; Kawai, T.; Kanazawa, A.; Takeda, M.; Kishi, R. Diffusive sampling and measurement of microbial volatile organic compounds in indoor air. Indoor Air; 2009; 19, pp. 421-432. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2009.00606.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19656233]
26. Matysik, S.; Herbarth, O.; Mueller, A. Determination of microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs) by passive sampling onto charcoal sorbents. Chemosphere; 2009; 76, pp. 114-119. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.010]
27. Huang, C.Y.; Shan, W.P.; Xiao, H. Recent Advances in Passive Air Sampling of Volatile Organic Compounds. Aerosol Air Qual. Res.; 2018; 18, pp. 602-622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.12.0556]
28. Kuske, M.; Romain, A.C.; Nicolas, J. Microbial volatile organic compounds as indicators of fungi. Can an electronic nose detect fungi in indoor environments?. Build. Environ.; 2005; 40, pp. 824-831. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.08.012]
29. Lee, S. Characteristics of Airborne Fungi-Derived VOCs in Residential Areas. Seoul National University of Science and Technology: Seoul, Korea, 2017.
30. Neu, L.; Banziger, C.; Proctor, C.R.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, W.T.; Hammes, F. Ugly ducklings-the dark side of plastic materials in contact with potable water. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes; 2018; 4, 7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41522-018-0050-9]
31. Lehtola, M.J.; Miettinen, K.T.; Keinanen, M.M.; Kekki, T.K.; Laine, O.; Hirvonen, A.; Vartiainen, T.; Martikainen, P.J. Microbiology, chemistry and biofilm development in a pilot drinking water distribution system with copper and plastic pipes. Water Res.; 2004; 38, pp. 3769-3779. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.024]
32. Yu, J.; Kim, D.; Lee, T. Microbial diversity in biofilms on water distribution pipes of different materials. Water Sci. Technol.; 2010; 61, pp. 163-171. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.813] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20057102]
33. Eduok, U.; Faye, O.; Szpunar, J. Recent developments and applications of protective silicone coatings: A review of PDMS functional materials. Prog. Org. Coat.; 2017; 111, pp. 124-163. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2017.05.012]
34. Shit, S.C.; Shah, P. A Review on Silicone Rubber. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett.; 2013; 36, pp. 355-365. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40009-013-0150-2]
35. Kristensen, K.; Lunderberg, D.M.; Liu, Y.J.; Misztal, P.K.; Tian, Y.L.; Arata, C.L.; Nazaroff, W.W.; Goldstein, A.H. Sources and dynamics of semivolatile organic compounds in a single-family residence in northern California. Indoor Air; 2019; 29, pp. 645-655. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.12561]
36. Dodson, R.E.; Bessonneau, V.; Udesky, J.O.; Nishioka, M.; McCauley, M.; Rudel, R.A. Passive indoor air sampling for consumer product chemicals: A field evaluation study. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol.; 2019; 29, pp. 95-108. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41370-018-0070-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30237551]
37. Atkinson, R.; Tuazon, E.C.; Aschmann, S.M. Atmospheric chemistry of 2-pentanone and 2-heptanone. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2000; 34, pp. 623-631. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es9909374]
38. Helmig, D.; Klinger, L.F.; Guenther, A.; Vierling, L.; Geron, C.; Zimmerman, P. Biogenic volatile organic compound emissions (BVOCs) I. Identifications from three continental sites in the US. Chemosphere; 1999; 38, pp. 2163-2187. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00425-1]
39. Wilkins, K.; Nielsen, E.M.; Wolkoff, P. Patterns in volatile organic compounds in dust from moldy buildings. Indoor Air; 1997; 7, pp. 128-134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-2-00007.x]
40. Kim, K.; Shin, H.M.; Wong, L.; Young, T.M.; Bennett, D.H. Temporal variability of indoor dust concentrations of semivolatile organic compounds. Indoor Air; 2021; 31, pp. 693-701. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ina.12759]
41. Wei, W.J.; Ramalho, O.; Mandin, C. A long-term dynamic model for predicting the concentration of semivolatile organic compounds in indoor environments: Application to phthalates. Build. Environ.; 2019; 148, pp. 11-19. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.044]
42. Dodson, R.E.; Camann, D.E.; Morello-Frosch, R.; Brody, J.G.; Rudel, R.A. Semivolatile Organic Compounds in Homes: Strategies for Efficient and Systematic Exposure Measurement Based on Empirical and Theoretical Factors. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2015; 49, pp. 113-122. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es502988r] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25488487]
43. Bennett, D.H.; Furtaw, E.J. Fugacity-based indoor residential pesticide fate model. Environ. Sci. Technol.; 2004; 38, 4912. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es040478t]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Lee, Suyeon; Choi, Yelim; Kim, Daekeun