It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Porphyry-type deposits are a vital source of green technology metals such as copper and molybdenum. They typically form in subduction-related settings from large, long-lived magmatic systems. The most widely accepted model for their formation requires that mantle-derived magmas undergo an increase in volatiles and ore-forming constituents in mid- to lower crustal reservoirs over millions of years, however, this is mostly based on observations from shallow, sporadically exposed parts of porphyry systems. To examine this paradigm, we have evaluated the timeframe and geochemical signatures of magmatism in a ~ 8 km palaeodepth cross-section through plutonic and volcanic rocks of the classic Yerington magmatic system, Nevada. We show that the magmas in the upper parts of the system (< 8 km) underwent a major and rapid change in chemistry over a period of < 200 kyrs that is coincident with the initiation of ore formation. We attribute this change to a shift from extraction of quartz monzodiorite and quartz monzonite magmas evolving in mid-crustal reservoirs, and that had relatively poor ore-forming potential, to extraction of volatile-rich granitic magmas from greater (~ 30 km) depths. As the granites crystallised, late stage melts were intruded through the carapace as aplite dykes which contain traceable expressions of the porphyry deposit-forming fluids. The rapid nature of the shift in ore-forming potential narrows the temporal-geochemical footprint of magmas associated with porphyry mineralisation and provides new constraints for exploration models.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Exeter, Camborne School of Mines, Cornwall, UK (GRID:grid.8391.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8024)
2 British Geological Survey, Geochronology and Tracers Facility, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK (GRID:grid.474329.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 5915)
3 Natural History Museum, London, UK (GRID:grid.35937.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2270 9879)
4 Durham University, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham, UK (GRID:grid.8250.f) (ISNI:0000 0000 8700 0572)
5 Selfrag AG, Kerzers, Switzerland (GRID:grid.474329.f); Lightning Machines, Didsbury, Greater Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.474329.f)