ABSTRACT
Objective: This study assessed the impact of fermented Averrhoa bilimbi fruit filtrate (FF) on growth, gut morphology, and meat traits of high-stocked broilers.
Materials and Methods: A 2 x 2 factorial trial with stocking densities (9 or 18 birds/m2) and drinking 2% FF or plain water was conducted using 378 14-day-old broiler chicks. On day 35, samples were obtained and analyzed.
Results: FF improved feed efficiency and income over the feed cost of high-stocked broilers by about 7.63% and 10%, respectively, compared to high-stocked broilers receiving only water. FF decreased duodenal crypt depth and meat water-holding capacity. Meats from high-stocked broilers receiving FF showed lower cholesterol than other meats. Lower cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and higher HDL/low-density lipoprotein were found in meats from broilers receiving FF. Total unsaturated fatty acid (UFA) was higher in meats of high-stocked broilers receiving FF than others. The UFA/saturated fatty acid was lower in meats of high-stocked broilers receiving plain water. High-stocked broilers given FF had higher meat n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA). FF enhanced meat n-6 PUFA levels. The n-3/n-6 PUFA increased with high density and drinking FF. Conclusion: Drinking FF improved gut morphology and meat qualities of broilers housed in high-density pens. FF may be an excellent alternative to improve the growth and meat qualities of broilers raised in high-density houses.
KEYWORDS
Broiler; fermented fruit filtrate; growth; gut morphology; meat quality; stocking density
Introduction
The broiler house is one of the most costly aspects of a broiler farm. Because broiler houses have such a high investment cost, broiler producers frequently grow birds at a high stocking density to maximize profits while lowering investment costs. In addition to the efficiency benefits, stockings in high-density pens have been linked to slower growth rates, compromised physiological conditions, and broiler well-being [1,2]. Also, high stocking density-induced stress has been associated with short intestinal villi, resulting in broilers' poor intestinal digestive and absorptive functions [3]. Moreover, decreased carcass weight [2,4], abnormal color, and reduced water-holding capacity (WHC) [5] have been observed in broiler meat stocked in high-density pens.
Given that broiler growth rate and meat quality are a source of concern in the broiler industry, the poor growth performance and meat quality must be ameliorated. Using synthetic antioxidants to combat oxidative stress is prevalent among broiler producers. Synthetic antioxidants could improve broiler performance and meat quality under stressful conditions [6]. On the other hand, long-term use of synthetic antioxidants may leave residue in broiler meats, harming consumers [6,7]. Because of this, it is very important to find natural antioxidants that can be used in a safe way to help reduce stress caused by high stocking densities in broiler production.
Organic acids have been shown to have antioxidant activity which can help chickens cope with stress [8,9]. Organic acids also improved intestinal ecology and morphology, which thereby helped broilers grow faster and healthier [7,9]. Meat quality treatment with organic acids has been shown to reduce cholesterol and saturated fatty acid (SEA) while enhancing polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) in broiler meats [10]. Similar to organic acids, LAB has been observed to exhibit antioxidant action [11]. Likewise, the lactic acid bacteria (LAB) treatment has improved intestinal digestive and absorptive functioning due to increased intestinal villi height (VH) of broilers [7]. With respect to meat quality, Yulianto et al. [12] have recently discovered that the dietary treatment of Lactobacillus casei enhanced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels while decreasing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and cholesterol in broiler meats. Furthermore, the LAB treatment enhanced the levels of n-3 PUFA, including eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexae-noic acid, in meats. In search of natural sources of organic acids, attention has been paid to acidic (sour-tasting) fruits. Averrhoa bilimbi L. is an acidic fruit with a high concentration of organic acids and phenolic substances [13,14].
Regarding LAB sources, fermented products are generally well recognized as rich in LAB [15]. Shrimp paste, made from fermented shrimp, is a natural LAB source [16,17], containing 4-6 log CFU/gm of LAB [16]. Lactobacillus plantarum is the most common LAB species found in Indonesian shrimp paste [17].
Previously, Mareta et al. [13] showed that providing fermented A. bilimbi fruit filtrate (FF) using Indonesian shrimp paste (as a fermentation starter) improved feed efficiency, physiological parameters, and the intestinal microbial population of broilers. The beneficial impact of the FF was evident in broilers reared in pens with normal density [13]. However, the impact of such treatment, especially on growth, intestinal morphology, carcass criteria, and meat quality has never been determined on broilers under stress conditions. Given that the elevation in the number of birds raised per square meter is one of the attempts to maximize cage use while minimizing cage investment costs, the application of natural antistress (instead of synthetic antistress) to ameliorate the adverse impact of stress due to high-density pens becomes critical. The current study assessed the effect of providing FF on productive parameters, gut morphology, carcass characteristics, and meat quality in broilers housed in high-density pens. It was hypothesized that giving FF improved production parameters, intestinal morphology, carcass proportions, and meat characteristics of broilers raised under high-density-induced stress conditions.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
The Animal Ethics Committee of Universitas Diponegoro's Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences approved the in vivo study (No. 57-04/A3/KEP/FPP).
Production of FF
A. bilimbi fruit (ripe condition) was picked from the campus gardens, while shrimp paste was acquired from Rembang Regency, Central Java Province, Indonesia. The conventional plate counting method using de Man Rogosa and Sharpe's agar (MRS; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) cultured anaerobically at 38°C for 48 h, shrimp paste contained 14.15 ± 0.33 log CFU/gm. Mareta et al. [13] described the fermentation of A. bilimbi fruit filtrate with shrimp paste. Briefly, A. bilimbi fruit was washed and drained before being crushed with an electric blender and filtered through a cheese cloth. The shrimp paste was then inoculated (gm:l) into the prepared fruit filtrate (pH 1.45 ± 0.06, determined with a portable pH meter, OHAUS ST300) in an anaerobic jar and left at room temperature. The FF had LAB counts of 30.37 ± 0.16 log CFU/ml and a pH of 1.30 ± 0.08 after 4 days of incubation. The fermented products were kept at -10°C until utilized in in vivo studies.
Broiler chicken study
Four hundred 1-day-old Lohmann broiler chickens (36.6 ± 0.10 gm; means standard ± deviation) were fed a commercial starting feed comprising 14% water, 20% protein, 5% fiber, 5% total fat, and 8% ash (according to label) until day 14. The birds were individually weighed on day 14, and 378 chicks (average body weight of 370 ± 9.25 gm) were employed in the current investigation. The in vivo study was set up in a factorial arrangement with two factors, i.e., stocking density (density of 9 birds/m2 or high density of 18 birds/m2) and treatment with 2% FF (from drinking water) or none. Within each density group, half of the chicks received FF via drinking water, while the other half received just plain water. As a result, there were four distinct treatment groups, each with seven pens. From day 14, the chickens were fed a mash-based formulated grower diet (Table 1).
Chicks were inoculated with the Newcastle disease vaccine via their eyes (day 4) and drinking water (day 18). Drinking water gave the Gumboro vaccine to the chicks on day 12. During the experiment, the chicks were reared in an open-sided house using rice husk matting. During the trial, the birds were kept in a constant light condition.
Sample collection and analysis
On day 35, each chicken was weighed individually. One male chick from each pen was killed, de-feathered, and dissected on the same day. For small intestine histological assessment, the segments of the small intestine were collected for about 2 cm, and the segments were placed in a 10% neutral formalin buffer. The edible giblets (heart, liver, and gizzard) and abdominal fat were taken and weighed. The commercial proportions of chicken were also assigned. Breast meat [without skin) was acquired to evaluate the proximate composition and physical properties, meat color, fatty acid levels, and cholesterol content. The meat samples were frozen at -10°C until they were analyzed.
Histopathological measurements of small intestine segments were performed according to Tunc et al. [18]. Hematoxylin and eosin were used to stain 5 |im intestinal slices. The VH and crypt depth (CD) were evaluated with an optical microscope linked to the camera. The gut morphology of each bird was determined based on five measurements. Before analyzing the meat, it was thawed for 30 min at room temperature. To determine the pH, 1 gm of meat was homogenized thoroughly with 9 ml of water, and the pH value of the filtrate was determined with a digital pH meter. The WHC of breast meat was assessed according to press techniques with filter paper [19]. Meat proximate ingredients were measured using the basic proximate analysis [20]. To measure the amount of cooking loss, meat was inserted into a plastic bag and cooked (at 80°C) for an hour. Before weighing, the meat was permitted to cool, and cooking loss was defined based on the weight divergence before and after the meat was cooked. Stewart et al. [21] described a modified saponification technique for measuring cholesterol in meat. After saponification, enzymatic techniques (using an enzyme kit from Merck Diagnostica, Darmstadt, Germany) were used to measure the meat's cholesterol, LDL, and HDL levels [22]. The levels of meat fatty acids were measured using gas chromatography. The fatty acids were identified based on the comparison of the retention time of each sample with the standard retention time. Fatty acids were quantified by normalizing the area percentage and converting it to mg per 100 gm edible portion with a lipid conversion factor [23]. On Mac OS X, meat color was determined using a digital color meter (set to CIE Lab). The values L* (brightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness) are used to represent colors.
Statistical analysis
The data were examined with SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary NC) based on the general linear model method and a 2 x 2 factorial set-up. Interactions between the major effects were included in the model, but they were removed when they were not statistically significant. The data are outlined as means, standard deviations, and standard errors. Duncan's multiple range test was used to distinguish statistically distinct means (p < 0.05).
Results
Growth and economic performances of broilers
From day 14 to 35, data on broiler growth and economic performance are shown in Table 2. There was no interaction (p > 0.05) between treatments on broiler total live weight, slaughter weight, and daily gain. Yet, the pen's density significantly impacted the above-measured parameters. The total live body weight of broilers per square meter in the high-density group was higher (p < 0.05) than in the normal density group. Normal-stocked broilers had a higher slaughter weight and daily gain (p < 0.05) than high-stocked broilers. There was a notable interaction between density and FF in terms of feed consumption, feed efficiency, feed cost, and income over feed cost. Birds raised at a high stocking density and administrated with FF had the lowest average daily feed consumption (p < 0.05), while birds raised at normal density and receiving FF had the highest (p < 0.05) feed intake. The efficiency of feed and income over feed cost improved (p < 0.05) after treatment with FF in drinking water, while feed cost per kg live weight gain decreased (p < 0.05) in chicks kept at a high density and provided with FF.
Intestinal morphology of broilers
The histomorphology of the intestine in broilers is shown in Table 3. The interaction between experimental factors was not substantial throughout the small intestine segments in the current investigation. In the duodenum, high stocking density tended to lower VH (p = 0.05) and VH/CD (p = 0.09). The FF tended (p = 0.06) to decrease the duodenal CD of broilers. The treatments did not influence the gut morphology of the jejunum and ileum (p > 0.05).
Carcass traits of broilers
Table 4 presents the data on carcass indices, abdominal fat, and edible giblets of broilers. A significant interaction was observed between the two factors regarding the abdominal fat accumulation of broilers. The abdominal fat deposition was less (p < 0.05) in normal-stocked broilers receiving FF than in other birds. The treatments, however, had no influence (p > 0.05) on carcass traits and edible giblets.
Chemical and physical traits of broiler meats
The data on the meat's chemical and physical traits are outlined in Table 5. There was no interaction (p > 0.05) between treatments on moisture, crude protein, crude fat, WHC, cooking loss, and pH of broiler breast meat. Stocking density had no (p > 0.05) impact, whereas WHC was reduced in broilers receiving FF breast meat. Cooking loss decreased (p < 0.05) with high density but was not affected (p > 0.05) by drinking FF. High-stocked meats showed higher (p < 0.05) pH values than normal-stocked broiler meats. The FF increased (p < 0.05) the meatpH. There was a notable interaction (p < 0.05) between these two factors in the lightness values of broiler meats, and it was also shown that a high-density pen reduced (p < 0.05) broiler meats. The notable interaction between density and drinking FF was not observed regarding broiler meats' redness and yellowness values. Indeed, housing broilers in density pens reduced redness levels in the meats (p > 0.05). Yet, stocking density had no impact (p > 0.05) on meat yellowness values.
Cholesterol and fatty acid composition of broiler meats
The cholesterol and fatty acid content of broiler breast meat are outlined in Table 6. Significant interactions between experimental factors were found for cholesterol, HDL, LDL, total unsaturated fatty acids (UFA), UFA/SFA ratio, and n-3 PUFA. However, a substantial interaction was not observed regarding cholesterol to HDL ratio, HDL to LDL ratio, total SEA, n-6 PUFA, and n-3 to n-6 PUFA ratio. Compared with other broiler meats, meats from broilers stocked at high density and receiving fermented fruit filtrate and from broilers stocked at normal density and receiving plain water had lower (p < 0.05) cholesterol levels. The meat of chicks kept at normal density and provided with FF had the greatest [p < 0.05) HDL and LDL values compared to other meats. In meats from broilers given fermented fruit filtrate, the cholesterol to HDL ratio was lower (p < 0.05), while the HDL to LDL ratio was higher [p < 0.05) than in meats from broilers given plain drinking water. The total SEA in broiler meat in high-density pens was higher (p < 0.05). When comparing meat from high-stocked broilers given fermented fruit filtrate to meat from other broilers, the total UFA was higher (p < 0.05). In meats of high-stocked broilers obtaining water, the UFA/SFAratio was lower (p < 0.05) than in other meats. The meat of high-stocked chicks fed FF had the greatest (p < 0.05) content of n-3 PUFA. Drinking fermented fruit filtrate enhanced [p < 0.05) n-6 PUFA concentrations. In high-stocked and drinking FF, the n-3/n-6 PUFA was higher (p < 0.05) than in normal-stocked broiler meats and plain water, respectively.
Discussion
Our current results showed that raising broilers at a high-density pen reduced slaughter weight and the average daily gain of broilers. A similar report was also documented by Li et al. [2] and Rashidi et al. [24]. This current study observed a novel finding: administering FF filtrate through drinking water enhanced the feed efficiency of broilers raised in high-density pens. This finding, therefore, suggests that using a natural additive in the form of FF can ameliorate the adverse impact of stress caused by high density on the efficiency of feed use for growth in chickens. It seemed that FF might improve the broiler's digestive and absorptive functions, resulting in higher nutrient availability for growth. In the latter case, the FF may act as an acidifier and probiotic source, thereby improving intestinal ecology and functions [13]. In modern broiler production, a natural novel additive in the form of FF can therefore be used as an alternative to in-feed antibiotics, which are currently prohibited in most countries around the world. Also, FF can be used as a natural antistress that can reduce the detrimental impact of stress due to its high density on broiler performance. In normal-stocked chicks, the effect of FF on feed efficiency was not as apparent as in high-stocked broilers. The reason for the latter condition was still unclear. The birds in normal-density pens seemed to have more prominent space for activity [25], making the birds allocate higher feed-derived energy for physical activity rather than growth.
Regarding average daily feed intake, the increased physical activity was most likely to elevate energy needs, thus increasing feed intake. Because there are fewer birds per square meter, competition for the feeder may be reduced, resulting in increased feed consumption. In a similar trend with feed efficiency, provision of birds with FF through drinking water was found to lower the feed cost per kg live weight gain of chickens, primarily when the birds were housed in high-density pens. Consequently, the income over feed cost of high-stocked broilers also increased with drinking fermented fruit filtrate. Based on the conditions described above, the use of FF could improve the economic or efficiency of modern broiler farms after the prohibition of in-feed antibiotics and the reduction of synthetic antistress agents in various countries around the world.
In the duodenum, broiler VH and the VH to CD ratio were lower when stocking density was high. In accordance with this, Kridtayopas et al. [3] found that increased stocking density was implicated in a substantial decrease in the VH of the duodenum of broiler chickens. In most cases, the lower VH and VH to CD ratio were usually linked to the broiler's reduced ability to absorb nutrients [26]. As a result, broiler chicken growth rates may be slowed, as in the present trial. A novel finding was found in the current investigation, in which administration of FF tended to reduce CD of broiler chickens regardless of the stocking density effect. According to Alyileili et al. [26], nutrient absorption is promoted by the shallow CD. Feed efficiency in high-stocked pens was better in broilers provided with FF than in broilers that only received water. This could be attributed to the reduced CD due to the fermented filtrate and improved broiler feed utilization and efficiency. As previously discussed, FF is very likely to act as an acidifier and a probiotic [13] that can protect the intestinal mucosa of broilers from damage during stress conditions. Indeed, damage to the intestinal mucosa can increase the demand for new tissue, resulting in increased tissue turnover and deeper crypts in broiler chickens [26]. The latter condition may have an adverse effect on broiler nutrient absorption.
Our data showed that drinking FF was attributed to the reduced abdominal fat proportion of chickens reared in a normal-density environment. The capability of FF to lower fat content seemed to be ascribed to the acid characteristic of the fermented fruit filtrate, which was able to inhibit de novo lipid production [27]. Similarly, the presence of LAB in FF may reduce de novo lipid formation in the liver while increasing fatty acid oxidation [28]. These conditions may eventually lower the abdominal fat deposition of broilers. However, the fat-lowering action of the fermented filtrate did not appear to be present in high-stocked broilers. In this study, the fat-lowering impact of fermented fruit filtrate was most likely counteracted by the rising effect of high-density-triggered stress on fat deposition. It should be noted that higher stocking density is linked to reduced broiler motility, resulting in increased abdominal fat accumulation [29]. If you want to stop fat from building up in the abdomens of broilers living in high-density pens, you may need to test higher doses (more than 2%) of fermented fruit filtrate in drinking water.
Regardless of the density impact, findings from our study revealed that WHC was reduced in the breast meat of broilers administrated with FF. Attia et al. [30] formerly documented that dietary supplementation of citric or fumaric acids reduced the WHC of broiler breast meats. Owing to the latter study, the high amount of citric acid in FF [14] was most likely responsible for the decreased WHC of broiler meat in the current investigation. In most cases, lower WHC is linked to meats with more crude fat, lower protein, and lower water content [31]. In the current investigation, the crude fat, protein, and water content of meat did not differ amongst the meats. As a result, the lower WHC in the meats of broilers administrated with FF in the current investigation was challenging to justify. In this study, high stocking density was linked to a decreased cooking loss of broiler breast meat. This finding contrasted with that of Nasr et al. [32], who found that housing chickens at a high density resulted in increased cooking and drip loss of meat. The rationale for the lower cooking loss in high-stocked meats is unknown. Commonly, broiler meat with low pH values is associated with lower WHC and higher cooking loss [31]. In this regard, higher pH values of high-stocked broiler meats may be linked to higher WHC and lower cooking loss than normal-stocked broiler meats. Regarding meat pH, high-stocked broiler meats had higher pH values than normal-stocked broiler meats. Birds raised in normal or low-density pens showed more physical activity than those raised in high-density pens, implying that this may increase the rate of glycolysis [33]. The latter circumstance may result in increased lactic acid production, thereby lowering the pH of broiler meats. In particular, with respect to the effect of FF on the pH values of meats, the treatment has been shown to increase the pH values of meats. An earlier study by Sugiharto et al. [34] pointed out that organic acids (formic acid, butyric acid, or a combination of both) increased the pH values of broiler breast meats. Organic acids in FF most likely reduced postmortem muscle glycolysis, preventing meat pH drop after slaughter [35].
Based on the results of the current experiment, high stocking density was linked to reduced broiler meat lightness. Because there is a negative relationship between pH values and broiler meat lightness, higher pH values in high-stocked broilers are usually related to lower lightness values of broiler meat [31]. The lightness values of meats in this investigation were lower than typical values (ranging from 44 to 53). Meats were frozen before laboratory analysis in this study. The fact that broiler meats have a lower lightness score could be because they were frozen before the test [36].
Regarding the administration of FF, the impact of such an additive did not provide a clear pattern, as fermented fruit filtrate decreased the lightness values of broiler meats under normal density conditions but increased lightness under high-density conditions. Until now, the precise cause of this condition has remained unknown. In the current investigation, stocking broilers in a high-density pen was linked to lower redness levels in the meat. The amount of myoglobin in meats is one of the most critical factors impacting the redness values of meats [31]. Indeed, physical activity is linked to higher myoglobin levels in muscles [37]. Considering this, the lesser activity of broiler chicks in high-density pens may explain the lower myoglobin content and, as a result, lower redness levels of high-stocked broiler meat. In this study, the provision of FF had no impact on the redness and yellowness of meat. It seemed that FF was unable to modify the myoglobin and hence did not affect the redness and yellowness values of broiler meats.
Our finding showed that total cholesterol in meat was higher in high-stocked broilers receiving plain water than in normal-stocked broilers receiving plain water. The stress caused by high density appeared to raise cholesterol levels in broiler meat. Park et al. [38] discovered elevated serum cholesterol levels in ducks kept in high-density pens. Stress-induced increases in corticosterone levels appeared to promote cholesterol production and accumulation in broiler chicken muscle tissues [39]. Indeed, FF could help reduce elevated cholesterol levels in meats caused by high-density stress. The antioxidant properties of A. bilimbi fruit [14] were most likely to alleviate stress and, as a result, minimize cholesterol synthesis and accumulation in muscle tissues. The latter assumption, however, should be approached with caution, as the FF increased total cholesterol in meats under normal density conditions. The precise reason for the disparate effects of FF on cholesterol content in broiler meats at normal and high stocking densities remains unknown. However, when the chicks were raised in high stocking density pens, the antistress activity of FF appeared to be more pronounced. The same thing occurred to broiler feed efficiency when they were housed in high stocking density pens (feed efficiency was improved by the additive only when the chicks were raised in high density, but not in normal density pens). Consumers generally prefer meat with lower cholesterol/ HDL and higher HDL/LDL since it is less likely to cause atherosclerosis. Promising findings were found in this current trial: the administration of FF reduced cholesterol/HDL and enhanced the HDL/LDL ratio in broiler meats. This condition could be explained by the higher increase in HDL (35.1%) compared to cholesterol (increased by 1.05%) and LDL (increased by 4.87%) levels after consuming FF. In terms of the effect of FF on the cholesterol profile, Pratama et al. [40] discovered that drinking FF (spontaneous fermentation) quadratically increased the serum levels of HDL in chicks. The latter investigators also proposed that the probiotic properties of the FF could modify lipoprotein metabolism, resulting in higher HDL levels. Also, the acid in the fermented fruit filtrate made it easier to digest and use proteins, which led to more lipoprotein (the main part of HDL) being made.
The current experiment showed that stocking at a high-density pen increased total SFA in broiler meat. This result is in line with Simsek et al. [41], revealing that high stocking density is implicated in increased SFA proportions in the breast meat of broilers. In this case, stress due to overcrowding may increase de novo fatty acid synthesis, resulting in increased SFA in meats [42]. It was also shown in this study that total UFA was higher in high-stocked broilers receiving FF. The application of such an additive appeared advantageous since customers preferred meats with a higher proportion of UFA, particularly PUFA. According to Simsek et al. [41], rearing broilers at a high density implicated a lower ratio of UFA to SFA in meat in the current investigation.
Interestingly, drinking with FF could prevent broiler meat's decreased UFA to SFA ratio due to high stocking density rearing. The acids and LAB contents in FF were most likely to ameliorate the stress conditions in broilers, which in turn reduced the liver's de novo fatty acid formation. This inference was supported by Galli et al. [43] and Imran et al. [44], who revealed that acids and LAB-based probiotics reduced the SFA content of broiler meats. In this study, the content of n-3 and n-6 PUFA in meats increased with the provision of FF to the broiler through drinking water. The exact reason for the latter circumstance was not known, but acid content in the FF seemed to be responsible. This is in agreement with Galli et al. [43], who found that the incorporation of acids increased the content of n-3 and n-6 PUFA in broiler meats. It was shown in this current investigation that n-3/n-6 PUFA was higher in high-stocked than in normal-stocked broiler meats. This is in contrast to Simsek et al. [41], who found that under the ad libitum feeding regimen, the n-3 and n-6 PUFA ratios rose with a reduced density. The substantially increased content of n-3 PUFA in high-stocked compared to normal-stocked broiler meats appeared to contribute to the higher n-3/n-6 PUFA in high-stocked broiler meats. With regard to FF, the treatment increased the n-3/n-6 PUFA of broiler meat in the present study. Indeed, drinking FF increased both n-3 and n-6 PUFA levels. Yet, the increase in n-3 PUFA was much more pronounced (426%) than in n-6 PUFA (28%). This may explain why broiler meats have more n-3 and n-6 PUFA after drinking FF.
Conclusion
High stocking density impaired broilers' production parameters, duodenal morphology, and meat quality. Drinking FF improved gut morphology (decreased duodenal CD) and meat quality (increased meat pH, decreased cholesterol levels and cholesterol to HDL ratio, increased HDL to LDL ratio, UFA, n-3 PUFA, and n-3/n-6 PUFA) of broilers stocked in a high-density pen.
List of abbreviations
CD: crypt depth, FF: fermented A biiimbi fruit filtrate, HDL: high-density lipoprotein, LAB: lactic acid bacteria, LDL: low-density lipoprotein, SFA: saturated fatty acids, PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids, UFA: unsaturated fatty acids, VH: villi height, WHC: water-holding capacity.
Acknowledgment
The work was sponsored by the Directorate of Research and Community Service, Directorate General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, the Republic of Indonesia, for the year 2021 (contractno. 225-88/UN7.6.1/PP/2021).
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Authors' contribution
SS designed and conducted the experiment, analyzed the data, and interpreted the results. TY and EW conducted the investigation and laboratory work and revised the manuscript.
References
[1] WangB, MinZ, Yuan J, Zhang B, Guo Y. Effects of dietary tryptophan and stocking density on the performance, meat quality, and metabolic status of broilers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2014; 5:44; https:// doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-5-44
[2] Li W, Wei F, Xu B, Sun Q, Deng W, Ma H, et al. Effect of stocking density and alpha-lipoic acid on the growth performance, physiological and oxidative stress and immune response of broilers. Asian-Austral ] Anim Sci 2019; 32:1914-22; https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0939
[3] Kridtayopas C, Rakangtong C, Bunchasak C, Loongyai W. Effect of prebiotic and synbiotic supplementation in diet on growth performance, small intestinal morphology, stress, and bacterial population under high stocking density condition of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2019; 98:4595-605; https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/ pezl52
[4] dos Santos Henrique C, Oliveira AFG, Ferreira TS, Silva ES, de Mello BFFR, de Freitas Andrade A, et al. Effect of stocking density on performance, carcass yield, productivity, and bone development in broiler chickens Cobb 500(r). Semina CiencAgrar 2017; 38:2705-18; https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n4SUPLp2705
[5] Wu Y, Wang Y, Wu W, Yin D, Sun X, Guo X, et al. Effects of nicotinamide and sodium butyrate on meat quality and muscle ubiquiti-nation degradation genes in broilers reared at a high stocking density. Poult Sci 2020; 99:1462; https://doi.Org/1470.10.1016/j. psj.2019.10.070
[6] Salami SA, Majoka MA, Saha S, Garber A, Gabarrou JF. Efficacy of dietary antioxidants on broiler oxidative stress, performance and meat quality: science and market. Avian Biol Res 2015; 8:65-78; https://doi.org/10.3184/175815515X14291701859483
[7] Sugiharto S. Role of nutraceuticals in gut health and growth performance of poultry. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 2016; 15:99-111; https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2014.06.001
[8] Zhang D, Nie S, Xie M, Hu J. Antioxidant and antibacterial capabilities of phenolic compounds and organic acids from Camellia oleifera cake. Food Sci Biotechnol 2020; 29:17-25; https://doi. org/10.1007/sl0068-019-00637-l
[9] Pearlin BV, Muthuvel S, Govidasamy P, Villavan M, Alagawany M, Ragab Farag M, et al. Role of acidifiers in livestock nutrition and health: a review. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2020; 104:558-69; https://doi.org/10.llll/jpn.13282
[10] Vinus V, Akbar MA, Tewatia BS, Kumar S. Effect of dietary supplementation of salts of organic acids on gut morphology and meat quality of broilers. Indian J Anim Res 2018; 52:1727-31; https:// doi.org/10.18805/ijar.B-3448
[11] Zhang Y, Hu P, Lou L, Zhan J, Fan M, Li D, et al. Antioxidant activities of lactic acid bacteria for quality improvement of fermented sausage. J Food Sci 2017; 82:2960-7; https://doi. org/10.1111/1750-3841.13975
[12] Yulianto AB, Lokapirnasari WP, Najwan R, Wardhani HCP, Rahman NFN, Huda K, et al. Influence of Lactobacillus casei WB 315 and crude fish oil (CFO) on growth performance, EPA, DHA, HDL, LDL, cholesterol of meat broiler chickens. Iran J Microbiol 2020; 12:148-55.
[13] Mareta I, Nathaniel G, Yudiarti T, Widiastuti E, Wahyuni HI, Sugiharto S. Effect of Averrhoa bilimbi fruit filtrate and shrimp paste mixture on performance, gut microbes and blood profile of broilers. Indones J Anim Vet Sci 2020; 25:182-9; https://dx.doi.org/10.14334/jitv. v25i4.2515
[14] Sugiharto S. The potentials of two underutilized acidic fruits [Averrhoa bilimbi L. and Phyllanthus acidus L.) as phytobiotics for broiler chickens. J Adv Vet Res 2020; 10:179-85; https://adve-tresearch.com/index.php/AVR/article/view/464
[15] Sugiharto S, Ranjitkar S. Recent advances in fermented feeds towards improved broiler chicken performance, gastrointestinal tract microecology and immune responses: a review. Anim Nutr 2019; 5:1-10; https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.aninu.2018.ll.001
[16] Kobayashi T, Kajiwara M, Wahyuni M, Kitakado T, Hamada-Sato N, Imada C, et al. Isolation and characterization of halophilic lactic acid bacteria isolated from "terasi" shrimp paste: a traditional fermented seafood product in Indonesia. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2003; 49:279-86; https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.49.279
[17] Amalia U, Sumardianto, Agustini TW. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from Indonesian shrimp paste (terasi). IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2018; 116:012049; https:// doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/116/1/012049
[18] Tunc MA, Yildirim S, Yoriik MA. Effects of tarragon [Artemisia dra-cunculus) powder on broiler performance parameters and his-topathology of internal organs. Austral J Vet Sci 2019; 51:113-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0719-81322019000300113
[19] Grau R, Hamm R. Eine einfache Methode zur Bestimmung der Wasserbindungim Muskel. Naturwissenschaften 1953; 40:29-30.
[20] AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 16th edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, 1995.
[21] Stewart G, Gosselin C, Pandian S. Selected ion monitoring of tertbu-tyldimethylsilyl cholesterol ethers for determination of total cholesterol content in foods. Food Chem 1992; 44:377-80; https:// doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(92)90271-3
[22] Bragagnolo N, Rodriguez-Amaya DB. Total lipid, cholesterol, and fatty acids of farmed freshwater prawn [Macrobrachium rosenber-gii) and wild marine shrimp [Penaeus brasiliensis, Penaeus schim-itti, Xiphopenaeus kroyeri). J Food Compos Anal 2001; 14:359-69; https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.2000.0981
[23] Holland B, Welch AA, Unwin ID, Buss DH, Paul AA, Southgate DAT. The composition of foods. The Royal Society of Chemistry, London, UK, 1998.
[24] Rashidi N, Ghorbani MR, Tatar A, Salari S. Response of broiler chickens reared at high density to dietary supplementation with licorice extract and probiotic. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2019; 103:100-7; https://doi.org/10.llll/jpn.13007
[25] Patria CA, Afnan R, Arief II. Physical and microbiological qualities of kampong-broiler crossbred chickens meat raised in different stocking densities. Media Peternakan 2016; 39:141-7; https://doi. org/10.5398/medpet.2016.39.3.141
[26] Alyileili SR, El-Tarabily KA, Belal I, Ibrahim WH, Sulaiman M, Hussein AS. Intestinal development and histomorphometry of broiler chickens fed Trichoderma reesei degraded date seed diets. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7:349; https://doi.org/10.3389/ivets.2020.00349
[27] Peng M, Han J, Li L, Ma H. Suppression of fat deposition in broiler chickens by (-)-hydroxycitric acid supplementation: a proteomics perspective. Sci Rep 2016; 6:32580; https://doi. org/10.1038/srep32580
[28] Wang H, Ni X, Qing X, Zeng D, Luo M, Liu L, et al. Live probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii BS15 promotes growth performance and lowers fat deposition by improving lipid metabolism, intestinal development, and gut microflora in broilers. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:1073; https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01073
[29] Beg MAH, Baqui MA, Sarker NR, Hossain MM. Effect of stocking density and feeding regime on performance of broiler chicken in summer season. Int J Poult Sci 2011; 10:365-75; https://doi. org/10.3923/ijps.2011.365.375
[30] Attia FAM, EL-Haliem HSA, Hermes IH, Mahmoud MMA. Effect of organic acids supplementation on nutrients digestibility, gut microbiota and immune response of broiler chicks. Egypt Poult Sc J 2018; 38:223-39; https://doi.org/10.21608/EPSJ.2018.5602
[31] Mir NA, Rafiq A, Kumar F, Singh V Shukla V Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review. J Food Sci Technol 2017; 54:2997-3009; https://doi.org/10.1007/ S13197-017-2789-Z
[32] Nasr MAF, Alkhedaide AQ, Ramadan AAI, Hafez ASE, Hussein MA. Potential impact of stocking density on growth, carcass traits, indicators of biochemical and oxidative stress and meat quality of different broiler breeds. Poult Sci 2021:101442; https://doi. org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101442
[33] Debut M, Berri C, Baeza E, Sellier N, Arnould C, Guemene D, et al. Variation of chicken technological meat quality in relation to genotype and preslaughter stress conditions. Poult Sci 2003; 82:1829-38; https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/82.12.1829
[34] Sugiharto S, Yudiarti T, Isroli I, Widiastuti E, Wahyuni HI, Sartono TA, et al. Effect of dietary supplementation of formic acid, butyric acid or their combination on carcass and meat characteristics of broiler chickens. J Indonesian Trop Anim Agric 2019; 44:286-94; https://doi.Org/10.14710/jitaa.44.3.286-294
[35] El-Senousey HK, Fouad AM, Yao JH, Zhang ZG, Shen QW. Dietary alpha lipoic acid improves body composition, meat quality and decreases collagen content in muscle of broiler chickens. Asian-Austral J Anim Sci 2013; 26:394-400; https://doi.org/10.5713/ ajas.2012.12430
[36] Augustyhska-Prejsnar A, Ormian M, Sokotowicz Z. Physicochemical and sensory properties of broiler chicken breast meat stored frozen and thawed using various methods. J Food Qual 2018:Article ID 6754070; https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6754070
[37] Roxin LE, Hedin G, Venge P. Muscle cell leakage of myoglobin after long-term exercise and relation to the individual performances. Int J Sports Med 1986; 7:259-63.
[38] Park BS, Um KH, Park SO, Zammit VA. Effect of stocking density on behavioral traits, blood biochemical parameters and immune responses in meat ducks exposed to heat stress. Arch Anim Breed 2018; 61:425-32; https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-61-425-2018
[3 9] Duan Y, Fu W, Wang S, Ni Y, Zhao R. Cholesterol deregulation induced by chronic corticosterone (CORT) stress in pectoralis major of broiler chickens. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 2014; 176:59-64; https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.07.010
[40] Pratama A, Mareta I, Yudiarti T, Wahyuni HI, Widiastuti E, Sugiharto S. Administration of fermented Averrhoa bilimbi L. fruit filtrate on growth, hematological, intestinal, and carcass indices of broilers. Trop Anim Sci J 2021; 44:79-89; https://doi.org/10.5398/ tasj.2021.44.1.79
[41] Simsek UG, Cerci IH, Dalkilic B, Yilmaz O, Ciftci M. Impact of stocking density and feeding regimen on broilers: chicken meat composition, fatty acids, and serum cholesterol levels. J Appl Poult Res 2009; 18:514-20; https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2008-00141
[42] Kpomasse CC, Oke OE, Houndonougbo FM, Tona K. Broiler production challenges in the tropics: a review. Vet Med Sci 2021; 7:831-42; https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.435
[43] Galli GM, Aniecevski E, Petrolli TG, da Rosa G, Boiago MM, Simoes CADP, et al. Growth performance and meat quality of broilers fed with microencapsulated organic acids. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2021; 271:114706; https://doi.Org/10.1016/j. anifeedsci.2020.114706
[44] Imran, Wajizah S, Samadi. Influence of liquid probiotic inclusion as feed additives on lipid profiles and meat cholesterol content of commercial broiler chickens. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2021; 667:012075; https://doi. org/10.1088/1755-1315/667/1/012075
[45] Bolton W. Poultry nutrition. MAFF Bulletin No.174. HMSO, London, UK, 1967.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ (the“License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Objective: This study assessed the impact of fermented Averrhoa bilimbi fruit filtrate (FF) on growth, gut morphology, and meat traits of high-stocked broilers. Materials and Methods: A 2 x 2 factorial trial with stocking densities (9 or 18 birds/m2) and drinking 2% FF or plain water was conducted using 378 14-day-old broiler chicks. On day 35, samples were obtained and analyzed. Results: FF improved feed efficiency and income over the feed cost of high-stocked broilers by about 7.63% and 10%, respectively, compared to high-stocked broilers receiving only water. FF decreased duodenal crypt depth and meat water-holding capacity. Meats from high-stocked broilers receiving FF showed lower cholesterol than other meats. Lower cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and higher HDL/low-density lipoprotein were found in meats from broilers receiving FF. Total unsaturated fatty acid (UFA) was higher in meats of high-stocked broilers receiving FF than others. The UFA/saturated fatty acid was lower in meats of high-stocked broilers receiving plain water. High-stocked broilers given FF had higher meat n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA). FF enhanced meat n-6 PUFA levels. The n-3/n-6 PUFA increased with high density and drinking FF. Conclusion: Drinking FF improved gut morphology and meat qualities of broilers housed in high-density pens. FF may be an excellent alternative to improve the growth and meat qualities of broilers raised in high-density houses.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Faculty of Animal and Agricultural Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia