It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease whose molecular mechanisms are activated several years before cognitive symptoms appear. Genotype-based prediction of the phenotype is thus a key challenge for the early diagnosis of AD. Machine learning techniques that have been proposed to address this challenge do not consider known biological interactions between the genes used as input features, thus neglecting important information about the disease mechanisms at play. To mitigate this, we first extracted AD subnetworks from several protein–protein interaction (PPI) databases and labeled these with genotype information (number of missense variants) to make them patient-specific. Next, we trained Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) on the patient-specific networks for phenotype prediction. We tested different PPI databases and compared the performance of the GNN models to baseline models using classical machine learning techniques, as well as randomized networks and input datasets. The overall results showed that GNNs could not outperform a baseline predictor only using the APOE gene, suggesting that missense variants are not sufficient to explain disease risk beyond the APOE status. Nevertheless, our results show that GNNs outperformed other machine learning techniques and that protein–protein interactions lead to superior results compared to randomized networks. These findings highlight that gene interactions are a valuable source of information in predicting disease status.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Complutense University of Madrid, Department of Computer Architecture and Automation, Computer Science Faculty, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667); San Carlos Research Health Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667); Technical University of Munich, Big Data in BioMedicine Group, Chair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a) (ISNI:0000000123222966)
2 Technical University of Munich, Big Data in BioMedicine Group, Chair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a) (ISNI:0000000123222966); Technical University of Munich, Institute for Advanced Study, Garching, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a) (ISNI:0000000123222966)
3 Technical University of Munich, Big Data in BioMedicine Group, Chair of Experimental Bioinformatics, TUM School of Life Sciences, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a) (ISNI:0000000123222966)
4 San Carlos Research Health Institute (IdISSC), Universidad Complutense, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667)
5 Complutense University of Madrid, Department of Computer Architecture and Automation, Computer Science Faculty, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.4795.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7667)