It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains a deadly malignancy lacking systemic therapies for advanced disease. Recent advancements include selective FGFR1–3 inhibitors for the 15% of ICC patients harboring fusions, although survival is limited by poor response and resistance. Herein we report generation of a patient-derived FGFR2 fusion-positive ICC model system consisting of a cell line, organoid, and xenograft, which have undergone complete histologic, genomic, and phenotypic characterization, including testing standard-of-care systemic therapies. Using these FGFR2 fusion-positive ICC models, we conducted an unbiased high-throughput small molecule screen to prioritize combination strategies with FGFR inhibition, from which HDAC inhibition together with pemigatinib was validated in vitro and in vivo as a synergistic therapy for ICC. Additionally, we demonstrate broad utility of the FGFR/HDAC combination for other FGFR fusion-positive solid tumors. These data are directly translatable and justify early phase trials to establish dosing, safety, and therapeutic efficacy of this synergistic combination.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
2 Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, New Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32) (ISNI:0000000419368710)
3 Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
4 Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
5 Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
6 Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Bioinformatics, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
7 Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, New Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32) (ISNI:0000000419368710); Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, New Haven, USA (GRID:grid.47100.32) (ISNI:0000000419368710)