Choiromyces sichuanensis sp. nov., a New Species from Southwest China, and Its Mycorrhizal Synthesis with Three Native Conifers

Abstract

A new Choiromyces species was discovered at local wild mushroom markets in Songpan County, Sichuan, southwest China where it has been considered as a Chinese white truffle. Based on both morphological and phylogenetic analyses, the collection was described as Choiromyces sichuanensis sp. nov. This study confirms the occurrence of members of Choiromyces in China. In addition, the mycorrhizal synthesis via spore inoculation between C. sichuanensis and Pinus armandii or two Picea species of Pi. likiangensis and Pi. crassifolia was attempted in a greenhouse. Both morphoanatomical and molecular analyses evidenced well-developed mycorrhization between C. sichuanensis and P. armandii, but not in Picea seedlings. Our current study provides data about the species diversity and mycorrhizal research of this genus for further studies. In addition, a successful mycorrhization between C. sichuanensis and selected tree species, irrespective of Pinus genus or other plant species, would broaden the set of species for a successful mycorrhization in greenhouse conditions and potential outplanting for cultivation purposes.

1. Introduction

The genus Choiromyces Vittad. (Tuberaceae, Pezizales, Ascomycotina) with C. meandriformis Vittad. as the type species was first described in 1831 [1]. Although Choiromyces is widely distributed in Asia, Europe, and North America [2,3,4,5], the species diversity of Choiromyces is low and only eight species have been categorized (C. alveolatus, C. cerebriformis, C. cookei, C. ellipsosporus, C. helanshanensis, C. meandriformis, C. tetrasporus and C. venosus) [2,3,4,5,6,7]. Among them, C. venosus is commonly considered conspecific with C. meandriformis [4,8], while C. cerebriformis and C. helanshanensis are sporadically reported from China [4,5].

Choiromyces venosus has been a delicacy in Northern Europe [9]. It is hypogeous, subglobose, or irregular, whitish in color, has a fragrant ascomata, and is solid gleba, which is often mistaken for a species of the genus Tuber. For example, C. meandriformis was once sold as T. magnatum Picco. as a highly prized mushroom in the European markets [3]. Interestingly, a similar situation also occurred in 2020 in the local fresh mushroom markets of Sonpan county, Sichuan, southwest China where “white truffle-like” mushrooms were sold as Chinese white truffles (Tuber panzhihuanense Deng, X.J. & Wang, Y.) at a comparatively high price of $80−100 USD kg⁻¹. Our morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses showed that these market collections belonged to a new species that had not been previously classified.

By enquiring local collectors and identifying plant leaves on the fruiting bodies, we assumed that those mushroom samples grow under a Picea dominated forest at altitude of ~2000 m. Choiromyces species has been described to be able to establish ectomycorrhizal associations in the field with Rosaceae (Dryas), Salicaceae (Salix), and Pinaceae (Abies, Picea, Pinus) and thus play an important ecological role in these forest ecosystems [4,5,10]. However, no information is available on how such an ectomycorrhization could be constructed under laboratory environments. In this study, using spores of C. sichuanensis sp. nov., we artificially examined their mycorrhizal symbiosis of three selected tree species including Pinus armandii Franch, an economically planted tree species that is also widely and naturally distributed at high altitude in southwest China [11] and two other important afforestation tree species, Picea likiangensis (Franch.) Pritz. and Pi. crassifolia Kom., which have wide distributions in southwest China and northwest China, respectively. Herein, we described these collections as Choiromyces sichuanensis sp. nov., and its relationships with other Choiromyces species were discussed. Additionally, a successful mycorrhizal synthesis between C. sichuanensis and selected tree species, irrespective of Pinus genus or other plant species, would broaden the set of species for a successful mycorrhization in greenhouse conditions and develop an effective pathway for cultivation purposes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Morphological Studies of Ascomata

Fresh specimens were purchased from markets in Songpan County, Tibetan Qiang Autonomous Prefecture of Ngawa, Sichuan, China. Morphological examinations were performed for three Choiromyces specimens, comprising 14 ascomata, which are from three different collection sites. Gross morphology was described based on the fresh ascomata, and microscopic examination was later conducted using dry material according to Yang and Zhang [12]. Hand-cut sections were mounted in a 5% (w/v) KOH solution and examined under a light microscope (Leica DM2500, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) to observe and record morphology of the ascospores, dermatocystidia, and peridium. For the evaluation of the range of ascus and spore size, 30 asci and 80 ascospores were totally measured based on three samples from three different sites. The spores were also scanned by electron microscopy to observe the surface decoration and record spines’ length. For the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observation, spores were scraped from the dried gleba onto double-sided tape and then directly mounted on a SEM stub, coated with gold-palladium, examined, and photographed using a JSM-5600LV SEM (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Specimens were deposited at Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

2.2. Mycorrhizal Synthesis with Plants

Seeds of Pinus armandii were purchased from the Ciba market, Kunming, Yunnan. Seeds of Picea likiangensis (No. 16CS14028) and Pi. crassifolia (No. LiuJQ-09XZ-LZT-125) were obtained from the Southwest Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. In June 2021, 30% hydrogen peroxide was used for surface sterilization of seeds for 10 min and then rinsed thoroughly in distilled water. Seeds of all three species were germinated on a sterilized mixture of perlite and peat (1:1, V:V), which was autoclaved at 121 °C for one hour. Substrate for inoculation was composed of vermiculite: peat: perlite (3:2:1, V:V:V) [13]. Before inoculation, one ascomata was sliced, air dried (average room temperature was 12 °C), and stored at −40 °C. Three-month-old seedlings (September 2021) were rinsed with tap water to remove remaining substrate, and roots were kept moistened until inoculation. Dry slices of ascomata were soaked in distilled water for 24 h at 4 °C and then homogenized with a blender. Spore concentration was measured with a hemacytometer. Five seedlings of each tree species were inoculated with C. sichuanensis spore slurry. Each seedling received 8.0 × 10⁶ spores. Spore slurry was applied in the upper third of the seedling’s root system. Five seedlings of each non-C. sichuanensis inoculated control tree species received 10 mL of distilled water. Seedlings were kept in 420 mL square plastic containers (“olive pots”, Daltons Ltd., Christchurch, New Zealand) and grown in a greenhouse on the Kunming Institute of Botany (KIB) campus for six months (September 2021 to March 2022). Growth conditions were natural day-length (10–12 h), average temperature in the day was 14–22 °C. The containers with or without C. sichuanensis inoculation were grown in groups, rather than a randomized arrangement. Each group consisted of a given Pinus/Picea species inoculated or not with C. sichuanensis: 10 seedlings distributed in two rows (one inoculated, one uninoculated) of five seedlings. Seedlings were watered with tap water three times a week to maintain moisture around 50–80%.

2.3. Morphological Observations of Ectomycorrhizae (ECM)

Each seedling was carefully removed from the container to identify the macro-morphological and anatomical characters of C. sichuanensis ECM using a stereomicroscope (Leica S8AP0, Leica Microsytems, Wetzlar, Germany) and a compound light microscope (Leica DM2500, Leica Microsytems, Wetzlar, Germany) following the methods of Agerer [14] and Munsell Color Chart (1994 revised edition). Photographs were captured using the Leica Application Suite. Cross- and longitudinal-sections were made by a freezing microtome (Leica CM3050S) and observed under a compound light microscope (Leica DM2500) for characterization [15,16]. ECM colonization was calculated as the number of ECM roots divided by the total number of root tips, which include ECM root tips and non-ECM root tips [17]. Number of root tips were estimated using W_INR_HIZO (Regent Instruments Canada Inc., Quebec, QC, Canada).

2.4. Phylogenetic Analyses

Total DNA was extracted from pieces of dried ascomata using a modified CTAB procedure [18]. Genomic DNA of 10 pooled mycorrhizal tips displaying morphology characteristic of C. sichuanensis from each inoculated seedling and 10 pooled root tips from each non-inoculated seedling were extracted using Aidlab™ kit (Beijing, China). The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) was amplified using primers ITS1F and ITS4 [18,19]. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed using the following procedure: 25 µL of PCR reaction solution contained 1 μL DNA, 1 μL (5 μM) of each primer, 2.5 μL 10 × buffer (Mg²⁺ dNTP (1 mM), 0.5 μL BSA (0.1%), 0.5 μL MgCl₂, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Taq, Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). PCR reactions were run as follows: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 52 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were sent to Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China) for sequencing.

We have obtained three sequences from ascocarps, 1 from ectomycorrhiza, and the rest of the 52 sequences used for phylogenetic analysis (Table 1) were retrieved from the GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/). Dingleya sp. (JF300131, HM485334, JQ925627 and JQ925628) were selected as the outgroup (Table 1) [4,5]. Dataset was aligned using MAFFT v.7.0 [20] applying the L–INS–I strategy and then manually edited with BioEdit v.7.0.9 as needed [21] for deleting the bases in the beginning and end of the matrix that do not belong to the ITS interval. The phylogenetic relationships of taxa were inferred using maximum likelihood (ML) [22] and Bayesian inference (BI) [23].

3. Results

3.1. Taxonomy

Choiromyces sichuanensis Wan, S.P., Wang, R. & Yu, F.Q., sp. nov. (Figure 1).

MycoBank no.: MB843523

Type: CHINA, Sichuan Province, in humic soil under Picea asperata M ast. forest, 29 October 2020, wsp971 (Holotype, YNAU003, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS = MW380902).

Etymology: sichuanensis, referring to the location of the type collection.

Description: The ascomata was 2–9 cm in diam, hypogeous, subglobose, or tuberiform, knobby with deep lobes, surface smooth, white, pale yellow to reddish-brown with dark gullies when fresh (Figure 1a), then becoming brown when dry. The peridium was 37–567 µm thick, not clearly differentiated, composed of light brown (outer) or hyaline (inner) hyphae, 0.7–10.0 μm at septa in diam (Figure 1b,c). The gleba was solid, milky white, slightly brown and marbled with white veins, of interwoven thin-walled hyphae, and an odor that was strong, pleasant. The asci hyaline, clavate to saccate, were eight-spored, (35.0–)50.0–88.0(–103.5) × (31.0–)34.0–65.0(–67.0) μm (N = 30). The ascospores were spherical, pale yellow-brown at maturity, (16.7–)17.0–21.4(–24.6) μm in diam (N = 80), irregularly covered with curved blunt spines up to 4 μm (Figure 1d–f).

Habitat and distribution: The specimens were found and collected from a humus soil under a Picea sp. forest in October. Additional specimens examined: CHINA, Sichuan Province: Picea sp., 29 October 2020, wsp 971-1 (YNAU0022, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS = OM417587); wsp 971-2 (YNAU004, GenBank Acc. No.: ITS = OK585070).

Remarks: Choiromyces sichuanensis is characterized by hypogeous, glabrous, white, pale yellow or brown, irregularly knobby, much lobed ascomata, and globose spores ornamented with conspicuous, straight, or slightly curved blunt spines. In fact, C. sichuanensis can easily be distinguished from the other two phylogenetically related Chinese Choiromyces species based on the ascosporal ornamentation with long blunt spines (up to 4 μm) whereas spines’ height was <3 μm in Chinese C. helanshanensis (2.0–2.5 μm), C. cerebriformis (2.0–3.0 μm), and southern African C. echinulatus (<2 μm) [4,5,25]. In addition, the spores of C. meandriformis are ornamented with free and “hollow” rods with truncated tips (with apical depressions) [3]. Choiromyces venosus is commonly considered conspecific with C. meandriformis [4]. Additionally, spores’ ornamentation of C. magnusii looks pitted to verrucose-reticulated with a minutely meshed reticulum, and spores of the American species of C. alveolatus are ornamented small pores, which are clearly different from those of C. sichuanensis [3]. Additionally, this species shares similar characteristics with Tuber panzhihuanense, namely the size of ascocarps, color, an irregularly knobbed ascomata, and whitish gleba with sinuous veins when young. However, C. sichuanensis differs from T. panzhihuanense and any other white Tuber species in its globose spores ornamented with conspicuous spines.

3.2. Description of Ectomycorrhizae Choiromyces sichuanensis Wan, S.P., Wang, R. & Yu, F.Q. + Pinus armandii Franch (Figure 2)

After inoculation in the greenhouse for six months (September 2021 to March 2022), ECM was formed between C. sichuanensis and all inoculated P. armandii seedlings (Figure 2a–c). ECM colonization (%) was 82.86 (±2.04). No ECM was detected in any of Picea or control seedlings.

Figure 2

(a) Six-month-old Pinus armandii seedlings inoculated with Choiromyces sichuanensis in pots. (b,c) Ectomycorrhizal tips after six-month inoculation (bars = 1 mm). (d) Detail of the surface showing sparse emanating hyphae (bars = 1 mm). (e) Septate and see-through hyphae emanating and rhizomorphs from the outer mantle layer (bar = 20 µm). (f) Plan view of the inner mantle (bar = 20 µm). (g,h) Cross-section showing the mantle (M), cortical cells (CC), and Hartig net (HN) (bar = 20 µm). (i) Tangential section showing Hartig net (HN) (bar = 20 µm). (j) Plan view of the outer mantle showing irregular tree branch–like pattern (bar = 10 μm).

[Figure omitted. See PDF]

ECM systems were 2.5–4.3 mm long and 1.5–5.6 mm wide (Figure 2b,c), monopodial or dichotomously branched and complex, with a coralloid, main axis 0.3–0.4 mm wide, branches 2.4–6.0 mm long and 0.3–0.5 mm wide, straight to slightly sinuous, and yellowish-brown ochre. Mantles were smooth or slightly woolly (Figure 2d); emanating hyphae were long, with sample or branched, septate, rounded tips, up to 3.0–4.8 μm diam at the base and were frequent on young ECM, rhizomorphs occurrence (Figure 2e). Whole mycorrhiza discoloring was darker with age; the was mantle distinct, not transparent; cortical cells were not visible.

Cross-section: The mantle was 18–45 μm thick, with 4–9 layers of hypha cells (Figure 2g,h). The outer mantle layer (Figure 2j) was pseudoparenchymatous or a transitional type between plectenchymatous to pseudoparenchymatous in plan views (close to type H), partially Hartig net-lik with some of them cut in a cross-section view, thin-walled, and smooth. The inner mantle layer (Figure 2f) was plectenchymatous with a net-like arrangement of hyphal bundles (mantle type A), partially Hartig net-like with often thin-walled. Hartig net palmetto type had single hyphal rows (Figure 2h). Longitudinal section: The mantle was disposed in a plectenchymatous arrangement; hyphae was disposed in parallel and was flat-lying, compact in the inner layer, compact in the outer mantle, with tannin cells cylindrical, cortical cells rectangular to rounded, and hyphae between cortical cells cylindrical (Figure 2i).

The ECM of other fungal species were not detected in any of the inoculated or control seedlings.

3.3. Phylogenetic Analyses

The final ITS alignment included 56 sequences (Table 1), which contained 665 aligned sites. The Bayesian analysis yielded similar trees as the parsimony analysis; thus, only the phylogenetic tree established from the parsimony analysis was presented (Figure 3). All analyzed Choiromyces species formed a monophyletic group with 100% bootstrap support. Three Choiromyces specimens and one Choiromyces mycorrhiza from this study were independently clustered as a well-supported subclade (PP = 1.0, BP = 100) and were clearly distinct from the known C. helanshanensis and C. cerebriformis.

4. Discussion

Phylogenetic analysis based on ITS sequences indicated that there are nine species of C. cerebriformis, C. helanshanensis, C. sichuanensis, Choiromyces sp. 1, C. alveolatus, Choiromyces sp. 2, C. meandriformis, C. venosus, and C. magnusii within the genus Choiromyces. C. cookei, C. ellipsosporus. Among them, C. venosus is commonly considered conspecific with C. meandriformis [4,8], and we unified the above viewpoint through the phylogenetic analysis results of this study (Figure 3). Among the above species, the Choiromyces Chinese specimens formed an independent clade (Figure 3) with high Bayesian posterior probability and were easily distinguishable from other European and American species. Meanwhile, DNA analyses revealed less than 95% ITS sequence similarity between C. sichuanensis, C. cerebriformis, and C. helanshanensis. Most species of fungi show 1–3% intraspecific and >3% interspecific distance between ITS sequences [31]. Thus, the molecular results confirmed that C. sichuanensis was well distinguished from C. cerebriformis and C. helanshanensis. Moreover, morphologically, ascosporal ornamentation in C. sichuanensis had longer blunt spine than that in two other Chinese Choiromyces species. Therefore, these morphological and molecular results provided strong support for C. sichuanensis as a new species (100% and 98% PP). In China, little is known about hypogeous fungi other than the genus Tuber. However, the abundance and diversity of Tuber species in southwest China indicate a potential biodiversity of other hypogeous fungi in this region. In this study, we confirmed an independent species within the genus Choiromyces and provided fundamental data about the diversity of species for future studies.

The ECM between C. sichuanensis and P. armandii was well developed, while no such ECM formation was observed on Picea roots. Both morphological descriptions and molecular identification fully confirmed the real identities of mycorrhization between C. sichuanensis and P. armandii as the ITS sequences of the synthesized mycorrhizae were identical to the original ascomata used for inoculation. Although C. sichuanensis was sold as Chinese white truffle, the ectomycorrhizal morphological characteristics are different with Tuber panzhihuanense which has typical needle-shaped cystidia and pseudoparenchymatous mantles [32]. This result is the first report on the synthesized mycorrhizae between pine plants with a commercial pig truffle of C. sichuanensis. Both morphological and molecular evidence in this study could provide reliable references for future studies of other Choiromyces species. In contrast, we had not observed ECM formation either from Picea likiangensis or Pi. crassifolia, although C. sichuanensis samples might come from a Picea dominated forest, which has to be confirmed in nature. Mycorrhizal synthesis in this study was carried out in September 2021 to March 2022 in greenhouse with natural light and a minimal midday temperature of 10 °C in winter months. Low soil temperatures have been shown to inhibit shoot, leaf, and root growth and water uptake [33,34,35]. Lahti et al. [36] studied the effects of soil temperature on Norway spruce seedlings’ root growth. The results showed that the root growth of Norway spruce was significantly lower at 9 °C compared with the other treatments. In our study, a kind of winter dormancy of Picea might inhibit root growth, and then affect the formation of mycorrhiza. Therefore, further studies are required to better understand the relationships between C. sichuanensis and Picea or other ecotomycorrhizal tree species. The expected results could provide management strategies for developing mushroom cultivation under planted and natural forests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.Y.; methodology, R.W. and S.W.; software, R.W. and S.W.; validation, R.W., S.W. and F.Y; formal analysis, R.W. and S.W.; investigation, S.W.; resources, J.Y.; data curation, R.W. and S.W.; writing—original draft preparation, R.W. and S.W.; writing—review and editing, F.Y.; visualization, R.W. and S.W.; supervision, F.Y.; project administration, S.W.; funding acquisition, S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Xinhua He for constructive comments that improved the quality of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures and Table

Figure 1. Choiromyces sichuanensis (YNAU003, Type): (a) ascoma; (b) dermatocystidia; (c) peridium section; (d,e) light micrograph (LM) of ascospores; (f) SEM image of an ascospore.

Figure 3. RAxML tree based on ITS sequences of Choiromyces sichuanensis and related species. Bootstrap (BS) values derived from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis (≥70%) and posterior probabilities (PPs) from Bayesian inference (≥0.90) are shown above or beneath the branches at nodes. New sequences are in colored bold font.

Table 1

Species name, voucher, origin, ITS, and references for sequences.

Species Name	Voucher	Origin	ITS	References
Choiromyces alveolatus (Harkn.) Trappe	MES97	USA	HM485332	Bonito et al. [24]
C. alveolatus	Trappe 17497	USA	EU669384	Unpublished
C. alveolatus	22830	Israel	AF501258	Ferdman et al. [25]
C. alveolatus	HS2886	USA	HM485333	Bonito et al. [24]
C. cerebriformis Yuan, T.J., Li, S.H. & Wang, Y.	YAAS 8890 Holotype	Diqing, China	MW209701	Yuan et al. [5]
C. cerebriformis	YAAS TJ16-2	Yunnan, China	MT672014	Yuan et al. [5]
C. cerebriformis	YAAS TJ16-1	Yunnan, China	MT672013	Yuan et al. [5]
C. helanshanensis Juan Chen & P.G. Liu	YAAS L3063	China	MT672012	Yuan et al. [5]
C. helanshanensis	YAAS L3062	China	MT672011	Yuan et al. [5]
C. helanshanensis	YAAS L3051	China	MT672010	Yuan et al. [5]
C. helanshanensis	HKAS 80639	Inner Mongolia, China	KP019351	Chen et al. [4]
C. helanshanensis	HKAS 80647	Inner Mongolia, China	KP019350	Chen et al. [4]
C. helanshanensis	HKAS80631	Inner Mongolia, China	KP019349	Chen et al. [4]
C. helanshanensis	HKAS80642	Inner Mongolia, China	KP019348	Chen et al. [4]
C. helanshanensis	HKAS80646	Inner Mongolia, China	KP019347	Chen et al. [4]
C. helanshanensis	HKAS80634 Holotype	Inner Mongolia, China	KP019346	Chen et al. [4]
C. helanshanensis	HKAS80645	Inner Mongolia, China	KP019345	Chen et al. [4]
C. helanshanensis	HKAS80638	Inner Mongolia, China	KP019344	Chen et al. [4]
C. helanshanensis	HKAS80636	Inner Mongolia, China	KP019343	Chen et al. [4]
C. helanshanensis	HMAS83766	Heilongjiang, China	KU531609	Unpublished
C. helanshanensis	HKAS80641	Inner Mongolia, China	KU531606	Unpublished
C. magnusii (Mattir.) Paol.	AH11894	Spain	JF300144	Moreno et al. [3]
C. magnusii	AH19770	Spain	JF300143	Moreno et al. [3]
C. meandriformis Vittad.	K(M):171388	United Kingdom	MZ159438	Unpublished
C. meandriformis	K(M)53644	England	EU784185	Brock et al. [26]
C. meandriformis	K(M)135393	England	EU784184	Brock et al. [26]
C. sichuanensis Wan, S.P., Wang, R. & Yu, F.Q.	YNAU003 Holotype	Sichuan, China	MW380902	This study
C. sichuanensis	YNAU004	Sichuan, China	OK585070	This study
C. sichuanensis	YNAU0022	Sichuan, China	OM417587	This study
C. sichuanensis Wan, S.P., Wang, R. & Yu, F.Q. + Pinus armandii Franch	Synthesized ECM of Pinus armandii	Sichuan, China	ON113253	This study
C. venosus (Fr.) Th. Fr.	AH38904	Romania	JF300147	Moreno et al. [3]
C. venosus	AH38915	Italy	JF300146	Moreno et al. [3]
C. venosus	AH38935	UK	JF300145	Moreno et al. [3]
Choiromyces sp.	AR1291	Canada	JX630965	Timling et al. [27]
Choiromyces sp.	AR1293	Canada	JX630960	Timling et al. [27]
Choiromyces sp.	AR1647	Canada	JX630948	Timling et al. [27]
Choiromyces sp.	HV_D3_8	USA	JX630713	Timling et al. [27]
Choiromyces sp.	PP_S3_3_287_1	Canada	JX630610	Timling et al. [27]
Choiromyces sp.	FB_D3_5_188_1	USA	JX630491	Timling et al. [27]
Choiromyces sp.	FB_D3_1_184a_4	USA	JX630489	Timling et al. [27]
Choiromyces sp.	JLF1765	USA	MH220314	Unpublished
Choiromyces sp.	58-351	USA	MH038084	Hart et al. [28]
Uncultured Choiromyces	NX1-4299	Ningxia, China	LC622741	Unpublished
Uncultured Choiromyces	NX2-148	Ningxia, China	LC623368	Unpublished
Uncultured Choiromyces	t24	Xinjiang, China	MF142389	Unpublished
Uncultured Choiromyces	NX1-4464	Ningxia, China	LC622777	Unpublished
Uncultured Choiromyces	NX1-4377	Ningxia, China	LC622757	Unpublished
Uncultured Choiromyces	NX1-4472	Ningxia, China	LC622778	Unpublished
Uncultured Choiromyces	NX2-137	Ningxia, China	LC623365	Unpublished
Uncultured Choiromyces	3232A6	USA	KF617408	Taylor et al. [29]
Uncultured Choiromyces	AR699	Canada	JX630936	Timling et al. [27]
Uncultured Choiromyces	TK21_OTU183	USA	EF434127	Taylor et al. [29]
Dingleya sp.	JT31036	Australia	JQ925628	Bonito et al. [30]
Dingleya sp.	JT31575	Australia	HM485334	Bonito et al. [24]
Dingleya sp.	JT27686	Australia	JQ925627	Bonito et al. [30]
Dingleya sp.	AH37860	Australia	JF300131	Moreno et al. [3]

References

1. Vittadini, C. Monographia Tuberacearum; Ex Typographia F. Rusconi: Milan, Italy, 1831; pp. 1-88.

2. Pegler, D.N.; Spooner, B.M.; Young, T.W.K. British Truffles: A Revision of British Hypogeous Fungi; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew: London, UK, 1993; ISBN 0-947643-39-7

3. Moreno, G.; Alvarado, P.; Manjon, J.L. Phylogenetic affiliation of Choiromyces magnusii and C. venosus (Tuberaceae Ascomycota) from Spain. Mycol. Prog.; 2012; 11, pp. 463-471. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11557-011-0762-1]

4. Chen, J.; Sun, L.H.; Su, Y.; Zhao, W.Q.; Liu, P.G. Choiromyces helanshanensis sp. nov. a new species of subterranean truffle from China. Mycoscience; 2016; 57, pp. 279-286. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.myc.2016.04.001]

5. Yuan, T.J.; Rasp, O.; Li, Y.J.; Wang, L.; Li, S.H. Choiromyces cerebriformis (Tuberaceae), a new hypogeous species from Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa; 2021; 482, pp. 251-260. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.482.3.3]

6. Trappe, J.M. Generic synonyms in the Tuberales. Mycotaxon; 1975; 2, pp. 109-122.

7. Kirk, P.M.; Cannon, P.F.; Minter, D.W.; Stalpers, J.A. Dictionary of the Fungi; 10th ed. CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2008.

8. McNeill, J.; Barrie, F.F.; Buck, W.R.; Demoulin, V.; Greuter, W.; Hawksworth, D.L.; Herendeen, P.S.; Knapp, S.; Marhold, K.; Prado, J. et al. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code); Regnum Vegetabile No. 154 Koeltz Scientific Books: Königstein, UK, 2012.

9. Weden, C.; Larsson, S.; Burman, R.; Backlund, A. The edible truffle Choiromyces venosus and its use in Sweden. Acta Botanica Yunnanica Suppl; 2009; 31, pp. 94-96.

10. Maia, L.C.; Yano, A.M.; Kimbrough, J.W. Species of Ascomycota forming ectomycorrhizae. Mycotaxon; 1996; 57, pp. 371-390.

11. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C. Study on environment impact factors of Pinus armandii forest in Yunnan Province. Forest. Resour. Manag.; 2018; 6, pp. 68-75. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.06.012]

12. Yang, Z.L.; Zhang, L.F. Type studies on Clitocybe macrospora and Xerula furfuracea var. bispora. Mycotaxon; 2003; 88, pp. 447-454. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2009.05.004]

13. Huang, L.L.; Guerin-Laguette, A.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.M.; Yu, F.Q. Mycorrhizal synthesis of Tuber pseudohimalayense with seven broad-leaved trees and Pinus armandii. Mycoscience; 2021; 62, pp. 322-330. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.47371/mycosci.2021.06.004]

14. Agerer, R. Colour Atlas of Ectomycorrhizae; Einhorn-Verlag + Druck: Munich, Germany, 1987–2002; 1–12.

15. Agerer, R. Characterization of Ectomycorrhiza, in Techniques for the Study of Mycorrhiza; Norris, J.R.; Read, D.J.; Varma, A.K. Academic Press: London, UK, 1991; pp. 25-73. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0580-9517(08)70172-7]

16. Agerer, R.; Rambold, G. DEEMY—An Information System for Characterization and Determination of Ectomycorrhizae. 2004–2017. Available online: www.deemy.de (accessed on 30 June 2020).

17. Gehring, C.A.; Whitham, T.G. Comparisons of ectomycorrhizae in Pinyon Pines (Pinus edulis; Pinaceae) across extremes of soil type and herbivory. Am. J. Bot.; 1994; 81, pp. 1509-1516. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1994.tb11461.x]

18. Gardes, M.; Bruns, T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes--application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol.; 1993; 2, pp. 113-118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1993.tb00005.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8180733]

19. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M.; Gelfand, D.; Sninsky, J.; White, T. Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315-322. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1]

20. Katoh, K.; Standley, D.M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol.; 2013; 30, pp. 772-780. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23329690]

21. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user–friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser.; 1999; 41, pp. 95-98. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-14998u1.29]

22. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum-likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics; 2006; 22, pp. 2688-2690. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446]

23. Ronquist, F.; Huelsenbeck, J.P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics; 2003; 19, pp. 1572-1574. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12912839]

24. Bonito, G.; Trappe, J.M.; Rawlinson, P.; Vilgalys, R. Improved resolution of major clades within Tuber and taxonomy of species within the Tuber gibbosum complex. Mycologia; 2010; 102, pp. 1042-1057. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3852/09-213] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20943504]

25. Ferdman, Y.; Aviram, S.; Roth-Bejerano, N.; Trappe, J.M. Phylogenetic studies of Terfezia pfeilii and Choiromyces echinulatus (Pezizales) support new genera for southern African truffles: Kalaharituber and Eremiomyces. Mycol. Res.; 2005; 109, pp. 237-245. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953756204001789]

26. Brock, P.M.; Döring, H.; Bidartondo, M.I. How to know unknown fungi: The role of a herbarium. New. Phytol.; 2009; 181, pp. 719-724. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02703.x]

27. Timling, I.; Dahlberg, A.; Walker, D.A.; Gardes, M.; Charcosset, J.Y.; Welker, J.M.; Taylor, D.L. Distribution and drivers of ectomycorrhizal fungal communities across the North American Arctic. Ecosphere; 2012; 3, pp. 1-25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES12-00217.1]

28. Hart, B.T.N.; Smith, J.E.; Luoma, D.L.; Hatten, J.A. Recovery of ectomycorrhizal fungus communities fifteen years after fuels reduction treatments in ponderosa pine forests of the Blue Mountains, Oregon. Forest. Ecol. Manag.; 2018; 422, pp. 11-22. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.03.050]

29. Taylor, D.L.; Herriott, I.C.; Long, J.; O’Neill, K. TOPO TA is A-OK: A test of phylogenetic bias in fungal environmental clone library construction. Environ. Microbiol.; 2007; 9, pp. 1329-1334. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01253.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17472644]

30. Bonito, G.; Smith, M.E.; Nowak, M.; Healy, R.A.; Guevara, G.; Cazares, E.; Kinoshita, A.; Nouhra, E.R.; Dominguez, L.S.; Tedersoo, L. et al. Historical biogeography and diversification of truffles in the Tuberaceae and their newly identified southern hemisphere sister lineage. PLoS ONE; 2013; 8, E52765. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052765] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23300990]

31. Nilsson, R.H.; Kristiansson, E.; Ryberg, M.; Hallenberg, N.; Larsson, K.H. Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification. Evol. Bioinform. Online; 2008; 4, pp. 193-201. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4137/EBO.S653] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19204817]

32. Yang, M.; Zou, J.; Liu, C.; Xiao, Y.J.; Zhang, X.P.; Yan, L.J.; Ye, L.; Tang, P.; Li, X.L. Chinese white truffles shape the ectomycorrhizal microbial communities of Corylus avellana. Ann. Microbiol.; 2019; 69, pp. 553-565. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13213-019-1445-4]

33. Grossnickle, S.C.; Blake, T.J. Acclimation of cold-stored jack pine and white spruce seedlings: Effect of soil temperature on water relations. Can. J. For. Res.; 1985; 15, pp. 544-550. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x85-089]

34. Landhäusser, S.M.; Lieffers, V.J. Growth of Populus tremuloides in association with Calamagrostis canadensis. Can. J. For. Res.; 1998; 28, pp. 396-401. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x98-006]

35. Wan, X.; Zwiazek, J.J.; Lieffers, V.J.; Landhäusser, S.M. Hydraulic conductance in aspen (Populus tremuloides) seedlings exposed to low soil temperatures. Tree. Physiol.; 2001; 21, pp. 691-696. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/21.10.691]

36. Lahti, M.; Aphalo, P.J.; Finér, L.; Ryyppö, A.; Lehto, T.; Mannerkoski, H. Effects of soil temperature on shoot and root growth and nutrient uptake of 5-year-old Norway spruce seedlings. Tree. Physiol.; 2005; 25, pp. 115-122. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.1.115]