It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Despite decades of intense research, the enigmatic pseudo-gap (PG) phase of superconducting cuprates remains unsolved. In the last 15 years, various symmetry breaking states were discovered in the PG phase, including an intra-unit cell (IUC) magnetism, which preserves the lattice translational (LT) symmetry but breaks the time-reversal and parity symmetries, and an additional incipient charge density wave breaking the LT symmetry. However, none of these states can (alone) account for the partial gapping of the Fermi surface. Here we report a hidden LT-breaking magnetism using polarized neutron diffraction. Our measurements reveal magnetic correlations, in two different underdoped YBa2Cu3O6.6 single crystals that set in at the PG onset temperature with (i) a planar propagation wave vector (π, 0) ≡ (0, π), yielding a doubling or quadrupling of the magnetic unit cell and (ii) magnetic moments mainly pointing perpendicular to the CuO2 layers. The LT-breaking magnetism is at short-range suggesting the formation of clusters of 5–6 unit cells. Together with the previously reported IUC magnetism, it yields a hidden magnetic texture of the CuO2 unit cells hosting loop currents, forming large supercells that may be helpful for elucidating the PG puzzle.
The pseudogap state in high-Tc superconducting copper oxides in one of the most mysterious quantum states of matter whose understanding remains a challenge for condensed matter physicists. The authors report a hidden magnetic texture deep in the pseudogap state highlighting another piece of the puzzle.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS-CEA, Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, Gif sur Yvette, France
2 Max Planck Institute for Solid State, Stuttgart, Germany (GRID:grid.419552.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 6736)
3 Institut Laue-Langevin, Grenoble, France (GRID:grid.156520.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0647 2236)
4 Université Paris-Saclay, Laboratoire de Physique des Solides, Orsay, France (GRID:grid.462447.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9404 6552)
5 Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS-CEA, Laboratoire Léon Brillouin, Gif sur Yvette, France (GRID:grid.462447.7)