Adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids and pigmented glia (ALSP), also known as CSF1R-related leukoencephalopathy or Hereditary diffuse leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids (HDLS), is a devastating disease characterised by rapidly progressive cognitive decline and motor impairment. First symptoms typically evolve in the fourth or fifth decade and include memory deficits, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and motor involvement.1–3 Patients are often demented and wheelchair-bound as early as 3 years after disease onset, and mean survival is 7 years.2
ALSP is an autosomal-dominant genetic disorder, implying a 50% risk of inheriting the disease for all first degree relatives. In 2012, Rademakers et al. identified the responsible gene, Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R).4 CSF1R is a receptor-tyrosine kinase mainly found on cells of the myeloid lineage, including monocytes and macrophages.5 In the central nervous system, the principal cell type expressing CSF1R is microglia, the tissue-resident macrophages of the brain. The mechanisms leading from CSF1R mutation to manifest disease still remain unknown. However, microglia survival, proliferation, differentiation, and migration are dependent on CSF1R signalling,6 suggesting that impaired microglia function is responsible for the pathological changes occurring in ALSP.
In the present study we investigated chitotriosidase, an enzyme that is secreted by microglia, in ALSP and analysed chitotriosidase activity in correlation with cognitive function, clinical disability, and disease duration.
Methods Patients and sample acquisitionFourteen patients with genetically confirmed ALSP (median age 48 years, range 33–59) and seven presymptomatic CSF1R mutation carriers (median age 30 years, range 25–73) were recruited at the leukodystrophy outpatient clinic in Tübingen (Germany) (Table S1). All probands underwent standardised neurological examination. Activities of daily living were assessed using the Barthel index,7 and cognitive status was screened by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).8 Serum and CSF were obtained according to standard procedures and stored at −80°C until further processing. Disease duration was defined as the period from first reported symptom to sampling. Control serum and CSF of 10 healthy controls without symptoms of neurological disease (median age 49 years, range 18–81) was obtained from the Biobank of the Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (HIH), University of Tübingen. The study has been evaluated by the local Institutional Review Board (Vote 690/2011BO1). All participants gave their written informed consent prior to inclusion.
Chitotriosidase measurementsChitotriosidase was measured according to Hollak et al.9 In brief, 5 μL CSF or serum were incubated with 50 μL of 0.022 mmol/L 4-Methylimbelliferyl-β-D-N,N′,N″-triacetylchototriosidase-citrate–phosphate (0.1/0.2 mol/L)-buffer (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), pH 5.2, for 15 min at 37°C and attenuated with 1 mL 20% alkaline buffer solution (1.5 mol/L, pH 10.3; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in water. The cleavage product 4-methylumbelliferone was measured fluorometrically at 460 nm (excitation at 355 nm). Triplicate measurements were performed for all samples except for CSF of one patient, were CSF volume was only available for two measurements.
Statistical analysisStatistical significance was assessed using GraphPad Prism Version 9.3.0. Gaussian distribution was tested using the D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus normality test. Depending on the type of distribution, differences between groups were analysed using a parametric or non-parametric unpaired two-tailed t-test and one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test, respectively. Likewise, correlation was analysed using either Pearson r for normally distributed data or Spearman r for data that did not pass the normality test. The applied test is indicated in the text and figure legend, respectively. Numerical results represent mean ± standard error of the mean, graphical results mean ± standard deviation.
ResultsSerum and CSF were available from 14 patients with ALSP. In addition, serum of 7 presymptomatic carriers of CSF1R mutations has been included. Given the known influence of ageing on chitotriosidase activity,10,11 we first performed a correlation analysis of serum as well as CSF with age in all groups. In neither group, chitotriosidase activity correlated with age (Fig. S1).
Serum chitotriosidase activity was elevated in patients with ALSP compared to healthy controls (controls: 28.7 ± 3.3 nmol/h/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): 21.6 to 36.0, n = 10; ALSP: 64.7 ± 11.3 nmol/h/mL, 95% CI: 40.3 to 89.2, n = 14, p = 0.016 (unpaired t-test)) (Fig. 1A). Similarly, in CSF we found chitotriosidase activity to be highly increased in patients with ALSP (controls: 2.0 ± 0.6 nmol/h/mL, 95% CI: 0.7 to 3.2, n = 10; ALSP: 93.0 ± 17.3 nmol/h/mL, 95% CI: 55.6 to 130.4, n = 14, p < 0.0001 (Mann–Whitney test)) (Fig. 1B).
Figure 1. Chitotriosidase activity is increased in ALSP. (A) Chitotriosidase activity in serum of patients with ALSP compared to controls; *p = 0.016 (unpaired t-test). (B) Chitotriosidase activity in CSF of patients with ALSP compared to controls. ****p [less than] 0.0001 (Mann–Whitney test). CSF, cerebrospinal fluid.
Next, we investigated clinical determinants of chitotriosidase activity. Chitotriosidase activity did not correlate with cognitive function (tested by MoCA) or clinical disability (assessed by Barthel Index), neither in serum nor in CSF (Fig. 2A and B). However, there was a strong negative association between chitotriosidase activity in CSF and disease duration in patients with ALSP: the shorter the disease duration, the higher was the chitotriosidase activity (r2 = 0.410, n = 13, p = 0.018 (Pearson r)) (Fig. 2C, right panel). This correlation was not found in serum (Fig. 2C, left panel).
Figure 2. Chitotriosidase activity correlates inversely with disease duration in ALSP. (A) Chitotriosidase activity in serum and CSF does not correlate with MoCA score of patients with ALSP. Serum (left panel): r2 = 0.024, n = 13, p = 0.616 (Pearson r); CSF (right panel): r2 = 0.1, n = 13, p = 0.293 (Pearson r). (B) Chitotriosidase activity in serum and CSF does not correlate with Barthel Index of patients with ALSP. Serum (left panel): r2 = 0.113, n = 12, p = 0.285 (Pearson r); CSF (right panel): r2 = 0.016, n = 12, p = 0.692 (Pearson r). (C) Chitotriosidase activity correlates inversely with disease duration in CSF, but not in serum. Serum (left panel): r2 = 0.011, n = 13, p = 0.739 (Pearson r); CSF (right panel): r2 = 0.410, n = 13, p = 0.018 (Pearson r), simple linear regression with dashed lines representing SEM. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid. MoCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
When examining the correlation of chitotriosidase activity between serum and CSF of patients with ALSP, we found a moderate positive association (r2 = 0.289, n = 14, p = 0.049 (Spearman r)) (Fig. 3A). As we have recently identified neurofilament light chain (NfL) in serum and CSF as a biomarker in ALSP,12 we investigated the correlation between these biomarkers. We found a strong correlation between NfL and chitotriosidase in CSF, but not in serum (serum: r2 = 0.019, n = 10, p = 0.707 (Spearman r); CSF: r2 = 0.614, n = 11, p = 0.017 (Spearman r)) (Fig. 3B and C).
Figure 3. Chitotriosidase activity and NfL in patients with ALSP. (A) The activity of serum chitotriosidase moderately correlates with the activity in CSF of patients with ALSP. (B) Chitotriosidase activity in serum does not correlate with serum NfL in patients with ALSP. C, CSF chitotriosidase activity and CSF NfL strongly correlate in patients with ALSP. CSF, cerebrospinal fluid. NfL, Neurofilament light chain.
We further analysed chitotriosidase activity in presymptomatic CSF1R mutation carriers. As there was no CSF available from presymptomatic carriers, we compared serum chitotriosidase activity between carriers and healthy controls as well as patients with ALSP. The levels in carriers did not differ from those of controls, but from those of patients (controls: 28.7 ± 3.3 nmol/h/mL, 95% confidence interval: 21.6 to 36.0, n = 10; mutation carriers: 24.0 ± 3.2 nmol/h/mL, 95% CI: 16.2 to 31.8, n = 7; ALSP: 64.7 ± 11.3 nmol/h/mL, 95% CI: 40.3 to 89.2, n = 14; controls vs. mutation carriers: p = 0.946; mutation carriers vs. ALSP: p = 0.017 (one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test)) (Fig. 4).
Figure 4. Chitotriosidase activity in presymptomatic CSF1R mutation carriers. Serum chitotriosidase activity in CSF1R mutation carriers is similar to controls, and significantly lower than in patients with ALSP. *p [less than] 0.05. n. s., not significant.
We found chitotriosidase activity to be highly increased in serum and CSF of patients with ALSP. CSF levels differentiated perfectly between patients and controls. In addition, we found an inverse correlation of chitotriosidase activity with disease duration – the shorter the disease duration, the higher the activity. In contrast, chitotriosidase was not increased in serum of presymptomatic CSF1R mutation carriers.
The physiological role of chitotriosidase in humans is not entirely resolved. Chitotriosidase was shown to be mainly expressed in innate immune cells such as activated macrophages and microglia,9,13,14 and that pro-inflammatory stimuli elicit chitotriosidase secretion.15 In ALSP, chitotriosidase elevation may represent an activation of either microglia or infiltrating macrophages, but most likely is the common final pathway of both. Independent of the source, the strong elevation of chitotriosidase in the CNS compartment could reflect an inflammatory state of brains affected by ALSP. In this context, chitotriosidase may not necessarily have a detrimental influence on CNS tissue, but likely represents an epiphenomenon occurring in disease pathophysiology, or even has a protective role. Whether the putative inflammation is of primary cause, i.e. autoimmune, or secondary, for example due to excessive cell debris, remains to be resolved. Independent of the aetiology, our finding of an inverse correlation of chitotriosidase activity with disease duration and of normal levels in presymptomatic CSF1R mutation carriers suggests a dynamic process. Longitudinal assessment is required to demonstrate the evolution of chitotriosidase activity; our pilot data suggest a decrease over time, potentially caused by a progressive loss of functional microglia during the course of the disease.
According to our data, chitotriosidase may also help in monitoring the conversion from presymptomatic state to manifest disease in CSF1R mutation carriers. This is of special interest to determine the optimal time point for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation as the only available treatment in ALSP.16 Longitudinal assessment of CSF1R mutation carriers covering the period around disease manifestation is required to prove the value of chitotriosidase activity as marker of imminent conversion into manifest disease.
Chitotriosidase is also found elevated in other neurological diseases such as Gaucher disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer's disease.9,11,17–19 These diseases are clinically distinct from ALSP in terms of progression and symptoms, and/or show different imaging features. Highly elevated chitotriosidase in a patient with clinical and imaging features of ALSP is therefore a valuable marker to support the diagnosis of ALSP and should lead to the initiation of genetic testing. In addition, although the diagnosis of ALSP is primarily made by genetic testing, diagnostic uncertainty may arise with novel variants of unknown significance in the CSF1R gene. In such cases, the analysis of chitotriosidase helps to confirm the pathogenic character of a variant. Nonetheless, before chitotriosidase can be established as a distinct diagnostic biomarker for ALSP, it needs to be evaluated in larger cohorts, and other leukoencephalopathies with similar clinical presentation. It also has to be noted that chitotriosidase deficiency can be found in 6% of healthy individuals.9,18–20
Taken together, we propose chitotriosidase as a new biomarker in ALSP, substantiating the notion that microglia play an important role in this devastating disease, even though its contribution – beneficial or detrimental – remains to be elucidated. It will be intriguing to analyse larger cohorts, longitudinal measurements, and transplanted patients to reveal the applicability of chitotriosidase activity as a biomarker in ALSP.
AcknowledgementWe are grateful to the Biobank of the Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (HIH), University of Tübingen (
Stefanie Hayer is supported by a grant from the Hertie Foundation (P1200021) and the Clinician–Scientist programme of the Medical Faculty of the University of Tübingen, Germany.
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Author ContributionsStefanie N. Hayer: Study concept and design, patient care, acquisition of biomaterials, data analysis, drafting and revision of the manuscript.
Vidiyaah Santhanakumaran: Chitotriosidase measurements, revision of the manuscript.
Judith Böhringer: Chitotriosidase measurements, revision of the manuscript.
Ludger Schöls: Study concept and design, patient care, acquisition of biomaterials, revision of the manuscript.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Hertie‐Institute for Clinical Brain Research & Department of Neurology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; German Research Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tübingen, Germany
2 Children's Hospital, Department of Neuropediatrics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany