It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Vibrio species are classified as potent hazards because of their tendency to effect serious diseases like cholera and other gastrointestinal ailments in humans, as well as vibriosis in fish. A total of 144 freshwater samples were aseptically collected monthly across four rivers (Asejire, Ona, Dandaru and Erinle rivers) over a 12-month period from which Vibrio spp. were isolated using culture procedures, confirmed by means of biochemical test as well as Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay and further characterized for their phenotypic antibiotic susceptibilities and relevant antimicrobial resistant determinants by PCR. Three hundred and fifteen (58%) isolates confirmed across the sampled sites (Asejire = 75, Dandaru = 87, Eleyele = 72, Erinle = 81) showed high resistance against erythromycin—95%, Sulphamethoxazole—94%, rifampicin—92%, doxycycline—82%, tetracycline—75%, amoxicillin—45%, cephalothin—43% and varied susceptibilities to other antibiotics. The multiple antibiotic resistance indices of 97% of the Vibrio isolates were above the 0.2 threshold limit with MAR phenotype pattern E-SUL-RF-TET-DOX (0.38) found to be the most prevalent pattern among the isolates. The distributions of resistance determinant of the tested antibiotics were revealed as follows: sulII 33%, sulI 19% (sulfonamides); blaOXA 27%, ampC 39%, blapse 11% (beta-lactams); tetA 28%, tetE 20%, tet39 8%, (tetracyclines) and strA 39%. aacC2 24%, aphA1 14% (aminoglycosides). Strong positive associations were observed among tetA, sulI, tetE and sulII. This study raises concerns as these selected rivers may contribute to the environmental spread of waterborne diseases and antibiotic resistance genes. Therefore, we recommend environmental context-tailored strategies for monitoring and surveillance of resistance genes so as to safeguard the environment from becoming reservoirs of virulent and infectious Vibrio species.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Obafemi Awolowo University, Institute of Ecology and Environmental Studies, Ile Ife, Nigeria (GRID:grid.10824.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2183 9444); University of Fort Hare, South Africa Medical Research Council, Water Monitoring Centre, Alice, South Africa (GRID:grid.413110.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 8048); University of Medical Sciences, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Ondo, Nigeria (GRID:grid.413110.6)
2 Obafemi Awolowo University, Department of Microbiology, Ile Ife, Nigeria (GRID:grid.10824.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2183 9444)
3 University of Fort Hare, South Africa Medical Research Council, Water Monitoring Centre, Alice, South Africa (GRID:grid.413110.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 8048); University of Sharjah, Department of Environmental Health Sciences College of Health Sciences, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates (GRID:grid.412789.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 4686 5317)