1. Introduction
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by severe hypoxemia due to noncardiogenic pulmonary edema [1]. Despite advances in our understanding of ARDS and its treatment strategies, the mortality of patients with ARDS remains unacceptably high [2,3]. Many of studies have made attempts to determine the predictors of mortality in ARDS, with conflicting results [3,4,5,6]. For instance, there are different results regarding whether diabetes mellitus (DM) affects the clinical outcomes of ARDS. It was found that the mortality was lower in an experiment exploring the relationship of DM and ARDS [7] and higher in a predictive model of lung injury [8], and there was no correlation between DM and ARDS in a prognosis-related study [9]. One possible explanation for these discrepant results is the clinical heterogeneity of ARDS [10].
This high heterogeneity has been recognized as a barrier to the effective treatment of patients with ARDS [11,12]. To reduce the high heterogeneity, there have been growing efforts to categorize ARDS into subtypes (e.g., direct and indirect ARDS) according to various characteristics. The classification of direct and indirect ARDS is based on the risk factors of ARDS [11,13,14]. Pneumonia, aspiration, and lung contusion are attributed to direct ARDS, and pancreatitis, non-pulmonary sepsis, trauma, and burns are attributed to indirect ARDS [11]. Hoelz et al. showed that direct ARDS causes more alveolar collapse, fiber exudation, and alveolar wall edema than indirect ARDS [15]. Calfee et al. suggested that there are more severe alveolar epithelial damages and less endothelial damage in direct ARDS than in indirect ARDS [16].
Whether there are differences in clinical characteristics and mortality between direct and indirect ARDS is still controversial [17,18], and so it needs further research and discussion. Therefore, we aimed to explore the different clinical characteristics and predictors of 28-day mortality between direct and indirect ARDS.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study design
This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (No.2022-36). Because of the retrospective nature of this study, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee. To ensure confidentiality, all patient information was anonymously recorded.
In this study, 1291 ARDS patients were enrolled between September 2012 and December 2021 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code. We further screened all patients according to the Berlin criteria [19]. Patients who had lost important data with being related to the Berlin criteria could not be enrolled in the study. All patients who met the following criteria were excluded: (1) age of < 18 y, (2) pregnant women, (3) patients with malignancy, (4) immunocompromised patients, and (5) patients who could not be divided into the group of direct or indirect ARDS uniquely. Finally, 451 patients were enrolled in the study (Figure 1). According to the different risk factors, each patient was divided into the direct ARDS group (n = 239; pneumonia (n = 227), aspiration of gastric contents (n = 3), and lung contusion (n = 9)) or the indirect ARDS group (n = 212; pancreatitis (n = 136), non-pulmonary sepsis (n = 36), trauma (n = 35), burns (n = 2), and poisoning (n = 3)). In this study, the primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Survivors were defined as patients who were alive 28 days after admission.
2.2. Data Collection
We reviewed the electronic medical records of all study subjects and collected demographic information, clinical characteristics, comorbidity, laboratory findings, significant scores, and therapy used. All laboratory findings were collected from medical records within 24 h of ARDS diagnosis. If laboratory findings were recorded multiple times in the first 24 h after the diagnosis of ARDS, we used the laboratory findings from the first measurement. According to the medical records, patients discharged within 28 days were followed-up by telephone, and those with lost contact information were not enrolled in the study.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
SPSS software (version 26.0, IBM, United States) and R statistical software (version 3.4.2, R Core Team, New Zealand) were used to perform the statistical analysis and plotting. Continuous variables and categorical variables were represented by medians (interquartile ranges) and frequencies (percentages), respectively. Continuous variables were employed the Mann–Whitney U test to compare groups, conversely, using the chi-square test. Regression imputation was used to fill in the missing values of some laboratory findings.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the predictors of 28-day mortality. Variables that were statistically significant (p < 0.05) between the survivors and non-survivors in the two ARDS groups were enrolled into the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Scores (APACHE II and SOFA) were excluded from the multivariate logistic regression analysis because of the overlap of demographic information, laboratory findings, and scores. Because the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aCCI) overlaps with age and comorbidity, it was not included in multiple logistic regression analysis. To further identify the different predictors of 28-day mortality between the two ARDS groups, we used the interaction terms between the ARDS type and risk factors. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% CI were reported, and we used a two-tailed p-value of < 0.05 to define statistical significance.
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Direct and Indirect ARDS
In the direct ARDS group, patients were more likely to be older (p < 0.001) and male (p = 0.009) and have a lower oxygenation index (OI, p < 0.001), higher aCCI (p < 0.001), and more comorbidity (including hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and coronary artery disease, all p < 0.05) compared with the indirect ARDS group (Table 1). In the indirect ARDS group, the values of C-reactive protein (CRP, p < 0.001), procalcitonin (PCT, p < 0.001), blood glucose (p < 0.001), and prothrombin time (PT, p = 0.003) were higher than those of the direct ARDS group. There were higher acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II scores (p = 0.001), higher 28-day mortality rates (p < 0.001), and shorter lengths of stay (p < 0.001) in the direct ARDS group than in the indirect ARDS group. In terms of therapy, patients with direct ARDS used more glucocorticoids, more vasopressors, and less rehabilitation (all p < 0.05). More details are shown in Table 1.
As patients with moderate ARDS accounted for the majority, we conducted a subgroup analysis that limited the research scope to moderate ARDS (oxygenation index of 100–200 mmHg). The results revealed that the difference in baseline information between moderate direct and indirect ARDS was similar to that of the original group (Supplementary Table S1).
3.2. Clinical Characteristics of Survivors and Non-Survivors
Table 2 shows that, in the direct ARDS group, non-survivors were older (p < 0.001), and likely to incorporate MODS (p = 0.004) and had higher values of aCCI (p = 0.001), creatinine (p = 0.006), PT (p = 0.002), APACHEII (p = 0.003), and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA, p < 0.001). In the indirect ARDS group, there were statistically significant differences in OI, comorbidity, laboratory findings (including platelet, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, albumin, PT, and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)), and important scores of APACHEII and SOFA between the survivors and non-survivors. In both the direct and indirect ARDS groups, there were differences in the use of vasopressors and invasive mechanical ventilation between the survivors and non-survivors.
3.3. Independent Predictors of 28-Day Mortality of Direct and Indirect ARDS
To determine whether there were different predictors of 28-day mortality in the direct and indirect ARDS groups, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis and assessed the interactions between the risk factors and the ARDS type (Table 3). In the total group, age, MODS, creatinine, and OI were independently associated with 28-day mortality. In the direct ARDS group, age (OR = 1.032, p = 0.002) and MODS (OR = 2.059, p = 0.026) were predictors of 28-day mortality. In the indirect ARDS group, age (OR = 1.034, p = 0.005), MODS (OR = 4.370, p = 0.002), creatinine (OR = 1.005, p = 0.017), PT (OR = 1.161, p = 0.006), and OI (OR = 0.991, p = 0.010) were independent predictors of 28-day mortality. Creatinine (p = 0.001), PT (p < 0.001), and OI (p < 0.001) had interactions with the ARDS type (direct and indirect ARDS) (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).
4. Discussion
In our study, there were significant differences in the clinical characteristics and independent predictors of 28-day mortality in the direct and indirect ARDS groups. In the direct ARDS group, patients were more likely to be older and male and have a lower oxygenation index and more comorbidity compared with the indirect ARDS group. Patients with direct ARDS used more glucocorticoids and more vasopressors and had less rehabilitation. Patients diagnosed with direct ARDS had higher mortality rates, which has been validated in previous studies [14]. In addition, age and MODS were predictors of mortality in the direct and indirect ARDS groups. PT, creatinine, and OI were independent predictors of 28-day mortality only in the indirect ARDS group.
In our study, we found that age was an independent predictor of 28-day mortality in the direct and indirect ARDS groups. Other clinical studies have found that ARDS patients of different ages had different outcomes [18,20]. Therefore, our findings are consistent with those of previous studies. Some animal models have suggested that the severity of lung injury varies with age because pulmonary edema and lung tissue damage were aggravated with age [21,22,23]. For example, Manish Bodas found that age-related proteostasis-imbalance can enhance nuclear factor kappa-B mediated inflammatory responses and play a crucial role in acute lung injury [24], suggesting that patients with ARDS can be managed by age stratification.
Our study found that MODS was an independent predictor of 28-day mortality in the direct and indirect ARDS groups. A previous study confirmed that MODS is a well-recognized major determinant of death in patients with ARDS [25]. In addition, in an animal experiment, Martin found that inhibiting the activity of the intracellular enzyme phosphoinositide-3 kinase gamma can prevent the development of ARDS and MODS and improve survival [26], suggesting that ARDS patients with MODS have a poor prognosis.
In our study, creatinine was an independent predictor of 28-day mortality in the indirect ARDS group. Previous studies have found similar results in that ARDS non-survivors had higher creatinine values than survivors [27,28]. Creatinine is a laboratory indicator that can reflect the severity of renal impairment. Some studies have found that ARDS combined with renal impairment can increase the mortality of ARDS patients because of inflammatory factors and immune disorders [29,30,31]. It is well known that the kidneys are closely linked to the lungs, and both organs are supported by a thick network of capillaries [29]. Previous animal models have found that renal injury can reduce the clearance of inflammatory factors, leading to increased pulmonary neutrophils aggregation and pulmonary capillary permeability, which causes or exacerbates lung injury [29,32,33]. Therefore, our study found that creatinine is only associated with mortality in the indirect ARDS (more endothelial damage) group because renal impairment may be associated with increased pulmonary capillary permeability.
In our study, PT was an independent predictor of 28-day mortality in the indirect ARDS group. Similarly, in a COVID-19-related ARDS study, Denis showed that prolonged PT was a prognostic indicator and patients with prolonged PT were sicker [34]. It is well known that the coagulation system plays an important role in ARDS. Studies have shown that the interrelationship between inflammatory mediators and the coagulation cascade is relevant to the pathogenesis of ARDS [35,36], which may explain the association between PT and ARDS. The reason why PT was a predictor of 28-day mortality only in indirect ARDS group requires further in-depth research.
The oxygenation index is the main objective indicator of the diagnostic criteria of ARDS, and it is also an indicator for evaluating the severity of ARDS. With in-depth studies of ARDS, some scholars have gradually proposed that the oxygenation index could be affected by other factors when predicting the prognosis of ARDS. For example, Sunitha Palanidurai et al. found that the multifactorial P/FP ratio has a greater predictive validity for hospital mortality in ARDS than does the oxygenation index [37]. Similarly, our study showed that OI is only associated with the death of indirect ARDS patients, but not with direct ARDS patients, suggesting that the prognosis of ARDS predicted by oxygenation index may be different due to different causes of ARDS, but the mechanism is still unclear, More large-scale studies are required to confirm our findings.
Interestingly, we found that the CRP of non-survivors was lower than that of survivors. In our study, all laboratory findings were collected from medical records within 24 h of ARDS diagnosis, which is more reflective of the early stage of diseases. Consistent with our results, Bajwa E.K. et al. found that the increasing plasma levels of CRP within 48 h of ARDS onset were associated with improved survival, lower organ failure scores, and fewer days of mechanical ventilation [38], and some possible reasons could account for this, for example, biologically, neutrophils play a crucial role in lung injury. Buchta R found that CRP inhibited chemotaxis, along with other characteristic neutrophil functions [39]. Mechanistically, the CRP-mediated inhibition of p38 mitogen-associated protein kinase activity reduced the neutrophil signal transduction proteins involved in the response to chemotactic stimuli [40]. In an animal experiment, Heuertz R.M. et al. found that by reducing neutrophil influx and protein leakage, CRP played a protective role in neutrophil-mediated lung injury [41]. Taken together, CRP may have a protective effect against ARDS.
In our study, we confirmed that several common variables (including age and MODS) are risk factors for mortality in ARDS patients. To our knowledge, this is one of the few studies to explore the significant differences in the clinical characteristics and 28-day mortality between direct and direct ARDS patients. Specially, laboratory findings were enrolled into multivariate logistic regression analysis to investigate the predictors of 28-day mortality.
In addition, our study has limitations. Firstly, this study carries the inherent limitations of any retrospective study, such as missing data and selection bias, and we have tried to expand the sample size to reduce the bias. Secondly, patients with moderate ARDS accounted for the majority and there was proportional inequity of survivors to non-survivors in our study, and so we conducted a subgroup analysis and obtained similar results. Thirdly, because of the retrospective nature of this study, we were unable to establish causality between variables and increased mortality in ARDS. Fourthly, our study was a single-center study, and our demographic data were geographically restricted. These factors may limit the generalizability of our findings. Therefore, large prospective studies with more complete clinical data and in vitro/in vivo studies for mechanisms are needed to validate our findings.
5. Conclusions
In the direct ARDS group, patients were more likely to be older and male and have worse conditions and prognoses than those in the indirect ARDS group. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, it was found that age and MODS were predictors of 28-day mortality in the direct and indirect ARDS groups, whereas creatinine, PT, and OI were predictors of 28-day mortality only in the indirect ARDS group. The differences between direct and indirect ARDS suggest the need for different management strategies of ARDS.
Conceptualization, W.T and D.W.; methodology, W.T and D.W.; formal analysis and data curation, W.T., R.T., and Y.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, W.T.; writing—review and editing, W.T., D.W., and J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (No.2022-36, approved date 15.03.2022).
Because of the retrospective nature of this study, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the ethics committee.
The datasets used in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. The interaction between creatinine and ARDS type (test for interaction, p = 0.001).
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. The interaction between prothrombin time and ARDS type (test for interaction, p < 0.001).
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. The interaction between oxygenation index and ARDS type (test for interaction, p < 0.001).
Baseline characteristics of direct and indirect ARDS.
| Characteristic | Total ARDS (n = 451) | Direct ARDS (n = 239) | Indirect ARDS (n = 212) | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male, n (%) | 300 (66.5) | 172 (72.0) | 128 (60.4) | 0.009 |
| Age (years) | 63.0 (47.0–75.0) | 70.0 (59.0–78.0) | 50.0 (41.3–66.0) | < 0.001 |
| Alcohol, n (%) | 132 (29.3) | 64 (26.8) | 68 (32.1) | 0.217 |
| Oxygenation index (mmHg) | 171.0 (127.5–215.0) | 154.1 (118.2–203.0) | 184.5 (141.8–227.8) | < 0.001 |
| Comorbidity, n (%) | ||||
| Diabetes, n (%) | 101 (22.4) | 60 (25.1) | 41 (19.3) | 0.143 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 146 (32.4) | 101 (42.3) | 45 (21.2) | < 0.001 |
| Coronary heart disease, n (%) | 57 (12.6) | 48 (20.1) | 9 (4.2) | < 0.001 |
| COPD, n (%) | 50 (11.1) | 47 (19.7) | 3 (1.4) | < 0.001 |
| MODS, n (%) | 107 (23.7) | 62 (25.9) | 45 (21.2) | 0.240 |
| aCCI | 4.0 (2.0–5.0) | 5.0 (3.0–6.0) | 2.0 (1.0–4.0) | < 0.001 |
| Laboratory findings | ||||
| Platelet (×109/L) | 165.0 (109.0–228.0) | 173.0 (109.0–252.0) | 158.5 (108.3–215.0) | 0.115 |
| NLR | 13.0 (7.7–21.7) | 12.5 (6.8–21.0) | 14.0 (8.4–22.2) | 0.235 |
| CRP (ng/mL) | 135.6 (55.4–200.0) | 102.2 (34.7–176.3) | 182.4 (97.6–200.0) | < 0.001 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 1.5 (0.4–8.4) | 0.9 (0.2–6.5) | 2.6 (0.6–12.7) | < 0.001 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 30.2 (25.8–34.0) | 30.2 (25.1–33.6) | 30.4 (26.8–34.4) | 0.113 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 8.7 (6.6–12.3) | 8.1 (6.3–11.0) | 9.8 (7.4–14.0) | <0.001 |
| Creatinine (umol/L) | 76.1 (52.4–121.6) | 79.1 (56.6–120.8) | 73.7 (50.3–122.2) | 0.147 |
| PT (s) | 15.1 (14.0–17.0) | 14.8 (13.8–16.4) | 15.5 (14.1–17.4) | 0.003 |
| APTT (s) | 42.1 (36.9–47.7) | 41.7 (36.5–47.2) | 42.2 (37.2–48.1) | 0.221 |
| Scores | ||||
| SOFA | 6.0 (4.0–8.0) | 6.0 (4.0–8.0) | 6.0 (4.0–9.0) | 0.360 |
| APACHEⅡ | 18.0 (14.0–23.0) | 19.0 (15.0–24.0) | 16.0 (12.0–21.0) | 0.001 |
| Therapy, n (%) | ||||
| IMV, n (%) | 152 (33.7) | 81 (33.9) | 71 (33.5) | 0.928 |
| Glucocorticoid, n (%) | 181 (45.1) | 147 (61.5) | 34 (16.0) | < 0.001 |
| Vasopressor, n (%) | 185 (41.0) | 116 (48.5) | 69 (32.5) | 0.001 |
| Rehabilitation, n (%) | 298 (66.1) | 140 (58.6) | 158 (74.5) | < 0.001 |
| Outcome | ||||
| 28-day mortality, n (%) | 158 (35.0) | 109 (45.6) | 49 (23.1) | < 0.001 |
| Hospital LOS, n (d) | 15 (7–24) | 14 (6–22) | 18 (9–28) | < 0.001 |
Note: Continuous variables were displayed by using medians (interquartile ranges) and compared by using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were displayed by using frequencies (percentages) and compared by using the chi-square test. Abbreviations: TOA = time of ARDS diagnosis after admission. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. MODS = multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. CRP = C-reactive protein. NLR = neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio. PT = prothrombin time. APTT = activated partial thromboplastin time. SOFA = sequential organ failure assessment. APACHE = acute physiology and chronic health evaluation. LOS = length of stay. IMV = invasive mechanical ventilation. aCCI = age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Clinical characteristics of the survivors and non-survivors.
| Characteristic | Direct ARDS (n = 239) | p-Value | Indirect ARDS (n = 212) | p-Value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Survivors (n = 130, 54.4%) | Non-Survivors (n = 109, 45.6%) | Survivors (n = 163, 76.9%) | Non-Survivors (n = 49, 23.1%) | |||
| Male, n (%) | 88 (67.7) | 84 (77.1) | 0.108 | 97 (59.5) | 31 (63.3) | 0.637 |
| Age (years) | 66.0 (56.0–75.0) | 74.0 (64.5–82.0) | < 0.001 | 50.0 (41.0–63.0) | 52.0 (41.5–78.5) | 0.096 |
| Alcohol, n (%) | 31 (23.8) | 33 (30.3) | 0.264 | 55 (33.7) | 13 (26.5) | 0.343 |
| Oxygenation index (mmHg) | 160.8 (121.4–195.3) | 143.9 (111.0–210.3) | 0.593 | 188.0 (152.0–230.0) | 174.0 (117.0–213.0) | 0.024 |
| Comorbidity, n (%) | ||||||
| Diabetes, n (%) | 35 (26.9) | 25 (22.9) | 0.479 | 35 (21.5) | 6 (12.2) | 0.152 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 59 (45.4) | 42 (38.5) | 0.285 | 35 (21.5) | 10 (20.4) | 0.873 |
| Coronary heart disease, n (%) | 22 (16.9) | 26 (23.9) | 0.183 | 5 (3.1) | 4 (8.2) | 0.121 |
| COPD, n (%) | 27 (20.8) | 20 (18.3) | 0.639 | 1 (0.6) | 2 (4.1) | 0.072 |
| MODS, n (%) | 24 (18.5) | 38 (34.9) | 0.004 | 21 (12.9) | 24 (49.0) | < 0.001 |
| aCCI | 4.0 (3.0–5.0) | 5.0 (4.0–6.0) | 0.001 | 2.0 (1.0–4.0) | 3.0 (1.0–5.0) | 0.014 |
| Laboratory findings | ||||||
| Platelet (×109/L) | 175.0 (123.0–248.8) | 167.0 (98.0–256.5) | 0.579 | 164.0 (115.0–216.0) | 133.0 (70.5–208.5) | 0.027 |
| NLR | 12.8 (7.6–21.1) | 12.0 (6.1–22.0) | 0.333 | 13.7 (8.1–21.1) | 15.2 (8.8–28.2) | 0.214 |
| CRP (ng/Ml) | 95.7 (34.4–179.0) | 116.5 (37.0–172.9) | 0.706 | 200.0 (116.4–200.0) | 148.7 (53.8–200.0) | 0.006 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 0.7 (0.2–6.4) | 1.4 (0.2–7.0) | 0.575 | 1.8 (0.5–7.1) | 6.9 (1.1–20.4) | 0.007 |
| Albumin(g/L) | 30.6 (26.1–34.1) | 28.6 (24.3–33.5) | 0.102 | 30.5 (27.9–35.0) | 28.6 (24.3–32.9) | 0.015 |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 8.1 (6.4–11.0) | 8.2 (6.0–11.3) | 0.697 | 9.7 (7.4–13.8) | 10.1 (7.8–14.6) | 0.355 |
| Creatinine (umol/L) | 70.1 (55.2–100.8) | 91.1 (60.6–136.9) | 0.006 | 64.0 (47.8–98.5) | 127.4 (74.6–224.3) | < 0.001 |
| PT (s) | 14.6 (13.5–15.8) | 15.3 (14.1–17.5) | 0.002 | 15.3 (14.1–16.6) | 17.6 (14.9–21.1) | < 0.001 |
| APTT (s) | 41.7 (36.1–46.9) | 42.1 (37.0–48.3) | 0.508 | 41.4 (36.7–47.1) | 46.2 (37.5–67.7) | 0.005 |
| Scores | ||||||
| SOFA | 5.0 (4.0–7.0) | 7.0 (4.0–9.0) | < 0.001 | 5.0 (4.0,8.0) | 10.0 (6.5,12.0) | < 0.001 |
| APACHEⅡ | 17.5 (14.0–22.0) | 21.0 (16.0–24.5) | 0.003 | 15.0 (11.0,19.0) | 25.0 (17.5,30.5) | < 0.001 |
| Therapy, n (%) | ||||||
| IMV, n (%) | 35 (26.9) | 46 (42.2) | 0.013 | 37 (22.7) | 34 (69.4) | < 0.001 |
| Glucocorticoid, n (%) | 73 (56.2) | 74 (67.9) | 0.063 | 24 (14.7) | 10 (20.4) | 0.342 |
| Vasopressor, n (%) | 33 (25.4) | 83 (76.1) | < 0.001 | 29 (17.8) | 40 (81.6) | < 0.001 |
| Rehabilitation, n (%) | 79 (60.8) | 61 (56.0) | 0.453 | 121 (74.2) | 37 (75.5) | 0.857 |
Note: Continuous variables were displayed by using medians (interquartile ranges) and compared by using the Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical variables were displayed by using frequencies (percentages) and compared by using the chi-square test. See
Independent predictors of 28-day mortality of direct and indirect ARDS.
| Characteristic | Total ARDS (n = 451) | Direct ARDS (n = 239) | Indirect ARDS (n = 212) | p-Value * | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-Value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-Value | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p-Value | ||
| Age (years) | 1.034 (1.021–1.048) | < 0.001 | 1.032 (1.012–1.053) | 0.002 | 1.034 (1.010–1.059) | 0.005 | |
| MODS | 2.972 (1.802–4.902) | < 0.001 | 2.059 (1.092–3.879) | 0.026 | 4.370 (1.755–10.882) | 0.002 | |
| Platelet (×109/L) | 1.000 (0.998–1.002) | 0.949 | 1.000 (0.998–1.002) | 0.838 | 1.000 (0.996–1.004) | 0.999 | |
| CRP (ng/mL) | 0.997 (0.994–1.000) | 0.054 | 0.999 (0.996–1.003) | 0.791 | 0.996 (0.991–1.002) | 0.193 | |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 1.000 (0.997–1.004) | 0.843 | 1.003 (0.996–1.010) | 0.396 | 0.995 (0.986–1.004) | 0.235 | |
| Albumin(g/L) | 0.970 (0.936–1.005) | 0.089 | 0.981 (0.938–1.027) | 0.413 | 0.976 (0.916–1.040) | 0.456 | |
| Creatinine (umol/L) | 1.002 (1.000–1.004) | 0.049 | 1.001 (0.998–1.003) | 0.637 | 1.005 (1.001–1.010) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
| PT (s) | 1.022 (0.992–1.053) | 0.148 | 1.010 (0.983–1.038) | 0.460 | 1.161 (1.043–1.292) | 0.006 | < 0.001 |
| APTT (s) | 1.003 (0.994–1.011) | 0.510 | 1.005 (0.990–1.020) | 0.555 | 0.994 (0.980–1.008) | 0.388 | |
| Oxygenation index (mmHg) | 0.996 (0.992–0.999) | 0.023 | 0.999 (0.995–1.004) | 0.810 | 0.991 (0.984–0.998) | 0.010 | < 0.001 |
Note: Multivariate logistic regression was performed in the total ARDS cohort and then separately in the direct ARDS and indirect ARDS populations. The interactions of the ARDS type (direct or indirect) with creatinine, PT, and OI were included in the regression analysis. * p-value for interaction with ARDS type.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Meyer, N.J.; Gattinoni, L.; Calfee, C.S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet; 2021; 398, pp. 622-637. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00439-6]
2. Moss, M.; Huang, D.T.; Brower, R.G. Early neuromuscular blockade in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2019; 380, pp. 1997-2008. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31112383]
3. Villar, J.; Blanco, J.; Añón, J.M.; Santos-Bouza, A.; Blanch, L.; Ambrós, A.; Gandía, F.; Carriedo, D.; Mosteiro, F.; Basaldúa, S. et al. The ALIEN study: Incidence and outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in the era of lung protective ventilation. Intensive Care Med.; 2011; 37, pp. 1932-1941. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-011-2380-4] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21997128]
4. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network Brower, R.G.; Matthay, M.A.; Morris, A.; Schoenfeld, D.; Thompson, B.T.; Wheeler, A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2000; 342, pp. 1301-1308. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10793162]
5. Cartotto, R.; Li, Z.; Hanna, S.; Spano, S.; Wood, D.; Chung, K.; Camacho, F. The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) in mechanically ventilated burn patients: An analysis of risk factors, clinical features, and outcomes using the Berlin ARDS definition. Burns; 2016; 42, pp. 1423-1432. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.01.031]
6. Kallet, R.H.; Lipnick, M.S.; Zhuo, H.; Pangilinan, L.P.; Gomez, A. Characteristics of Nonpulmonary Organ Dysfunction at Onset of ARDS Based on the Berlin Definition. Respir. Care; 2019; 64, pp. 493-501. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06165]
7. Yu, S.; Christiani, D.C.; Thompson, B.T.; Bajwa, E.K.; Gong, M.N. Role of diabetes in the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care Med.; 2013; 41, pp. 2720-2732. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318298a2eb]
8. Kor, D.J.; Warner, D.O.; Alsara, A.; Fernández-Pérez, E.R.; Malinchoc, M.; Kashyap, R.; Li, G.; Gajic, O. Derivation and diagnostic accuracy of the surgical lung injury prediction model. J. Am. Soc. Anesthesiol.; 2011; 115, pp. 117-128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31821b5839]
9. Singla, A.; Turner, P.; Pendurthi, M.K. Effect of type II diabetes mellitus on outcomes in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Crit. Care; 2014; 29, pp. 66-69. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.10.003]
10. Callister, M.E.; Evans, T.W. Pulmonary versus extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: Different diseases or just a useful concept?. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care; 2002; 8, pp. 21-25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00075198-200202000-00004]
11. Bernard, G.R.; Artigas, A.; Brigham, K.L.; Carlet, J.; Falke, K.; Hudson, L.; Lamy, M.; Legall, J.R.; Morris, A.; Spragg, R. The American–European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 1994; 149, pp. 818-824. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7509706]
12. Khan, Y.A.; Fan, E.; Ferguson, N.D. Precision Medicine and Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Therapies for ARDS. Chest; 2021; 160, pp. 1729-1738. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.07.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34270967]
13. Capelozzi, V.L.; Allen, T.C.; Beasley, M.B.; Cagle, P.T.; Guinee, D.; Hariri, L.P.; Husain, A.N.; Jain, D.; Lantuejoul, S.; Larsen, B.T. et al. Molecular and immune biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndrome: A perspective from members of the pulmonary pathology society. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med.; 2017; 141, pp. 1719-1727. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2017-0115-SA]
14. Shaver, C.M.; Bastarache, J.A. Clinical and biological heterogeneity in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Direct versus indirect lung injury. Clin. Chest Med.; 2014; 35, pp. 639-653. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2014.08.004] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25453415]
15. Hoelz, C.; Negri, E.M.; Lichtenfels, A.J.; Conceição, G.M.; Barbas, C.S.; Saldiva, P.H.; Capelozzi, V.L. Morphometric differences in pulmonary lesions in primary and secondary ARDS. A preliminary study in autopsies. Pathol. Res. Pract.; 2001; 197, pp. 521-530.
16. Calfee, C.S.; Janz, D.R.; Bernard, G.R.; May, A.K.; Kangelaris, K.N.; Matthay, M.A.; Ware, L.B. Distinct molecular phenotypes of direct vs indirect ARDS in single-center and multicenter studies. Chest; 2015; 147, pp. 1539-1548. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.14-2454]
17. Sheu, C.-C.; Gong, M.N.; Zhai, R.; Chen, F.; Bajwa, E.K.; Clardy, P.F.; Gallagher, D.C.; Thompson, B.T.; Christiani, D.C. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of sepsis-related vs non-sepsis-related ARDS. Chest; 2010; 138, pp. 559-567. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-2933]
18. Luo, L.; Shaver, C.M.; Zhao, Z.; Koyama, T.; Calfee, C.S.; Bastarache, J.A.; Ware, L.B. Clinical Predictors of Hospital Mortality Differ Between Direct and Indirect ARDS. Chest; 2017; 151, pp. 755-763. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.004]
19. ARDS Definition Task Force Ranieri, V.M.; Rubenfeld, G.D.; Thompson, B.; Ferguson, N.; Caldwell, E.; Fan, E.; Camporota, L.; Slutsky, A.S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: The Berlin Definition. JAMA; 2012; 307, pp. 2526-2533.
20. Cooke, C.R.; Kahn, J.M.; Caldwell, E.; Okamoto, V.N.; Heckbert, S.R.; Hudson, L.D.; Rubenfeld, G.D. Predictors of hospital mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with acute lung injury. Crit. Care Med.; 2008; 36, pp. 1412-1420. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e318170a375]
21. Antonini, J.M.; Roberts, J.R.; Clarke, R.W.; Yang, H.M.; Barger, M.W.; Ma, J.Y.; Weissman, D.N. Effect of age on respiratory defense mechanisms: Pulmonary bacterial clearance in Fischer 344 rats after intratracheal instillation of Listeria monocytogenes. Chest; 2001; 120, pp. 240-249. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.120.1.240] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11451845]
22. Redente, E.F.; Jacobsen, K.M.; Solomon, J.J.; Lara, A.R.; Faubel, S.; Keith, R.C.; Henson, P.M.; Downey, G.P.; Riches, D.W. Age and sex dimorphisms contribute to the severity of bleomycin-induced lung injury and fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.; 2011; 301, pp. L510-L518. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00122.2011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21743030]
23. Schouten, L.R.; Schultz, M.J.; van Kaam, A.H.; Juffermans, N.P.; Bos, A.P.; Wösten-van Asperen, R.M. Association between Maturation and Aging and Pulmonary Responses in Animal Models of Lung Injury: A Systematic Review. Anesthesiology; 2015; 123, pp. 389-408. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000000687]
24. Bodas, M.; Min, T.; Vij, N. Early-age-related changes in proteostasis augment immunopathogenesis of sepsis and acute lung injury. PLoS ONE; 2010; 5, e15480. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015480] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21085581]
25. Suchyta, M.R. The changing face of organ failure in ARDS. Chest; 2003; 124, pp. 1871-1879. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.5.1871]
26. Martin, E.L.; Souza, D.G.; Fagundes, C.T.; Amaral, F.A.; Assenzio, B.; Puntorieri, V.; Del Sorbo, L.; Fanelli, V.; Bosco, M.; Delsedime, L. et al. Phosphoinositide-3 kinase {gamma} activity contributes to sepsis and organ damage by altering neutrophil recruitment. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 2010; 182, pp. 762-773. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201001-0088OC] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20508212]
27. Chen, T.; Wu, D.; Chen, H.; Yan, W.; Yang, D.; Chen, G.; Ma, K.; Xu, D.; Yu, H.; Wang, H. et al. Clinical characteristics of 113 deceased patients with coronavirus disease 2019: Retrospective study. BMJ; 2020; 368, m1091. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1091] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32217556]
28. Zhang, P.; Ye, Q.; Wan, Q.; Zhou, J. Mortality predictors in recipients developing acute respiratory distress syndrome due to pneumonia after kidney transplantation. Ren. Fail.; 2016; 38, pp. 1082-1088. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2016.1184938]
29. Seeley, E.J. Updates in the management of acute lung injury: A focus on the overlap between AKI and ARDS. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis.; 2013; 20, pp. 14-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2012.10.001]
30. Park, B.D.; Faubel, S. Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Crit. Care Clin.; 2021; 37, pp. 835-849. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2021.05.007]
31. Betjes, M.G. Immune cell dysfunction and inflammation in end-stage renal disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol.; 2013; 9, pp. 255-265. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2013.44] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23507826]
32. Andres-Hernando, A.; Dursun, B.; Altmann, C.; Ahuja, N.; He, Z.; Bhargava, R.; Edelstein, C.E.; Jani, A.; Hoke, T.S.; Klein, C. et al. Cytokine production increases and cytokine clearance decreases in mice with bilateral nephrectomy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.; 2012; 27, pp. 4339-4347. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfs256] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22778179]
33. Rabb, H.; Wang, Z.; Nemoto, T.; Hotchkiss, J.; Yokota, N.; Soleimani, M. Acute renal failure leads to dysregulation of lung salt and water channels. Kidney Int.; 2003; 63, pp. 600-606. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00753.x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12631124]
34. Baranovskii, D.S.; Klabukov, I.D.; Krasilnikova, O.A.; Nikogosov, D.A.; Polekhina, N.V.; Baranovskaia, D.R.; Laberko, L.A. Prolonged prothrombin time as an early prognostic indicator of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19 related pneumonia. Curr. Med. Res. Opin.; 2021; 37, pp. 21-25. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1853510]
35. Frantzeskaki, F.; Armaganidis, A.; Orfanos, S.E. Immunothrombosis in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Cross Talks between Inflammation and Coagulation. Respiration; 2017; 93, pp. 212-225. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000453002]
36. Ware, L.B.; Fang, X.; Matthay, M.A. Protein C and thrombomodulin in human acute lung injury. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.; 2003; 285, pp. L514-L521. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00442.2002]
37. Palanidurai, S. P/FP ratio: Incorporation of PEEP into the PaO2/FiO2 ratio for prognostication and classification of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann. Intensive Care; 2021; 11, 124. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00908-3]
38. Bajwa, E.K.; Khan, U.A.; Januzzi, J.L.; Gong, M.N.; Thompson, B.T.; Christiani, D.C. Plasma C-reactive protein levels are associated with improved outcome in ARDS. Chest; 2009; 136, pp. 471-480. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.08-2413]
39. Buchta, R.; Fridkin, M.; Pontet, M.; Contessi, E.; Scaggiante, B.; Romeo, D. Modulation of human neutrophil function by C-reactive protein. Eur. J. Biochem.; 1987; 163, pp. 141-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb10747.x]
40. Heuertz, R.M.; Tricomi, S.M.; Ezekiel, U.R.; Webster, R.O. C-reactive protein inhibits chemotactic peptide-induced p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activity and human neutrophil movement. J. Biol. Chem.; 1999; 274, pp. 17968-17974. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.25.17968]
41. Heuertz, R.M.; Piquette, C.A.; Webster, R.O. Rabbits with elevated serum C-reactive protein exhibit diminished neutrophil infiltration and vascular permeability in C5a-induced alveolitis. Am. J. Pathol.; 1993; 142, pp. 319-328. [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8424463]
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.