It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
As the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic evolves, vaccine evaluation needs to include consideration of both durability and cross-reactivity. This report expands on previously reported results from a Phase 1 trial of an AS03-adjuvanted, plant-based coronavirus-like particle (CoVLP) displaying the spike (S) glycoprotein of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 virus in healthy adults (NCT04450004). Humoral and cellular responses against the ancestral strain were evaluated 6 months post-second dose (D201) as secondary outcomes. Independent of dose, all vaccinated individuals retain binding antibodies, and ~95% retain neutralizing antibodies (NAb). Interferon gamma and interleukin-4 responses remain detectable in ~94% and ~92% of vaccinees respectively. In post-hoc analyses, variant-specific (Alpha, Beta, Delta, Gamma and Omicron) NAb were assessed at D42 and D201. Using a live virus neutralization assay, broad cross-reactivity is detectable against all variants at D42. At D201, cross-reactive antibodies are detectable in almost all participants against Alpha, Gamma and Delta variants (94%) and the Beta variant (83%) and in a smaller proportion against Omicron (44%). Results are similar with the pseudovirion assay. These data suggest that two doses of 3.75 µg CoVLP+AS03 elicit a durable and cross-reactive response that persists for at least 6 months post-vaccination.
Here, the authors report results from a Phase 1 trial with an AS03-adjuvanted, plant-based virus-like particle displaying the spike protein of the ancestral SARS-CoV-2. Six months post-second dose, they observe good neutralizing antibody titers and T cell responses to ancestral virus and variants of concern in participants.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Medicago Inc., Québec, Canada (GRID:grid.421219.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0635 0044)
2 The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (GRID:grid.63984.30) (ISNI:0000 0000 9064 4811)
3 GlaxoSmithKline (Vaccines), Wavre, Belgium (GRID:grid.425090.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0468 9597)
4 GlaxoSmithKline (Vaccines), Rixensart, Belgium (GRID:grid.425090.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0468 9597); BioNTech, Mainz, Germany (GRID:grid.434484.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 4692 2203)
5 Medicago Inc., Québec, Canada (GRID:grid.421219.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0635 0044); The Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada (GRID:grid.63984.30) (ISNI:0000 0000 9064 4811)