It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
While climate models project that Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) melt will continue to accelerate with climate change, models exhibit limitations in capturing observed connections between GrIS melt and changes in high-latitude atmospheric circulation. Here we impose observed Arctic winds in a fully-coupled climate model with fixed anthropogenic forcing to quantify the influence of the rotational component of large-scale atmospheric circulation variability over the Arctic on the temperature field and the surface mass/energy balances through adiabatic processes. We show that recent changes involving mid-to-upper-tropospheric anticyclonic wind anomalies – linked with tropical forcing – explain half of the observed Greenland surface warming and ice loss acceleration since 1990, suggesting a pathway for large-scale winds to potentially enhance sea-level rise by ~0.2 mm/year per decade. We further reveal fingerprints of this observed teleconnection in paleo-reanalyses spanning the past 400 years, which heightens concern about model limitations to capture wind-driven adiabatic processes associated with GrIS melt.
Here, the authors highlight that a better representation of large-scale wind-driven warming processes in climate models has potential for lessening sea-level rise projection uncertainties associated with Greenland ice sheet melt.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Institute for Geological and Geochemical Research, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, MTA-Centre for Excellence, ELKH, Budapest, Hungary (GRID:grid.481804.1); University of California-Santa Barbara, Department of Geography and Earth Research Institute, Santa Barbara, USA (GRID:grid.133342.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9676); ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Doctoral School of Environmental Sciences, Budapest, Hungary (GRID:grid.5591.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 6276)
2 University of California-Santa Barbara, Department of Geography and Earth Research Institute, Santa Barbara, USA (GRID:grid.133342.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9676)
3 University of Alaska Fairbanks, International Arctic Research Center, Fairbanks, USA (GRID:grid.70738.3b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 981X)
4 University of Lincoln, Department of Geography and Lincoln Climate Research Group, Lincoln, UK (GRID:grid.36511.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0420 4262)
5 University of Liège, SPHERES research units, Geography Department, Liège, Belgium (GRID:grid.4861.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0805 7253)
6 ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Institute of Geography and Earth Sciences, Department of Meteorology, Budapest, Hungary (GRID:grid.5591.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 6276)