It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The subfamily Phyllostominae (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae) comprises 10 genera of Microchiroptera bats from the Neotropics. The taxonomy of this group is controversial due to incongruities in the phylogenetic relationships evident from different datasets. The genus Lophostoma currently includes eight species whose phylogenetic relationships have not been resolved. Integrative analyzes including morphological, molecular and chromosomal data are powerful tools to investigate the phylogenetics of organisms, particularly if obtained by chromosomal painting. In the present work we performed comparative genomic mapping of three species of Lophostoma (L. brasiliense 2n = 30, L. carrikeri 2n = 26 and L. schulzi 2n = 26), by chromosome painting using whole chromosome probes from Phyllostomus hastatus and Carollia brevicauda; this included mapping interstitial telomeric sites. The karyotype of L. schulzi (LSC) is a new cytotype. The species L. brasiliense and L. carrikeri showed interstitial telomeric sequences that probably resulted from expansions of repetitive sequences near pericentromeric regions. The addition of chromosomal painting data from other species of Phyllostominae allowed phylogeny construction by maximum parsimony, and the determination that the genera of this subfamily are monophyletic, and that the genus Lophostoma is paraphyletic. Additionally, a review of the taxonomic status of LSC is suggested to determine if this species should be reclassified as part of the genus Tonatia.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Laboratório de Citogenética, Centro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belém, Brazil (GRID:grid.271300.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 5249); Universidade do Estado do Pará, Departamento de Morfofuncional, Tucuruí, Brazil (GRID:grid.442052.5)
2 Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Laboratório de Citogenética, Centro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Belém, Brazil (GRID:grid.271300.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 5249)
3 Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, Laboratório de Genética & Biodiversidade, Instituto de Ciências da Educação, Santarém, Brazil (GRID:grid.448725.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0509 0076)
4 University of Cambridge, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000000121885934)
5 Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cytogenetics Facility, Hinxton, UK (GRID:grid.10306.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 0606 5382); Shandong University, School of Life Sciences and Medicine, Jinan, China (GRID:grid.27255.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1761 1174)