It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Ediacaran biota were soft-bodied organisms, many with enigmatic phylogenetic placement and ecology, living in marine environments between 574 and 539 million years ago. Some studies hypothesize a metazoan affinity and aerobic metabolism for these taxa, whereas others propose a fundamentally separate taxonomic grouping and a reliance on chemoautotrophy. To distinguish between these hypotheses and test the redox-sensitivity of Ediacaran organisms, here we present a high-resolution local and global redox dataset from carbonates that contain in situ Ediacaran fossils from Siberia. Cerium anomalies are consistently >1, indicating that local environments, where a diverse Ediacaran assemblage is preserved in situ as nodules and carbonaceous compressions, were pervasively anoxic. Additionally, δ238U values match other terminal Ediacaran sections, indicating widespread marine euxinia. These data suggest that some Ediacaran biotas were tolerant of at least intermittent anoxia, and thus had the capacity for a facultatively anaerobic lifestyle. Alternatively, these soft-bodied Ediacara organisms may have colonized the seafloor during brief oxygenation events not recorded by redox proxy data. Broad temporal correlations between carbon, sulfur, and uranium isotopes further highlight the dynamic redox landscape of Ediacaran-Cambrian evolutionary events.
Geochemical data from sedimentary rocks in Siberia indicate that members of the soft-bodied Ediacara biota (the earliest macroscopic life on Earth) were tolerant of low-oxygen conditions, suggesting they had the capacity for anaerobic metabolisms.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 George Mason University, Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences, Fairfax, USA (GRID:grid.22448.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8032); University of Maryland, Department of Geology, College Park, USA (GRID:grid.164295.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 7177)
2 George Mason University, Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Earth Sciences, Fairfax, USA (GRID:grid.22448.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8032)
3 Russian Academy of Sciences, Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russia (GRID:grid.415877.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2254 1834)
4 Arizona State University, School of Earth and Space Exploration, Tempe, USA (GRID:grid.215654.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 2636)
5 IPICYT, Division de Geociencias Aplicadas, San Luis Potosí, Mexico (GRID:grid.419262.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1784 0583)
6 University of Maryland, Department of Geology and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, College Park, USA (GRID:grid.164295.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0941 7177)