Abstract

Most current methods to assess T-cell-dependent antibody responses (TDAR) are semi-quantitative and based on measures of antibody titer generated against a standard antigen like keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The precision, sensitivity, and convenience of TDAR assays might be improved by applying rapid, sensitive, specific cytometric bead assays (CBA). In the study here, KLH antigen was covalently coupled onto the surface of cytometric beads using immune microsphere technology, and IgM antibody capture spheres were prepared for use in pretreatment processing of samples. The working parameters associated with this novel TDAR-CBA system were optimized in orthogonal experiments. The optimal concentration of the KLH coating solution in this system was 160 μg/ml, that of the anti-KLH IgG capture spheres 6.0 × 105/ml, and the optimal dilution of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated Affini-Pure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) was 60 μg/ml. Repeated tests indicated that this approach yielded good linearity (r2 = 0.9937) method, with a within-run precision of 3.1–4.9%, and a between-run precision of 4.4–4.9%. This new approach had a limit of detection of 113.43 ng/ml (linear range = 390.63–50 000), and an interference rate of just 0.04–3.51%. Based on these findings, it seems that a new mouse TDAR assay based on CBA can be developed that would appear to be more sensitive, accurate, and precise than the current TDAR assay approaches based on traditional ELISA.

Details

Title
A T-cell-dependent antibody response (TDAR) method in BALB/c mice based on a cytometric bead array
Author
Zhong, Wenhua 1 ; Chang, Penghuan 2 ; Gan, Lianfang 1 ; Zhong, Lifan 1 ; Yang, Zhaoxin 1 

 Hainan Medical University, Research Center for Drug Safety Evaluation of Hainan Province, Haikou, China 
 Haikou Municipal People’s Hospital and Xiangya Medical College Affiliated Hospital, Nursing Department, Haikou, China 
Pages
34-40
Publication year
2022
Publication date
Dec 2022
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Ltd.
ISSN
1547691X
e-ISSN
15476901
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2742863011
Copyright
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.