It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Vitamin D deficiency (VDD), defined as 25(OH)D <20ng/ml, is a global public health concern. An international group of vitamin D researchers recommends targeting optimal blood levels of 40-60ng/ml to decrease global prevalence of VDD, improve patient outcomes, population health, and decrease costs. A literature review revealed no public health model of evidence-based vitamin D best practices for translating research into practice, and healthcare professionals lack vitamin D knowledge and confidence in translating evidence into practice.
The pre-, post-test, and follow-up survey study design aimed to increase nurses’ and dietitians' level of vitamin D knowledge, confidence, translation of evidence into spheres of practice and influence, and identify translation barriers. A vitamin D toolkit was developed and implemented using an online, asynchronous learning management system. Subject matter experts established face validity for the toolkit, including assessments, the Cycle of Best Practices for Addressing Vitamin D Deficiency model, educational content, and translational resources.
Participants (n=119) completed the toolkit. Knowledge scores showed a statistically significant increase from 31% to 65% (p <0.001). Follow-up survey confidence scores increased significantly from 2.0 to 3.3 (p<0.001) on a scale of 1-5. Respondents reported using the model (100%), sharing VDD knowledge (94%), and identified financial barriers and interdisciplinary team resistance.
Nurses’ and dietitians' knowledge and translation of best practices for addressing VDD are critical to improving patient outcomes, population health, and decreasing healthcare costs. Results of this pilot demonstrate implementing an evidence-based toolkit and applying a translational model with accessible resources should be part of vitamin D public health initiatives. Continuing research should include longitudinal studies in specific practice settings to track improvement in the long-term patient, staff, and financial outcomes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer