It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ferropericlase (Mg,Fe)O is the second most abundant mineral in Earth’s lower mantle and a common inclusion found in subcratonic diamonds. Pyrolitic mantle has Mg# (100 × Mg/(Mg+Fe)) ~89. However, ferropericlase inclusions in diamonds show a broad range of Mg# between 12 and 93. Here we use Synchrotron Mössbauer Source (SMS) spectroscopy and single-crystal X-ray diffraction to determine the iron oxidation state and structure of two magnesiowüstite and three ferropericlase inclusions in diamonds from São Luiz, Brazil. Inclusion Mg#s vary between 16.1 and 84.5. Ferropericlase inclusions contain no ferric iron within the detection limit of SMS, while both magnesiowüstite inclusions show the presence of monocrystalline magnesioferrite ((Mg,Fe)Fe3+2O4) with an estimated 47–53 wt% Fe2O3. We argue that the wide range of Fe concentrations observed in (Mg,Fe)O inclusions in diamonds and the appearance of magnesioferrite result from oxidation of ferropericlase triggered by the introduction of subducted material into sublithospheric mantle.
This article reports finding of a highly oxidised mineral in diamond inclusion derived from mantle transition zone or lower mantle, very reduced areas on our planet. Such oxidised material is likely linked to subduction of carbonates into this region.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 University College Cork, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cork, Ireland (GRID:grid.7872.a) (ISNI:0000000123318773)
2 Institute of Precambrian Geology and Geochronology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia (GRID:grid.465386.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0562 7224)
3 Universität Bayreuth, Bayerisches Geoinstitut, Bayreuth, Germany (GRID:grid.7384.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 6972)
4 A.N. Zavaritsky Institute of Geology and Geochemistry, Ekaterinburg, Russia (GRID:grid.473268.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0221 8044); Ural State Mining University, Ekaterinburg, Russia (GRID:grid.446243.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 0646 288X)
5 Universität Bayreuth, Materials Physics and Technology at Extreme Conditions, Laboratory of Crystallography, Bayreuth, Germany (GRID:grid.7384.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 6972); Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany (GRID:grid.7683.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0492 0453)
6 Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESY, Hamburg, Germany (GRID:grid.7683.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0492 0453)
7 ESRF-The European Synchrotron, CS 40220, Grenoble, France (GRID:grid.5398.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0641 6373)
8 The University of Tokyo, Geochemical Research Center, Graduate School of Science, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.26999.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 536X)