Abstract

We assessed the fungal and fungal-like sequence diversity present in marine sediments obtained in the vicinity of the South Shetland Islands (Southern Ocean) using DNA metabarcoding through high-throughput sequencing (HTS). A total of 193,436 DNA reads were detected in sediment obtained from three locations: Walker Bay (Livingston Island) at 52 m depth (48,112 reads), Whalers Bay (Deception Island) at 151 m (104,704) and English Strait at 404 m (40,620). The DNA sequence reads were assigned to 133 distinct fungal amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) representing the phyla Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Mortierellomycota, Chytridiomycota, Glomeromycota, Monoblepharomycota, Mucoromycota and Rozellomycota and the fungal-like Straminopila. Thelebolus balaustiformis, Pseudogymnoascus sp., Fungi sp. 1, Ciliophora sp., Agaricomycetes sp. and Chaetoceros sp. were the dominant assigned taxa. Thirty-eight fungal ASVs could only be assigned to higher taxonomic levels, and may represent taxa not currently included in the available databases or represent new taxa and/or new records for Antarctica. The total fungal community displayed high indices of diversity, richness and moderate to low dominance. However, diversity and taxa distribution varied across the three sampling sites. In Walker Bay, unidentified fungi were dominant in the sequence assemblage. Whalers Bay sediment was dominated by Antarctic endemic and cold-adapted taxa. Sediment from English Strait was dominated by Ciliophora sp. and Chaetoceros sp. These fungal assemblages were dominated by saprotrophic, plant and animal pathogenic and symbiotic taxa. The detection of an apparently rich and diverse fungal community in these marine sediments reinforces the need for further studies to characterize their richness, functional ecology and potential biotechnological applications.

Details

Title
Fungal and fungal-like diversity in marine sediments from the maritime Antarctic assessed using DNA metabarcoding
Author
da Silva, Mayanne Karla 1 ; de Souza, Láuren Machado Drumond 1 ; Vieira, Rosemary 2 ; Neto, Arthur Ayres 2 ; Lopes, Fabyano A. C. 3 ; de Oliveira, Fábio S. 4 ; Convey, Peter 5 ; Carvalho-Silva, Micheline 6 ; Duarte, Alysson Wagner Fernandes 7 ; Câmara, Paulo E. A. S. 6 ; Rosa, Luiz Henrique 1 

 Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Laboratório de Microbiologia Polar E Conexões Tropicais, Departamento de Microbiologia, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (GRID:grid.8430.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4888) 
 Universidade Federal Fluminense, Instituto de Geociências, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (GRID:grid.411173.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2184 6919) 
 Universidade Federal Do Tocantins, Laboratório de Microbiologia, Porto Nacional, Brazil (GRID:grid.440570.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 1550 1623) 
 Universidade Federal de Minas, Departamento de Geografia, Gerais, Brazil (GRID:grid.8430.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 4888) 
 British Antarctic Survey, NERC, High Cross, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.478592.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0598 3800); University of Johannesburg, Department of Zoology, Auckland Park, South Africa (GRID:grid.412988.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0109 131X); Millennium Institute Biodiversity of Antarctic and Subantarctic Ecosystems (BASE), Santiago, Chile (GRID:grid.412988.e) 
 Universidade de Brasília, Departamento de Botânica, Brasília, Brazil (GRID:grid.7632.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2238 5157) 
 Imunologia E Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Laboratório de Microbiologia, Arapiraca, Alagoas, Brazil (GRID:grid.411179.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2154 120X) 
Publication year
2022
Publication date
2022
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2747147992
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.