It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Evidence shows that participants performing a continuous visual categorization task respond slower following the presentation of a task-irrelevant sound deviating from an otherwise repetitive or predictable auditory context (deviant sound among standard sounds). Here, for the first time, we explored the role of the environmental context (instrumentalized as a task-irrelevant background picture) in this effect. In two experiments, participants categorized left/right arrows while ignoring irrelevant sounds and background pictures of forest and city scenes. While equiprobable across the task, sounds A and B were presented with probabilities of .882 and .118 in the forest context, respectively, and with the reversed probabilities in the city context. Hence, neither sound constituted a deviant sound at task-level, but each did within a specific context. In Experiment 1, where each environmental context (forest and city scene) consisted of a single picture each, participants were significantly slower in the visual task following the presentation of the sound that was unexpected within the current context (context-dependent distraction). Further analysis showed that the cognitive system reset its sensory predictions even for the first trial of a change in environmental context. In Experiment 2, the two contexts (forest and city) were implemented using sets of 32 pictures each, with the background picture changing on every trial. Here too, context-dependent deviance distraction was observed. However, participants took a trial to fully reset their sensory predictions upon a change in context. We conclude that irrelevant sounds are incidentally processed in association with the environmental context (even though these stimuli belong to different sensory modalities) and that sensory predictions are context-dependent.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of the Balearic Islands, Department of Psychology and Research Institute of Health Sciences, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (GRID:grid.9563.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 1940 4767); University of Western Australia, School of Psychological Science, Perth, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7910)
2 University of the Balearic Islands, Department of Psychology and Research Institute of Health Sciences, Palma de Mallorca, Spain (GRID:grid.9563.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 1940 4767)
3 University of Bologna, Department of Psychology, Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.6292.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 1758)
4 Universitat de Vic-Universitat Central de Catalunya, Department of Psychology, Vic, Spain (GRID:grid.440820.a)
5 University of Western Australia, School of Psychological Science, Perth, Australia (GRID:grid.1012.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7910)