It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In Brazil, prevalence of diagnosed COPD among adults aged 40 years and over is 16% although over 70% of cases remain undiagnosed. Hypertension is common and well-recorded in primary care, and frequently co-exists with COPD because of common causes such as tobacco smoking, therefore we conducted a cross-sectional screening test accuracy study in nine Basic Health Units in Brazil, among hypertensive patients aged ≥40 years to identify the optimum screening test/combinations to detect undiagnosed COPD. We compared six index tests (four screening questionnaires, microspirometer and peak flow) against the reference test defined as those below the lower limit of normal (LLN-GLI) on quality diagnostic spirometry, with confirmed COPD at clinical review. Of 1162 participants, 6.8% (n = 79) had clinically confirmed COPD. Peak flow had a higher specificity but lower sensitivity than microspirometry (sensitivity 44.3% [95% CI 33.1, 55.9], specificity 95.5% [95% CI 94.1, 96.6]). SBQ performed well compared to the other questionnaires (sensitivity 75.9% [95% CI 65.0, 84.9], specificity 59.2% [95% CI 56.2, 62.1]). A strategy requiring both SBQ and peak flow to be positive yielded sensitivity of 39.2% (95% CI 28.4, 50.9) and specificity of 97.0% (95% CI 95.7, 97.9). The use of simple screening tests was feasible within the Brazilian primary care setting. The combination of SBQ and peak flow appeared most efficient, when considering performance of the test, cost and ease of use (costing £1690 (5554 R$) with 26.7 cases detected per 1,000 patients). However, the choice of screening tests depends on the clinical setting and availability of resources.
ISRCTN registration number: 11377960.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details














1 ABC Medical School, Family Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.412368.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0643 8839)
2 University of Birmingham, Institute of Applied Health Research, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486); Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Midview City, Singapore (GRID:grid.500407.6)
3 ABC Medical School, Family Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.412368.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0643 8839); Universidade de Sao Paulo, Respiratory Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722)
4 Federal University of São Paulo, Faculty of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.411249.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0514 7202)
5 University of Birmingham, Institute of Applied Health Research, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
6 University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Lung Function & Sleep, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.412563.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0376 6589)
7 University of Birmingham, Institute of Applied Health Research, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486); University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.412563.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0376 6589)
8 Peking University First Hospital, Department of General Practice, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.411472.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1764 1621)
9 International Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.411472.5); University of Minho, Braga Portugal, ICVS/3B’s, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal (GRID:grid.10328.38) (ISNI:0000 0001 2159 175X)
10 University of Birmingham, Health Services Management Centre, School of Social Policy, College of Social Sciences, Birmingham, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7486)
11 Georgian Respiratory Association, Tbilisi, Georgia (GRID:grid.6572.6); Petre Shotadze Tbilisi Medical Academy, Tblisi, Georgia (GRID:grid.444026.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0519 9653)
12 Georgian Respiratory Association, Tbilisi, Georgia (GRID:grid.444026.0); Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tblisi, Georgia (GRID:grid.26193.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2034 6082)
13 Ss.Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Center for Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Skopje, North Macedonia (GRID:grid.7858.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0708 5391)
14 International Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.6572.6)
15 Universidade de Sao Paulo, Respiratory Division, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Sao Paulo, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722)