1. Introduction
The chemistry of low-valent actinoid (An) and lanthanoid (Ln) complexes has propelled in recent years, leading to seminal work concerning single molecule magnetism [1,2,3,4,5], small molecule activation [6,7,8,9], new computational approaches [10,11,12,13], and an increased interest in spectroscopic properties regarding fluorescent upconversion [14,15,16] and molecular reporters [17,18]. Material that is classified as nuclear waste has proven to be a valuable source to chemists and physicists to further our understanding of f-electrons [19], chemical bonding [20,21], and coordination [22]. The importance of f-element research has been demonstrated in breakthrough articles covering novel oxidation states, small molecule activation, catalysis and single molecule magnets, and may therefore benefit from easily accessible starting materials. [23,24,25,26,27,28,29] Oftentimes—in contrast to chloride and fluoride salts of lanthanoids and actinoids—iodides make valuable starting materials for coordination chemistry, as they combine well with potassium salts of organic ligands in salt metatheses, precipitating KI. However, the relevant starting materials, (i.e., mainly the divalent or trivalent metal iodides) for these investigations are often hard to access through solution-based or traditional solid-state syntheses, involving long reaction times or the unavoidable coordination of solvent molecules from the synthesis or work-up. These may sometimes impede reactivity, trigger side reactions or interfere with spectroscopic measurements [30]. In spite of this, the synthesis of f-block metal iodides which are coordinated to Lewis bases such as THF (e.g., [SmI2(thf)n], n = 2–5; [31] [LaI3(thf)4] [32], [UI3(thf)4] [33]), is well established and refined to an elegant art [34]. However, acquiring base-free derivatives remains a largely tedious and unappealing enterprise due to: the inability of removing pre-coordinating Lewis bases, their preparation in liquid ammonia (e.g., EuI2) [35], use of toxic materials (e.g., HgI2) [36,37], extended reaction times (e.g., seven days to one month for UI3) [38], and attempted dehydration of readily available hydrates (LnI3(H2O)x) [39]. Mechanochemical synthesis of metal iodides is a practical approach to access otherwise difficult to obtain materials [40,40,41] and several new techniques [42,43] and protocols [44,45] have been established quite recently. Although mechanochemical synthesis is used across a wide variety of metal classes, this technique is considerably underdeveloped in the realms of the f-block series [46,47,48,49,50], let alone for targeting iodides. Herein, we present a facile, quick, and high yielding mechanochemical synthesis of lanthanoid and actinoid iodides. Considering both the commercial unavailability of uranium iodides, and the high prices for purchasing base-free lanthanoid iodides—not to mention the benefits of the base-free halides over solvates [32] and difficulties associated with Lewis base co-ligands in chemical transformations [51,52], spectroscopic analysis [30], and overall complex stability [53,54]—this clean, simple method of synthesising base-free f-block metal iodides provides a new way of accessing these materials.
In this study, we present Eu and Ce as two examples for this chemistry, however, Table S1 of the Supplementary Materials provides an overview regarding syntheses involving other elements of the lanthanoid series, yet they could not be fully characterised.
2. Materials and Methods
The oscillating ball mill apparatus was purchased from Retsch (400 MM), along with the milling containers (inner layer being either tungsten carbide or steel in 15 or 25 mL volume). Powder X-ray diffraction was performed using a P-XRD Stoe Stadi-P equipped with a Mythen 1 K detector and measured from 0 to 60° in 1° steps and 120 s exposure time in Debye-Scherrer geometry using Mo-Kα1 radiation.
There are a few general ball milling considerations to ensure high yields and short reaction times for lanthanoid and actinoid iodides. For instance, a tungsten carbide container is necessary as the analogous synthesis in a steel mill appears to give alternative products. In an instance where an excess of metal is used, metal chunks can be removed through a metal sieve after reaction occurs. In the instance when excess iodine and non-granulated lanthanoid metal (e.g., chips) are used, prior to the actual mechanochemical reaction, it is recommended to mill the mixture at 16 Hz for approximately 20-30 min to break up the metal pieces. By milling at 16 Hz for this duration, no indication of a reaction was observed when the container was opened. The size of the milling container relative to the sample size must also be considered, and it is recommended that a 15 mL container be used for a targeted yield of about 2.0 g. Avoiding the use of an overly large excess of iodine is recommended in order to avoid hindering the overall obtained yield of the product. It is recommended that the container be sealed tightly (preferably with one layer of Teflon tape around the screw).
3. Results
For the 4f elements, milling the metal with an appropriate amount of iodine for a given frequency and duration (Scheme 1) readily affords either the lanthanoid diiodide EuI2 or the lanthanoid triiodide CeI3.
The mixing of lanthanoid metal Ln (Ln = Ce, Eu) with an excess of iodide in an oscillating ball mill produces the respective iodide as a fine powder within less than 90 min (Scheme 2). The excess iodine can be easily removed under vacuum (0.03 mbar) with gentle heating (120 °C), affording the dry powders of CeI3 or EuI2 in essentially quantitative yields. Yield loss is only due to losses upon removal from the container, and the material can be directly used for further synthetic purposes.
The materials could be identified by powder X-ray crystallography, though due to the method of synthesis, the samples obtained from the milling container were naturally of poor crystallinity. For CeI3 additional tempering was required to obtain material with a higher degree of crystallinity (Figure 1).
For EuI2, remarkably, the material obtained contained both known phases for EuI2 (Figure 2).
Remarkably, the mechanochemical synthesis could be extended beyond the 4f elements to the 5f elements, and the synthesis of UI3 was performed using a similar approach (Scheme 3). Initially, the material is milled followed by brief tempering of over 225 °C overnight, with the best results in terms of crystallinity at 500 °C, giving UI3 as large single crystals in essentially quantitative yield. This approach is remarkably quick, and supersedes the previous milestone of 7 days.
The differences for UI3 over the 4f elements were as follows: the synthesis was carried out using clean uranium turnings and 1.5 equivalents of I2. The material was transferred into a steel milling vessel, cooled in liquid nitrogen to −196 °C, and the material was milled for 60 min at 30 Hz. This process of cooling and milling was performed six times. The isolated jet-black powder was pressed into a pellet and transferred into a quartz ampoule, sealed under vacuum, and heated to 500 °C for 24 h, resulting in a total work-up time of two days from start to finish. The purity of the UI3 was analysed using PXRD (Figure 3) and was further confirmed using 1H-NMR spectroscopy on the THF adduct UI3(thf)4 in C6D6, resulting in two resonances at 10.76 ppm and 6.15 ppm for the THF H atoms.
4. Discussion
In light of the aforementioned results, we also probed the potential synthesis of a range of other divalent and trivalent lanthanoid iodides. A detailed overview of these can be found in Table S1 of the SI listing conditions and yields for the respective iodides. A detailed description and photos have been provided in the supporting information. However, as it has been difficult for us to obtain high quality powder diffraction data for these materials, they are not further discussed within this work.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion we present a fast, facile, high-yielding mechanochemical synthesis of Lewis base-free f-block metal iodides. The lanthanoid iodides can thus be synthesised in the solid state in less than 90 min with minimal work-up. Considering the importance of EuI2 and CeI3 as important precursors for coordination chemistry and spectroscopic investigations [57,58,59,60,61], this synthetic method provides a practical pathway to valuable starting materials. In addition, we have shown that uranium (III) iodide can be easily and quickly obtained in single crystalline form using the same approach followed by heating overnight at >225 °C. The results herein show the potential of mechanochemical techniques for f-block chemistry, which is poorly developed, and future work will entail synthetic expansion beyond precursors towards direct complex synthesis.
Conceptualization, D.W. and M.Z.; methodology, D.W. and M.Z.; software, D.W. and M.Z.; validation, D.W. and M.Z.; formal analysis, D.W. and M.Z.; investigation, D.W., M.Z., D.B., J.S., S.E. and P.B.; resources, M.S.W.; data curation, D.W., M.Z. and D.B.; writing—original draft preparation, D.W. and M.Z.; writing—review and editing, D.W. and M.Z.; visualization, D.W. and M.Z.; supervision, D.W. and M.Z.; project administration, D.W., M.Z. and M.S.W.; funding acquisition, M.S.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Original data are available upon request from the University of Cologne.
The authors thank Alexander Weiz for his initial support in the setup of the equipment and the experiments.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Scheme 1. Reaction scheme for the mechanochemical synthesis of divalent and trivalent lanthanoid iodides.
Figure 1. PXRD (full range, left; enhanced, right) of CeI3 (black) versus the calculated isostructural UI3 (red) [55].
Figure 2. PXRD (full range, left; enhanced, right) of EuI2 (black) showing two distinct crystallographic phases (orthorhombic, red [35], and monoclinic, green [56]).
Supplementary Materials
Supporting information containing further experimental details can be downloaded at:
References
1. Mougel, V.; Chatelain, L.; Pécaut, J.; Caciuffo, R.; Colineau, E.; Griveau, J.-C.; Mazzanti, M. Uranium and Manganese Assembled in a Wheel-Shaped Nanoscale Single-Molecule Magnet with High Spin-Reversal Barrier. Nat. Chem.; 2012; 4, pp. 1011-1017. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1494] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23174981]
2. Chatelain, L.; Walsh, J.P.S.; Pécaut, J.; Tuna, F.; Mazzanti, M. Self-Assembly of a 3d-5f Trinuclear Single-Molecule Magnet from a Pentavalent Uranyl Complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2014; 53, pp. 13434-13438. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201407334] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25284018]
3. Chilton, N.F.; Goodwin, C.A.P.; Mills, D.P.; Winpenny, R.E.P. The First Near-Linear Bis(Amide) f-Block Complex: A Blueprint for a High Temperature Single Molecule Magnet. Chem. Commun.; 2015; 51, pp. 101-103. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4CC08312A] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25384179]
4. Guo, F.-S.; Day, B.M.; Chen, Y.-C.; Tong, M.-L.; Mansikkamäki, A.; Layfield, R.A. A Dysprosium Metallocene Single-Molecule Magnet Functioning at the Axial Limit. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2017; 56, pp. 11445-11449. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201705426] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28586163]
5. Goodwin, C.A.P.; Ortu, F.; Reta, D.; Chilton, N.F.; Mills, D.P. Molecular Magnetic Hysteresis at 60 Kelvin in Dysprosocenium. Nature; 2017; 548, pp. 439-442. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature23447]
6. Evans, W.J.; Fang, M.; Zucchi, G.; Furche, F.; Ziller, J.W.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Zink, J.I. Isolation of Dysprosium and Yttrium Complexes of a Three-Electron Reduction Product in the Activation of Dinitrogen, the (N2)3− Radical. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2009; 131, pp. 11195-11202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja9036753]
7. Formanuik, A.; Ortu, F.; Beekmeyer, R.; Kerridge, A.; Adams, R.W.; Mills, D.P. White Phosphorus Activation by a Th(III) Complex. Dalton Trans.; 2016; 45, pp. 2390-2393. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5DT04528B]
8. Langeslay, R.R.; Fieser, M.E.; Ziller, J.W.; Furche, F.; Evans, W.J. Expanding Thorium Hydride Chemistry Through Th2+, Including the Synthesis of a Mixed-Valent Th4+ /Th3+ Hydride Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2016; 138, pp. 4036-4045. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b11508]
9. Falcone, M.; Chatelain, L.; Scopelliti, R.; Živković, I.; Mazzanti, M. Nitrogen Reduction and Functionalization by a Multimetallic Uranium Nitride Complex. Nature; 2017; 547, pp. 332-335. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature23279]
10. Schreckenbach, G.; Shamov, G.A. Theoretical Actinide Molecular Science. Acc. Chem. Res.; 2010; 43, pp. 19-29. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ar800271r]
11. Kefalidis, C.E.; Castro, L.; Perrin, L.; Rosal, I.D.; Maron, L. New Perspectives in Organolanthanide Chemistry from Redox to Bond Metathesis: Insights from Theory. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2016; 45, pp. 2516-2543. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00907C] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26958989]
12. Kaltsoyannis, N. Seventeen-Coordinate Actinide Helium Complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2017; 56, pp. 7066-7069. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201700245] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28508530]
13. Tanti, J.; Lincoln, M.; Kerridge, A. Decomposition of D- and f-Shell Contributions to Uranium Bonding from the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules: Application to Uranium and Uranyl Halides. Inorganics; 2018; 6, 88. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/inorganics6030088]
14. Nonat, A.; Chan, C.F.; Liu, T.; Platas-Iglesias, C.; Liu, Z.; Wong, W.-T.; Wong, W.-K.; Wong, K.-L.; Charbonnière, L.J. Room Temperature Molecular up Conversion in Solution. Nat. Commun.; 2016; 7, 11978. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11978] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27302144]
15. Chen, S.; Weitemier, A.Z.; Zeng, X.; He, L.; Wang, X.; Tao, Y.; Huang, A.J.Y.; Hashimotodani, Y.; Kano, M.; Iwasaki, H. et al. Near-Infrared Deep Brain Stimulation via Upconversion Nanoparticle–Mediated Optogenetics. Science; 2018; 359, pp. 679-684. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1144] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29439241]
16. Hasegawa, Y.; Kitagawa, Y.; Nakanishi, T. Effective Photosensitized, Electrosensitized, and Mechanosensitized Luminescence of Lanthanide Complexes. NPG Asia Mater.; 2018; 10, pp. 52-70. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41427-018-0012-y]
17. Sørensen, T.J.; Kenwright, A.M.; Faulkner, S. Bimetallic Lanthanide Complexes That Display a Ratiometric Response to Oxygen Concentrations. Chem. Sci.; 2015; 6, pp. 2054-2059. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4SC03827D] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29142674]
18. Su, Y.; Yu, J.; Li, Y.; Phua, S.F.Z.; Liu, G.; Lim, W.Q.; Yang, X.; Ganguly, R.; Dang, C.; Yang, C. et al. Versatile Bimetallic Lanthanide Metal-Organic Frameworks for Tunable Emission and Efficient Fluorescence Sensing. Commun. Chem.; 2018; 1, 12. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42004-018-0016-0]
19. Maron, L.; Eisenstein, O. Do f Electrons Play a Role in the Lanthanide−Ligand Bonds? A DFT Study of Ln(NR2)3; R = H, SiH3. J. Phys. Chem. A; 2000; 104, pp. 7140-7143. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp0010278]
20. Gregson, M.; Lu, E.; Mills, D.P.; Tuna, F.; McInnes, E.J.L.; Hennig, C.; Scheinost, A.C.; McMaster, J.; Lewis, W.; Blake, A.J. et al. The Inverse-Trans-Influence in Tetravalent Lanthanide and Actinide Bis(Carbene) Complexes. Nat. Commun.; 2017; 8, 14137. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14137]
21. La Pierre, H.S.; Rosenzweig, M.; Kosog, B.; Hauser, C.; Heinemann, F.W.; Liddle, S.T.; Meyer, K. Charge Control of the Inverse Trans-Influence. Chem. Commun.; 2015; 51, pp. 16671-16674. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C5CC07211E] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430823]
22. Kaltsoyannis, N. Does Covalency Increase or Decrease across the Actinide Series? Implications for Minor Actinide Partitioning. Inorg. Chem.; 2013; 52, pp. 3407-3413. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic3006025] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22668004]
23. Barluzzi, L.; Giblin, S.R.; Mansikkamäki, A.; Layfield, R.A. Identification of Oxidation State +1 in a Molecular Uranium Complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2022; 144, pp. 18229-18233. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c06519] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169550]
24. MacDonald, M.R.; Bates, J.E.; Ziller, J.W.; Furche, F.; Evans, W.J. Completing the Series of +2 Ions for the Lanthanide Elements: Synthesis of Molecular Complexes of Pr2+, Gd2+, Tb2+, and Lu2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 2013; 135, pp. 9857-9868. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja403753j] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23697603]
25. Langeslay, R.R.; Fieser, M.E.; Ziller, J.W.; Furche, F.; Evans, W.J. Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity of Crystalline Molecular Complexes of the {[C5H3(SiMe3)2]3Th}1− Anion Containing Thorium in the Formal +2 Oxidation State. Chem. Sci.; 2015; 6, pp. 517-521. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4SC03033H] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29560172]
26. Fox, A.R.; Bart, S.C.; Meyer, K.; Cummins, C.C. Towards Uranium Catalysts. Nature; 2008; 455, pp. 341-349. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07372] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18800133]
27. La Pierre, H.S.; Scheurer, A.; Heinemann, F.W.; Hieringer, W.; Meyer, K. Synthesis and Characterization of a Uranium(II) Monoarene Complex Supported by δ Backbonding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2014; 53, pp. 7158-7162. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201402050]
28. Guo, F.-S.; Day, B.M.; Chen, Y.-C.; Tong, M.-L.; Mansikkamäki, A.; Layfield, R.A. Magnetic Hysteresis up to 80 Kelvin in a Dysprosium Metallocene Single-Molecule Magnet. Science; 2018; 362, pp. 1400-1403. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aav0652] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30337456]
29. Arnold, P.L.; Stevens, C.J.; Bell, N.L.; Lord, R.M.; Goldberg, J.M.; Nichol, G.S.; Love, J.B. Multi-Electron Reduction of Sulfur and Carbon Disulfide Using Binuclear Uranium(III) Borohydride Complexes. Chem. Sci.; 2017; 8, pp. 3609-3617. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7SC00382J]
30. Evans, W.J.; Kozimor, S.A.; Ziller, J.W.; Fagin, A.A.; Bochkarev, M.N. Facile Syntheses of Unsolvated UI3 and Tetramethylcyclopentadienyl Uranium Halides. Inorg. Chem.; 2005; 44, pp. 3993-4000. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic0482685]
31. Girard, P.; Namy, J.L.; Kagan, H.B. Divalent Lanthanide Derivatives in Organic Synthesis. 1. Mild Preparation of Samarium Iodide and Ytterbium Iodide and Their Use as Reducing or Coupling Agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc.; 1980; 102, pp. 2693-2698. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja00528a029]
32. Izod, K.; Liddle, S.T.; Clegg, W. A Convenient Route to Lanthanide Triiodide THF Solvates. Crystal Structures of LnI3(THF)4 [Ln = Pr] and LnI3(THF)3.5 [Ln = Nd, Gd, Y]. Inorg. Chem.; 2004; 43, pp. 214-218. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic034851u] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14704070]
33. Clark, D.L.; Sattelberger, A.P.; Bott, S.G.; Vrtis, R.N. Lewis Base Adducts of Uranium Triiodide: A New Class of Synthetically Useful Precursors for Trivalent Uranium Chemistry. Inorg. Chem.; 1989; 28, pp. 1771-1773. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic00309a004]
34. Windorff, C.J.; Dumas, M.T.; Ziller, J.W.; Gaunt, A.J.; Kozimor, S.A.; Evans, W.J. Small-Scale Metal-Based Syntheses of Lanthanide Iodide, Amide, and Cyclopentadienyl Complexes as Analogues for Transuranic Reactions. Inorg. Chem.; 2017; 56, pp. 11981-11989. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b01968] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28915015]
35. Krings, M.; Wessel, M.; Dronskowski, R. EuI2, a Low-Temperature Europium(II) Iodide Phase. Acta Crystallogr. C; 2009; 65, pp. i66-i68. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0108270109038542]
36. Asprey, L.B.; Keenan, T.K.; Kruse, F.H. Preparation and Crystal Data for Lanthanide and Actinide Triiodides. Inorg. Chem.; 1964; 3, pp. 1137-1141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic50018a015]
37. Corbett, J.D.; Simon, A. Lanthanum Triiodide (and Other Rare Earth Metal Triiodides). Inorganic Syntheses; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1984; pp. 31-36. ISBN 978-0-470-13253-1
38. Carmichael, C.D.; Jones, N.A.; Arnold, P.L. Low-Valent Uranium Iodides: Straightforward Solution Syntheses of UI3 and UI4 Etherates. Inorg. Chem.; 2008; 47, pp. 8577-8579. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic801138e]
39. Hazin, P.N.; Huffman, J.C.; Bruno, J.W. Synthetic and Structural Studies of Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl Complexes of Lanthanum and Cerium. Organometallics; 1987; 6, pp. 23-27. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/om00144a006]
40. Wilke, M.; Casati, N. Insight into the Mechanochemical Synthesis and Structural Evolution of Hybrid Organic–Inorganic Guanidinium Lead(II) Iodides. Chem. Eur. J.; 2018; 24, pp. 17701-17711. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.201804066] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30230654]
41. Wilke, M.; Casati, N. A New Route to Polyoxometalates via Mechanochemistry. Chem. Sci.; 2022; 13, pp. 1146-1151. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1SC05111C]
42. Katsenis, A.D.; Puškarić, A.; Štrukil, V.; Mottillo, C.; Julien, P.A.; Užarević, K.; Pham, M.-H.; Do, T.-O.; Kimber, S.A.J.; Lazić, P. et al. In Situ X-Ray Diffraction Monitoring of a Mechanochemical Reaction Reveals a Unique Topology Metal-Organic Framework. Nat. Commun.; 2015; 6, 6662. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7662] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25798542]
43. Beedle, A.E.M.; Mora, M.; Davis, C.T.; Snijders, A.P.; Stirnemann, G.; Garcia-Manyes, S. Forcing the Reversibility of a Mechanochemical Reaction. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 3155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05115-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30089863]
44. Tan, D.; García, F. Main Group Mechanochemistry: From Curiosity to Established Protocols. Chem. Soc. Rev.; 2019; 48, pp. 2274-2292. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7CS00813A] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30806391]
45. Ingner, F.J.L.; Giustra, Z.X.; Novosedlik, S.; Orthaber, A.; Gates, P.J.; Dyrager, C.; Pilarski, L.T. Mechanochemical Synthesis of (Hetero)Aryl Au(I) Complexes. Green Chem.; 2020; 22, pp. 5648-5655. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D0GC02263B]
46. Alanko, G.A.; Butt, D.P. Mechanochemical Synthesis of Uranium Sesquisilicide. J. Nucl. Mater.; 2014; 451, pp. 243-248. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.03.042]
47. Woen, D.H.; Kotyk, C.M.; Mueller, T.J.; Ziller, J.W.; Evans, W.J. Tris(Pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) Complexes of Late Lanthanides Tb, Dy, Ho, and Er: Solution and Mechanochemical Syntheses and Structural Comparisons. Organometallics; 2017; 36, pp. 4558-4563. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.7b00385]
48. Fatila, E.M.; Maahs, A.C.; Hetherington, E.E.; Cooper, B.J.; Cooper, R.E.; Daanen, N.N.; Jennings, M.; Skrabalak, S.E.; Preuss, K.E. Stoichiometric Control: 8- and 10-Coordinate Ln(Hfac)3(Bpy) and Ln(Hfac)3(Bpy)2 Complexes of the Early Lanthanides La–Sm. Dalton Trans.; 2018; 47, pp. 16232-16241. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8DT03286F]
49. Wegner, W.; Jaroń, T.; Grochala, W. Preparation of a Series of Lanthanide Borohydrides and Their Thermal Decomposition to Refractory Lanthanide Borides. J. Alloys Compd.; 2018; 744, pp. 57-63. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.020]
50. Woen, D.H.; White, J.R.K.; Ziller, J.W.; Evans, W.J. Mechanochemical C–H Bond Activation: Synthesis of the Tuckover Hydrides, (C5Me5)2Ln(μ-H)(μ-H1:H5-CH2C5Me4)Ln(C5Me5) from Solvent-Free Reactions of (C5Me5)2Ln(μ-Ph)2BPh2 with KC5Me5. J. Organomet. Chem.; 2019; 899, 120885. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2019.120885]
51. Szostak, M.; Procter, D.J. Beyond Samarium Diiodide: Vistas in Reductive Chemistry Mediated by Lanthanides(II). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2012; 51, pp. 9238-9256. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201201065]
52. Procter, D.J.; Flowers, R.A.; Skrydstrup, T. Organic Synthesis Using Samarium Diiodide; RSC Publishing: London, UK, 2009; ISBN 978-1-84755-110-8
53. Boisson, C.; Berthet, J.C.; Lance, M.; Nierlich, M.; Ephirtikhine, M. Novel Ring-Opening Reaction of Tetrahydrofuran Promoted by a Cationic Uranium Amide Compound. Chem. Commun.; 1996; 18, pp. 2129-2130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/cc9960002129]
54. Avens, L.R.; Bott, S.G.; Clark, D.L.; Sattelberger, A.P.; Watkin, J.G.; Zwick, B.D. A Convenient Entry into Trivalent Actinide Chemistry: Synthesis and Characterization of AnI3(THF)4 and An[N(SiMe3)2]3 (An = U, Np, Pu). Inorg. Chem.; 1994; 33, pp. 2248-2256. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ic00088a030]
55. Rudel, S.S.; Deubner, H.L.; Scheibe, B.; Conrad, M.; Kraus, F. Facile Syntheses of Pure Uranium(III) Halides: UF3, UCl3, UBr3, and UI3. Z. Für Anorg. Allg. Chem.; 2018; 644, pp. 323-329. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/zaac.201700402]
56. Bärnighausen, H.; Schulz, N. Die Kristallstruktur der monoklinen Form von Europium(II)jodid EuJ2. Acta Crystallogr. B; 1969; 25, pp. 1104-1110. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S0567740869003591]
57. Simler, T.; Feuerstein, T.J.; Yadav, R.; Gamer, M.T.; Roesky, P.W. Access to Divalent Lanthanide NHC Complexes by Redox-Transmetallation from Silver and CO2 Insertion Reactions. Chem. Commun.; 2019; 55, pp. 222-225. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C8CC08120D]
58. Silantyeva, L.I.; Ilichev, V.A.; Shavyrin, A.S.; Yablonskiy, A.N.; Rumyantcev, R.V.; Fukin, G.K.; Bochkarev, M.N. Unexpected Findings in a Simple Metathesis Reaction of Europium and Ytterbium Diiodides with Perfluorinated Mercaptobenzothiazolates of Alkali Metals. Organometallics; 2020; 39, pp. 2972-2983. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.organomet.0c00334]
59. Bannister, R.D.; Levason, W.; Light, M.E.; Reid, G. Tertiary Phosphine Oxide Complexes of Lanthanide Diiodides and Dibromides. Polyhedron; 2018; 154, pp. 259-262. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.poly.2018.07.057]
60. Casely, I.J.; Liddle, S.T.; Blake, A.J.; Wilson, C.; Arnold, P.L. Tetravalent Cerium Carbene Complexes. Chem. Commun.; 2007; 47, pp. 5037-5039. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/b713041d]
61. Gregson, M.; Lu, E.; McMaster, J.; Lewis, W.; Blake, A.J.; Liddle, S.T. A Cerium(IV)–Carbon Multiple Bond. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.; 2013; 52, pp. 13016-13019. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201306984]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Lewis base-free lanthanoid (Ln) and actinoid (An) iodides are difficult to obtain, as standard protocols describe syntheses in solutions of donor solvents which are ultimately hard to remove. We have now established a mechanochemical approach towards the synthesis of Lewis base-free f-block metal iodides with excellent yields. In particular, we describe herein the synthesis of EuI2 as an example of a divalent lanthanoid iodide, of CeI3 as an example of a trivalent lanthanoid iodide, and of UI3 as the most important actinoid iodide. Each can be obtained in high yield with minimal work-up, presenting the most efficient and simple synthetic route to access these materials to date.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer