It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
For large herbivores living in highly dynamic environments, maintaining range fidelity has the potential to facilitate the exploitation of predictable resources while minimising energy expenditure. We evaluate this expectation by examining how the seasonal range fidelity of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in the Kruger National Park, South Africa is affected by spatiotemporal variation in environmental conditions (vegetation quality, temperature, rainfall, and fire). Eight-years of GPS collar data were used to analyse the similarity in seasonal utilisation distributions for thirteen family groups. Elephants exhibited remarkable consistency in their seasonal range fidelity across the study with rainfall emerging as a key driver of space-use. Within years, high range fidelity from summer to autumn and from autumn to winter was driven by increased rainfall and the retention of high-quality vegetation. Across years, sequential autumn seasons demonstrated the lowest levels of range fidelity due to inter-annual variability in the wet to dry season transition, resulting in unpredictable resource availability. Understanding seasonal space use is important for determining the effects of future variability in environmental conditions on elephant populations, particularly when it comes to management interventions. Indeed, over the coming decades climate change is predicted to drive greater variability in rainfall and elevated temperatures in African savanna ecosystems. The impacts of climate change also present particular challenges for elephants living in fragmented or human-transformed habitats where the opportunity for seasonal range shifts are greatly constrained.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Bangor University, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor, UK (GRID:grid.7362.0) (ISNI:0000000118820937)
2 Bangor University, School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor, UK (GRID:grid.7362.0) (ISNI:0000000118820937)
3 University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Life Sciences, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (GRID:grid.16463.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 0723 4123)
4 University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Life Sciences, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (GRID:grid.16463.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 0723 4123); Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment, Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation, Bangalore, India (GRID:grid.464760.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 8547 8046)
5 Indian Institute of Science, Centre for Ecological Sciences, Bangalore, India (GRID:grid.34980.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 0482 5067)
6 South African National Parks, Conservation Management, Kruger National Park, Skukuza, South Africa (GRID:grid.463628.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9533 5073); Nelson Mandela University, School of Natural Resource Management, George, South Africa (GRID:grid.412139.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2191 3608)