It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Deep learning has been shown to accurately assess “hidden” phenotypes from medical imaging beyond traditional clinician interpretation. Using large echocardiography datasets from two healthcare systems, we test whether it is possible to predict age, race, and sex from cardiac ultrasound images using deep learning algorithms and assess the impact of varying confounding variables. Using a total of 433,469 videos from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and 99,909 videos from Stanford Medical Center, we trained video-based convolutional neural networks to predict age, sex, and race. We found that deep learning models were able to identify age and sex, while unable to reliably predict race. Without considering confounding differences between categories, the AI model predicted sex with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.84–0.86), age with a mean absolute error of 9.12 years (95% CI 9.00–9.25), and race with AUCs ranging from 0.63 to 0.71. When predicting race, we show that tuning the proportion of confounding variables (age or sex) in the training data significantly impacts model AUC (ranging from 0.53 to 0.85), while sex and age prediction was not particularly impacted by adjusting race proportion in the training dataset AUC of 0.81–0.83 and 0.80–0.84, respectively. This suggests significant proportion of AI’s performance on predicting race could come from confounding features being detected. Further work remains to identify the particular imaging features that associate with demographic information and to better understand the risks of demographic identification in medical AI as it pertains to potentially perpetuating bias and disparities.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.50956.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 9905)
2 Stanford University, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
3 Stanford University, Department of Computer Science, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956)
4 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco Veteran Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, USA (GRID:grid.266102.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 6811)
5 Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.50956.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 9905); Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Division of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA (GRID:grid.50956.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 9905)