It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This study aimed to validate an Indonesian version of the Mobile Phone Problem Use Scale (MPPUS) in a sample of high school students from South Tangerang City, Banten Province,, Indonesia. Throughout this process, we evaluated the scale’s psychometric properties and examined the differential item functioning (DIF) across schools with and without a smartphone ban policy. The study used a cross-sectional survey design with a sample of 622 high school students (Mage = 16.10; SDage = 1.41). There were 312 respondents from schools with a smartphone ban and 310 from schools with no smartphone ban. We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multiple indicators multiple causes (MIMIC) model, and Rasch Rating Scale Model (RSM) to analyze the data. The CFA and MIMIC model results indicated a good fit for the overall model using the pooled sample. Based on MIMIC model, one item was flagged as DIF. Furthermore, RSM analysis demonstrated that the Indonesian MPPUS has adequate psychometric properties. RSM-based DIF analysis identified four DIF items. Therefore, 23 of 27 items on the scale have the same meaning across schools with two different policies. Our findings provide empirical evidence that MPPUS performed well across students from schools with and without smartphone restrictions, despite the fact that the MPPUS was originally designed for the general population. The findings of this study can be used to develop an evidence-based policy for implementing smartphone policies in Indonesian schools.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Department of English Language Education, State University of Jakarta, jakarta, Indonesia
2 Faculty of Psychology, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University Jakarta, Indonesia
3 Faculty of Psychology, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4 Department of Psychology, Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines
5 Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
6 Faculty of Psychology, Widya Dharma University, Klaten, Indonesia