It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
China is facing a huge challenge in achieving its carbon neutrality goal by 2060 given that it is currently one of the world’s largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emitters and has set a very short timeline for going from peak emissions to carbon neutrality. Natural climate solutions (NCS) that protect, manage, and restore ecosystems have shown substantial potential for increasing carbon sinks or reducing GHG emissions to offset fossil fuel CO2 emissions. This study quantified the mitigation potential of 18 NCS pathways in China at 0.67–1.65 Gigatonne of CO2 equivalent (Gt CO2e) yr−1 averaged from 2020 to 2060, which is even larger than the size of the current national terrestrial carbon sink. Compared with a previous global estimate, our results show a lower mitigation potential in forest ecosystems but a much greater potential for cropland ecosystems in China. From 2020 to 2060, all 18 pathways combined can provide cost-effective mitigation compared to the global social cost of CO2 emission and carbon prices, and 98.6% and 83.3% mitigation potential are cost-effective, respectively. This study further showed that immediate action provides the greatest mitigation. Our estimates highlight the important role of NCS in achieving the national carbon neutrality goal because of their large mitigation potential and cost-effectiveness.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 School of Atmospheric Sciences, Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Sun Yat-sen University , Guangdong, Zhuhai 519082, People’s Republic of China
2 Tianjin Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Environment, Tianjin Normal University , Tianjin 300387, People’s Republic of China
3 Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China
4 Institute of Energy, Environment and Economy, Tsinghua University , Beijing 100084, People’s Republic of China
5 College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Joint Center for Global Change Studies, Beijing Normal University , Beijing 100875, People’s Republic of China
6 Chonqing Jinfo Mountain Karst Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University , Chongqing 400715, People’s Republic of China