Introduction
As one of the most serious and pressing health problems worldwide, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is closely correlated with obesity, usually assessed by body mass index(BMI). However, BMI has crucial limitations due to its inability to assess weight distribution, fat mass and muscle mass. Fat accumulation and lean mass decrease are important changes that occur as adults age and are associated with an increased risk of T2DM [1]. T2DM is more closely related to fat distribution, percentage body fat and skeletal muscle than BMI [2]. Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is a new kind of complex syndrome characterized by double burden of sarcopenia (low muscle mass, muscle strength decreases and physical dysfunction) and excess fat [3]. T2DM is closely related to SO, and obesity is a common risk factor for both [4]. Body composition measurements include body weight, BMI, waist circumference, fat mass, percentage body fat, muscle mass, visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneus adipose tissue, which is performed by non-invasive techniques, playing a key role in evaluating T2DM and SO [5, 6].
As new class of oral hypoglycemic agents, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2(SGLT-2) inhibitors are paid attention due to unique mechanism of inhibiting proximal tubular glucose reabsorption and increasing urinary glucose excretion, which have been demonstrated to reduce body weight, improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes [7, 8]. However, there are warnings that SGLT-2 inhibitors should be used with caution due to the potential to increase the risk of dehydration and sarcopenia [9]. Therefore, the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on body composition in T2DM is worth discussing. This comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on body composition in T2DM.
Materials and methods
Search strategy and study selection
PubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase and Web of Science databases were searched by computer. The combination of subject words and free words was used in the search. The search terms were as follows: (Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors OR Ertugliflozin OR Dapagliflozin OR Canagliflozin OR Empagliflozin OR Ipragliflozin OR Luseogliflozin OR Tofogliflozin OR Sotagliflozin OR Gliflozins) AND (Body composition OR Waist circumference OR Skeletal muscle mass OR Fat mass OR Lean mass OR Visceral adipose tissue OR Subcutaneus adipose tissue), eligible search was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two reviewers independently selected relevant articles based on their titles and abstracts, then screened the full text and resolved any differences by consensus with a third reviewer to determine whether it met the inclusion or exclusion criteria. All RCTs evaluating SGLT-2 inhibitors on body composition in T2DM were included in the meta-analysis. The following inclusive selection criteria were applied: (1)Participants were clinically diagnosed with T2DM. Patients with type 1 diabetes and gestational diabetes were excluded. There were no restrictions on the age, sex or race of participants. (2)The treatment group consisted of various types of SGLT-2 inhibitors, meanwhile the control group consisted of other hypoglycemic drugs. Both groups had sufficient baseline and post-treatment information in the study report, such as body weight(BW), BMI, waist circumference(WC), percentage body fat(PBF), fat mass(FM), lean mass(LM), skeletal muscle mass(SMM), visceral fat area(VFA) and subcutaneus fat area(SFA). (3)The study design was RCTs. Case reports, animal experiments, conference abstracts, reviews, subgroup analysis and editorials were excluded.
Data extraction and quality assessment
Two independent reviewers extracted the following information from eligible articles: first author, year of publication, sample size, type and dose of SGLT-2 inhibitors, control group medication, follow-up time and baseline patient information. Data collection for the following clinical outcomes: BW, BMI, FM, WC, PBF, LM, SMM, VFA and SFA. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of RCTs using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, which includes the following seven criteria: random sequence generation (selection bias), allocation concealment(selection bias), blinding of participants and personnel(performance bias), blinding of outcome data(detection bias), incomplete outcome data(attrition bias), selective reporting(reporting bias)and other bias(certain biases not indicated above but influence the results). Each item was assessed as a "low risk", "high risk" or "unclear risk" of bias, according to recommendations in the Cochrane manual.
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were carried out with Review Manager version 5.3 Results compared by Weight mean difference (WMD), with 95% confidence intervals(CI) for continuous outcomes. The I2 statistic was used to assess study heterogeneity. Studies with I2 statistic of 25%-50% were characterized as low heterogeneity, I2 statistic of 50%-75% was characterized as moderate heterogeneity, I2 statistic higher than 75% was characterized as high heterogeneity. A random effects model was applied regardless of heterogeneity, followed by subgroup analysis or sensitivity analysis to explain the reason for heterogeneity as soon as possible. Publication bias was assessed using Funnel plots.
Results
Literature search
A total of 473 articles were selected by preliminary search, with 73 articles being duplications. 400 records were eliminated based on the titles and abstracts. 171 full text of potential studies were retrieved for further evaluations. 153 articles were excluded, including 109 non-RCT studies, 31 conference abstracts, 13 incomplete trial studies. Finally, 18 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. The selection process is shown in Fig 1.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Basic characteristics and quality assessment
The characteristics of the 18 included studies published between 2013 and 2022 are shown in Table 1 [10–27]. The articles involved 1430 participants (726 SGLT-2 inhibitors participants and 704 control participants), including 7 multi-centre studies and 11 single-center studies. SGLT-2 inhibitors groups include canagliflozin (3 studies), dapagliflozin (8 studies), empagliflozin (3 studies) and ipragliflozin(4 studies), meanwhile control groups include traditional hypoglycemic drugs(16 studies), such as sulfonylureas, insulin, metformin, thiazolidinediones, DPP-4 inhibitors, etc and another new class of hypoglycemic drugs, GLP-1 receptor agonists(GLP-1RAs)(2 studies). 3 studies lasted 12 weeks, 10 studies lasted 24 weeks, 1 study lasted 26 weeks, 1 study lasted 28 weeks, 2 studies lasted 52 weeks and 1 study lasted 102 weeks. In addition, the Cochrane Risk Bias Assessment Tool was used to assess study bias. All studies were high-quality parallel grouped studies, and the quality assessment results of the included studies are summarized in S1 and S2 Figs.
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Outcome meta-analysis
BW, BMI and WC.
Fourteen RCTs reported BW in 617 SGLT-2 inhibitors users and 604 non-users. The meta-analysis showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors treatment significantly decreased BW compared with other drugs (WMD:-2. 73kg, 95%CI: -3. 32 to -2. 13, p<0. 00001). Low heterogeneity was found between studies (I2 = 33%). Seven RCTs reported BMI in 234 SGLT-2 inhibitors users and 219 non-users. In this meta-analysis, SGLT-2 inhibitors treatment significantly decreased BMI compared with other drugs (WMD:-1. 13kg/m2, 95%CI: -1. 77 to -0. 50, p = 0. 0005). No heterogeneity was observed between studies (I2 = 0%). Four studies evaluated the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on WC. Overall analysis showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced WC(WMD:-2. 20cm, 95%CI: -3. 81 to -0. 58, p = 0. 008). The I2 was 0%, showing that the result was stable (Fig 2).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
VFA and SFA.
Eight studies of 429 participants showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly decreased VFA compared with other antihyperglycemic drugs (MD:-14. 79cm2, 95%CI: -24. 65 to -4. 93, p = 0. 003), with no heterogeneous(I2 = 0). Six studies evaluated the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on SFA. Overall analysis showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly decreased SFA (WMD:-23. 27cm2, 95% CI:-46. 44 to -0. 11, P = 0. 05), with no heterogeneity(I2 = 0) (Fig 3).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
FM, PBF, LM, SMM.
Ten studies of 827 participants showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly decreased FM compared with other antihyperglycemic drugs (WMD:-1. 16kg, 95%CI: -2. 01 to -0. 31, p = 0. 008), with a moderate heterogeneous(I2 = 65%). There were four studies that reported the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on PBF. In contrast with the control group, SGLT-2 inhibitors evidently reduced PBF (WMD:-1. 50%, 95%CI:-2. 12 to -0. 87, P<0. 00001), with no heterogeneity(I2 = 0%). Nine studies evaluated the effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on LM. Overall analysis showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly decreased LM compared with other antihyperglycemic drugs (WMD:-0. 76kg, 95%CI:-1. 53 to 0. 01, P = 0. 05). A moderate heterogeneity was found between studies (I2 = 74%). Seven studies in 206 SGLT-2 inhibitors users and 201 non-users evaluated the SMM. Overall analysis showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced SMM compared with other antihyperglycemic (WMD:-1. 01kg, 95%CI:-1. 91 to -0. 11, P = 0. 03), with no heterogeneity(I2 = 0) (Fig 4).
[Figure omitted. See PDF.]
Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis
In order to test heterogeneity, we did sensitivity analysis. When Nakaguchi and McCrimmon’s studies were removed, the heterogeneity decreased from 65% to 29% in the analysis of FM, with a decrease in P values (from 0. 008 to less than 0. 0001), and the heterogeneity decreased from 74% to 51% in the analysis of LM, with a decrease in P values (from 0. 05 to 0. 0001), so we further performed a subgroup analysis based on different control groups. The results showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced FM compared with traditional hypoglycemic treatment (WMD:-1. 74kg, 95%CI:-2. 32 to -1. 16, p<0. 00001). SGLT-2 inhibitors seemed to reduce FM less than GLP-1RAs, but there was no statistical difference (WMD:0. 71kg, 95%CI:-0. 55 to 1. 97, P = 0. 27) (S3 Fig). Compared with traditional hypoglycemic agents, SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced LM (WMD:-1. 13kg, 95%CI:-1. 71 to -0. 56, P = 0. 0001). Compared with GLP-1RAs, SGLT-2 inhibitors seemed to decrease LM to a lower extent, but there was no statistical difference (WMD:0. 76kg, 95%CI:-0. 04 to 1. 56, P = 0. 06) (S4 Fig). Other outcomes, such as BW, BMI, WC, VFA, SFA and SMM were not carried out further tests due to low heterogeneity.
Discussion
This meta-analysis confirmed that SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced BW, BMI, WC, VFA, SFA, PBF, FM, LM and SMM to a greater extent than other hypoglycemic agents in T2DM.
Epidemiological evidence suggests that changes in body composition especially increased systemic FM and abdominal obesity, such as visceral adipose tissue, are strongly associated with T2DM risk [28]. BMI provides a fast and convenient standard for assessing obesity. However, the inability to specifically quantify total fat distribution, FM and LM has limited utility in estimating the risk of T2DM and other obesity-related diseases [29]. With similar BMI, LM decreased and FM increased more significantly in diabetic patients than in non-diabetic patients [30]. Studies have shown a strong relationship between T2DM and SO [4, 31], and body composition measurements are important tools for assessing both diseases [5, 6]. Bidirectional interactions have been hypothesized in obesity, low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance and sarcopenia [4]. Insulin in diabetic patients loses its function of promoting cellular glucose uptake and utilization, leading to insulin resistance, which destroys the role of insulin in inhibiting muscle protein breakdown, resulting in muscle fiber atrophy, muscle mass reduction and muscle strength decline [4]. On the contrary, SO may have synergistic effects with low-grade inflammation, which will increase production and secretion of various inflammatory factors and change insulin sensitivity by triggering different key steps of insulin signaling pathway, leading to insulin resistance and increasing risk of diabetes [32].
SGLT-2 inhibitors not only directly lead to weight loss through urinary glucose excretion mechanisms, but also improve adipocyte dysfunction in visceral adipose tissue, leading to leptin, visfatin, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 decreased, adiponectin level increased, effectively promote lipolysis, reduce visceral fat [7, 33]. However, the unique mechanism of SGLT-2 inhibitors results in decreased insulin and elevated glucagon, limiting liver and muscle absorption of glucose and amino acids, promoting hepatic glucongenesis and glycogenolysis, and accelerating protein breakdown in muscle [9]. Case report of sarcopenia caused by SGLT-2 inhibitor use in elderly patients with T2DM has been published [34]. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on body composition, such as fat distribution, fat mass and muscle mass in patients with T2DM.
As expected, the role of SGLT-2 inhibitors in body weight, WC, VFA and SFA reduction was confirmed in this meta-analysis, which was consistent with the conclusions of previous two meta-analyses [35, 36]. However, the previous two studies only targeted T2DM patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, while this study targeted a wider range of T2DM patients, and the number of articles and subjects included was larger. In addition, this meta-analysis confirmed the advantages of SGLT-2 inhibitors in reducing FM and BFP, which had not been mentioned in previous meta-analyses. To sum up, these results suggest that SGLT-2 inhibitors may play an important role in improving body composition. Cefalu et al. confirmed that about two-thirds of the weight loss caused by SGLT-2 inhibitors was attributable to a reduction in FM, with the remaining third attributable to a reduction in LM [11]. Due to limited data, the proportion of weight loss from LM was not analyzed in this meta-analysis. However, according to the number of FM, LM and SMM decrease(-1. 74kg, -1. 13kg, -1. 01kg) comparing with other traditional hypoglycemic drugs, it can be inferred that the reduction of FM accounted for a greater proportion in weight loss of SGLT-2 inhibitors, which was roughly consistent with Cefalu’s conclusion. It should be noted that both LM and SMM play important roles in the diagnosis of sarcopenia and measurement of muscle mass [37]. LM measured with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry includes muscle, organs and body water, whereas bioelectrical impedance analysis measures SMM. This meta-analysis showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced both LM and SMM compared with other traditional hypoglycemic treatments, suggesting the adverse effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on muscle mass decrease. In addition, the weight loss caused by SGLT-2 inhibitors may be due in part to body water loss, based on a unique glucose-lowering mechanism [38]. However, it should be noted that studies of ketosis and euglycemic ketoacidosis based on dehydration and insulinopenia during SGLT-2 inhibitors use have been reported [34, 39, 40]. Due to limited data, we did not conduct further analysis of water loss and risk of ketosis caused by SGLT-2 inhibitors. However, dehydration and ketosisis are also potential adverse effects that needs to be considered during SGLT-2 inhibitors use. In a word, despite producing a more favorable body composition, the potential of muscle mass loss induced by SGLT-2 inhibitors is noteworthy. Strategies to conserve skeletal muscle and improve physical function, such as through organized exercise, are important during the SGLT-2 inhibitors using.
Both GLP-1RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors had favorable effects on BW. In this meta-analysis, the results showed that SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs had no significant difference in BW and FM loss. In addition, although there is no statistical difference in the LM reduction between the two drugs, the reduction by GLP-1RAs is more than that by SGLT-2 inhibitors. Therefore, the adverse effects of muscle mass reduction should be taken into account when the two drugs are used in patients with T2DM. However, this meta-analysis included only two studies comparing the body composition of the two drugs [16, 17]. More studies are needed to compare the difference in body composition changes between these two drugs.
The highlight of this meta-analysis is to confirm not only the advantages of SGLT-2 inhibitors in improving body composition, such as weight loss, BMI, WC, VFA, SFA, PBF and FM reduction, but also the adverse effects of these drugs on muscle mass reduction. However, the following are the limitations of this article:First, only a few RCTs met the conditions, and most of them had small sample sizes. Additional RCTs are needed to further validate the current results. Second, the included studies were followed up for a short period of time, with a median of 24 weeks, and the long-term effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors are unknown, so follow-up is needed. Third, due to the lack of data, the changes in the ratio of LM to FM and the changes in segmental LM were not analyzed. More research on the above parameters are needed to carry out in-depth discussions. Fourth, the studies included in the meta-analysis are from different ethnic groups, age ranges, genders and patient groups with comorbidities, and that there are many parameters that may affect muscle loss, suggesting that pre-planned prospective control and large-scale studies will be more instructive in this regard.
Conclusion
SGLT-2 inhibitors improve body composition in T2DM such as weight loss, BMI, WC, VFA, SFA, FM and PFM reduction, but cause adverse effects of reducing muscle mass. Therefore, until more evidence is obtained to support that SGLT-2 inhibitors increase the risk of sarcopenia, not only the benefit on body composition, but also the adverse effects of the reduction on muscle mass by SGLT-2 inhibitors in T2DM should be considered.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Risk of bias graph.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279889.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Risk of bias summary.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279889.s002
(TIF)
S3 Fig. Meta-analysis of FM level comparisons between SGLT-2 inhibitors and the control group based on the control.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279889.s003
(TIF)
S4 Fig. Meta-analysis of LM level comparisons between SGLT-2 inhibitors and the control group based on the control.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279889.s004
(TIF)
S1 Checklist. PRISMA 2009 checklist.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279889.s005
(PDF)
Citation: Pan R, Zhang Y, Wang R, Xu Y, Ji H, Zhao Y (2022) Effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0279889. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279889
About the Authors:
Runzhou Pan
Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Affiliation: Department of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, China
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7187-1573
Yan Zhang
Roles: Formal analysis, Software
Affiliation: Department of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, China
Rongrong Wang
Roles: Formal analysis
Affiliation: Department of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, China
Yao Xu
Roles: Investigation, Visualization
Affiliation: Department of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, China
Hong Ji
Roles: Investigation, Visualization
Affiliation: Department of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, China
Yongcai Zhao
Roles: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing
E-mail: [email protected]
Affiliation: Department of Endocrinology, Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, Hebei Province, China
ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1973-515X
1. Al-Sofiani ME, Ganji SS, Kalyani RR. Body composition changes in diabetes and aging. J Diabetes Complications. 2019. 33(6):451–459. pmid:31003924.
2. Han TS, Al-Gindan YY, Govan L, Hankey CR, Lean MEJ. Associations of BMI, waist circumference, body fat, and skeletal muscle with type 2 diabetes in adults. Acta Diabetologica. 2019. 8(56):947–954. pmid:30927105.
3. Ji T, Li Y, Ma L. Sarcopenic Obesity: An Emerging Public Health Problem. Aging Dis. 2022. 13(2):379–388. pmid:35371597.
4. Wang M, Tan Y, Shi Y, Wang X, Liao Z, Wei P. Diabetes and Sarcopenic Obesity: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatments. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2020. 11:568. pmid:32982969.
5. Lin C, Yu N, Wu H, Lee Y, Lin W, Chiu I, et al. Association of Body Composition with Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Chart Review Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. 18(9). 4421. pmid:33919339.
6. Batsis JA, Villareal DT. Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018. 14(9): 513–537. pmid:30065268.
7. Pereira MJ, Eriksson JW. Emerging Role of SGLT-2 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Obesity. Drugs. 2019. 79(3): 219–230. pmid:30701480.
8. Palmer SC, Tendal B, Mustafa RA, Vandvik PO, Li S, Hao Q, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021. 372: m4573. pmid:33441402.
9. Yabe D, Nishikino R, Kaneko M, Iwasaki M, Seino Y. Short-term impacts of sodium/glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in Japanese clinical practice:considerations for their appropriate use to avoid serious adverse events. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015. 14(6):795–800. pmid:25851664.
10. Bode B, Stenlöf K, Sullivan D, Fung A, Usiskin K. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin treatment in older subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial. Hosp Pract (1995). 2013. 41(2):72–84. pmid:23680739.
11. Cefalu WT, Leiter LA, Yoon K, Arias P, Niskanen L, Xie J, et al. Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (CANTATA-SU): 52 week results from a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2013. 382(9896): 941–50. pmid:23850055.
12. Bolinder J, Ljunggren Ö, Johansson L, Wilding J, Langkilde AM, Sjöström CD, et al. Dapagliflozin maintains glycaemic control while reducing weight and body fat mass over 2 years in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014. 16(2): 159–69. pmid:23906445.
13. Fadini GP, Bonora BM, Zatti G, Vitturi N, Iori E, Marescotti MC, et al. Effects of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on HDL cholesterol, particle size, and cholesterol efflux capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017. 16(1): 42. pmid:28376855.
14. Ito D, Shimizu S, Inoue K, Saito D, Yanagisawa M, Inukai K, et al. Comparison of Ipragliflozin and Pioglitazone Effects on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, 24-Week, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2017. 40(10): 1364–1372. pmid:28751548.
15. Han E, Lee Y, Lee B, Kang ES, Cha BS. Ipragliflozin Additively Ameliorates Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Controlled with Metformin and Pioglitazone: A 24-Week Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2020. 9(1). 259. pmid:31963648.
16. McCrimmon RJ, Catarig A, Frias JP, Lausvig NL, Roux CWI, Thielke D, et al. Effects of once-weekly semaglutide vs once-daily canagliflozin on body composition in type 2 diabetes: a substudy of the SUSTAIN 8 randomised controlled clinical trial. Diabetologia. 2020. 63(3): 473–485. pmid:31897524.
17. Nakaguchi H, Kondo Y, Kyohara M, Konishi H, Oiwa K, Terauchi Y. Effects of liraglutide and empagliflozin added to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled study. J Diabetes Investig. 2020. 11(6): 1542–1550. pmid:32279451.
18. Yamakage H, Tanaka M, Inoue T, Odori S, Kusakabe T, Satoh-Asahara N. Effects of dapagliflozin on the serum levels of fibroblast growth factor 21 and myokines and muscle mass in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, controlled trial. J Diabetes Investig. 2020. 11(3): 653–661. pmid:31721467.
19. Wolf VLW, Breder I, Carvalho LSF, Soares AAS, Cintra RM, Barreto J, et al. Dapagliflozin increases the lean-to total mass ratio in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Diabetes. 2021. 11(1): 17. pmid:34120150.
20. Chehrehgosha H, Sohrabi MR, Ismail-Beigi F, Malek M, Babaei MR, Zamani F, et al. Empagliflozin Improves Liver Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Diabetes Ther. 2021. 12(3): 843–861. pmid:33586120.
21. Horibe K, Morino K, Miyazawa I, Tanaka-Mizuno S, Kondo K, Sato D, et al. Metabolic changes induced by dapagliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes treated by oral anti-diabetic agents: A randomized, clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022. 186: 109781. pmid:35181350.
22. Inoue H, Morino K, Ugi S, Tanaka-Mizuno S, Fuse K, Miyazawa I, et al. Ipragliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, reduces bodyweight and fat mass, but not muscle mass, in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin: A randomized clinical trial. J Diabetes Investig. 2019. 10(4): 1012–1021. pmid:30536746.
23. Kayano H, Koba S, Hirano T, Matsui T, Fukuoka H, Tsuijita H, et al. Dapagliflozin Influences Ventricular Hemodynamics and Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension in Type 2 Diabetes Patients—A Randomized Controlled Trial. Circ J. 2020. 84(10): 1807–1817. pmid:32921680.
24. Kinoshita T, Shimoda M, Nakashima K, Fushimi Y, Hirata Y, Tanabe A, et al. Comparison of the effects of three kinds of glucose-lowering drugs on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, open-label, three-arm, active control study. J Diabetes Investig. 2020. 11(6): 1612–1622. pmid:32329963.
25. Tsurutani Y, Nakai K, Inoue K, Azuma K, Mukai S, Maruyama S, et al. Comparative study of the effects of ipragliflozin and sitagliptin on multiple metabolic variables in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicentre, randomized, prospective, open-label, active-controlled study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018. 20(11): 2675–2679. pmid:29893003.
26. Shimizu M, Suzuki K, Kato K, Jojima T, Iijima T, Murohisa T, et al. Evaluation of the effects of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, on hepatic steatosis and fibrosis using transient elastography in patients with type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019. 21(2): 285–292. pmid:30178600.
27. Zeng Y, Liu S, Lee C, Sun F, Liu JJ. Effect of empagliflozin versus linagliptin on body composition in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes treated with premixed insulin. Sci Rep. 2022. 12(1): 17065. pmid:36224294.
28. Preis SR, Massaro JM, Robins SJ, Hoffmann U, Vasan RS, Irlbeck T, et al. Abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue and insulin resistance in the Framingham heart study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010. 18(11): 2191–8. pmid:20339361.
29. Sneed NM, Morrison SA. Body Composition Methods in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes or at Risk for T2D: a Clinical Review. Curr Diab Rep. 2021. 21(5): 14. pmid:33730341.
30. Kim TN, Park MS, Yang SJ, Yoo HJ, Kang HJ, Song W, et al. Prevalence and determinant factors of sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Korean Sarcopenic Obesity Study (KSOS). Diabetes Care. 2010. 33(7): 1497–9. pmid:20413515.
31. Khadra D, Itani L, Tannir H, Kreidieh D, Masri DE, Ghoch ME. Association between sarcopenic obesity and higher risk of type 2 diabetes in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Diabetes. 2019. 10(5): 311–323. pmid:31139318.
32. Bastard J, Maachi M, Lagathu C, Kim MJ, Caron M, Vidal H, et al. Recent advances in the relationship between obesity, inflammation, and insulin resistance. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2006. 17(1): 4–12. pmid:16613757.
33. Sakurai S, Jojima T, Iijima T, Tomaru T, Usui I, Aso Y, et al. Empagliflozin decreases the plasma concentration of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in patients with type 2 diabetes: Association with improvement of fibrinolysis. J Diabetes Complications. 2020. 34(11): 107703. pmid:32883567.
34. Yasuda M, Iizuka K, Kato T, Liu Y, Takao K, Nonomura K, et al. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor and sarcopenia in a lean elderly adult with type 2 diabetes: A case report. J Diabetes Investig. 2020. 11(3): 745–747. pmid:31479586.
35. Wong C, Yaow CYL, Ng CH, Chin YH, Low YF, Lim AYL, et al. Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Asian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020. 11: 609135. pmid:33643221.
36. Wei Q, Xu X, Guo L, Li J, Li L. Effect of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021. 12: 635556. pmid:34220701.
37. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019. 393(10191): 2636–2646. pmid:31171417.
38. Post A, Groothof D, Eisenga MF, Bakker SJL. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Kidney Outcomes: True Renoprotection, Loss of Muscle Mass or Both? J Clin Med. 2020. 9(5): 1603. pmid:32466262.
39. Bilgin S, Duman TT, Kurtkulagi O, Yilmaz F, Aktas G. A Case of Euglycemic Diabetic Ketoacidosis due to Empagliflozin Use in a Patient with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022. 32(7): 928–930. pmid:35795946.
40. Bilgin S, Kurtkulagi O, Duman TT, Tel BMA, Kahveci G, Kiran M, et al. Sodium glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor, Empagliflozin, is associated with significant reduction in weight, body mass index, fasting glucose, and A1c levels in Type 2 diabetic patients with established coronary heart disease: the SUPER GATE study. Ir J Med Sci. 2022. 191(4): 1647–1652. pmid:34476725.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 Pan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Objective
Type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) is closely related to sarcopenic obesity(SO). Body composition measurement including body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, percentage body fat, fat mass, muscle mass, visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneus adipose tissue, plays a key role in evaluating T2DM and SO. The weight reduction effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2(SGLT-2) inhibitors has been demonstrated. However, there are warnings that SGLT-2 inhibitors should be used with caution because they may increase the risk of sarcopenia. The effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on body composition in T2DM is inconclusive. In this work, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to evaluate the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on body composition in T2DM.
Methods
PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMbase and Web of Science databases were searched by computer. All statistical analyses were carried out with Review Manager version 5. 3. Results were compared by weight mean difference(WMD), with 95% confidence intervals(CI) for continuous outcomes. A random effects model was applied regardless of heterogeneity. The I2 statistic was applied to evaluate the heterogeneity of studies. Publication bias was assessed using Funnel plots.
Results
18 studies with 1430 participants were eligible for the meta-analysis. SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly reduced body weight(WMD:-2. 73kg, 95%CI: -3. 32 to -2. 13, p<0. 00001), body mass index(WMD:-1. 13kg/m2, 95%CI: -1. 77 to -0. 50, p = 0. 0005), waist circumference(WMD:-2. 20cm, 95%CI: -3. 81 to -0. 58, p = 0. 008), visceral fat area(MD:-14. 79cm2, 95%CI: -24. 65 to -4. 93, p = 0. 003), subcutaneous fat area(WMD:-23. 27cm2, 95% CI:-46. 44 to -0. 11, P = 0. 05), fat mass(WMD:-1. 16kg, 95%CI: -2. 01 to -0. 31, p = 0. 008), percentage body fat(WMD:-1. 50%, 95%CI:-2. 12 to -0. 87, P<0. 00001), lean mass(WMD:-0. 76kg, 95%CI:-1. 53 to 0. 01, P = 0. 05) and skeletal muscle mass(WMD:-1. 01kg, 95%CI:-1. 91 to -0. 11, P = 0. 03).
Conclusion
SGLT-2 inhibitors improve body composition in T2DM including body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, visceral fat area, subcutaneous fat area, percentage body fat and fat mass reduction, but cause adverse effects of reducing muscle mass. Therefore, until more evidence is obtained to support that SGLT-2 inhibitors increase the risk of sarcopenia, not only the benefit on body composition, but also the adverse effect of the reduction in muscle mass by SGLT-2 inhibitors in T2DM should be considered.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Zhang, Yan; Wang, Rongrong; Xu, Yao; Ji, Hong; Zhao, Yongcai