It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Understanding the temporal and spatial patterns of flood in the Awash River basin, which is located in Ethiopia’s Afar region, is crucial. The Awash basin was picked because it is continuously in danger both spatially and temporally. The likelihood of flooding was assessed using eight independent variables: elevation, slope, rainfall, drainage density, land use, soil type, wetness index, and lineament density. Each constituent was assigned a weight based on its susceptibility to the danger, which was classified into four classifications. Exploratory regression analysis showed that the existing land use is the main factor influencing flood susceptibility. For the GIS domain, a total of 31 models were built using exploratory regression. Model number 31 was found to be the best fit model, having the highest Adjusted R2 value of 0.8 and the lowest Akaike’s Information criterion value of 1536.8. The spatial autocorrelation tool’s Z score and p-value for the standard residuals are, respectively, 0.7 and 0.4, indicating that they were neither clustered nor scattered. The geographic breadth of flood susceptibility and risk is thoroughly examined in this paper, as is the significance of spatial planning in the Awash basin.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 China University of Geosciences, School of Environmental Studies, (Wu Han), China; China University of Geosciences Press Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.503241.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 1760 9015)
2 Debre Tabor University, Department of Hydraulic and Water Resources Engineering, Debra Tabor, Ethiopia (GRID:grid.510430.3)
3 Technical University of Kosice, Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Kosice, Slovakia (GRID:grid.6903.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2235 0982)
4 Integrated Watershed Management Programme, Department of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj, Government of Jammu and Kashmir, Srinagar, India (GRID:grid.510430.3)
5 Woldia University, Department of Computer Science, Weldiya, Ethiopia (GRID:grid.507691.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 6023 9806)