It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Controllable fabrication of angstrom-size channels has been long desired to mimic biological ion channels for the fundamental study of ion transport. Here we report a strategy for fabricating angstrom-scale ion channels with one-dimensional (1D) to three-dimensional (3D) pore structures by the growth of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) into nanochannels. The 1D MIL-53 channels of flexible pore sizes around 5.2 × 8.9 Å can transport cations rapidly, with one to two orders of magnitude higher conductivities and mobilities than MOF channels of hybrid pore configurations and sizes, including Al-TCPP with 1D ~8 Å channels connected by 2D ~6 Å interlayers, and 3D UiO-66 channels of ~6 Å windows and 9 − 12 Å cavities. Furthermore, the 3D MOF channels exhibit better ion sieving properties than those of 1D and 2D MOF channels. Theoretical simulations reveal that ion transport through 2D and 3D MOF channels should undergo multiple dehydration-rehydration processes, resulting in higher energy barriers than pure 1D channels. These findings offer a platform for studying ion transport properties at angstrom-scale confinement and provide guidelines for improving the efficiency of ionic separations and nanofluidics.
The fabrication of synthetic nanochannels for ion separation is challenging. Here, the authors synthesize angstrom-scale ion channels featuring one-dimensional to three-dimensional pore configurations by growing metal‒organic frameworks into nanochannels; the structure of the pore influences the ion transport performance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details










1 Monash University, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Clayton, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857)
2 Wuhan University of Science and Technology, College of Science, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.412787.f) (ISNI:0000 0000 9868 173X)
3 RMIT University, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Melbourne, Australia (GRID:grid.1017.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 2163 3550)
4 Manufacturing, CSIRO, Clayton, Australia (GRID:grid.1016.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 2719)
5 Faculty of Physics & Electronic Science, Hubei University, Hubei Key Laboratory of Ferro- & Piezoelectric Materials and Devices, Wuhan, China (GRID:grid.34418.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0727 9022)
6 The University of Melbourne, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Parkville, Australia (GRID:grid.1008.9) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 088X)
7 Monash University, Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Clayton, Australia (GRID:grid.1002.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7857); The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Chemical Engineering, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)