It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Imagery from drones is becoming common in wildlife research and management, but processing data efficiently remains a challenge. We developed a methodology for training a convolutional neural network model on large-scale mosaic imagery to detect and count caribou (Rangifer tarandus), compare model performance with an experienced observer and a group of naïve observers, and discuss the use of aerial imagery and automated methods for large mammal surveys. Combining images taken at 75 m and 120 m above ground level, a faster region-based convolutional neural network (Faster-RCNN) model was trained in using annotated imagery with the labels: “adult caribou”, “calf caribou”, and “ghost caribou” (animals moving between images, producing blurring individuals during the photogrammetry processing). Accuracy, precision, and recall of the model were 80%, 90%, and 88%, respectively. Detections between the model and experienced observer were highly correlated (Pearson: 0.96–0.99, P value < 0.05). The model was generally more effective in detecting adults, calves, and ghosts than naïve observers at both altitudes. We also discuss the need to improve consistency of observers’ annotations if manual review will be used to train models accurately. Generalization of automated methods for large mammal detections will be necessary for large-scale studies with diverse platforms, airspace restrictions, and sensor capabilities.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of North Dakota, Department of Biology, Grand Forks, USA (GRID:grid.266862.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8163)
2 University of North Dakota, Department of Biology, Grand Forks, USA (GRID:grid.266862.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8163); University of Victoria, School of Environmental Studies, Victoria, Canada (GRID:grid.143640.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9465)
3 University of North Carolina Wilmington, Department of Computer Science, Wilmington, USA (GRID:grid.217197.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9813 0452)
4 Rochester Institute of Technology, Department of Software Engineering, Rochester, USA (GRID:grid.262613.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2323 3518)
5 American Museum of Natural History, Vertebrate Zoology, New York, USA (GRID:grid.241963.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2152 1081)