1. Introduction
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent airflow obstruction and shortness of breath [1]. This condition affects 384 million persons and is responsible for over 3 million deaths worldwide [2]. Although the pathogenesis of COPD has not been fully elucidated, it is caused by a complex interaction between environmental and genetic factors [3]. For example, cigarette smoking, which is the leading known risk factor for COPD, can alter gene expression, which may be mediated through epigenetic mechanisms. We have previously shown that the airway epithelium of COPD patients harbors a unique DNA methylation profile [4] and can alter gene expression without changing the DNA sequence. Whether these changes are local (i.e., in the small airways) or systemic (i.e., also reflected in blood) are uncertain. Moreover, their influence on patient-related outcomes such as symptoms or health status is also not known.
The St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a commonly used instrument, which captures the impact of disease (and its symptoms) on the quality of life of patients with COPD [5,6]. SGRQ is a 50-item questionnaire built on three domains: symptoms (frequency and severity of respiratory symptoms), activity (the effect of breathlessness on mobility and physical activity), and impact (the influence of disease on the psychosocial aspects of life). This tool is also used to assess the potential benefits of a treatment. A reduction of 4 units in the total SGRQ score is considered the minimum clinically important difference [7]. The molecular mechanisms underlying quality of life in COPD are not well understood. Here, we hypothesized that epigenetic dysregulation contributes to worsening health status in COPD patients and because COPD is a systemic disease, we also posited that blood will contain more epigenomic changes than in the airways. To investigate our hypothesis we conducted epigenome-wide differential methylation analyses to determine the association of blood and airway DNA methylation profiles with total SGRQ scores and its domains in COPD patients; we then compared the blood and airway epigenetic signatures and identified important pathways characterized by differential methylation.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Differential Effects of Inhaled Symbicort and Advair on Lung Microbiota (DISARM) Study Cohort
For this investigation we used the DISARM study, a 12-week randomized control trial (ClinicalTrials.gov [NCT02833480]) conducted in two hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada (St. Paul’s Hospital and the British Columbia Cancer Agency). Institutional ethics approval was obtained from the University of British Columbia/the Providence Health Care Research Ethics Committee (H14-02277). This study has been fully described previously [8,9,10,11]. In brief, DISARM enrolled 89 stable COPD patients, and 63 of these patients reached the bronchoscopy stage of the study. The initial bronchoscopy was performed with the patient free of any inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-based therapy for at least 4 weeks and were clinically stable for at least 8 weeks prior to the procedure. Bronchial brush samples were obtained from the 6th–8th generation airways (typically in the right or left upper lobes). Blood samples were also collected at the initial bronchoscopy visit. Spirometry was performed according to the recommendations of ATS/ERS [12]. Health-related quality of life was ascertained using the SGRQ 1-week following the bronchoscopy. Patients provided baseline demographic information including medications and comorbidities and also underwent pulmonary function tests. For the present study, we retained a total of 64 patients; of these 57 provided blood and 62 underwent bronchoscopy for DNA methylation profiling; and 55 of these patients had paired blood and brushing samples. A study diagram is shown in Supplemental Figure S1.
2.2. DNA Methylation Profiling
For all participants, DNA extracts were obtained from peripheral blood (buffy coat fraction) and airway epithelial cell samples using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Unmethylated cytosine residues present in the DNA extracts were converted to uracil using the EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo, Irvine, CA, USA). The Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip microarray was then used to profile 863,904 DNA methylation sites (CpG probes). All samples were profiled in one run and were randomized within the chip; this step was performed by technicians blinded to the patients’ clinical characteristics. To ensure that the blood and airway profiles were comparable we processed the data together according to previously described methods [4,13,14,15,16]. The beta values for the CpG probes were calculated as the ratio of methylation probe intensity to the overall intensity ranging from 0 (fully unmethylated) to 1 (fully methylated). CpG probes with a detection quality of p > 1 × 10−10, or contained non-CpGs, single nucleotide polymorphisms, or cross-hybridization probes were removed from the downstream analyses. Background correction, normalization, and batch correction steps were applied using the Normal-exponential out-of-band [17], Beta-Mixture Quantile Normalization [18], and ComBat [19] methods, respectively.
2.3. Differential Methylation Analysis
We conducted epigenome-wide association analyses based on the blood and airway epithelial cell DNA methylation profiles. For each tissue type we used the EPISTRUCTURE algorithm [20] to infer the population structure in our data. This software calculates principal components (PCs) based on CpGs that are highly correlated with a single nucleotide polymorphism to capture the genetic variability within a population. Blood cell proportions were estimated based on the deconvolution method by Houseman et al. [21] as implemented in the Horvath laboratory webtool (
The differential analysis for airway epithelial cells profiles was defined as:
These analyses were conducted to assess the association between DNA methylation in the two tissues and SGRQ scores and its domains (Supplementary Figure S1). Significant DMPs were defined based on a false discovery rate (FDR) cut-off of <0.10. We later used the R package DMRcate [24] to identify differentially methylated regions (DMR), which were defined with at least three consecutive CpGs.
2.4. Pathway Enrichment Analysis
We used the software package WebGestaltR to identify Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways enriched by the genes characterized by differential methylation in blood and airway epithelial cells. Significant enrichment was defined at FDR < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Study Cohort Overview
An overview of the study cohort is presented in Table 1. The participants included a total of 64 adults, of these 57 were profiled for blood and 62 had airway samples; the majority of whom were males.
3.2. Blood and Airway Epigenetic Disruptions Are Associated with SGRQ Scores
Differential blood DNA methylation analysis based on DNA methylation profiles yielded 29,211 DMPs associated with total SGRQ scores (Figure 1A, Supplementary Table S1). These DMPs were within the vicinity of 13,485 unique genes. Table 2 shows that the top five DMPs identified in blood were located within the ARFGAP1, RP11-711C17.2, PPARG and MGAT4C genes (Figure 1A). In blood, we identified 3250 DMRs associated with total SGRQ scores (Supplementary Table S2); Table 3 shows the top five DMRs. Differentially methylated genes for total SGRQ score were enriched in 119 pathways (Figure 2A, Supplementary Table S3), including cancer pathways (e.g., small and non-small cell lung cancer), age-related pathways (e.g: longevity regulating pathway and mTOR signaling pathway), and neurological pathways (e.g., cholinergic synapse and dopaminergic synapse). The SGRQ activity, impact, and symptom domains were associated with 9161, 25,689 and 17,293 DMPs in blood, respectively. Activity score DMPs corresponded to 5508 unique genes that enriched 19 pathways (e.g., pathways in cancer, longevity regulating pathway and oxytocin signaling pathway); impact score DMPs corresponded to 11,901 genes that enriched 115 pathways (e.g., pathways in cancer, MAPK signaling pathway and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway); and symptom score DMPs were located within 8332 genes that enriched 75 pathways (e.g., platelet activation, Inflammatory mediator regulation of TRP channels and cortisol synthesis and secretion). Furthermore, 2087 genes were exclusive to activity DMPs, 6181 genes to impact DMPs and 3581 genes to symptom DMPs (Supplemental Figure S2). The top genes characterized by differential methylation in blood for each SGRQ domain are shown in Table 2, and included CCDC30, DOCK2 and F2 for the activity score DMPs, ERC2, AC004041.2, RAD50, and AP4S1 for the impact score DMPs, and BACH2 and WNK2 for the symptom score. We also found 1048, 2925, and 1924 DMRs for activity, impact, and symptom score, respectively; Table 3 shows the top five DMRs.
Airway differential DNA methylation was associated with SGRQ scores, albeit less than in the blood. For instance, 5044 DMPs were associated with total SGRQ score (Figure 2B), which corresponded to 2950 unique genes that enriched 38 pathways (e.g., small and non-small lung cancer, mTOR signalling pathway and insulin resistance). In addition, we identified 643 DMRs for total SGRQ score in the airway; top five DMRs are shown in Table 3. For the SGRQ activity score, we identified 4674 DMPs located within 2847 genes, which enriched 36 pathways (e.g., T and B cell receptor signaling pathways, and longevity regulating pathway); DMPs were grouped into 590 DMRs. For the impact score, we identified 3730 DMPs within 2198 genes, which enriched 8 pathways (e.g., Insulin signaling pathway, and mTOR signaling pathway); in addition we also identified 473 DMRs for the impact score. The symptom score was associated 5063 DMPs, these were located within 2850 genes that significantly enriched 24 pathways (e.g., platelet activation and cortisol synthesis and secretion); furthermore 625 DMRs were identified for the symptom score. In addition, we found that 2039 genes were unique to activity score DMPs, 1257 genes to impact score DMPs, and 1919 genes to symptom score DMPs (Supplemental Figure S3).
3.3. A Systemic Epigenetic Signature of Health Status in COPD
We compared differentially methylated genes (DMGs) in blood to those in the airway epithelium. For DMGs associated with total SGRQ score, there were 1590 overlapping genes, which represented 54% of the airway epithelial DMGs (Figure 3A). These genes enriched 25 pathways (Figure 3E), most of these were captured by the blood differential methylation analyses (24 pathways). These pathways included many aging (e.g., PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, longevity regulating pathway, and Ras signaling pathway) and cancer (e.g., non-small and small cell lung cancer) pathways. For DMGs associated with SGRQ domain scores, there were 779, 1154 and 1156 overlapping genes for activity, impacts and symptoms scores, respectively, representing 27%, 53%, and 41% of the airway epithelial DMGs, respectively (Figure 3B–D).
We also compared pathways enriched for DMGs between blood and airway epithelium. For total SGRQ score, 36 out of the 38 pathways identified in the airway epithelium (Figure 2B) overlapped with those in blood, including small and non-small cell lung cancer and mTOR signaling pathways. For SGRQ activity score, 9 out of the 36 pathways identified in the airway overlapped with those in blood (e.g., pathways in cancer and longevity regulating pathway); for SGRQ impact score, 7 out of the 8 pathways identified in the airway epithelium overlapped with those identified in blood (e.g., mTOR signaling pathway and insulin signaling pathway); for SGRQ symptom score, we identified 20 out of 24 pathways in the airway epithelium that overlapped with blood pathways, including platelet activation, pathways in cancer and Wnt signaling pathway.
4. Discussion
To our knowledge this the first report that directly evaluated blood and airway epigenetic signatures in relation to health status of patients with COPD. We made several novel observations. First, there are distinct epigenetic signatures that relate to health status and symptoms of patients with COPD. These signatures (both in blood and in the airway) are enriched in pathways related to accelerated ageing and lung cancer, which are important consequences and comorbidities of COPD [25]. Second, although blood carries most of the epigenetic changes observed in the airways, it also harbors distinct non-airway related epigenetic changes, which may reflect the systemic nature of COPD [26].
Epigenome-wide disruptions have been associated with COPD [4]; however their clinical impact has not been well characterized. Our findings suggest that differential methylation in blood and airway epithelial cells is associated with patient symptoms and health status in COPD and that these changes can be detected in blood as well as airway samples. Our analyses also highlight several interesting differentially methylated genes, which may have plausible effects in COPD. One of the most significant genes in the blood differential analyses was PPARG, where increased methylation within PPARG in the airways was associated with increased score in the SGRQ symptoms domain. This gene has anti-inflammatory functions in various cells in the lung including: airway epithelial cells, endothelial cells, airway smooth muscle cells, alveolar macrophages and eosinophils [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Mice experiments have shown that activation of PPARG downregulates the expression of inflammatory chemokines and mitigates cigarette-smoking induced emphysema [36]. COPD is related to both airway and systemic inflammation [37,38]. We found that some of the genes in the inflammatory pathways (e.g., STAT3, PIAS3, IL8 [blood—all DMPs are hypermethylated], IL6 [blood—all DMPs are hypomethylated], and IL6R [airway and blood—specific DMPs are hypo- or hypermethylated], IL10 [blood—all DMPs are hypomethylated]) were differentially methylated and related to health status of our patients. In support of these findings, in vitro model has linked hypomethylation of promoters in the NF-κB and STAT3 genes with the induction of inflammation by lipopolysaccharide and cigarette smoke extract [39].
Multiple pathways were enriched by the differentially methylated genes in both blood and airways. Overlapping pathways included age-related processes such as mTOR signaling pathway, which regulates cell proliferation, apoptosis, and autophagy in the cellular senescence process [40] and the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Akt activation, which occurs during ageing, may be responsible for neuronal dysfunction of ageing [41]. Akt is also involved in the regulation of mTOR [42]. In addition, cancer pathways were identified in all our enrichment analyses (e.g., lung cancer). It is well established that COPD is a major risk factor for lung cancer, increasing its risk by 2 to 4 fold [43]. Our findings suggest that methylation changes in the genome may be responsible for some of this excess risk, however more research is needed to define the effect of hypo- and hyper- methylated genes on cancer risk. Our analyses also highlighted neurological pathways, for example, dopaminergic synapse, which plays a central role in the control of behavioral processes such as addiction and stress [44]. Furthermore, dopamine has been associated with improvement of diaphragmatic function in COPD patients [45], thus its regulation may also affect respiratory symptoms. We also found that there was epigenomic changes in pathways for cholinergic signaling, which dampens inflammation by downregulating pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., TNF-a, IL-1B and IL-6) [46,47]. Thus, DNA methylation in COPD may not only affect physical manifestations of COPD, but also contributes to the individuals’ ability to cope with psychosocial stress of COPD.
Our analyses were limited by several factors. First, our study cohort was small, and lacked significant sex/gender and ethnic diversity; thus our findings may not be fully generalizable to patients in the community. In addition the small sample size limited our investigation of methylation patterns in smokers and ex-smokers separately. Second, longitudinal effects of epigenetic disruptions could not be captured due to the cross-sectional methodology of DISARM. Third, we were not able to establish whether poor health status in COPD caused the epigenetic disruptions or vice versa. Fourth, due to the invasive nature of the bronchoscopy procedure, a replication cohort was not available, and thus future efforts should aim to replicate our findings. Fifth, bronchial brush samples, while mostly epithelial cells, might have also included inflammatory cells, which may could have impacted our results. However, previous research has shown that epithelial cells are the main component of bronchial brush samples [4]; likewise, although our blood analysis were adjusted for cell composition [48] blood samples have a complex mixture of immune cells, which varies across patients [49] and therefore we were not able to identify epigenetic differences for each specific cell populations. In summary, there are epigenetic disruptions in blood and airways associated with SGRQ scores, which may contribute to age-, cancer- and neurological-related processes in COPD. Our findings support the notion that the processes disrupted in the lung of COPD patients could have systemic effects that may impact their quality of life and symptoms, and that blood DNA methylation features are sensitive indicators of similar changes in the airways. Together these data suggest that blood DNA methylation patterns can be cultivated as potential biomarkers of health status and outcomes of patients with COPD.
A.I.H.C. and D.D.S.: wrote the first draft and contributed to the data analysis and interpretation. X.L.: conducted the main analyses. J.Y.: collected the biological samples. C.X.Y.: contribute to the data analysis. S.M.: results interpretation. J.L.M., S.F.v.E., M.S.K., T.S., K.D. and S.L.: data acquisition. J.M.L. contribute to the study design and results interpretation. D.D.S. contribute to the study design. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
This study was approved by the University of British Columbia and the Providence Health Care Research Ethics Committee (H14-02277).
All participants provided informed consent for the DISARM Study. Consent is available upon request to authors (D.D.S., A.H.C.)
Data available upon request to authors (D.D.S., A.H.C.)
We thank the patients who participated in the DISARM study.
D.D.S. has received honorarium from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim for giving talks on COPD.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. Blood (A) and airway (B) differentially methylated sites association with Total SGRQ score. x-axis represents the robust linear model (rlm) estimated effects on the methylation Beta-values, y-axis represents the rlm −log10P on M-values. For each unit of SGRQ increased, DNA methylation decreases (hypomethylation = blue) or increases (hypermethylation = red).
Figure 2. KEGG pathways enriched for differentially methylated genes for total SGRQ score. Horizontal and vertical axis represent the percentage of genes within each pathway that are characterized by differential methylation and description of the pathways, respectively. (A) Blood. (B) Airway.
Figure 3. Differentially methylated genes overlapped between tissues. Venn diagrams show the overlap of differentially methylated genes identified in blood versus those in the airway for the total SGRQ score (A), and its domains: activity (B), impact (C) and symptom (D) scores. (E) shows the pathways enriched by the differentially methylated genes identified in blood and airway tissue.
Demographic characteristics at baseline.
DISARM Study Cohort | |
---|---|
n | 64 |
Age, years | 64 ± 8 |
Female, % | 17 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 24.58 (21.09–29.35) |
Smoking status | |
Current, % | 45 |
Former, % | 55 |
Pack per years | 48.00 (33.00–59.50) |
SGRQ total score | 44.06 (33.08–54.90) |
SGRQ activity score | 65.89 (48.52–74.08) |
SGRQ impacts score | 28.45 (18.10–39.68) |
SGRQ symptoms score | 56.20 (39.30–70.63) |
FEV1% of predicted | 55.00 (43.65–67.25) |
FVC% of predicted | 83.35 (71.90–92.25) |
FEV1/FVC, percent | 52.64 (42.93–60.09) |
BMI: body mass index. FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s. FVC: Forced vital capacity. Age is shown as mean and standard deviation. Count data are shown in percentages, and Lung function variables are reported as median and interquartile range as variables are not normally distributed.
Top five blood and airway DMPs for SGRQ scores.
SGRQ Score | Tissue | Probe | Beta Difference | p | FDR | Chr | Relation to Island | Position in Relation to Gene | Gene Symbol |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Blood | cg00542760 | −0.0002 | 5.22 × 10−25 | 2.06 × 10−19 | 20 | Island | 5’UTR; 1stExon; TSS1500; 3’UTR | ARFGAP1 |
cg02344187 | −0.0003 | 3.21 × 10−25 | 2.06 × 10−19 | 12 | Open Sea | 5’UTR | RP11-711C17.2 | ||
cg25911248 | −0.0004 | 2.78 × 10−23 | 7.32 × 10−18 | 3 | Open Sea | 3’UTR | PPARG | ||
cg00151915 | −0.0003 | 6.59 × 10−23 | 1.30 × 10−17 | 12 | Open Sea | 5’UTR | MGAT4C | ||
cg02213440 | −0.0003 | 1.49 × 10−20 | 2.35 × 10−15 | 7 | Open Sea | ||||
Airway | cg16929656 | 0.0026 | 1.44 × 10−17 | 1.13 × 10−11 | 19 | Open Sea | 3’UTR | PPP5C | |
cg05245430 | 0.0002 | 6.08 × 10−15 | 2.40 × 10−09 | 14 | Island | 3’UTR; 1stExon | CCDC88C | ||
cg21153875 | −0.0001 | 9.40 × 10−15 | 2.47 × 10−09 | 1 | Island | TSS200 | C1orf187; MAD2L2 | ||
cg15346134 | 0.0014 | 6.01 × 10−14 | 1.18 × 10−08 | 1 | Open Sea | TSS200 | EPHA2 | ||
cg15550234 | 0.0021 | 1.78 × 10−12 | 2.81 × 10−07 | 10 | Open Sea | 3’UTR; 5’UTR | CPXM2 | ||
Activity | Blood | cg09711814 | −0.0001 | 4.35 × 10−22 | 3.43 × 10−16 | 7 | Open Sea | ||
cg24639069 | −0.0002 | 1.76 × 10−18 | 6.94 × 10−13 | 1 | Open Sea | TSS1500; 5’UTR | CCDC30 | ||
cg10677105 | −0.0005 | 6.97 × 10−15 | 1.83 × 10−09 | 5 | Open Sea | 5’UTR; 3’UTR | DOCK2 | ||
cg11893552 | 0.0015 | 1.86 × 10−14 | 3.66 × 10−09 | 6 | Open Sea | ||||
cg00371195 | −0.0001 | 3.40 × 10−14 | 4.47 × 10−09 | 11 | Open Sea | TSS1500 | F2 | ||
Airway | cg00278597 | 0.0002 | 4.35 × 10−12 | 1.71 × 10−06 | 8 | Open Sea | TSS1500 | RP11-1057B8.2 | |
cg09397653 | 0.0009 | 2.60 × 10−12 | 1.71 × 10−06 | 15 | Open Sea | TSS1500 | ITGA11 | ||
cg27547307 | 0.0005 | 1.11 × 10−11 | 2.91 × 10−06 | 17 | Open Sea | TSS1500; 5’UTR | CYTH1 | ||
cg00413620 | 0.0011 | 1.74 × 10−11 | 3.43 × 10−06 | 1 | Open Sea | ||||
cg04926227 | 0.0011 | 4.02 × 10−11 | 6.33 × 10−06 | 8 | Open Sea | TSS1500; 3’UTR; 5’UTR | RP11-463D19.1; STAU2 | ||
Impact | Blood | cg23444468 | 0.0004 | 6.72 × 10−30 | 5.29 × 10−24 | 3 | Island | TSS1500; 5’UTR | ERC2 |
cg13886298 | −0.0002 | 1.45 × 10−24 | 5.70 × 10−19 | 5 | Open Sea | TSS1500; 3’UTR | AC004041.2; RAD50 | ||
cg15751204 | 0.0008 | 5.45 × 10−22 | 1.43 × 10−16 | 3 | Open Sea | ||||
cg00851837 | −0.0003 | 4.31 × 10−20 | 8.48 × 10−15 | 14 | Open Sea | TSS200 | AP4S1 | ||
cg15534855 | 0.0005 | 1.24 × 10−19 | 1.95 × 10−14 | 18 | Island | ||||
Airway | cg08738303 | 0.0005 | 3.69 × 10−13 | 2.91 × 10−07 | 18 | Open Sea | |||
cg01585096 | 0.0012 | 3.64 × 10−12 | 7.16 × 10−07 | 19 | Open Sea | TSS200; 3’UTR | KRTDAP | ||
cg03053018 | 0.0030 | 2.11 × 10−12 | 7.16 × 10−07 | 7 | Open Sea | ||||
cg20447038 | 0.0018 | 3.22 × 10−12 | 7.16 × 10−07 | 6 | Open Sea | ||||
cg02065293 | 0.0011 | 1.08 × 10−11 | 1.46 × 10−06 | 2 | Open Sea | ||||
Symptom | Blood | cg06894541 | 0.0003 | 3.10 × 10−19 | 2.44 × 10−13 | 2 | Open Sea | ||
cg25670076 | 0.0021 | 4.09 × 10−18 | 1.61 × 10−12 | 6 | Open Sea | 5’UTR; 3’UTR | BACH2 | ||
cg11743078 | −0.0004 | 1.87 × 10−15 | 4.92 × 10−10 | 1 | Open Sea | ||||
cg02415617 | −0.0004 | 2.08 × 10−14 | 3.25 × 10−09 | 9 | South Shore | 1stExon; 3’UTR; 5’UTR | WNK2 | ||
cg04028140 | 0.0007 | 2.48 × 10−14 | 3.25 × 10−09 | 11 | Open Sea | ||||
Airway | cg07380540 | −0.0010 | 6.04 × 10−26 | 4.76 × 10−20 | 1 | South Shelf | |||
cg10789584 | 0.0005 | 2.76 × 10−17 | 1.09 × 10−11 | 11 | Open Sea | 5’UTR | CD82 | ||
cg18910215 | −0.0007 | 5.49 × 10−14 | 1.44 × 10−08 | 9 | Open Sea | 5’UTR | MAPKAP1 | ||
cg20708037 | 0.0018 | 9.37 × 10−14 | 1.85 × 10−08 | 1 | Open Sea | ||||
cg21088488 | 0.0008 | 4.81 × 10−12 | 7.58 × 10−07 | 7 | South Shore | 3’UTR; TSS1500 | DBNL; PGAM2 |
Top CpGs criteria: smallest to largest FDR. Beta difference was estimated from each methylation site beta value and p-value was estimated from each methylation site M-value. Negative beta: for each unit of SGRQ increased, DNA methylation decreases. Positive beta: for each unit of SGRQ increased DNA methylation increases.
Top five blood and airway DMRs for SGRQ scores.
SGRQ Score | Tissue | Chr | Start | End | # CpGs | Min |
Gene Symbols |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Blood | 3 | 47,823,638 | 47,825,578 | 7 | 4.71 × 10−27 | SMARCC1 |
12 | 124,246,976 | 124,248,926 | 5 | 8.50 × 10−24 | DNAH10 | ||
20 | 61,917,085 | 61,918,367 | 5 | 9.22 × 10−23 | ARFGAP1, MIR4326 | ||
4 | 148,653,624 | 148,654,701 | 5 | 7.03 × 10−20 | ARHGAP10 | ||
5 | 126,779,737 | 126,780,974 | 4 | 1.47 × 10−19 | MEGF10 | ||
Airway | 18 | 56,296,094 | 56,296,607 | 10 | 2.90 × 10−22 | ALPK2, RPL9P31 | |
9 | 91,604,473 | 91,605,695 | 7 | 5.88 × 10−18 | C9orf47, S1PR3 | ||
19 | 46,894,811 | 46,895,714 | 3 | 1.41 × 10−16 | AC007193.8 | ||
12 | 11,698,534 | 11,699,363 | 5 | 3.03 × 10−14 | RP11-434C1.1, RNU7-60P | ||
1 | 120,173,989 | 120,175,029 | 7 | 3.03 × 10−14 | |||
Activity | Blood | 11 | 2,019,436 | 2,021,103 | 32 | 9.13 × 10−19 | H19 |
6 | 168,045,268 | 168,046,457 | 6 | 4.18 × 10−18 | |||
3 | 30,936,070 | 30,936,955 | 11 | 4.98 × 10−14 | GADL1 | ||
17 | 699,291 | 700,672 | 4 | 5.21 × 10−13 | |||
7 | 94,285,270 | 94,287,242 | 60 | 1.11 × 10−12 | SGCE, PEG10 | ||
Airway | 18 | 56,296,094 | 56,296,607 | 10 | 5.98 × 10−23 | ALPK2, RPL9P31 | |
11 | 86,085,026 | 86,086,489 | 12 | 1.24 × 10−13 | CCDC81 | ||
19 | 29,217,858 | 29,218,774 | 7 | 1.31 × 10−11 | AC005307.3 | ||
18 | 3,411,487 | 3,412,713 | 11 | 1.37 × 10−11 | TGIF1 | ||
7 | 157,866,683 | 157,868,361 | 13 | 2.33 × 10−11 | |||
Impact | Blood | 6 | 42,927,199 | 42,928,920 | 31 | 6.89 × 10−33 | GNMT |
3 | 56,501,352 | 56,502,814 | 12 | 1.26 × 10−30 | ERC2 | ||
18 | 74,960,629 | 74,963,364 | 35 | 6.35 × 10−27 | GALR1 | ||
10 | 134,598,316 | 134,601,851 | 37 | 4.30 × 10−24 | NKX6-2, RP11-288G11.3 | ||
3 | 47,823,674 | 47,825,578 | 6 | 1.03 × 10−23 | SMARCC1 | ||
Airway | 19 | 35,981,224 | 35,982,442 | 10 | 1.20 × 10−19 | KRTDAP | |
17 | 75,470,567 | 75,472,168 | 12 | 2.22 × 10−15 | SEPT9, RP11-75C10.9 | ||
21 | 43,315,518 | 43,316,705 | 6 | 9.74 × 10−14 | |||
12 | 11,698,367 | 11,699,363 | 6 | 2.63 × 10−13 | RP11-434C1.1, RNU7-60P | ||
3 | 113,160,071 | 113,161,177 | 14 | 1.70 × 10−12 | WDR52 | ||
Symptom | Blood | 6 | 32,807,895 | 32,811,521 | 30 | 3.27 × 10−24 | PSMB8, TAP2, PSMB9, TAPSAR1 |
5 | 78,364,769 | 78,366,302 | 14 | 2.24 × 10−22 | DMGDH, BHMT2 | ||
6 | 30,850,207 | 30,852,354 | 24 | 2.24 × 10−22 | DDR1 | ||
2 | 110,969,641 | 110,970,909 | 8 | 4.86 × 10−22 | LINC00116 | ||
2 | 98,329,337 | 98,330,493 | 10 | 1.96 × 10−21 | ZAP70 | ||
Airway | 6 | 33,244,976 | 33,246,895 | 44 | 1.04 × 10−22 | B3GALT4, WDR46, RPS18 | |
12 | 63,025,490 | 63,026,424 | 7 | 2.02 × 10−21 | |||
9 | 139,425,582 | 139,427,171 | 5 | 5.63 × 10−20 | |||
17 | 46,655,164 | 46,656,572 | 20 | 6.39 × 10−17 | HOXB4, MIR10A, HOXB3 | ||
2 | 161,992,157 | 161,993,364 | 6 | 1.19 × 10−16 | TANK |
Top differentially methylated region criteria: smallest to largest minimum FDR.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Agarwal, A.K.; Raja, A.; Brown, B.D. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; StatPearls Publishing: Tampa, FL, USA, 2021.
2. Stolz, D.; Mkorombindo, T.; Schumann, D.M.; Agusti, A.; Ash, S.Y.; Bafadhel, M.; Bai, C.; Chalmers, J.D.; Criner, G.J.; Dharmage, S.C. et al. Towards the Elimination of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Lancet Commission. Lancet; 2022; 400, pp. 921-972. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01273-9] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36075255]
3. Lee, H.; Sin, D.D. GETting to Know the Many Causes and Faces of COPD. Lancet Respir. Med.; 2022; 10, pp. 426-428. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00049-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35427529]
4. Hernández Cordero, A.I.; Yang, C.X.; Yang, J.; Horvath, S.; Shaipanich, T.; MacIsaac, J.; Lin, D.T.; Kobor, M.S.; Guillemi, S.; Harris, M. et al. Airway Aging and Methylation Disruptions in HIV-Associated Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 2022; 206, pp. 150-160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202106-1440OC]
5. Müllerova, H.; Gelhorn, H.; Wilson, H.; Benson, V.S.; Karlsson, N.; Menjoge, S.; Rennard, S.I.; Tabberer, M.; Tal-Singer, R.; Merrill, D. et al. St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire Score Predicts Outcomes in Patients with COPD: Analysis of Individual Patient Data in the COPD Biomarkers Qualification Consortium Database. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis.; 2017; 4, pp. 141-149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15326/jcopdf.4.2.2017.0131]
6. Weatherall, M.; Marsh, S.; Shirtcliffe, P.; Williams, M.; Travers, J.; Beasley, R. Quality of Life Measured by the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and Spirometry. Eur. Respir. J.; 2009; 33, pp. 1025-1030. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00116808] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19164350]
7. Jones, P.W. St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire: MCID. COPD; 2005; 2, pp. 75-79. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1081/COPD-200050513]
8. Yip, W.; Li, X.; Koelwyn, G.J.; Milne, S.; Leitao Filho, F.S.; Yang, C.X.; Hernández Cordero, A.I.; Yang, J.; Yang, C.W.T.; Shaipanich, T. et al. Inhaled Corticosteroids Selectively Alter the Microbiome and Host Transcriptome in the Small Airways of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Biomedicines; 2022; 10, 1110. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10051110]
9. Leitao Filho, F.S.; Takiguchi, H.; Akata, K.; Ra, S.W.; Moon, J.-Y.; Kim, H.K.; Cho, Y.; Yamasaki, K.; Milne, S.; Yang, J. et al. Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroid/Long-Acting Β2-Agonist Combination on the Airway Microbiome of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (DISARM). Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 2021; 204, pp. 1143-1152. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202102-0289OC]
10. Milne, S.; Li, X.; Yang, C.X.; Leitao Filho, F.S.; Hernández Cordero, A.I.; Yang, C.W.T.; Shaipanich, T.; van Eeden, S.F.; Leung, J.M.; Lam, S. et al. Inhaled Corticosteroids Downregulate SARS-CoV-2-Related Genes in COPD: Results from a Randomised Controlled Trial. Eur. Respir. J.; 2021; 58, 2100130. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00130-2021]
11. Ho, C.G.; Milne, S.; Li, X.; Yang, C.X.; Leitao Filho, F.S.; Cheung, C.Y.; Yang, J.S.W.; Hernández Cordero, A.I.; Yang, C.W.T.; Shaipanich, T. et al. Airway Eosinophilia on Bronchoalveolar Lavage and the Risk of Exacerbations in COPD. Biomedicines; 2022; 10, 1412. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10061412]
12. Graham, B.L.; Steenbruggen, I.; Miller, M.R.; Barjaktarevic, I.Z.; Cooper, B.G.; Hall, G.L.; Hallstrand, T.S.; Kaminsky, D.A.; McCarthy, K.; McCormack, M.C. et al. Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 2019; 200, pp. e70-e88. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31613151]
13. Yang, C.X.; Schon, E.; Obeidat, M.; Kobor, M.S.; McEwen, L.; MacIsaac, J.; Lin, D.; Novak, R.M.; Hudson, F.; Klinker, H. et al. Occurrence of Accelerated Epigenetic Aging and Methylation Disruptions in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection Before Antiretroviral Therapy. J. Infect. Dis.; 2021; 223, pp. 1681-1689. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaa599] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32959881]
14. Hernandez Cordero, A.I.; Yang, C.X.; Obeidat, M.; Yang, J.; MacIsaac, J.; McEwen, L.; Lin, D.; Kobor, M.; Novak, R.; Hudson, F. et al. DNA Methylation Is Associated with Airflow Obstruction in Patients Living with HIV. Thorax; 2021; 76, pp. 448-455. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215866] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33443234]
15. Hernandez Cordero, A.I.; Yang, C.X.; Milne, S.; Li, X.; Hollander, Z.; Chen, V.; Ng, R.; Tebbutt, S.J.; Leung, J.M.; Sin, D.D. Epigenetic Blood Biomarkers of Ageing and Mortality in COPD. Eur. Respir. J.; 2021; 58, 2101890. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01890-2021]
16. Hernandez Cordero, A.I.; Yang, C.X.; Li, X.; Milne, S.; Chen, V.; Hollander, Z.; Ng, R.; Criner, G.; Woodruff, P.; Lazarus, S. et al. Epigenetic Marker of Telomeric Age Is Associated with Exacerbations and Hospitalizations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Respir. Res.; 2021; 22, 316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-021-01911-9]
17. Triche, T.J.; Weisenberger, D.J.; Van Den Berg, D.; Laird, P.W.; Siegmund, K.D. Low-Level Processing of Illumina Infinium DNA Methylation BeadArrays. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2013; 41, e90. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt090]
18. Teschendorff, A.E.; Marabita, F.; Lechner, M.; Bartlett, T.; Tegner, J.; Gomez-Cabrero, D.; Beck, S. A Beta-Mixture Quantile Normalization Method for Correcting Probe Design Bias in Illumina Infinium 450 k DNA Methylation Data. Bioinformatics; 2013; 29, pp. 189-196. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts680]
19. Johnson, W.E.; Li, C.; Rabinovic, A. Adjusting Batch Effects in Microarray Expression Data Using Empirical Bayes Methods. Biostatistics; 2007; 8, pp. 118-127. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037]
20. Rahmani, E.; Shenhav, L.; Schweiger, R.; Yousefi, P.; Huen, K.; Eskenazi, B.; Eng, C.; Huntsman, S.; Hu, D.; Galanter, J. et al. Genome-Wide Methylation Data Mirror Ancestry Information. Epigenetics Chromatin; 2017; 10, 1. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13072-016-0108-y]
21. Houseman, E.A.; Accomando, W.P.; Koestler, D.C.; Christensen, B.C.; Marsit, C.J.; Nelson, H.H.; Wiencke, J.K.; Kelsey, K.T. DNA Methylation Arrays as Surrogate Measures of Cell Mixture Distribution. BMC Bioinform.; 2012; 13, 86. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-13-86]
22. Venables, W.N.; Ripley, B.D. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Statistics and Computing; 4th ed. Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2002; ISBN 978-0-387-95457-8
23. Lee, M.K.; Hong, Y.; Kim, S.-Y.; Kim, W.J.; London, S.J. Epigenome-Wide Association Study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Lung Function in Koreans. Epigenomics; 2017; 9, pp. 971-984. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2217/epi-2017-0002] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28621160]
24. Peters, T.J.; Buckley, M.J.; Statham, A.L.; Pidsley, R.; Samaras, K.; Lord, R.V.; Clark, S.J.; Molloy, P.L. De Novo Identification of Differentially Methylated Regions in the Human Genome. Epigenetics Chromatin; 2015; 8, 6. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-8935-8-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25972926]
25. Singh, D.; Agusti, A.; Anzueto, A.; Barnes, P.J.; Bourbeau, J.; Celli, B.R.; Criner, G.J.; Frith, P.; Halpin, D.M.G.; Han, M. et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease: The GOLD Science Committee Report 2019. Eur. Respir. J.; 2019; 53, 1900164. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00164-2019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30846476]
26. Sin, D.D.; Anthonisen, N.R.; Soriano, J.B.; Agusti, A.G. Mortality in COPD: Role of Comorbidities. Eur. Respir. J.; 2006; 28, pp. 1245-1257. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00133805] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17138679]
27. Benayoun, L.; Letuve, S.; Druilhe, A.; Boczkowski, J.; Dombret, M.C.; Mechighel, P.; Megret, J.; Leseche, G.; Aubier, M.; Pretolani, M. Regulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Expression in Human Asthmatic Airways: Relationship with Proliferation, Apoptosis, and Airway Remodeling. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 2001; 164, pp. 1487-1494. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.164.8.2101070]
28. Wang, A.C.; Dai, X.; Luu, B.; Conrad, D.J. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma Regulates Airway Epithelial Cell Activation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.; 2001; 24, pp. 688-693. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1165/ajrcmb.24.6.4376]
29. Calnek, D.S.; Mazzella, L.; Roser, S.; Roman, J.; Hart, C.M. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma Ligands Increase Release of Nitric Oxide from Endothelial Cells. Arterioscler Thromb. Vasc. Biol.; 2003; 23, pp. 52-57. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.ATV.0000044461.01844.C9]
30. Patel, H.J.; Belvisi, M.G.; Bishop-Bailey, D.; Yacoub, M.H.; Mitchell, J.A. Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in Human Airway Smooth Muscle Cells Has a Superior Anti-Inflammatory Profile to Corticosteroids: Relevance for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Therapy. J. Immunol.; 2003; 170, pp. 2663-2669. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.170.5.2663]
31. Reddy, A.T.; Lakshmi, S.P.; Kleinhenz, J.M.; Sutliff, R.L.; Hart, C.M.; Reddy, R.C. Endothelial Cell Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ Reduces Endotoxemic Pulmonary Inflammation and Injury. J. Immunol.; 2012; 189, pp. 5411-5420. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1201487]
32. Chinetti, G.; Griglio, S.; Antonucci, M.; Torra, I.P.; Delerive, P.; Majd, Z.; Fruchart, J.C.; Chapman, J.; Najib, J.; Staels, B. Activation of Proliferator-Activated Receptors Alpha and Gamma Induces Apoptosis of Human Monocyte-Derived Macrophages. J. Biol. Chem.; 1998; 273, pp. 25573-25580. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.40.25573]
33. Belvisi, M.G.; Hele, D.J. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors as Novel Targets in Lung Disease. Chest; 2008; 134, pp. 152-157. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.07-0019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18628217]
34. Hammad, H.; de Heer, H.J.; Soullié, T.; Angeli, V.; Trottein, F.; Hoogsteden, H.C.; Lambrecht, B.N. Activation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Gamma in Dendritic Cells Inhibits the Development of Eosinophilic Airway Inflammation in a Mouse Model of Asthma. Am. J. Pathol.; 2004; 164, pp. 263-271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63116-1] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14695339]
35. Michael, L.F.; Lazar, M.A.; Mendelson, C.R. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor Gamma1 Expression Is Induced during Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate-Stimulated Differentiation of Alveolar Type II Pneumonocytes. Endocrinology; 1997; 138, pp. 3695-3703. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1210/endo.138.9.5373] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9275054]
36. Solleti, S.K.; Simon, D.M.; Srisuma, S.; Arikan, M.C.; Bhattacharya, S.; Rangasamy, T.; Bijli, K.M.; Rahman, A.; Crossno, J.T.; Shapiro, S.D. et al. Airway Epithelial Cell PPARγ Modulates Cigarette Smoke-Induced Chemokine Expression and Emphysema Susceptibility in Mice. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.; 2015; 309, pp. L293-L304. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00287.2014] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26024894]
37. Man, S.F.P.; Connett, J.E.; Anthonisen, N.R.; Wise, R.A.; Tashkin, D.P.; Sin, D.D. C-Reactive Protein and Mortality in Mild to Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Thorax; 2006; 61, pp. 849-853. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.059808]
38. Hogg, J.C.; Chu, F.; Utokaparch, S.; Woods, R.; Elliott, W.M.; Buzatu, L.; Cherniack, R.M.; Rogers, R.M.; Sciurba, F.C.; Coxson, H.O. et al. The Nature of Small-Airway Obstruction in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N. Engl. J. Med.; 2004; 350, pp. 2645-2653. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032158]
39. Kaur, G.; Batra, S. Regulation of DNA Methylation Signatures on NF-ΚB and STAT3 Pathway Genes and TET Activity in Cigarette Smoke Extract-Challenged Cells/COPD Exacerbation Model in Vitro. Cell Biol. Toxicol.; 2020; 36, pp. 459-480. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10565-020-09522-8]
40. Papadopoli, D.; Boulay, K.; Kazak, L.; Pollak, M.; Mallette, F.A.; Topisirovic, I.; Hulea, L. MTOR as a Central Regulator of Lifespan and Aging. F1000Research; 2019; 8, 998. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17196.1]
41. Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Hsieh, T.; Wang, C.; Cheng, K.; Wang, L.; Lin, T.; Cheung, C.H.A.; Wu, C.; Chiang, H. Aging-induced Akt Activation Involves in Aging-related Pathologies and Aβ-induced Toxicity. Aging Cell; 2019; 18, e12989. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acel.12989]
42. Saxton, R.A.; Sabatini, D.M. MTOR Signaling in Growth, Metabolism, and Disease. Cell; 2017; 168, pp. 960-976. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.004]
43. Wasswa-Kintu, S.; Gan, W.Q.; Man, S.F.P.; Pare, P.D.; Sin, D.D. Relationship between Reduced Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second and the Risk of Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Thorax; 2005; 60, pp. 570-575. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.2004.037135] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15994265]
44. Chinta, S.J.; Andersen, J.K. Dopaminergic Neurons. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.; 2005; 37, pp. 942-946. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2004.09.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15743669]
45. Aubier, M.; Murciano, D.; Menu, Y.; Boczkowski, J.; Mal, H.; Pariente, R. Dopamine Effects on Diaphragmatic Strength during Acute Respiratory Failure in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ann. Intern. Med.; 1989; 110, pp. 17-23. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-110-1-17]
46. Pavlov, V.A.; Tracey, K.J. The Cholinergic Anti-Inflammatory Pathway. Brain Behav. Immun.; 2005; 19, pp. 493-499. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2005.03.015]
47. Maurer, S.V.; Williams, C.L. The Cholinergic System Modulates Memory and Hippocampal Plasticity via Its Interactions with Non-Neuronal Cells. Front. Immunol.; 2017; 8, 1489. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01489] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167670]
48. Jaffe, A.E.; Irizarry, R.A. Accounting for Cellular Heterogeneity Is Critical in Epigenome-Wide Association Studies. Genome Biol.; 2014; 15, R31. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r31] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24495553]
49. Potaczek, D.P.; Harb, H.; Michel, S.; Alhamwe, B.A.; Renz, H.; Tost, J. Epigenetics and Allergy: From Basic Mechanisms to Clinical Applications. Epigenomics; 2017; 9, pp. 539-571. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.2217/epi-2016-0162] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28322581]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Epigenetic modifications are common in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, their clinical relevance is largely unknown. We hypothesized that epigenetic disruptions are associated with symptoms and health status in COPD. We profiled the blood (n = 57) and airways (n = 62) of COPD patients for DNA methylation (n = 55 paired). The patients’ health status was assessed using the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). We conducted differential methylation analyses and identified pathways characterized by epigenetic disruptions associated with SGRQ scores and its individual domains. 29,211 and 5044 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were associated with total SGRQ scores in blood and airway samples, respectively. The activity, impact, and symptom domains were associated with 9161, 25,689 and 17,293 DMPs in blood, respectively; and 4674, 3730 and 5063 DMPs in airways, respectively. There was a substantial overlap of DMPs between airway and blood. DMPs were enriched for pathways related to common co-morbidities of COPD (e.g., ageing, cancer and neurological) in both tissues. Health status in COPD is associated with airway and systemic epigenetic changes especially in pathways related to co-morbidities of COPD. There are more blood DMPs than in the airways suggesting that blood epigenome is a promising source to discover biomarkers for clinical outcomes in COPD.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Edwin S.H. Leong Healthy Aging Program, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
2 Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
3 Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
4 Edwin S.H. Leong Healthy Aging Program, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
5 Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
6 Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
7 Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1, Canada
8 Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; Edwin S.H. Leong Healthy Aging Program, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada