1. Introduction
The MADS-box transcription factor superfamily has been widely identified in fungi, animals, and plants [1]. Members of this TF family have been shown to play fundamental roles in plant vegetative and reproductive growth, especially during flowering [2,3]. Genes encoding MADS-box proteins contain a typical domain that recognizes CArG-box, which consists of 56–58 amino acids at the N-terminus known as the MADS domain [4]. Based on their conserved MADS domains, this large gene family can be classified into two different groups, namely, type I and type II. In plants, type I members contain one (M) domain which can be subdivided into three subfamilies including, M α, M β, and M γ. On the other hand, the type II members contain three other typical domains including a less-conserved intervening (I) domain, which is crucial to the formation of DNA dimers; a well-conserved keratin (K) domain, involved in protein–protein interactions due to the coiled-coil structure; and a variable C-terminal (C) domain. On the basis of sequence divergence of the I domain, type II members can be classified into the MIKC and Mδ subgroups [5,6], whereas it can be classified into 12 groups based on their phylogenetic relationships in Arabidopsis and other model plants [7].
To date, several studies on the MADS-box gene family have been conducted at the genome level in many plant species; however, relatively less research has been conducted on the functions of Mδ and type I genes [8]. Mδ and type I genes have been shown to participate in the A. thaliana male and female gametophytes. Recent studies suggested the role of type I MADS-box genes in the regulation of endosperm development in Arabidopsis and grasses [9,10,11]. Similarly, MIKC-type members of MADS-box have been widely studied for their ability to form transcription factor complexes and their vital role in the control of flowering development [12,13,14]. According to the widely used ABCDE model of flower organ development, class A genes participate in sepal development in the first whorl; then, class A, B (AP3 and PI), and E (AGL3 and SEP) genes collectively control the petal identity in the second whorl, while class B, C (AG), and E genes all together control the stamen identity in the third whorl. Furthermore, class C and E genes combinedly determine the formation of carpel in the fourth whorl. Finally, class D (SHP1, SHP2, AGL11, and AGL13) and E genes jointly determine the formation of the ovule [15]. Several other studies demonstrated that MADS-box proteins form heterodimers with other proteins in order to regulate the plant flowering process. For example, AGL1, AG, and AP1 form homodimers, while AP3 and PI, and AP1 and CAL form heterodimers. Apart from that, different kinds of polyplexes are also involved in different stages of flowering in plants [16,17].
Over the course of plant evolution, the MADS-box family has undergone numerous variations, but their primary role of governing the flower development and morphology of flowers has remained unchanged. MADS-box genes including APETALA1 (AP1), CAULIFLOWER (CAL), and FRUITFULL (FUL) have been shown to play important roles in floral meristem specification. The AP1 (APETALA1) genes have been widely identified in flowering plants of angiosperms. Members of AP1 are mainly involved in floral organ formation and fruit and sepal development [18]. Studies on Arabidopsis have shown that the AP1 genes have undergone multiple duplications during evolution, of which the most critical was the divergence of AP1 and FUL clades [19,20,21]. Structurally, genes evolved from the same ancestor showed a high similarity and minor difference in the C-terminal amino acid arrangement. However, the C-terminus of FUL family members has an MPPWML-like hydrophobic motif, and in contrast, AP1 family members showed mutated motifs due to frameshift mutations [22,23,24]. Hence, the structural differences in these genes may lead to functional differentiation. In model plants, the AP1 gene is expressed at low levels in the floral meristem and at high levels in the developing sepals. On the other hand, AP1 mutants cause abnormal morphology in cauliflower-like petals and turn sepals into leaf-like organs [25,26]. Similarly, FUL branching genes are first expressed during the transition to inflorescence meristem and later in the carpel and fruit, mainly regulating flowering transition, inflorescence configuration, cauline leaf growth, compound leaf development, fruit development, and ripening [27,28,29]. The identification and functional analysis of AP1 in different species could provide important insights to further study its molecular mechanism regulating flower development.
Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is an important oilseed crop widely known for its high economic and medicinal value around the world. Previous studies demonstrated the genome-wide identification of several gene and transcription factor families in safflower. Gene families such as cytochrome P450 [30,31,32,33], HCT [34], and oleosin [35] and transcription-factor-encoding families such as MYB [36], bHLH [37], and bZIP [38] have been extensively studied in safflower. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying flowering control in safflower are still unknown; only a few studies have shown that the yield of petals and seeds of safflowers is related to the number of rosettes and the number of florets in the main and lateral stem, but no information is available on the genome-wide identification and functional analysis of MADS-box genes in safflower. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the identification, structural and functional diversification, conserved topology, and ectopic expression profiling of the CtMADS-box gene family in safflower. Moreover, the overexpression of a candidate CtMADS24 gene was shown to promote early flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis, possibly by regulating the expression of key genes interconnected with flower development pathways. Together, these results provide a fundamental understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying flower development in safflower.
2. Results
2.1. Phylogenetic Analysis of MADS-Box Family Members
A phylogenetic tree of both type I and type II MADS-box proteins was constructed to determine the evolutionary relationships among 77 Carthamus tinctorius MADS-box proteins, 23 Helianthus annuus MADS-box proteins, and 101 Arabidopsis thaliana MADS-box proteins. As shown in Figure 1, the members of safflower MADS-box were divided into two types and 15 subfamilies according to the established model for plant classification. The three subfamilies of type I included M α, M β, and M γ, while the 12 subfamilies of type II included M δ, FLC, PI, AP3, AP1, AGL6, SEP, SVP, B-sister, AGL17, SOC1, and AG/STK. Approximately, 60% of safflower MADS-box family members were distributed in type II and were subdivided into 11 subfamilies, with three members in SEP (class E), four members in AG/STK (class C/D), three members in AP3/PI (class B), and five members in AP1 (class A). Compared with Arabidopsis, the CtMADS-box family was more closely related to sunflower, a member of the Asteraceae family, indicating that the gene family may have diverged in function during evolution. Meanwhile, structural similarities among different branches were found in AP3/PI, AP1/FUL, AGL6, and SEP subfamily members, suggesting that the members of those subfamilies may have evolved from the same ancestor with a functional relationship.
2.2. Analysis of the Conserved Motifs and Gene Structure
The conserved motifs of CtMADS proteins were identified with the MEME motif search program. In total, 10 conserved motifs were identified, and these motifs were further annotated with SMART protein analyzing software (Figure 2). Motifs 1 and 8 contained the typical domain of MADS. Motifs 3, 4, and 9 contained another K-box domain. Meanwhile, CtMADS01 and the other 12 type II proteins only contained the K-box domain. These structural changes may cause corresponding functional changes. In addition, most of the members showed strong conservation in the N-terminus region and relatively large differences in the C-terminus region, which is similar to that reported for MADS-box family proteins in other plants, suggesting that this family of genes is highly conserved among different plant species.
To further explore the structural differences and conservative topology of MADS-box genes, the intron and exon arrangements were determined by comparing the full-length CDS and DNA sequences of candidate CtMADS using the GSDS web server (Figure 3). The result showed no introns or very few introns in type I members, which may have caused the genetic diversity in the three subfamilies or the differences in the genetic structure of their ancestors. On the other hand, most type II genes showed more than five introns. Fewer genes showed no introns, such as CtMADS22 and CtMADS23, which may have been caused by the short sequence and the loss of intron-rich K-box domains during evolution. The results showed that the genes in the same subfamily shared the same intron patterns while only having length differences. It is suggested that the subfamilies of the safflower MADS-box family have high functional similarity, while different subfamilies may have different regulatory functions.
2.3. Analysis of Cis-Regulatory Elements in the Promoters of MADS-Box Family Genes
To analyze the cis-regulatory elements in the promoter region of CtMADS genes, the 2000 bp upstream sequence of each CtMADS gene was extracted and analyzed using the PlantCare online web server, and the location of cis-elements is visualized in Figure 4. Nearly all the CtMADS-box gene promoters contained cis-acting elements related to growth and development, plant hormones, and stress responsiveness. Specifically, typical auxin response elements and gibberellin elements were found in the promoter regions of CtMADS01, CtMADS24, and CtMADS25. Furthermore, some protein binding sites, such as MYB and AT-rich binding sites, in the CtMADS promoter region were also found, suggesting that the expression of MADS-box genes may be regulated by other transcription factors. Interestingly, MeJA-related elements were observed only in type II members, indicating that some type II genes could respond to the signals of MeJA. These findings provide important insights into the structural conservation of MADS-box genes in safflower, which could be involved in crucial biological processes such as plant growth and development, responses to various stresses, and hormonal regulation.
2.4. Gene Expression Analysis by Transcriptome Data of CtMADS during Safflower Floral Development
To explore the potential role of the safflower MADS-box family, the expression patterns of MADS-box genes in different stages of safflower petal development and different tissues were investigated using RNA-seq data (Figure 5). The results showed that type I and Mδ subfamily genes were expressed at low levels in different organs and were not expressed in some organs, indicating the relatively redundant functions of those genes during the safflower developmental process. On the other hand, genes that demonstrated higher expression levels in each stage of petal development were likely to be involved in flower development. CtMADS20, CtMADS24, CtMADS25, and CtMADS26, presumed to be part of the ABCDE model, and CtMADS14 and CtMADS15, which belong to the FLC subfamily, were all highly expressed in the whole process of flower development. In addition, genes such as CtMADS39 and CtMADS43 showed specific expression patterns in leaves, stems, and roots, indicating that these MADS-box family genes may play a regulatory role in the vegetative development of safflower.
2.5. Gene Expression Analysis of CtMADS in Different Flower Organs
To further elucidate the possible regulatory role of safflower MADS-box family genes in flower organ development, twelve MADS-box genes were selected based on the ABCDE model. The expression levels of these genes during flower development were investigated using qRT-PCR analysis as shown in Figure 6. The results suggested that CtMADS24 (class A gene) and CtMADS26 (class E gene) both had high expression patterns in sepals, and CtMADS18 and CtMADS20 (class B genes) were mainly expressed in the pistil and sepals, while CtMADS47 (class C gene) was highly expressed in stamens and the pistil, suggesting that the different classes of genes have tissue-specific expression patterns during floral organ formation. Meanwhile, genes belonging to classes A, B, and E all showed high expression levels in sepals, indicating that the formation of sepals could be regulated by these three classes of genes.
2.6. Subcellular Location of CtMADS24
Importantly, the candidate gene CtMADS24 was detected with demonstrated ectopic expression and obvious phenotype change, and therefore we chose this gene for further functional analysis. In order to determine the subcellular localization of CtMADS24 (AP1/FUL subfamily member), the PROTCOMP online tools were initially used for computational prediction. The results showed a clear nuclear localization signal, indicating that CtMADS24 could be localized and expressed in the nucleus. Then, the experimental validation was carried out using CtMADS24-GFP fusion construct with the tobacco transient transformation system. The result of the GFP fluorescent protein was observed with a laser confocal microscope. As shown in Figure 7, the CtMADS24-GFP recombinant vector mainly appeared as a green fluorescent signal in the nucleus region when compared with the empty vector. This verified the predicted results, suggesting that the protein encoded by CtMADS24 was mainly expressed in the nucleus.
2.7. Ectopic Expression of CtMADS24 and Expression Level of Flowering-Related Genes in Arabidopsis
To further investigate the possible function of CtMADS24, ectopic expression analysis was carried out by introducing the cDNA of the CtMADS24 gene driven by cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter into Arabidopsis. In total, ten CtMADS24-overexpressed transgenic lines were obtained, of which two with significant phenotype changes and relatively consistent expression levels, line 1 and line 4, were selected for further analyses (Figure 8A). Compared with the wild-type lines, the flowering time of the two transgenic lines was accelerated from 35 days to approximately 27 days (Figure 8B). The rosette leaves showed a significant reduction in number, with smaller and thinner leaf morphology (Figure 8C,D). Meanwhile, the sepals of the transformed lines seemed not to completely enclose the internal floral organ (Figure 8E). Interestingly, the siliques were bumpier and smaller, with a lower seed setting rate, and the petals remained attached (Figure 8F,G). Furthermore, the differential expression of genes involved in the flower development of Arabidopsis were investigated using qRT-PCR analysis (Figure 8H). The results showed that the significantly upregulated genes such as LFY, FT, and AGL6 may act as positive regulators during flower development in the transgenic lines. On the other hand, the SVP gene was downregulated and could be identified as a flowering inhibitor gene. However, genes such as AP3 and AP1, which are related to floral organogenesis, remained fundamentally unchanged, while SEP3, which is directly related to sepal development, was significantly increased. These findings suggested that the overexpression of CtMADS24 could not cause changes in floral organs except for the sepals but induced the expression level of other endogenous flowering genes in Arabidopsis to regulate flower development.
3. Discussion
Flower development containing reproductive growth, flowering time regulation, and vegetative growth monitoring are only a few of the many roles that have been ascribed to MADS-box genes in flowering plants. As a result of these findings, evolutionary scientists have focused on MADS-box genes and their role in flower development and regulation. In recent years, with the accomplishment of various whole genome sequencing projects, the study of related gene families is rapidly progressing. Many MADS-box genes have been identified in various plant species including Arabidopsis [21], rice [39], sunflower [40], bamboo [41], pear [42], wheat [43], strawberry [44], and many other plants. These findings laid the groundwork for studying the evolution of MADS-box genes. However, their regulatory roles were not consistent and were found to be unique to particular species. Therefore, the identification and analysis of MADS-box genes in different kinds of species are necessary to gain deeper insights into the function of MADS-box genes.
In this study, a total of 77 MADS-box genes were identified from the safflower genome after excluding the missing and incomplete sequences. The numbers of MADS-box genes varied between different species: safflower (77) and sunflower (23) had less than Arabidopsis (101) and rice (75). This indicated that Asteraceae plants might have lost MADS-box genes during the evolutionary process. The phylogenetic analysis showed that MADS-box family members could be divided into two main types and 15 subfamilies according to the established model for plant classification [21]. In terms of gene structure and protein conserved motifs, the conservation within the same family was significant, but there were large structural differences among different families as found in marigold [45] and bamboo [41]. In the process of higher plant evolution, the conservation and number of introns in the plant type I MADS-box family were relatively low, while type II MADS-box family members with the K-box structure were more conservative and richer in introns, similar to wheat and orchid MADS-box genes [5,6,46,47]. Furthermore, the distribution of the cis-elements in the promoter region of CtMADS genes showed the presence of important elements such as responses to plant growth and developmental processes and hormones or environmental stimuli. Consistently with previous results, safflower type II genes had highly conserved motifs both interspecific and intraspecific.
The discovery of genes related to flower development and flowering transition remains a major focus in plant research. Studies have shown that MADS-box genes belonging to the type I clade are mainly involved in the development of the female gametophyte, the embryo, and seeds, while plant type II MADS-box genes have specific roles in flower organ development, especially in specifying floral organ identity [39,48]. In most plants, different subfamily members often have different expression patterns [45,49]. In our study, the transcript abundance in the flower development of type I clade genes was extremely low, while the subfamilies belonging to the type II clade displayed diverse expression patterns, and most of the type II genes were expressed in the reproductive organs, thereby indicating that type II MADS genes might play important roles in flower development in safflower. To better understand the role of the type II clade in the flower development of safflower, we performed a comprehensive investigation with the expression assay of these genes in different flower organs. The ABCDE model is a classic model of plant flower development [50,51]. Our findings indicated that several classes of MADS-box genes such as A, B, C, and E were expressed at varying levels during flower development, signifying their individual roles in floral organ development in safflower. On the other hand, genes with identical expression patterns may work together in floral organ development. These findings were found to be consistent with previous studies on plant species including carnation [52] and orchid [53].
Floral development from vegetative to reproductive development is an important transition process in plants, which involves the interaction of many genes. The AP1 subfamily is an ancient evolutionary lineage, and members of this family are mainly involved in floral organ formation, fruit development, and sepal development [54,55,56,57]. To date, AP1 orthologs have also been isolated in a wide range of plant species, such as Gossypium hirsutum [58], Magnolia wufengensis [59], and Petunia [60]. As already described in class A genes of the flowering model, the identification and analysis of genes in this class are significant for the in-depth understanding of the flower development process. In safflower, one of the homologous genes of the AP1 subfamily (CtMADS24) was identified and further investigated for functional analysis. The protein encoded by CtMADS24 was localized in the nucleus of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Moreover, the expression pattern of CtMADS24 in transgenic plants was notably higher during the flowering development period in sepals than in other tissues, which is in line with its expected function in sepal identity specification. Our results also showed that the ectopic expression of CtMADS24 in Arabidopsis induced early flowering by promoting the expression of other signaling genes involved in floral transition; however, no changes in the expression were found in petal characteristic genes. Previous studies on Arabidopsis, Fagopyrum esculentum, Rosa chinensis, and other plant species also suggested that AP1 overexpression results in significantly earlier flowering [61,62,63]. In addition, early reproductive development often leads to insufficient nutrition in plants, which in turn leads to a decrease in seed yield and even abortion [64]. Transgenic Arabidopsis showed significantly smaller siliques, suggesting that the ectopic expression of CtMADS24 accelerates the flowering process, inhibits vegetative development, and may lead to plant abortion as discussed by [45]. Together, our findings provide novel insights into the regulatory mechanisms of floral organ development by the intervention of MADS24 transcription factor, thereby facilitating future molecular breeding research on safflower.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plant Materials
The safflower variety of “Ji Hong No. 1” was grown in the experimental field of Jilin Agricultural University in Changchun, Jilin Province, China. Petal tissues were collected at the bud, early flower, full, and decline stages of flowering. The leaves, sepals, stamens, and pistils were collected for tissue-specific expression analysis. All plant materials were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until next use.
4.2. Identification of MADS-Box Family Genes
The safflower genome sequence was deposited at NCBI under the bioproject accession number: PRJNA399628. The MADS-box transcription factor family sequences were obtained from the safflower genome. The amino acid sequences of Safflower MADS-box family members were shown in Supplementary Table S2. The HMM file along with the MADS domain (PF00319) from the Pfam protein database (
4.3. Phylogenetic Analysis, Conserved Motif, and Gene Structure Analysis of CtMADSs
The downloaded sequences were further screened using the methods of Ayaz et al. [65], and multiple sequence alignment of MADS-box protein sequences from Arabidopsis, sunflower, and safflower was analyzed with Muscle software. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 iterations for the bootstrap values. Tree files were viewed and edited using ITOLS online tools (
4.4. Prediction of Cis-Acting Elements in Promoter Sequences
A 2000 bp upstream sequence from the translation initiation codon of each CtMADS gene was obtained from the genomic data of safflower in order to explore the distribution of cis-acting elements in the promoter region of CtMADS genes. The online web server of PlantCARE (
4.5. Safflower MADS-Box Genes Expression Pattern Analysis
The fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments (FPKM) values were obtained from the safflower RNA-seq data (PRJNA909037) to analyze the probable transcript abundance of CtMADS genes in different floral organs of safflower (bud stage, early flowering stage, full flowering stage, decline stage) and different vegetative tissues (root, leaf, stem). All the obtained values were log2-transformed and visualized by TBtools software.
4.6. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis
The expression levels of 12 genes in three flower tissues and leaf tissue were analyzed by qRT-PCR analysis. For this purpose, the total RNA content was extracted using the Fast-Pure Plant Total RNA Isolation Kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China), and the extracted RNA was measured for purity and concentration by a NanoDrop 2000 ultraviolet spectrophotometer. Then, the first-strand cDNA was synthesized using MonScript™ RTIII All-in-One Mix with dsDNase (Monad, Suzhou, China) kit and preserved at −20 °C. A set of gene-specific primers of safflower CtMADS genes was synthesized based on the information obtained from the coding sequences in Premier version 6 (Premier Biosoft, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Primer sequences were shown in Supplementary Table S1. To verify the integrity of primer specificity, each primer pair was generated away from the conserved domain of the genes. The internal reference genes of safflower used in the qRT-PCR analysis included the 18S ribosomal RNA gene [37]. All qRT-PCR reactions were performed with MonAmp™ ChemoHS qPCR Mix from Monad Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Suzhou, China) using the Stratagene MX3000P real-time PCR machine. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, a 20 μL reaction mixture was prepared with 2.0 μL cDNA template, 0.2 μM primers (F/R), 0.2 μL ROX dye (100×), 10 μL master mix, and 7 μL RNase-free water. PCR conditions were set according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The relative transcript abundance values were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [68].
4.7. ORF Cloning and Subcellular Localization
The open reading frame of the CtMADS24 (without a stop codon) was amplified from cDNA and cloned into pCAMBIA1302 using the MonClone™ Hi-Fusion Cloning Mix V2 kit. Primer sequences were shown in Supplementary Table S1. Subcellular localization was performed by transient expression of the CtMADS24-GFP proteins in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves according to previously established methods [69]. The recombinant plasmids pCAMBIA1302-CtMADS24-GFP and pCAMBIA1302-GFP were transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101(pSoup-19) competent cells by the freeze–thaw method. Transformed GV3101(pSoup-19) cells were injected into the leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana for transient expression. After being cultured for 60 h under long-day conditions of 16 h light, the cells were observed with a laser confocal microscope (Leica TCS SP8, Wetzlar, Germany).
4.8. Generation of CtMADS24-Overexpressed Transgenic Arabidopsis Lines and Ectopic Expression Analysis
The wild-type Arabidopsis plants were grown in the artificial growth chamber of our lab under long-day (LD) conditions (16 h light/8 h dark) at 21 °C. For the construction of overexpression vectors, the ORF of CtMADS24 was cloned into the pCAMBIA3301 vector and transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105 competent cells.The transformation was carried out by the floral dip method [70] The gene-specific primers were used to screen out transgenic plants until T3 generation was obtained harboring the CtMADS24 gene. The phenotype of the transgenic plants was observed for morphological differences, and the expression profiling was carried out simultaneously using qRT-PCR assay. All the primers sequences were shown in Supplementary Table S1.
5. Conclusions
In this study, a comprehensive and systematic analysis of the safflower MADS-box transcription factor family was conducted for the first time. In total, 77 members of the MADS-box transcription factor family were extensively identified in the safflower genome. The phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, conserved motifs, and cis-elements were analyzed using bioinformatic analysis. The expression profile of the MADS-box family genes in different developmental stages and flower organs revealed that they are likely involved in the floral organ development of safflower. In addition, the overexpression of a candidate gene, CtMADS24, caused early flowering and abnormal sepal development in Arabidopsis. These findings provide comprehensive resources for the improvement of new safflower cultivars with early flowering and increased petal production in future molecular breeding programs.
Y.W. (Yifei Wang), H.G. and J.L. wrote the manuscript and interpreted the data. Y.W. (Yijin Wang), X.L. (Xinyi Liu), W.L., X.L. (Xiaowei Li) and N.W. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. Y.W. (Yifei Wang), F.W. and Y.D. designed the work and revised the manuscript. N.A. contributed to the English editing and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
We are grateful to all the colleagues who provided the information of helpful databases and useful assistance in our laboratory.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Phylogenetic analysis of safflower, sunflower, and Arabidopsis MADS-box family proteins. A total of 77 safflower MADS-box proteins, 23 Sunflower MADS-box proteins, and 101 Arabidopsis MADS-box proteins were included in the phylogenetic tree constructed using a maximum likelihood method. The red circles represent the MADS-box proteins in safflower.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. Distribution and sequences of signature motifs of MADS and K-box structural domains obtained from safflower MADS-box proteins using MEME analysis. Different motifs are represented by different colors. Typical MADS and K-box structural domains extracted from MADS-box protein sequence are also shown on the right side.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. The organization of exon–intron structures of CtMADS genes. The lines indicate introns, the red rectangles indicate exons, and the blue rectangle indicate UTRs.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Distribution of cis-acting regulatory elements of CtMADS genes in safflower. The different colored boxes represent the presence of specific cis-regulatory elements in the promoters of CtMADS-box genes.
Enlarge this image.Figure 5. Expression analysis of MADS-box genes in safflower. The FPKM values of the safflower MADS-box genes were log2-transformed to create the heatmap using TBtools software. The white and red colors represent the expression levels of CtMADS genes from low to high.
Enlarge this image.Figure 6. Organ-specific expression analysis of 12 CtMADS genes in safflower. (A) The genes were classified into different classes including class A, B, C, and E and four different organs (leaf, stamen, pistil, and sepal) were selected for expression analysis. Error bars represent the standard deviation n = 3. (B) The phenotype of different safflower flower organs used in the study.
Enlarge this image.Figure 7. Subcellular localization of CtMADS24 using transient expression system in tobacco leaves. The CtMADS24-GFP (green fluorescent protein) fusion construct was localized to the nucleus. The fluorescence signal was detected with a laser scanning confocal microscope. GFP indicates fluorescence of green fluorescent protein, and the red color shows the auto-fluorescence of chlorophyll. Scale bar = 50 μm.
Enlarge this image.Figure 8. Phenotypic variations and expression of key floral regulator genes in CtMADS24-overexpressed transgenic Arabidopsis. (A) The flowering phenotype of CtMADS24 transgenic Arabidopsis and WT plants. (B) Statistics for anthesis time of CtMADS24 transgenic Arabidopsis and WT plants. (C) The rosette phenotype of CtMADS24 transgenic Arabidopsis and WT plants. (D) Statistics for rosette leaves of CtMADS24 transgenic Arabidopsis and WT plants. (E) The sepal phenotype of CtMADS24 transgenic Arabidopsis and WT plants, bar = 1 cm. The red arrows pointed the internal floral organ in WT and transgenic Arabidopsis lines. (F) Legume morphology of CtMADS24 transgenic Arabidopsis and WT plants, bar = 0.5 cm. (G) Statistics for legume length of CtMADS24 transgenic Arabidopsis and WT plants. (H) The expression pattern of key genes involved in flowering development (* significant difference at p < 0.05, ** significant difference at p < 0.01).
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Shore, P.; Sharrocks, A.D. The MADS-box family of transcription factors. Eur. J. Biochem.; 1995; 229, pp. 1-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.tb20430.x]
2. Gramzow, L.; Theissen, G. A hitchhiker’s guide to the MADS world of plants. Genome Biol.; 2010; 11, 214. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2010-11-6-214] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20587009]
3. Alvarez-Buylla, E.R.; Pelaz, S.; Liljegren, S.J.; Gold, S.E.; Burgeff, C.; Ditta, G.S.; Ribas de Pouplana, L.; Martínez-Castilla, L.; Yanofsky, M.F. An ancestral MADS-box gene duplication occurred before the divergence of plants and animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2000; 97, pp. 5328-5333. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.10.5328] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10805792]
4. de Folter, S.; Angenent, G.C. trans meets cis in MADS science. Trends Plant Sci.; 2006; 11, pp. 224-231. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.03.008] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16616581]
5. Smaczniak, C.; Immink, R.G.; Angenent, G.C.; Kaufmann, K. Developmental and evolutionary diversity of plant MADS-domain factors: Insights from recent studies. Development; 2012; 139, pp. 3081-3098. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.074674] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22872082]
6. Gramzow, L.; Weilandt, L.; Theissen, G. MADS goes genomic in conifers: Towards determining the ancestral set of MADS-box genes in seed plants. Ann. Bot.; 2014; 114, pp. 1407-1429. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcu066] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24854168]
7. Gramzow, L.; Theissen, G. Phylogenomics reveals surprising sets of essential and dispensable clades of MIKC(c)-group MADS-box genes in flowering plants. J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol.; 2015; 324, pp. 353-362. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22598] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25678468]
8. Schilling, S.; Pan, S.; Kennedy, A.; Melzer, R. MADS-box genes and crop domestication: The jack of all traits. J. Exp. Bot.; 2018; 69, pp. 1447-1469. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx479]
9. Zobell, O.; Faigl, W.; Saedler, H.; Munster, T. MIKC* MADS-box proteins: Conserved regulators of the gametophytic generation of land plants. Mol. Biol. Evol.; 2010; 27, pp. 1201-1211. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq005]
10. Masiero, S.; Colombo, L.; Grini, P.E.; Schnittger, A.; Kater, M.M. The emerging importance of type I MADS box transcription factors for plant reproduction. Plant Cell; 2011; 23, pp. 865-872. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.081737]
11. Qiu, Y.; Köhler, C. Endosperm Evolution by Duplicated and Neofunctionalized Type I MADS-Box Transcription Factors. Mol. Biol. Evol.; 2022; 39, msab355. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab355] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34897514]
12. Abraham-Juarez, M.J.; Schrager-Lavelle, A.; Man, J.; Whipple, C.; Handakumbura, P.; Babbitt, C.; Bartlett, M. Evolutionary Variation in MADS Box Dimerization Affects Floral Development and Protein Abundance in Maize. Plant Cell; 2020; 32, pp. 3408-3424. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.20.00300] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32873631]
13. Liu, G.; Li, F.; Shi, G.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Fan, L. Identification of MADS-Box Transcription Factors in Iris laevigata and Functional Assessment of IlSEP3 and IlSVP during Flowering. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2022; 23, 9950. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179950] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077350]
14. Kong, X.; Wang, F.; Geng, S.; Guan, J.; Tao, S.; Jia, M.; Sun, G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, K.; Ye, X. et al. The wheat AGL6-like MADS-box gene is a master regulator for floral organ identity and a target for spikelet meristem development manipulation. Plant Biotechnol. J.; 2022; 20, pp. 75-88. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13696]
15. Theissen, G.; Melzer, R.; Rumpler, F. MADS-domain transcription factors and the floral quartet model of flower development: Linking plant development and evolution. Development; 2016; 143, pp. 3259-3271. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.134080] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27624831]
16. Hugouvieux, V.; Silva, C.S.; Jourdain, A.; Stigliani, A.; Charras, Q.; Conn, V.; Conn, S.J.; Carles, C.C.; Parcy, F.; Zubieta, C. Tetramerization of MADS family transcription factors SEPALLATA3 and AGAMOUS is required for floral meristem determinacy in Arabidopsis. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2018; 46, pp. 4966-4977. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky205] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29562355]
17. Wang, X.; Cai, Y.; Wang, H.; Zeng, Y.; Zhuang, X.; Li, B.; Jiang, L. Trans-Golgi network-located AP1 gamma adaptins mediate dileucine motif-directed vacuolar targeting in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2014; 26, pp. 4102-4118. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.129759] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25351491]
18. Teo, Z.W.N.; Zhou, W.; Shen, L. Dissecting the Function of MADS-Box Transcription Factors in Orchid Reproductive Development. Front. Plant Sci.; 2019; 10, 1474. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01474]
19. Alvarez-Buylla, E.R.; Garcia-Ponce, B.; Garay-Arroyo, A. Unique and redundant functional domains of APETALA1 and CAULIFLOWER, two recently duplicated Arabidopsis thaliana floral MADS-box genes. J. Exp. Bot.; 2006; 57, pp. 3099-3107. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl081]
20. Pabón-Mora, N.; Hidalgo, O.; Gleissberg, S.; Litt, A. Assessing duplication and loss of APETALA1/FRUITFULL homologs in Ranunculales. Front. Plant Sci.; 2013; 4, 358. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00358]
21. Parenicová, L.; de Folter, S.; Kieffer, M.; Horner, D.S.; Favalli, C.; Busscher, J.; Cook, H.E.; Ingram, R.M.; Kater, M.M.; Davies, B. et al. Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of the complete MADS-box transcription factor family in Arabidopsis: New openings to the MADS world. Plant Cell; 2003; 15, pp. 1538-1551. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.011544] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12837945]
22. Vandenbussche, M.; Theissen, G.; Van de Peer, Y.; Gerats, T. Structural diversification and neo-functionalization during floral MADS-box gene evolution by C-terminal frameshift mutations. Nucleic Acids Res.; 2003; 31, pp. 4401-4409. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg642] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12888499]
23. Cho, S.; Jang, S.; Chae, S.; Chung, K.M.; Moon, Y.H.; An, G.; Jang, S.K. Analysis of the C-terminal region of Arabidopsis thaliana APETALA1 as a transcription activation domain. Plant Mol. Biol.; 1999; 40, pp. 419-429. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006273127067] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10437826]
24. Yalovsky, S.; Kulukian, A.; Rodríguez-Concepción, M.; Young, C.A.; Gruissem, W. Functional requirement of plant farnesyltransferase during development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell; 2000; 12, pp. 1267-1278. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.12.8.1267]
25. Berbel, A.; Navarro, C.; Ferrándiz, C.; Cañas, L.A.; Madueño, F.; Beltrán, J.P. Analysis of PEAM4, the pea AP1 functional homologue, supports a model for AP1-like genes controlling both floral meristem and floral organ identity in different plant species. Plant J.; 2001; 25, pp. 441-451. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.00974.x]
26. Benlloch, R.; d’Erfurth, I.; Ferrandiz, C.; Cosson, V.; Beltrán, J.P.; Cañas, L.A.; Kondorosi, A.; Madueño, F.; Ratet, P. Isolation of mtpim proves Tnt1 a useful reverse genetics tool in Medicago truncatula and uncovers new aspects of AP1-like functions in legumes. Plant Physiol.; 2006; 142, pp. 972-983. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.083543]
27. Müller, B.M.; Saedler, H.; Zachgo, S. The MADS-box gene DEFH28 from Antirrhinum is involved in the regulation of floral meristem identity and fruit development. Plant J.; 2001; 28, pp. 169-179. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01139.x]
28. Balanzà, V.; Martínez-Fernández, I.; Sato, S.; Yanofsky, M.F.; Kaufmann, K.; Angenent, G.C.; Bemer, M.; Ferrándiz, C. Genetic control of meristem arrest and life span in Arabidopsis by a FRUITFULL-APETALA2 pathway. Nat. Commun.; 2018; 9, 565. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03067-5]
29. Zhang, C.; Sun, Y.; Yu, X.; Li, H.; Bao, M.; He, Y. Functional Conservation and Divergence of Five AP1/FUL-like Genes in Marigold (Tagetes erecta L.). Genes; 2021; 12, 2011. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12122011]
30. Ahmad, N.; Li, T.; Liu, Y.; Hoang, N.Q.V.; Ma, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, J.; Yao, N.; Liu, X.; Li, H. Molecular and biochemical rhythms in dihydroflavonol 4-reductase-mediated regulation of leucoanthocyanidin biosynthesis in Carthamus tinctorius L. Ind. Crops Prod.; 2020; 156, 112838. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112838]
31. Ahmad, N.; Jianyu, L.; Xu, T.; Noman, M.; Jameel, A.; Na, Y.; Yuanyuan, D.; Nan, W.; Xiaowei, L.; Fawei, W. Overexpression of a novel cytochrome P450 promotes flavonoid biosynthesis and osmotic stress tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Genes; 2019; 10, 756. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes10100756] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31561549]
32. Liu, J.; Ahmad, N.; Hong, Y.; Zhu, M.; Zaman, S.; Wang, N.; Yao, N.; Liu, X. Molecular Characterization of an Isoflavone 2′-Hydroxylase Gene Revealed Positive Insights into Flavonoid Accumulation and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Safflower. Molecules; 2022; 27, 8001. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules27228001] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36432102]
33. Hoang, N.Q.; Kong, J.; Ahmad, N.; Ma, X.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, N.; Yao, N.; Liu, X.; Jin, L. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of duplicated flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase gene family in Carthamus tinctorius L. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca; 2021; 49, 12509. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15835/nbha49412509]
34. Sun, F.; Ahmad, N.; Jin, L.; Xinyue, Z.; Xintong, M.; Hoang, N.Q.; Mallano, A.I.; Wang, N.; Zhuoda, Y.; Liu, X. Genome-wide investigation of Hydroxycinnamoyl CoA: Shikimate Hydroxycinnamoyl Transferase (HCT) gene family in Carthamus tinctorius L. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca; 2021; 49, 12489.
35. Lu, Y.; Chi, M.; Li, L.; Li, H.; Noman, M.; Yang, Y.; Ji, K.; Lan, X.; Qiang, W.; Du, L. Genome-wide identification, expression profiling, and functional validation of oleosin gene family in Carthamus tinctorius L. Front. Plant Sci.; 2018; 9, 1393. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01393]
36. Hong, Y.; Ahmad, N.; Zhang, J.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ma, X.; Liu, X.; Na, Y. Genome-wide analysis and transcriptional reprogrammings of MYB superfamily revealed positive insights into abiotic stress responses and anthocyanin accumulation in Carthamus tinctorius L. Mol. Genet. Genom.; 2022; 297, pp. 125-145. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-021-01839-1]
37. Hong, Y.; Ahmad, N.; Tian, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, G.; Liu, X.; Dong, Y.; Wang, F.; Liu, W. et al. Genome-Wide Identification, Expression Analysis, and Subcellular Localization of Carthamus tinctorius bHLH Transcription Factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 3044. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20123044]
38. Li, H.; Li, L.; ShangGuan, G.; Jia, C.; Deng, S.; Noman, M.; Liu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Han, L.; Zhang, X. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of bZIP gene family in Carthamus tinctorius L. Sci. Rep.; 2020; 10, 15521. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72390-z]
39. Kim, E.J.; Hong, W.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Jung, K.H. Transcriptome Analysis of Triple Mutant for OsMADS62, OsMADS63, and OsMADS68 Reveals the Downstream Regulatory Mechanism for Pollen Germination in Rice (Oryza sativa). Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 23, 239. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010239]
40. Goloveshkina, E.N.; Shul’ga, O.A.; Shchennikova, A.V.; Kamionskaya, A.M.; Skryabin, K.G. Constitutive expression of the sunflower and chrysanthemum genes of the AP1/FUL group changes flowering timing in transgenic tobacco plants. Dokl. Biol. Sci.; 2010; 434, pp. 322-324. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S001249661005008X]
41. Zhang, Y.; Tang, D.; Lin, X.; Ding, M.; Tong, Z. Genome-wide identification of MADS-box family genes in moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) and a functional analysis of PeMADS5 in flowering. BMC Plant Biol.; 2018; 18, 176. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-018-1394-2] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30176795]
42. Meng, D.; Cao, Y.; Chen, T.; Abdullah, M.; Jin, Q.; Fan, H.; Lin, Y.; Cai, Y. Evolution and functional divergence of MADS-box genes in Pyrus. Sci. Rep.; 2019; 9, 1266. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37897-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30718750]
43. Schilling, S.; Kennedy, A.; Pan, S.; Jermiin, L.S.; Melzer, R. Genome-wide analysis of MIKC-type MADS-box genes in wheat: Pervasive duplications, functional conservation and putative neofunctionalization. New Phytol.; 2020; 225, pp. 511-529. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.16122] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31418861]
44. Dong, X.; Li, Y.; Guan, Y.; Wang, S.; Luo, H.; Li, X.; Li, H.; Zhang, Z. Auxin-induced AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR4 activates APETALA1 and FRUITFULL to promote flowering in woodland strawberry. Hortic. Res.; 2021; 8, 115. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41438-021-00550-x]
45. Zhang, C.; Wei, L.; Wang, W.; Qi, W.; Cao, Z.; Li, H.; Bao, M.; He, Y. Identification, characterization and functional analysis of AGAMOUS subfamily genes associated with floral organs and seed development in Marigold (Tagetes erecta). BMC Plant Biol.; 2020; 20, 439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02644-5] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32967618]
46. Zhao, T.; Ni, Z.; Dai, Y.; Yao, Y.; Nie, X.; Sun, Q. Characterization and expression of 42 MADS-box genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol. Genet. Genom.; 2006; 276, pp. 334-350. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00438-006-0147-3]
47. Gramzow, L.; Ritz, M.S.; Theissen, G. On the origin of MADS-domain transcription factors. Trends Genet.; 2010; 26, pp. 149-153. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2010.01.004]
48. Hsu, H.F.; Chen, W.H.; Shen, Y.H.; Hsu, W.H.; Mao, W.T.; Yang, C.H. Multifunctional evolution of B and AGL6 MADS box genes in orchids. Nat. Commun.; 2021; 12, 902. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21229-w]
49. Li, C.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L.; Nie, S.; Chen, Y.; Liang, D.; Sun, X.; Karanja, B.K.; Luo, X.; Liu, L. Genome-Wide Characterization of the MADS-Box Gene Family in Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) and Assessment of Its Roles in Flowering and Floral Organogenesis. Front. Plant Sci.; 2016; 7, 1390. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01390]
50. Kanno, A.; Saeki, H.; Kameya, T.; Saedler, H.; Theissen, G. Heterotopic expression of class B floral homeotic genes supports a modified ABC model for tulip (Tulipa gesneriana). Plant Mol. Biol.; 2003; 52, pp. 831-841. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025070827979]
51. Litt, A.; Kramer, E.M. The ABC model and the diversification of floral organ identity. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.; 2010; 21, pp. 129-137. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.11.019] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19948236]
52. Zhang, X.; Wang, Q.; Yang, S.; Lin, S.; Bao, M.; Bendahmane, M.; Wu, Q.; Wang, C.; Fu, X. Identification and Characterization of the MADS-Box Genes and Their Contribution to Flower Organ in Carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.). Genes; 2018; 9, 193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes9040193] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29617274]
53. Li, B.J.; Zheng, B.Q.; Wang, J.Y.; Tsai, W.C.; Lu, H.C.; Zou, L.H.; Wan, X.; Zhang, D.Y.; Qiao, H.J.; Liu, Z.J. et al. New insight into the molecular mechanism of colour differentiation among floral segments in orchids. Commun. Biol.; 2020; 3, 89. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0821-8] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32111943]
54. Shan, H.; Zhang, N.; Liu, C.; Xu, G.; Zhang, J.; Chen, Z.; Kong, H. Patterns of gene duplication and functional diversification during the evolution of the AP1/SQUA subfamily of plant MADS-box genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.; 2007; 44, pp. 26-41. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2007.02.016]
55. Burko, Y.; Shleizer-Burko, S.; Yanai, O.; Shwartz, I.; Zelnik, I.D.; Jacob-Hirsch, J.; Kela, I.; Eshed-Williams, L.; Ori, N. A role for APETALA1/fruitfull transcription factors in tomato leaf development. Plant Cell; 2013; 25, pp. 2070-2083. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.113035]
56. Pabón-Mora, N.; Sharma, B.; Holappa, L.D.; Kramer, E.M.; Litt, A. The Aquilegia FRUITFULL-like genes play key roles in leaf morphogenesis and inflorescence development. Plant J.; 2013; 74, pp. 197-212. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tpj.12113]
57. Ferrándiz, C.; Gu, Q.; Martienssen, R.; Yanofsky, M.F. Redundant regulation of meristem identity and plant architecture by FRUITFULL, APETALA1 and CAULIFLOWER. Development; 2000; 127, pp. 725-734. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.127.4.725]
58. Cheng, X.; Wang, H.; Wei, H.; Gu, L.; Hao, P.; Sun, H.; Wu, A.; Cheng, S.; Yu, S. The MADS transcription factor GhAP1.7 coordinates the flowering regulatory pathway in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Gene; 2021; 769, 145235. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2020.145235]
59. Li, C.; Chen, L.; Fan, X.; Qi, W.; Ma, J.; Tian, T.; Zhou, T.; Ma, L.; Chen, F. MawuAP1 promotes flowering and fruit development in the basal angiosperm Magnolia wufengensis (Magnoliaceae). Tree Physiol.; 2020; 40, pp. 1247-1259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaa057]
60. Morel, P.; Chambrier, P.; Boltz, V.; Chamot, S.; Rozier, F.; Rodrigues Bento, S.; Trehin, C.; Monniaux, M.; Zethof, J.; Vandenbussche, M. Divergent Functional Diversification Patterns in the SEP/AGL6/AP1 MADS-Box Transcription Factor Superclade. Plant Cell; 2019; 31, pp. 3033-3056. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.19.00162]
61. Alejandra Mandel, M.; Gustafson-Brown, C.; Savidge, B.; Yanofsky, M.F. Molecular characterization of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Nature; 1992; 360, pp. 273-277. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/360273a0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1359429]
62. Han, Y.; Tang, A.; Yu, J.; Cheng, T.; Wang, J.; Yang, W.; Pan, H.; Zhang, Q. RcAP1, a Homolog of APETALA1, is Associated with Flower Bud Differentiation and Floral Organ Morphogenesis in Rosa chinensis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 3557. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143557]
63. Liu, Z.; Fei, Y.; Zhang, K.; Fang, Z. Ectopic Expression of a Fagopyrum esculentum APETALA1 Ortholog only Rescues Sepal Development in Arabidopsis ap1 Mutant. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2019; 20, 2021. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms20082021] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31022949]
64. Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Cao, Y.; Shi, W.; Xie, E.; Mu, N.; Du, G.; Shen, Y.; Tang, D.; Cheng, Z. Nitrogen nutrition contributes to plant fertility by affecting meiosis initiation. Nat. Commun.; 2022; 13, 485. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28173-3] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35079011]
65. Ayaz, A.; Huang, H.; Zheng, M.; Zaman, W.; Li, D.; Saqib, S.; Zhao, H.; Lü, S. Molecular Cloning and Functional Analysis of GmLACS2-3 Reveals Its Involvement in Cutin and Suberin Biosynthesis along with Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci.; 2021; 22, 9175. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179175]
66. Ayaz, A.; Saqib, S.; Huang, H.; Zaman, W.; Lü, S.; Zhao, H. Genome-wide comparative analysis of long-chain acyl-CoA synthetases (LACSs) gene family: A focus on identification, evolution and expression profiling related to lipid synthesis. Plant Physiol. Biochem.; 2021; 161, pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.01.042]
67. Chen, C.; Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Thomas, H.R.; Frank, M.H.; He, Y.; Xia, R. TBtools: An Integrative Toolkit Developed for Interactive Analyses of Big Biological Data. Mol. Plant; 2020; 13, pp. 1194-1202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009]
68. Naeem, M.; Shahzad, K.; Saqib, S.; Shahzad, A.; Nasrullah,
69. Sparkes, I.A.; Runions, J.; Kearns, A.; Hawes, C. Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat. Protoc.; 2006; 1, pp. 2019-2025. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.286]
70. Clough, S.J.; Bent, A.F. Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J.; 1998; 16, pp. 735-743. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313x.1998.00343.x]
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Ge, Hengshuo 1 ; Ahmad, Naveed 2
; Li, Jia 1 ; Wang, Yijin 1 ; Liu, Xinyi 1 ; Liu, Weican 1 ; Li, Xiaowei 1 ; Wang, Nan 1 ; Wang, Fawei 1 ; Dong, Yuanyuan 1 1 College of Life Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2 Joint Center for Single Cell Biology, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China