1. Introduction
Mastitis is one of the most common emerging infections of milking animals, and affects the quantity and quality of milk. It involves the inflammation of mammary glands, the etiology of which can be infectious or non-infectious [1]. It causes irritation in the parenchyma of the mammary organs, typically caused by bacteria attacking the udder, multiplying there, and delivering harmful toxins to the mammary organs [2,3]. Mastitis has challenged economies worldwide, directly or indirectly, including Pakistan. In Pakistan, it has caused an alarming situation, and significant attention needs to be given to its control [4,5]. In dairy cows, mastitis leads to financial crises due to decreased milk production, treatment costs, including antibiotic treatments, and pre-emptive culling [2].
Of the hundreds of causes of mastitis known today, the most typical etiological agents reported are Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), streptococcus agalactiae, and others [6]. In buffalo, 70–80% cases of mastitis are due to S. aureus [7]. S. aureus is a pathogenic bacterium that is considered a threat to both animals and humans [8,9]. It causes approximately one-third of buffalo mastitis cases. In Pakistan, studies have shown that S. aureus is the primary infectious agent that causes mastitis [10]. For years, erythromycin has been used in treatment for various infections, and has been elected as an alternative to penicillin, cephalosporin, and other beta lactams for Gram-positive microbes [11,12]. However, resistance to erythromycin in S. aureus has prevailed, as its activity has resulted in the production of methylase encoded with the erm genes. Reports demonstrate that the genes ermA, erm B and erm C in bovine mastitis isolates are responsible for erythromycin resistance [13].
Antibiotic therapies are frequently ineffective in treating S. aureus infections, due to some of the unique features of the pathogen such as: the ability of the organism to colonize and produce micro-abscesses in the mammary gland which leads to be protected from normal defense mechanisms, the potential of invading bovine mammary epithelial cells, the switching to the small-colony variant (SCV) phenotype and biofilm formation which are relevant to chronic and recurrent infections, the capability of persisting within phagosomes, the ability to convert to L-form when exposed to antibiotics, and the ability to produce toxins [14]. Because of the 2low clearance rate in S. aureus associated mastitis, procedures have been developed to continue treatment for 6 to 8 days to maintain therapeutic levels of antibiotics [15]. Therefore, the overuse of antibiotics has resulted in the rise of multidrug-resistant S. aureus. It is well-known that excessive antimicrobial use is the main driver of antibiotic resistance [3].
S. aureus usually causes subclinical mastitis, which is very difficult to treat (due to high seeding rate of infected animals and chronic recurrent infections) [10]. This is probably related to the numerous virulence factors present in this pathogen, such as the ability to produce biofilm, or the production of toxins, or various enzymes designed to damage and better occupy the infected area [16]. On the other hand, it is also related to the occurrence of antibiotic resistance among these bacteria, which has arisen from the overuse of these active substances in veterinary medicine and in agriculture. Although the problem of S. aureus in dairy cattle has been known for years, a perfect preventive therapy or treatment has not yet been developed. This is due to the rapid genetic variability of this pathogen and the lack of knowledge about the interaction between the bacterium and the host. Studies from around the world have shown that there is no clear pattern in the distribution of virulence genes (adhesins or toxins) among bovine isolates [3]. Depending on the area from which the strains originate, a different antibiotic resistance profile can be observed. Such a situation significantly complicates the results of mastitis prevention research and the development of new therapies, and further research towards a better understanding of these bacteria should be conducted [17].
The prevalence of S. aureus in bovine mastitis in Pakistan is very high, and the problem is affecting the dairy industry. Many therapeutic strategies to treat mastitis have failed due to the antibiotic resistance shown by S. aureus [18]. Due to the high concern given to zoonotic infection, determination of the phenotypic and genotypic antimicrobial resistance profile of S. aureus recovered from mastitis-infected milk and the nasal carriages of farm personnel is important. Published data in antibiotic resistance-related studies on mastitis-derived S. aureus and on the molecular characterization and phylogenetic analysis of erythromycin resistance in S. aureus recovered from bovine mastitis and farm personnel in Pakistan are sparse. This study investigated strain-relatedness, the presence of genetic determinants of antibiotic resistance, and potential sources of zoonotic infections by applying phenotypic and genotypic methods. This will give an insight into the zoonotic characteristics, sources of origin, and antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus in Pakistan, as well as the control methods required.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sampling Area
The current study was conducted by the Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan from 10 August 2021 to 25 June 2022. The study was based upon buffaloes with clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis in dairy farms in Lahore. Three different locations of private dairy farms were selected for sample collection. In total, thirteen farms were included in this study. The herd size of each farm selected varied between 6 and 90 animals. Table S1 describes the sampling site, No. of total animals, and diseased animals. Lactating buffaloes with mastitis and their milk men were included in this study. A structured questionnaire was designed to collect data regarding the location of the farm, farm owner’s name, herd size, No. of animals suffering from mastitis, lactation period, antibiotics given, and No. of infected udders.
2.2. Screening of Infected Animals
Buffaloes with clinical and subclinical mastitis were tested in this study. Clinical mastitis was easily detected via visible symptoms such as inflammation of the udder or by impaired milk quality and appearance, while subclinical mastitis was screened via a test known as the Surf Field Mastitis Test (SFMT) [19]. In milk infected with subclinical mastitis, somatic cell count was greater than normal. The rupturing of somatic cells occurs in milk with the addition of detergent, and as a result DNA is released. Acidic DNA and basic detergent form a gel. The gel’s consistency depends on the somatic cell count.
2.2.1. Collection of Mastitis Milk Samples
An aseptic collection of milk samples for the biological assay was performed. Prior to testing, nipple closes were sanitized. A total of 10 mL was collected in a sterile falcon tube via a drain test [20]. After the collection of samples, these were stored immediately at 4 °C for further processing in the lab.
2.2.2. Sampling of Milker’s Nares
The sterile swabs were introduced into milkers’ nares and rotated in full rotation three times. Swabs were put back into the transport tube and labelled. These swabs were transported back to the lab (Supplementary Table S1).
2.3. Isolation and Identification of S. aureus from Samples
The genera-specific isolation of Staphylococci was performed on staph110 agar plates via the simple streaking of milk and nasal samples. Staph 110 is a selective media used to grow the genus Staphylococcus. The milk samples (0.1 mL) were inoculated on staph 110 agar plates using a disposable wire loop. Then, 24–48 h of incubation was completed at 37 °C. Nasal swabs were also cultured on staph 110 agar plates by rolling swabs on the plates, which were then incubated for 24–48 h at 37 °C. The purification of the representative colonies of S. aureus was performed on crispy mannitol salt agar (MSA) plates after isolation on staph 110 plates [21].
Specific colonies of S. aureus were isolated and purified by culturing distinct colonies from the Staph 110 plates on mannitol salt agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) by streaking the plates with a sterile inoculation loop following the 24–48 h of incubation at 37 °C. After sufficient incubation time, S. aureus colonies were identified by the appearance of yellow zones on the plates, indicating the fermentation of mannitol by S. aureus. This occurred because the byproduct produced as a result of mannitol fermentation is acidic in nature, and turns phenol red to a yellow color. Later, plates were stored at 4 °C to perform further biochemical identification tests and Gram staining [3].
S. aureus Biochemical Identification
Conventional biochemical tests were utilized for the identification of S. aureus. Catalase and tube coagulase was done from isolated colony of each bacterial culture and results were recorded [22].
2.4. Bacterial DNA Extraction
The bacterial culture was grown in nutrient broth at 37 °C for 24 h. By spinning down the bacterial culture at a high speed of 6000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min, the palette settled in a 50-milliliter falcon tube. The supernatant was discarded and 3 mL of TEN buffer was added to the tube containing the pellet. Suspension of the pellet was performed in TEN buffer by placing it on a vortex for agitation, and then it was centrifuged at 6000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. Then, the supernatant was disposed of. The pellet in the tube was then treated with 2ml of freshly prepared SET buffer. Around 200–250 µL lysozyme (10 mg/mL) was added to the tube with the pellet and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. After incubation, the pellet was treated with proteinase K, followed by the overnight incubation of samples at 50–55 °C. Upon completion of the incubation period, 500 µL of 10% SDS and 2 mL of TEN buffer were added and then incubated at 60 °C for 10 min. Equal volumes of chilled phenol: chloroform (1:1) and 1ml of 5 M NaCl were added and mixed properly. Then, centrifugation was performed for 15 min at 6000 rpm. Three visible layers were formed, and the lowest layer was phenol. The uppermost layer contained the DNA, and was then shifted to another tube. The precipitation of DNA was then carried out by the addition of chilled absolute ethanol in double volume to the aqueous layer and incubated for 30 min at −20 °C. After the designated time of incubation, tubes were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min to obtain the pellet in intact form while the supernatant was wasted. Washing of the DNA pellet was conducted with 5ml of freshly prepared 70% ethanol. Tubes were centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 5 min. Washing of the DNA was performed three times. The pellet obtained was left to air dry overnight. Then, 300 µL of nuclease-free water was added and transferred to a labeled 1.5 mL Eppendorf [23]. Spectrophotometry for the quantification of genomic DNA was performed, and the storage of samples for later use was undertaken at −20 °C.
2.5. Agarose Gel Electrophoresis
The quality of the extracted plasmid and whole genomic DNA was analyzed via gel electrophoresis. To make 1.2% agarose gel, 100 mL TAE 1× buffer was added to a flask and 1.2 g weighed agarose was mixed in the flask containing the buffer. After proper stirring, the solution was microwaved for 2 min until it turned transparent. Then, it was allowed to cool down to 50–60 °C, followed by the addition of 10 µL ethidium bromide. The gel caster apparatus was set with the comb in it. The agarose solution was poured in the caster and left at room temperature to polymerize. The comb was carefully taken out after the solidification of the gel. The gel caster was then placed in an electrophoresis tank filled with same TAE 1X buffer solution used to prepare the agarose gel. Samples of DNA in ratio 5:3 (5 µL of DNA sample mixed with 3 uL of 6× loading dye, bromophenol blue) were loaded in the wells of the gel. Gel electrophoresis at 110 volts was applied to the gel for 25 min [24]. After the given time, the gel was visualized under UV light to identify the quality of the DNA bands.
2.6. Quantification of DNA with Spectrophotometer
Quantification of the DNA sample was performed with a Nanodrop 2000 spectrophotometer. The principle of spectrophotometry relies on the basis of the absorption of the specific wavelength of ultraviolet light by nucleic acid. The measurement of the absorption pattern defines the quantity of the nucleic acid. Thus, all samples were quantified via spectrophotometry (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and the concentrations are listed. Contamination in the nucleic acid was determined via the A280/260 ratio.
2.7. S. aureus Molecular Identification
Whole genomic extracted samples of DNA were taken for the amplification nuclease (nuc) gene. For the specific identification of S. aureus, the thermonuclease gene was used. Reported specific primers of the nuc gene from already published papers were taken for this purpose. Table S2 shows the list of primer sequences. The PCR reaction mixture recipe is presented, and optimized PCR conditions are listed in Table S3. Notably, 2% agarose gel was used to visualize the results of the PCR products [25] (Supplementary Tables S2 and S3).
2.8. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test
Samples positive for S. aureus were subjected to the antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) using the disk diffusion method in order to determine their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. The results were interpreted according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines [25,26]. Samples were simultaneously tested for cefoxitin screening by using Cefoxitin disc (30µg) and results were recorded. Antibiotic discs used were from OxoidTM and their details are as follows: Amikacin (30 µg), Chloramphenicol (30 µg), Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Cotrimoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), Clindamycin (2 µg), Erythromycin (15 µg), Fusidic acid (10 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Linezolid (30 µg), Tetracycline (30 µg), Teicoplanin (30 µg), Tigecycline (15 µg), Tobramycin (10 µg) and E strip of Vancomycin.
2.9. Molecular Identification of Antibiotic Resistance Genes
2.9.1. Primer Design of the ermA Gene
A single-pair gene-specific primer set was designed using primer 3 software for the amplification of the full-length gene. The primer sequence of the ermA gene was developed on the basis of the plasmid-based sequence of ermA submitted to NCBI with accession number NC019144. The primer’s specificity was checked via NCBI BLAST.
2.9.2. Primer Design of the ermB Gene
A single set of primers was designed to amplify the full length of the sequence of the ermB gene based on the chromosomal nucleotide sequence of S. aureus submitted to NCBI with the accession number CP020741.1. The primers were designed using the primer 3 platform, and their specificity was determined via NCBI BLAST.
2.9.3. Primer Design of the ermC Gene
Two sets of overlapping, flanking and specific primers were required to design and amplify the overlapping sequence segments of the ermC gene. They were designed on the basis of the plasmid nucleotide sequence already published and submitted to NCBI for S. aureus (M17990) [13]. The primers were designed with the primer 3 platform, and their specificity was determined via NCBI BLAST. The list of primers used is shown in Table S4.
2.9.4. ermA Gene Amplification
For the amplification of the ermA gene, plasmid DNA was consumed. Only a single set of specific primers was designed for the amplification of the ermA gene. The PCR reaction mixture composition and the conditions optimized for PCR to amplify the gene details are given in Table S5.
2.9.5. ermB Gene Amplification
For the amplification of the ermB gene, whole-genome chromosomal DNA was taken. A single set of specific primers was designed which was used for the amplification of the ermB gene. The PCR reaction mixture composition and the conditions optimized for PCR to amplify the gene details are given in Table S6.
2.9.6. ermC Gene Amplification
For the amplification of the ermC gene, plasmid DNA was consumed. Two sets of specific primers were designed. One set was used first for identification, and then both sets of primers were applied for the amplification of the ermA gene. The PCR reaction mixture composition and the conditions optimized for PCR to amplify the gene details are given in Table S7 (Supplementary Tables S5–S8).
2.10. Statistical Analysis
Chi-square with the help of SPSS version 20 was used to statistically analyze the phenotypic and genotypic data.
3. Results
3.1. Genus Staphylococci Isolation on Staph 110
Of the 19 buffalo isolates and 21 nasal carriage isolates, 18 (94.7%) and 20 (95.2%) showed growth on staph 110 agar (Table 1 and Table 2). The resulting cultures showed mixed colonies. The representative colonies of Staphylococci on staph 110 agar were further purified and isolated on mannitol salt agar (MSA) for the identification of S. aureus (Supplementary Figure S1). The identification of S. aureus by Gram staining and biochemical test has been shown in Supplementary Figures S2–S4).
3.2. Whole Bacterial Genomic and Plasmid DNA Extraction
The whole-genome bacterial DNA extracts and plasmid DNA extracts had different concentrations in the S. aureus isolates, the values of which ranged between 80 ng/µL and 164 ng/µL. A 280/260 value shows good ratios, ranging from 1.75 to 2.1.
3.3. DNA Concentration and Quality Identification via Gel Electrophoresis
Isolated whole bacterial genomic and plasmid DNA samples were run through gel electrophoresis to determine DNA concentration and quality (Supplementary Figure S5).
3.4. Molecular Identification of S. aureus
All 31 samples that showed positive results in the microbiological identification tests were subjected to the species-specific identification of S. aureus with nuc gene amplification. The nuc gene was identified in all 31 isolates, and a 395 bp long amplified product was visualized after gel electrophoresis was performed. Of the 15 positive mastitis milk samples, 14 (93.3%) were positive for S. aureus. Significantly, 16 (100%) of the milker nasal samples were positive for S. aureus isolates (Table 3 and Supplementary Figure S6).
3.5. Prevalence of S. aureus in Human Nasal and Buffalo Milk Samples
The total number of samples was 40, of which 19 were mastitis-infected buffalo milk samples and 21 samples were nasal samples from milkers directly in contact with the infected animals. According to the microbiological test and the molecular identification results, S. aureus was found in 14 of the 19 samples of milk from buffaloes with mastitis, and in 16 of the 21 nasal samples from farm workers (Table 4).
3.6. Antibiotic Resistance Profile of S. aureus
Antibiotic resistance was determined in the milk samples of 14 mastitic buffaloes. Eight (53.1%) S. aureus isolates were resistant to erythromycin, while six (42.7%) were sensitive. Sixteen milker nasal samples were also subjected to the antibiotic susceptibility test. Resistance to erythromycin was found in nine (56.3%) isolates, while seven (43.8%) isolates were sensitive to it (Table 5 and Supplementary Figure S7).
3.7. Molecular Characterization Profile of Antibiotic Resistance in S. aureus
Genotypic antibiotic resistance profiles were determined in 14 milk samples from mastitic buffaloes. Eight (53.1%), three (21.4%) and five (35.7%) S. aureus isolates were positive for the ermA, ermB and ermC genes, respectively. However, the ermA, ermB and ermC genes were not present in 6 (42.8%), 11 (78.57) and 9 (64.2%) isolates. Sixteen milker nasal S. aureus isolates were also tested. ermA, ermB and ermC genes were observed in nine (56.3%), five (31.3%) and seven (43.6%) isolates, respectively. Notably, seven (43.7%), eleven (68.75%) and nine (56.2%) nasal samples were negative for the ermA, ermB and ermC genes, respectively.
3.8. Amplification of ermA, ermB and ermC Genes
All three resistant ermA, ermB and ermC genes were amplified for sequencing purposes. For the ermA and ermB genes, a single set of primers was enough to amplify the whole length of the gene, and two sets of primers were used to amplify the ermC gene’s full length. Samples positive for ermA, ermB and ermC genes in S. aureus isolates from the milk of mastitis-infected buffaloes and their respective milkers were selected for sequencing. (Supplementary Figure S8).
4. Discussion
Bovine mastitis is a clinically important disease found in dairy animals. Pakistan has an abundance of small household farms where buffaloes are the major producers of milk [18]. Interaction between buffaloes and humans can lead to the transfer of pathogens. Antibiotic-resistant S. aureus is the most pathogenic and contagious pathogen causing bovine mastitis [4,27]. Thus, this study was conducted with the objective of evaluating the association between phenotypic and genotypic erythromycin antibiotic resistance in S. aureus isolated recovered from mastitis-infected buffaloes and their milkers in dairy farms of Lahore, Pakistan. Another objective was to analyze the genetic similarities between the ermA, ermB and ermC genes in S. aureus isolates from bovine mastitis cases and farm personnel. The phylogenetic analysis of antibiotic resistance genes ermA, ermB and ermC in S. aureus isolates was also performed.
In total, 30 of the 40 samples considered were positive for S. aureus. Of the 30 samples, 14 were milk samples and 16 were nasal samples from milkers. The overall prevalence of S. aureus in mastitis-affected buffaloes was found to be 75%. This prevalence is similar to that reported in a recently published study by [8]. However, this prevalence is higher than reported by Ashfaq and Muhammad in 2008 [28]. According to their study in Pakistan, S. aureus was found to be positive in 48.08% of isolates from dairy buffaloes.
The resistance of S. aureus to antimicrobial agents is an increasing global concern. The determination of antimicrobial resistance profiles is necessary to develop effective therapeutic strategies [29]. The monitoring of resistant strain spread should also be considered important. In this study, the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of S. aureus were determined and high levels of resistance to erythromycin (52.1%) followed by clindamycin (42.8%) were detected. This resistance rate is comparable to one found by another study Mahdavi and colleagues in which they reported 48% and 46% resistance to erythromycin and clindamycin [30].
Results of our study are similar to the study conducted in China, where they concluded that most of the common drugs such as Erythromycin, Tetracycline, Clindamycin, penicillin and cotrimoxazole are ineffective against S. aureus isolated from bovine mastitis samples. Our study also showed higher resistance of S. aureus against these drugs [31]. Antibiotic resistance was determined in 14 milk samples from mastitic buffaloes, and 47% of S. aureus isolates were resistant to erythromycin. Clindamycin resistance was shown in 33% of isolates. It was also found that genotypic and phenotypic erythromycin resistance are associated. The genotypic antibiotic resistance profiles of 14 milk samples from mastitic buffaloes were determined. Overall, 52.1%, 21.4% and 35.7% of S. aureus isolates were positive for the ermA, ermB and ermC genes, respectively. Sixteen milker nasal S. aureus isolates were also tested for the presence of ermA, B and C genes, and these genes were observed in 56.2%, 31.3% and 43.8% of the samples, respectively. This finding is in correspondence to another study conducted in China, according to which highest number of genes detected from S. aureus was ermA gene [32].
In small household farms where there is interaction between animals and humans, there is suitable opportunity for microbial organisms to colonize humans [33]. However, some reports have noted that S. aureus is host-specific, but this applies to some specific lineages [16,26]. Most of them do not show host-specificity. Apart from these characteristics, S. aureus is an adaptive pathogen, and can adapt to many unfavorable circumstances [14]. Some genetic adaptions and mutations have helped it to become a successful pathogen [34].
To investigate the transmission of antibiotic resistance genes between buffaloes and humans via S. aureus transfer, the ermA, B and C genes were analyzed. This showed that there is little or no difference between S. aureus isolates of buffaloes and humans who live in close contact. Another study conducted on erythromycin resistant S. aureus isolated from environmental samples also reported the comparable results in sensitivity pattern of S. aureus, indicating that origin of isolates is independent of the sensitivity pattern [35]. These bugs can be acquired from environment by both milkers and buffaloes, which ultimately leads to infection [16]. This study reports that there is a transmission of antibiotic-resistant S. aureus between buffaloes and closely related humans, as the ermA, ermB and ermC gene sequences from buffaloes and their milkers from same farm were closely related, but distantly related to those isolated from other farms.
Study Limitations: The current study did not report the data on clinical and subclinical mastitis because of the restriction in ethical approval from the target institutions. Furthermore, because of the financial issues, the sequencing analysis of PCR products could not be done in order to further identify the isolates as well as to check their phylogenetics.
5. Conclusions
The current study concludes that erythromycin-resistant S. aureus was prevalent among buffaloes with mastitis and farm workers in dairy settings of Lahore, Pakistan. Hence, it is proven that there is an association between phenotypic and genotypic erythromycin antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic resistance genes (ermA, B and C) of S. aureus isolates from buffaloes with mastitis are genetically related to those found in their farm workers’ isolates. Therefore, there is a possibility of zoonotic transfer.
Conceptualization, S.F. and A.A.R.; methodology, Z.R., S.F. and A.R.; software, A.A. and H.N.; validation, M.A.H., A.A.S., M.A. and B.R.A.S.; formal analysis, Z.R., S.F. and A.R.; investigation, Z.R., S.F. and A.R.; resources, S.M.A., I.H.A., S.F., A.A.R. and M.G.; data curation, S.F. and A.A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.A., H.N., M.A.H., A.A.S., M.A. and B.R.A.S.; writing—review and editing, N.A., S.F. and A.A.R.; visualization, A.R.; supervision, S.F. and A.A.R.; project administration, N.A. and Z.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (UVAS), Lahore, Pakistan (protocol code: 2012-VA-347).
Informed consent was obtained from all the subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent has been obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.
More data related to this study could be available upon a reasonable request to the corresponding authors.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Microbiological identification test results of mastitic buffalo S. aureus isolates.
Sr. |
Identification Test | No. of Total Samples | No. of Positive Samples | No. of Negative Samples | Positive Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Growth on staph 110 | 19 | 18 | 1 | 94.7% |
2. | Mannitol salt agar | 16 | 15 | 1 | 93.7% |
3. | Gram staining | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
4. | Catalase test | 15 | 15 | 0 | 100% |
5. | Tube coagulase | 15 | 12 | 3 | 80% |
Microbiological identification test results of milkers’ nasal S. aureus isolates.
Sr. |
Identification Test | No. of Total Samples | No. of Positive Samples | No. of Negative Samples | Positive Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Growth on staph 110 | 21 | 17 | 1 | 80.95% |
2. | Mannitol salt agar | 17 | 16 | 1 | 94.11% |
3. | Gram staining | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100% |
4. | Catalase test | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100% |
5. | Tube coagulase | 16 | 12 | 4 | 75 |
Results of molecular identification of S. aureus isolates from buffalo and milkers.
Sr. |
Origin of Isolates | Total No. of Samples | Total No. of Positive Samples | Total No. of Negative Samples | Positive Samples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. | Buffalo | 15 | 14 | 1 | 93.3% |
2. | Milker | 16 | 16 | 0 | 100%% |
Prevalence of S. aureus in mastitic milk and milker nasal samples.
Sr. |
Characteristics | Buffalo Mastitic Milk Samples | Milker Nasal Samples | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | ||
1. | Total No. of samples | 19 | 100% | 21 | 100% |
2. | Prevalence of S. aureus | 14 | 73.6% | 16 | 76.19% |
Antibiotic resistance profile of Staphylococcus isolated from mastitis buffalo milk samples and milker’s nasal swab samples.
Antibiotics | Resistance % Milker Nasal Samples | Resistance % Mastitis Buffalo Milk Samples |
---|---|---|
Amikacin | 0 | 0 |
Clindamycin | 45.5 | 47.2 |
Erythromycin | 56.3 | 53.1 |
Gentamycin | 43.0 | 39.4 |
Tobramycin | 35.8 | 37.5 |
Teicoplanin | 0 | 0 |
Tigecycline | 16.8 | 18.0 |
Tetracycline | 62.3 | 61.4 |
Vancomycin | 0 | 0 |
Linezolid | 0 | 0 |
Ciprofloxacin | 68.7 | 70.5 |
Cotrimoxazole | 39.9 | 37.6 |
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
References
1. Bradley, A.J. Bovine mastitis: An evolving disease. Vet. J.; 2002; 164, pp. 116-128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/tvjl.2002.0724] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12359466]
2. Sharma, N.; Upadhyay, S.; Hussain, K.; Soodan, J.; Gupta, S. Role of antioxidants in udder health: A review. Intas Polivet; 2007; 8, pp. 284-295.
3. Artursson, K.; Söderlund, R.; Liu, L.; Monecke, S.; Schelin, J. Genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus in bovine mastitis and correlation to phenotypic characteristics. Vet. Microbiol.; 2016; 193, pp. 156-161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.08.012] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27599942]
4. Bilal, M.; Iqbal, M.; Muhammad, G.; Avais, M.; Sajid, M. Factors affecting the prevalence of clinical mastitis in buffaloes around Faisalabad district (Pakistan). Int. J. Agric. Biol.; 2004; 6, pp. 185-187.
5. Ali, M.; Ahmad, M.; Muhammad, K.; Anjum, A. Prevalence of sub clinical mastitis in dairy buffaloes of Punjab, Pakistan. J. Anim. Plant Sci.; 2011; 21, pp. 477-480.
6. Kader, M.; Samad, M.; Saha, S.; Taleb, M. Prevalence and etiology of subclinical mastitis with antibiotic sensitivity to isolated organisms among milch cows in Bangladesh. Indian J. Dairy Sci.; 2002; 55, pp. 218-223.
7. Krishnaveni, N.; Isloor, S.; Suryanarayana, V.; Rathnamma, D.; Veeregowda, B.; Nagaraja, C.; Sundareshan, S. Antibiogram profile of Group B Streptococci isolated from bovine mastitis cases. Vet. Clin. Sci.; 2014; 2, pp. 10-15.
8. Akkou, M.; Antri, K.; Bachtarzi, M.-A.; Bes, M.; Tristan, A.; Dauwalder, O.; Kaidi, R.; Meugnier, H.; Tazir, M.; Etienne, J. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with bovine mastitis and nasal carriage of workers in contact to animals in Algeria. Pak. Vet. J; 2016; 36, pp. 184-188.
9. Li, J.-p.; Zhou, H.-j.; Yuan, L.; He, T.; Hu, S.-h. Prevalence, genetic diversity, and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Zhejiang Province, China. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B; 2009; 10, pp. 753-760. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B0920072]
10. Sakwinska, O.; Giddey, M.; Moreillon, M.; Morisset, D.; Waldvogel, A.; Moreillon, P. Staphylococcus aureus host range and human-bovine host shift. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.; 2011; 77, pp. 5908-5915. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00238-11]
11. Leclercq, R. Mechanisms of resistance to macrolides and lincosamides: Nature of the resistance elements and their clinical implications. Clin. Infect. Dis.; 2002; 34, pp. 482-492. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/324626] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11797175]
12. Rabello, R.; Souza, C.; Duarte, R.; Lopes, R.; Teixeira, L.; Castro, A. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from bovine mastitis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J. Dairy Sci.; 2005; 88, pp. 3211-3219. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73004-6] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16107411]
13. Gao, J.; Ferreri, M.; Liu, X.Q.; Chen, L.B.; Su, J.L.; Han, B. Development of multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and selected antibiotic resistance genes in bovine mastitic milk samples. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig.; 2011; 23, pp. 894-901. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1040638711416964] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21908344]
14. El-Jakee, J.; Atta, N.S.; Samy, A.; Bakry, M.; Elgabry, E.; Kandil, M.M.; El-Said, W.G. Antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from bovine and human sources in Egypt. Glob. Vet.; 2011; 7, pp. 581-586.
15. El-Ashker, M.; Gwida, M.; Tomaso, H.; Monecke, S.; Ehricht, R.; El-Gohary, F.; Hotzel, H. Staphylococci in cattle and buffaloes with mastitis in Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt. J. Dairy Sci.; 2015; 98, pp. 7450-7459. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9432]
16. Petersson-Wolfe, C.S.; Mullarky, I.K.; Jones, G.M. Staphylococcus Aureus Mastitis: Cause, Detection, and Control; Virginia Cooperative Extension: Petersburg, VA, USA, 2010.
17. Wang, D.; Wang, Z.; Yan, Z.; Wu, J.; Ali, T.; Li, J.; Lv, Y.; Han, B. Bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus: Antibiotic susceptibility profile, resistance genes and molecular typing of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive strains in China. Infect. Genet. Evol.; 2015; 31, pp. 9-16. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2014.12.039]
18. Rabbani, R.A.; Ahmad, I.; Lodhi, L.; Ahmad, N.; Muhammad, G. Prevalence of various reproductive disorders and economic losses caused by genital prolapse in buffaloes. Pak. Vet. J.; 2010; 30, pp. 44-48.
19. Muhammad, G.; Naureen, A.; Asi, M.N.; Saqib, M. Evaluation of a 3% surf solution (surf field mastitis test) for the diagnosis of subclinical bovine and bubaline mastitis. Trop. Anim. Health Prod.; 2010; 42, pp. 457-464. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-009-9443-3]
20. Nirwal, S.; Pant, R.; Rai, N. Analysis of milk quality, adulteration and mastitis in milk samples collected from different regions of Dehradun. Int. J. PharmTech Res.; 2013; 5, pp. 359-364.
21. Parveen, S.; Saqib, S.; Ahmed, A.; Shahzad, A.; Ahmed, N. Prevalence of MRSA colonization among healthcare-workers and effectiveness of decolonization regimen in ICU of a Tertiary care Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. Adv. Life Sci.; 2020; 8, pp. 38-41.
22. Hussain, S.; Zeshan, B.; Arshad, R.; Kabir, S.; Ahmed, N. MRSA Clinical Isolates Harboring mecC Gene Imply Zoonotic Transmission to Humans and Colonization by Biofilm Formation. Pak. J. Zool.; 2022; pp. 1-4. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20210518040546]
23. Ramesh, A.; Padmapriya, B.; Chrashekar, A.; Varadaraj, M. Application of a convenient DNA extraction method and multiplex PCR for the direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Yersinia enterocolitica in milk samples. Mol. Cell. Probes; 2002; 16, pp. 307-314. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.2002.0428] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12270272]
24. Annamanedi, M.; Sheela, P.; Sundareshan, S.; Isloor, S.; Gupta, P.; Jasmeen, P.; Gargi, M.; Mallick, S.; Hegde, N.R. Molecular fingerprinting of bovine mastitis-associated Staphylococcus aureus isolates from India. Sci. Rep.; 2021; 11, 15228. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94760-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34315981]
25. Horowitz, G.; Altaie, S.; Boyd, J.; Ceriotti, F.; Garg, P.; Horn, P. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2008.
26. Reller, L.B.; Weinstein, M.; Jorgensen, J.H.; Ferraro, M.J. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: A review of general principles and contemporary practices. Clin. Infect. Dis.; 2009; 49, pp. 1749-1755.
27. Gurjar, A.A.; Klaessig, S.; Salmon, S.A.; Yancey Jr, R.J.; Schukken, Y.H. Evaluation of an alternative dosing regimen of a J-5 mastitis vaccine against intramammary Escherichia coli challenge in nonlactating late-gestation dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.; 2013; 96, pp. 5053-5063. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6456]
28. Ashfaq, K.; Muhammad, G. Pathogens associated with bovine and bubaline mastitis in peri-urban areas of Faisalabad, Pakistan. Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci.; 2008; 6, pp. 86-88.
29. Hogan, J.; Smith, K.L. Coliform mastitis. Vet. Res.; 2003; 34, pp. 507-519. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2003022]
30. Mahdavi, F.; Zaboli, F.; Khoshbakht, R. Characteristics of erythromycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw milk. Int. J. Enteric Pathog.; 2019; 7, pp. 121-125. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15171/ijep.2019.25]
31. Ahmed, N.; Khalid, H.; Mushtaq, M.; Basha, S.; Rabaan, A.A.; Garout, M.; Halwani, M.A.; Al Mutair, A.; Alhumaid, S.; Al Alawi, Z. The Molecular Characterization of Virulence Determinants and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in Human Bacterial Uropathogens. Antibiotics; 2022; 11, 516. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11040516]
32. Sun, X.; Lin, Z.-W.; Hu, X.-X.; Yao, W.-M.; Bai, B.; Wang, H.-Y.; Li, D.-Y.; Chen, Z.; Cheng, H.; Pan, W.-G. et al. Biofilm formation in erythromycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and the relationship with antimicrobial susceptibility and molecular characteristics. Microb. Pathog.; 2018; 124, pp. 47-53. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.021]
33. Bachaya, H.A.; Iqbal, Z.; Jabbar, A.; Abbas, R.; Ali, R. Subclinical bovine mastitis in Attock district of Punjab (Pakistan). Int. J. Agric. Biol.; 2005; 12, pp. 777-780.
34. Spoor, L.E.; McAdam, P.R.; Weinert, L.A.; Rambaut, A.; Hasman, H.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Kearns, A.M.; Larsen, A.R.; Skov, R.L.; Fitzgerald, J.R. Livestock origin for a human pandemic clone of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. MBio; 2013; 4, e00356-13. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00356-13] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23943757]
35. Arjyal, C.; Kc, J.; Neupane, S. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in shrines. Int. J. Microbiol.; 2020; 2020, 7981648. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/7981648] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32190054]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a major causative agent of mastitis and is resistant to many antibiotics. Thus, there is a need to characterize the genetic determinants of S. aureus erythromycin resistance, such as ermA, ermB and ermC. The current study aimed to determine the phenotypic and genotypic erythromycin resistance profile and relatedness of S. aureus recovered from bovine mastitis and humans in close contact. A total of 14 mastitis-infected buffalo milk samples and 16 samples from their respective milkers were collected from different farms of Lahore, Pakistan. The antibiotic resistance profile was determined through the disk diffusion test. The overall prevalence of S. aureus in mastitis-affected buffaloes was found to be 75%, of which 52.1% were resistant to erythromycin and 42.8% to clindamycin. S. aureus isolates recovered from milker nasal samples showed 56.25% resistance to erythromycin and 44% resistance to clindamycin. Genotypic antibiotic resistance profiles were determined from 14 milk samples through PCR. Overall, eight (52.1%), three (21.4%) and five (35.7%) S. aureus isolates were positive for the ermA, ermB and ermC genes, respectively. Moreover, 16 milker nasal S. aureus isolates were also tested for the presence of ermA, ermB and ermC genes. The ermA, ermB and ermC genes were observed in nine(56.7%), five (31.3%) and seven (43.7%) isolates, respectively. A significant association was shown between phenotypic and genotypic erythromycin resistance. The results indicate both that there are sufficient genetic similarities, and the actual transmission of erythromycin resistance genes between these two hosts of S. aureus.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Institute of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
2 Department of Medical Education, Avviceena Medical College, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
3 Department of Medical Education, University of Lahore, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
4 Department of Microbiology, Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Center (PKLI & RC), Lahore 54000, Pakistan
5 Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran 31311, Saudi Arabia; College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh 11533, Saudi Arabia; Department of Public Health and Nutrition, The University of Haripur, Haripur 22610, Pakistan
6 Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Al Baha University, Al Baha 65799, Saudi Arabia
7 Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
8 Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin 39831, Saudi Arabia
9 Infectious and Zoonotic Diseases Division, Ministry of Environment, Water and Agriculture, Al-Ahsa 11116, Saudi Arabia
10 Department of International Organisations and Health Cities Al-Ahsa Municipality, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi Arabia
11 Department of Community Medicine and Health Care for Pilgrims, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 21955, Saudi Arabia
12 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Central Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan; Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia