Abstract

Accurate prediction of postoperative complications can inform shared decisions regarding prognosis, preoperative risk-reduction, and postoperative resource use. We hypothesized that multi-task deep learning models would outperform conventional machine learning models in predicting postoperative complications, and that integrating high-resolution intraoperative physiological time series would result in more granular and personalized health representations that would improve prognostication compared to preoperative predictions. In a longitudinal cohort study of 56,242 patients undergoing 67,481 inpatient surgical procedures at a university medical center, we compared deep learning models with random forests and XGBoost for predicting nine common postoperative complications using preoperative, intraoperative, and perioperative patient data. Our study indicated several significant results across experimental settings that suggest the utility of deep learning for capturing more precise representations of patient health for augmented surgical decision support. Multi-task learning improved efficiency by reducing computational resources without compromising predictive performance. Integrated gradients interpretability mechanisms identified potentially modifiable risk factors for each complication. Monte Carlo dropout methods provided a quantitative measure of prediction uncertainty that has the potential to enhance clinical trust. Multi-task learning, interpretability mechanisms, and uncertainty metrics demonstrated potential to facilitate effective clinical implementation.

Details

Title
Dynamic predictions of postoperative complications from explainable, uncertainty-aware, and multi-task deep neural networks
Author
Shickel, Benjamin 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Loftus, Tyler J. 2   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Ruppert, Matthew 3 ; Upchurch, Gilbert R. 4   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Ozrazgat-Baslanti, Tezcan 3 ; Rashidi, Parisa 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Bihorac, Azra 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 University of Florida, Department of Medicine, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Florida, Intelligent Critical Care Center (IC3), Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091) 
 University of Florida, Department of Surgery, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Florida, Intelligent Critical Care Center (IC3), Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091) 
 University of Florida, Department of Medicine, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Florida, Precision and Intelligent Systems in Medicine (PRISMAp), Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Florida, Intelligent Critical Care Center (IC3), Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091) 
 University of Florida, Department of Surgery, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091) 
 University of Florida, Department of Medicine, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Florida, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Florida, Intelligent Health Lab (i-Heal), Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); University of Florida, Intelligent Critical Care Center (IC3), Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091) 
Pages
1224
Publication year
2023
Publication date
2023
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2767523225
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.