It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The trait-based strategies of microorganisms appear to be phylogenetically conserved, but acclimation to climate change may complicate the scenario. To study the roles of phylogeny and environment on bacterial responses to sudden moisture increases, we determine bacterial population-specific growth rates by 18O-DNA quantitative stable isotope probing (18O-qSIP) in soils subjected to a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) combined with warming. We find that three growth strategies of bacterial taxa – rapid, intermediate and slow responders, defined by the timing of the peak growth rates – are phylogenetically conserved, even at the sub-phylum level. For example, members of class Bacilli and Sphingobacteriia are mainly rapid responders. Climate regimes, however, modify the growth strategies of over 90% of species, partly confounding the initial phylogenetic pattern. The growth of rapid bacterial responders is more influenced by phylogeny, whereas the variance for slow responders is primarily explained by environmental conditions. Overall, these results highlight the role of phylogenetic and environmental constraints in understanding and predicting the growth strategies of soil microorganisms under global change scenarios.
Microbial ecological strategies are expected to be phylogenetically conserved, but plasticity and acclimation to environmental change may complicate the picture. Here, the authors show that shifts in soil bacterial ecological strategies deviate from phylogenetic-based predictions after acclimation to long-term warming and CO2 enrichment.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Lanzhou University, Centre for Grassland Microbiome, State Key Laboratory of Herbage Improvement and Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou, China (GRID:grid.32566.34) (ISNI:0000 0000 8571 0482); Nanjing Agricultural University, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.27871.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9750 7019)
2 University of Goettingen, Department of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, Department of Agricultural Soil Science, Göttingen, Germany (GRID:grid.7450.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2364 4210); Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia (GRID:grid.77642.30) (ISNI:0000 0004 0645 517X)
3 Nanjing Agricultural University, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Solid Organic Waste Resource Utilization, Nanjing, China (GRID:grid.27871.3b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9750 7019)
4 Tsinghua University, State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.12527.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 0662 3178)