It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ensuring COVID-19 testing remains accurate and reliable is of critical importance as the SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to evolve. Currently, a number of Omicron variants are dominating infection across the globe in including BQ.1 and XBB. Both variants and their sublineages (BQ.1* and XBB*) contain a 28,311 C/U mutation inherited from the original Omicron variant (BA.1). This mutation overlaps with a commonly used fluorescent probe for N gene detection in many Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) assays, as this target was originally established by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in their EUA test for COVID-19 (2019-nCoV_N1). This C to U mutation was previously shown to have no impact on CDC N1 target detection. The rise of Omicron sublineages has increased the likelihood of additional point mutations occurring within the same assay target. A subpopulation of BQ.1* has an additional 28,312 C/U mutation within the CDC 2019_nCoV_N1 fluorescent probe in addition to the 28,311 C/U mutation. The double mutation could adversely affect the ability of diagnostic assays to detect the virus in patient samples and therefore it is important to verify the impacts of this additional mutation. Using in vitro transcribed (IVT) N gene RNA representing the wildtype (GenBank/GISAID ID MN908947.3) and Omicron BQ.1.1 variant (BQ.1, GISAID ID EPI_ISL_ 15155651), we evaluated the performance of two different amplification protocols, both of which include the CDC 2019-nCoV_N1 primer-probe set. Both assays successfully detected the mutant N gene sequence efficiently even at 10 copies of input, although the double mutation caused a 0.5~1 Cq delay on average when compared to the wild-type sequence. These data suggest that circulating BQ.1* lineage viruses with this double mutation likely have minimal impact on diagnostic assays that use the 2019-nCoV-N1 primer-probe.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors are employees of, and received funding from, New England Biolabs, the manufacturer of reagents described in the paper. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer