It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Delayed sowing of maize hybrids could exacerbate the capability of maximizing the yield potential through poor crop stand, root proliferation, nutrient uptake, and dry matter accumulation coupled with the inadequate partitioning of the assimilates. This study appraised the performance of five recent maize hybrids viz., PMH-1, PJHM-1, AH-4158, AH-4271, and AH-8181 under timely and late sown conditions of the irrigated semi-arid ecologies. Timely sowing had the grain and stover yields advantage of 16–19% and 12–25%, respectively over the late sown maize hybrids. The advanced hybrids AH-4271 and AH-4158 had higher grain yields than the others. During the post-anthesis period, a greater dry matter accumulation and contribution to the grain yield to the tune of 16% and 10.2%, respectively, was observed under timely sown conditions. Furthermore, the nutrient acquisition and use efficiencies also improved under the timely sown. The nutrient and dry matter remobilization varied among the hybrids with AH-4271 and PMH-1 registering greater values. The grain yield stability index (0.85) was highest with AH-4158 apart from the least yield reduction (15.2%) and stress susceptibility index (0.81), while the maximum geometric mean productivity was recorded with the AH-4271 (5.46 Mg ha−1). The hybrids AH-4271 and PJHM-1 exhibited improved root morphological traits, such as root length, biomass, root length density, root volume at the V5 stage (20 days after sowing, DAS) and 50% flowering (53 DAS). It is thus evident that the timely sowing and appropriate hybrids based on stress tolerance indices resulted in greater yields and better utilization of resources.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Agronomy, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.418196.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 0814)
2 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Genetics, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.418196.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 0814)
3 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Plant Physiology, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.418196.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 0814)
4 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Environment Science, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.418196.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 0814)
5 Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University (CCSHAU), Hisar, India (GRID:grid.7151.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0170 2635)
6 ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), Microbiology, New Delhi, India (GRID:grid.418196.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2172 0814)